GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
Material
Language
Years
Subjects(RVK)
  • 1
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 112, No. 11 ( 2008-11-16), p. 4250-4250
    Abstract: In CML real time PCR for the detection of residual disease usually has been done by the detection of the BCR-ABL-fusion transcript. In addition some reports have shown the usefulness of WT1 as a target for follow up in CML blast crisis. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether WT1 in addition to BCR-ABL assessment in imatinib treated CML can give any new information. Expression of BCR-ABL as well as WT1 (ELN assay) was normalized to ABL and expressed as % to ABL. In total 268 bone marrow samples (spls) of 40 patients (pts) have been analysed. Sixteen spls were newly diagnosed untreated CML. 252 spls were analysed at several timepoint during treatment with imatinib starting with a “near to untreated” sample with a & gt;50% BCR-ABL/ABL ratio. According to standard definitions 6 of the 40 pts showed no response, 16 minor (MR), and 18 major molecular response (MMR) as determined by BCR-ABL expression. Three of the MR and one of the MMR pts relapsed. The 14 pretreatment spls showed a median WT1 expression of 3.36 (range 0.176–14.9) whereas the median BCR-ABL level was 56.6 (range 11.4–149.2). Thus the BCR-ABL level was more than one log above the WT1 level and was more uniform within the cohort. This lower total expression and a background level of 0.04 (as estimated from 7 normal bone marrows) results in 2–3 log lower sensitivity of WT1 compared to BCR-ABL. The correlation of WT1 and BCR-ABL in the total cohort of 268 spls was low (r=0.259). Median WT1 expression in BCR-ABL negative spls (n=15) was 0.055 and thus correlates to that of normal spls. Regarding the total follow up in all 40 pts a good correlation of WT1 and BCR-ABL was found only in 9 cases, all of which had a WT1 expression & gt;10 at the start of follow up. 7 pts had a WT1 expression between 1–7 with good correlation to BCR-ABL but restricted sensitivity. 24 pts had a WT1 expression of & lt;1 and a BCR-ABL ratio & gt;50 at start of follow up. In these pts there was no correlation of BCR-ABL and WT1 during follow up. In two of these 24 pts there was even a negative correlation with increasing WT1 levels during FU even though BCR-ABL remained undetectable. Cytogenetic investigation of these two pts revealed the development of Ph-negative aberrant clones (one with +8 and one with +11). This result raised the hypothesis that increasing WT1 expression in BCR-ABL negative CML during follow up may indicate the development of BCR-ABL negative clones. Therefore we measured the WT1 expression in a new cohort of 26 CML pts that developed Ph-clones during follow up. All these pts had low ( & lt;0.5) or undetectable BCR-ABL. Chromosomal aberrations in these cases were −7 (n=1), +8 (n=12), +11 (n=1), del(20q) (n=1), −Y (n=10)–X (n=1). A high WT1 expression (range 5–177) was detected in the two cases with +11 and −7 and in 10 of 12 cases with +8. A low WT1 expression ( & lt;0.5) was detected in the case with 20q- and in all 10 cases with–Y. An intermediate expression of 1.5 was detected in the case with +X. In summary a high WT1 expression was detected in 12/26 (46%) of all cases with new chromosomal aberrations in a Ph-negative clone and in 12/16 (75%) excluding the 10 cases with -Y. So far, the clinical relevance of Ph-negative clones is unclear. In rare cases the development of secondary MDS has been described. The cases that were followed here were all still in CR of CML with no signs of a secondary disease. However, high WT1 expression was detected in most cases with +8 but never with–Y, possibly indicating unequal biological relevance of these aberrations. The 10–100-times elevated WT1 expression in the +8 and +11 cases suggest that these aberrations may be of adverse impact. However, further clinical follow up is needed to show the outcome in these pts. In contrast, none of the cases with–Y revealed elevated WT1 expression suggestive for the expansion of healthy–Y clones that frequently can occur in a normal male bone marrow. 21 pts with Ph-negative clones could be followed for 13–36 months. There was a good correlation of the WT1 expression level with the number of metaphases carrying the chromosomal aberration (r=0.729). In one case an increase of WT1 expression was measured 11 months before detection of the evolving +8 suggestive of a preexisting cytogenetically undetected clone. In conclusion, BCR-ABL is superior to WT1 as marker for follow up in CML. Increasing WT1 levels in BCRABL negative follow up spls can indicate the development of Ph-negative clones under imatinib treatment. Future studies will show whether the WT1 level in Ph-clones may indicate the relevance of certain aberrations for outcome in these patients.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2008
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 112, No. 11 ( 2008-11-16), p. 3203-3203
    Abstract: It has previously been shown that imatinib uptake into chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) cells is dependent on human Organic Cation Transporter 1 (hOCT1; SLC22A1). In more recent work on clinical samples it was further shown that low hOCT1 expression of this influx transporter may be an important mechanism of imatinib resistance. To further evaluate this issue we have retrospectively quantified pretreatment hOCT1 mRNA expression in 92 CML patients (pts) that responded with major molecular remission within the first year of treatment and compared these results to 19 pts with primary resistance to imatinib. We found that all