GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • 1
    Publication Date: 2021-06-27
    Description: Private precaution is an important component in contemporary flood risk management and climate adaptation. However, quantitative knowledge about vulnerability reduction via private precautionary measures is scarce and their effects are hardly considered in loss modeling and risk assessments. However, this is a prerequisite to enable temporally dynamic flood damage and risk modeling, and thus the evaluation of risk management and adaptation strategies. To quantify the average reduction in vulnerability of residential buildings via private precaution empirical vulnerability data (n = 948) is used. Households with and without precautionary measures undertaken before the flood event are classified into treatment and nontreatment groups and matched. Postmatching regression is used to quantify the treatment effect. Additionally, we test state‐of‐the‐art flood loss models regarding their capability to capture this difference in vulnerability. The estimated average treatment effect of implementing private precaution is between 11 and 15 thousand EUR per household, confirming the significant effectiveness of private precautionary measures in reducing flood vulnerability. From all tested flood loss models, the expert Bayesian network‐based model BN‐FLEMOps and the rule‐based loss model FLEMOps perform best in capturing the difference in vulnerability due to private precaution. Thus, the use of such loss models is suggested for flood risk assessments to effectively support evaluations and decision making for adaptable flood risk management.
    Description: Plain Language Summary: Private precautionary measures such as adapted building use, sealing basements and purchasing flood barriers reduce flood damage to residential buildings. Using an empirical dataset consisting of 948 flooded households in Germany, we estimate that the average loss reducing effect of implementing private precautionary measures is 11‐15 thousand EUR per household. This is approximately equal to 27% of the average building loss suffered by the flooded households (48000 EUR). Despite this significant risk mitigation effect, these precautionary measures are hardly considered in flood risk assessment modelling. This results in biased flood loss predictions being used for evaluating risk management strategies. Hence, we compare state‐of‐the‐art flood loss models in respect to their ability to account for building loss reduction due to private precaution. From all tested flood loss models, the expert Bayesian Network based model BN‐FLEMOps and the rule‐based loss model FLEMOps are best able to capture the damage reducing effect of private precaution. These models can be valuable for evaluating adaptable flood risk management strategies.
    Description: Key Points: Private precaution significantly reduces the flood vulnerability of private households as shown by robust empirical matching methods State‐of‐the‐art flood damage models differ strongly based on their ability to capture differences in vulnerability of private households Methodology applied and validated using an extensive object‐level flood damage data set from Germany
    Description: European Union http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100011102
    Keywords: 333.91 ; flood loss ; average treatment effect ; matching methods ; loss models ; risk analysis ; adaptation
    Type: article
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Publication Date: 2022-03-25
    Description: Large‐scale flood risk assessments are crucial for decision making, especially with respect to new flood defense schemes, adaptation planning and estimating insurance premiums. We apply the process‐based Regional Flood Model (RFM) to simulate a 5000‐year flood event catalog for all major catchments in Germany and derive risk curves based on the losses per economic sector. The RFM uses a continuous process simulation including a multisite, multivariate weather generator, a hydrological model considering heterogeneous catchment processes, a coupled 1D–2D hydrodynamic model considering dike overtopping and hinterland storage, spatially explicit sector‐wise exposure data and empirical multi‐variable loss models calibrated for Germany. For all components, uncertainties in the data and models are estimated. We estimate the median Expected Annual Damage (EAD) and Value at Risk at 99.5% confidence for Germany to be €0.529 bn and €8.865 bn, respectively. The commercial sector dominates by making about 60% of the total risk, followed by the residential sector. The agriculture sector gets affected by small return period floods and only contributes to less than 3% to the total risk. The overall EAD is comparable to other large‐scale estimates. However, the estimation of losses for specific return periods is substantially improved. The spatial consistency of the risk estimates avoids the large overestimation of losses for rare events that is common in other large‐scale assessments with homogeneous return periods. Thus, the process‐based, spatially consistent flood risk assessment by RFM is an important step forward and will serve as a benchmark for future German‐wide flood risk assessments.
    Description: Plain Language Summary: We provide spatially consistent flood risk estimates for the residential, commercial and agricultural sectors of Germany. The Regional Flood Model (RFM) simulates a 5000‐year flood event catalogue from which the flood risk curves are derived based on the losses per economic sector. The RFM is a process‐based model chain, that couples the weather generator providing spatially consistent precipitation fields with the hydrological and hydrodynamic models considering processes such as dike overtopping and hinterland storage. The coherent heterogeneous return period flows result in flood maps consisting of inundation depth and duration. These are intersected with sector specific assets at high spatial resolution. Detailed flood loss models are used to estimate losses. From the risk curves, we estimate the Expected Annual Damage and losses corresponding to a 200‐year return period for Germany to be €0.529 bn and €8.865 bn, respectively. The commercial sector dominates by making about 60% of the total risk, followed by the residential sector. The agriculture sector gets affected by small return period floods and only contributes to less than 3% to the total risk. Owing to the process‐based, spatially consistent approach implemented, our risk estimates for extreme events are more realistic compared to other large‐scale assessments.
    Description: Key Points: Regional Flood Model provides spatially consistent flood risk estimates for residential, commercial and agriculture sectors for Germany. Flood risk is derived using a 5000‐year event catalog, yielding a realistic representation of risk along with uncertainty quantification. The median Expected Annual Damage and Value At Risk at 99.5% confidence for Germany is estimated to be €0.53 bn and €8.87 bn, respectively.
    Description: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100002347
    Description: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001659
    Keywords: ddc:551.489
    Language: English
    Type: doc-type:article
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Publication Date: 2022-07-23
    Description: This open access book presents the results of three years collaboration between earth scientists and data scientists, in developing and applying data science methods for scientific discovery. The book will be highly beneficial for other researchers at senior and graduate level, interested in applying visual data exploration, computational approaches and scientifc workflows.
    Repository Name: EPIC Alfred Wegener Institut
    Type: Book , NonPeerReviewed
    Format: application/pdf
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...