Publication Date:
2021-01-03
Description:
Azaspiracids (AZAs) are a group of lipophilic biotoxins responsible for the azaspiracid shellfish
poisoning syndrome (AZP) in humans after consumption of contaminated shellfish. AZAs are
produced by four representatives of the marine nanoplanktonic family Amphidomataceae
(Dinophyceae), i.e. Azadinium spinosum, Az. poporum, Az. dexteroporum and Amphidoma
languida. Among those species, Az. spinosum producing AZA-1, -2 and -33 (as known in 2017)
and, to lesser extent, Az. poporum producing AZA-37, are known from the North Atlantic. These
toxigenic species pose a major concern, especially for the coastal shellfish production in Ireland,
and are thus frequently monitored along with AZA toxins by the regulatory authorities of the Irish
government. A third North Atlantic AZA producer, Amphidoma languida, has been described
based on an isolate obtained from Irish coastal waters, but the actual threat by this species and the
respective AZA variants (AZA-38, -39) is unknown. In contrast to AZAs produced by Az. spinosum
and Az. poporum, these AZA congeners are currently not regulated within the EU. The three AZA
producers have been confirmed in the North Sea as well, but current knowledge on the
biogeography of toxigenic Amphidomataceae relies on a limited number of observations and
studies. The lack of data impedes an assessment of the actual risk of AZP in the North Sea and
adjacent waters at present. However, shellfish farming in European coastal waters including the
North Sea is of increasing importance for seafood supply, and enhanced production capacities are
heavily advocated by the European Commission (EC).
The goal of this thesis study was to increase knowledge about the current biogeography of toxigenic
Amphidomataceae in the eastern North Atlantic, and to evaluate the risk potential of AZP in the
area under the perspective of global change. Interpretations of the results should help to improve
safety and sustainable use of coastal seafood production sites in the North Sea and adjacent areas.
Major difficulties for reliable species detection and identification are the small cell size and
inconspicuousness of nanoplanktonic Amphidomataceae, as well as the sympatric occurrence of
toxigenic and non-toxigenic representatives. Multiple methods, i.e. light microscopy (LM) and
scanning electron microscopy (SEM) for morphological inspection, liquid chromatography
coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) for AZA analysis, and quantitative
polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) for DNA-based cell detection, were applied to respond to these
challenges and to gain a broad spectrum of new insights into (toxigenic) Amphidomataceae.
The isolation and characterization of (in total) 102 new Az. spinosum and Am. languida strains
from the North Atlantic in 2016 and 2018 yielded increased knowledge on variation in AZA
profiles and cell quotas of these toxigenic species. Samples from the North Sea provided 30 new
Am. languida strains, all confirming previous morphological, phylogenetic and toxinological
(i.e. AZA-38 and -39) records from the area. The 72 new Az. spinosum strains represented both
Ribotype A in the North Sea and Irish Sea, but Ribotype B was only detected from the North Sea.
For the first time, variability in the toxin profile of Ribotype A was confirmed, with different
combinations of the three AZA variants (AZA-1 always present, combined with presence/absence
of AZA-2 and/or -33), whereas the toxin profile of Ribotype B (AZA-11 and -51) was consistent
in all strains. Multiple analyses over 18 months revealed that the AZA profile within all given
strains remained stable. In contrast, AZA cell quotas were highly variable among and within
Az. spinosum strains, and variability of single analogs was as high as 330-fold. These findings
confirmed previous studies, but the reasons for the cell quota variability remain unclear. Five new
amphidomatacean strains isolated from the 2018 field survey displayed the morphological
characteristics of Az. spinosum, but exhibited significant DNA sequence differences (clustering
closer to Az. obesum in phylogenetic trees) and no AZA production. The final taxonomic
assignment remains undetermined, and the strains were thus designated as Az. cf. spinosum. The
newly identified Az. cf. spinosum and the description of four new non-toxigenic Azadinium species
(i.e. Az. galwayense, Az. perforatum, Az. perfusorium and Az. pseudozhuanum) highlighted in fact
that amphidomatacean biodiversity is still underestimated and that AZA production is rather
exceptional within this dinophyte family.
Although qPCR assays for Az. spinosum and Az. poporum were already available prior to this study,
the respective assay for quantification of toxigenic Amphidoma languida cells was developed and
extensively evaluated in the course of this doctoral thesis project. A quick, cost-effective and high
throughput application, coupled with high specificity and quantification limit down to 10 target
gene copies per reaction, enables this sensitive assay to detect even single Am. languida cells per
liter of seawater, and thus is a valuable tool for subsequent biogeographical studies. With respect
to multiple newly discovered species and isolated amphidomatacean strains, specificity testing of
the three alternative qPCR assays was of upmost importance to test for false-positive or falsenegative
amplification and therefore to assure reliable detection and quantification in monitoring
programs. None of the three assays showed false-positive signals, including for the new nontoxigenic
Az. cf. spinosum, except for rDNA amplification from a new non-toxigenic Az. poporum
isolate from the Danish coast. The most concerning result, however, was the significant
amplification efficiency difference between Az. spinosum Ribotype A and B strains, revealing a
degree of uncertainty for quantification from natural field samples by application of the current
Az. spinosum assay because both ribotypes have been shown to co-occur in the Norwegian Sea and
the North Sea. Although the current Az. spinosum and Az. poporum assays have not completely lost
their validity for field applications, they should be redesigned for improved reliability.
Multiple DNA sample sets, comprising more than 200 field samples from various expeditions
between 2015 and 2019 to the eastern North Atlantic, were analyzed by qPCR for the presence and
cell abundance of the three toxigenic amphidomatacean species. All three AZA-producers were
found to be widely distributed in the area. In terms of positive geographical hits and cell densities
(up to 8.3 x 104 cells L-1) Az. spinosum was the dominant toxigenic species in Irish coastal waters
in summer 2018, underlining the threat for Irish shellfish production. Multiple hits and relatively
high cell abundances of Az. spinosum were frequently found in the North Sea, as well. Amphidoma
languida was also widely present and relatively abundant (2.3 x 104 cells L-1) around Ireland at
that time, but highest cell density was found in the central North Sea, with an extraordinary
abundance of ~ 1.2 x 105 cells L-1. This represents the highest ever recorded field abundance for
this species and for North Atlantic Amphidomataceae in general. This finding, together with
multiple further geographical records, indicated that Am. languida may be the dominant AZA
producer in the North Sea. On this basis, incorporation of this species is recommended for both the
national Irish- and official EU monitoring programs. Several amphidomatacean species have been
found in Arctic and Subarctic waters before, and this finding was confirmed in the course of this
study. Amphidoma languida was the only AZA producing species detected in the Arctic (〉 75 °N)
close to Spitzbergen in 2015, indicating that this species is able to cope with colder (around 5 °C)
water temperatures. In contrast to Az. spinosum and Am. languida, Az. poporum was found in only
a few locations and at low cell densities usually 〈 100 cells L-1, but with one extraordinary signal
at Scapa Flow, Orkney Islands in June 2016, corresponding to ~ 3 x 103 cells L-1. This indicates an
overall much lower potential contribution of this species to AZA contamination in recent years.
Due to continuous sampling at several fixed North Sea stations, this thesis contains detailed qPCR
data (in total 245 samples) on the seasonality of all three toxigenic species. The subsequent analysis
revealed recurrent occurrence from July to October, consistent with observations at the Irish
coastline (Marine Institute, Galway, Ireland), and indicating higher AZP risk in summer and fall.
In addition, weekly sampling at the North Sea islands Helgoland and Sylt suggested relatively rapid
population increases, demonstrating that sudden bloom events of toxigenic Amphidomataceae
leading to rapid shellfish toxicity should be considered for respective monitoring frequency.
First data on the vertical distribution of toxigenic Amphidomataceae presented here revealed no
distinct distributional pattern in the water column, and hence pooling of water samples from various
depths is an appropriate sampling method. Simultaneous on-board application of alternative
technologies during an expedition in 2018 revealed a highly significant correlation between the
results of light microscopy of plankton cells and qPCR assays for the detection and enumeration
of toxigenic Amphidomataceae, and chemical analysis of AZA composition in the field. Detailed
method-specific advantages and disadvantages are presented herein, but in particular the qPCR
approach has proven to give solid results by combining high specificity with convenient detection
limits.
Laboratory experiments with North Atlantic strains representing all three toxigenic
Amphidomataceae (including the first study on Am. languida) targeted temperature dependent
growth and AZA production. Growth rates and AZA cell quota were inversely related: whereas
higher temperatures led to higher growth rates, AZA content per cell decreased with increasing
temperatures. Nevertheless, faster growth was shown to overcompensate for lower toxin cell
quotas, leading to similar or even higher total AZA content per seawater volume (μg AZA L-1) at
higher temperatures. This suggests a potentially increasing AZP risk under expected rising ocean
temperatures. Highest AZA production was found in Az. spinosum Ribotype A (with a
characteristic toxin profile of AZA-1, -2 and -33), highlighting a major role of this taxon
determining AZP risk in the eastern North Atlantic. Except for Az. spinosum Ribotype B strain
(containing AZA-11 and -51), all investigated strains showed lower extracellular than intracellular
AZA levels. This suggests that AZA is predominantly retained intracellularly, and that screening
for cells and intracellular AZAs is an appropriate monitoring method for AZP risk assessment.
In conclusion, extensive research in this doctoral study, including development of a reliable qPCR
assay for toxigenic Am. languida, with the description of new amphidomatacean species, strains,
AZA variants, toxin profiles, adds considerably to the knowledge base on biogeography and
variability within the Amphidomataceae. Combining data on AZA cell quota variability with the
comprehensive data set on biogeography, seasonality and vertical distribution of the three toxigenic
representatives in the North Sea has redefined our view of the role and importance of (toxigenic)
Amphidomataceae and AZAs in the North Sea and adjacent areas. Thus, this doctoral thesis study
provides a highly valuable baseline for official monitoring and future studies on toxigenic
Amphidomataceae.
Repository Name:
EPIC Alfred Wegener Institut
Type:
Thesis
,
notRev
Format:
application/pdf
Permalink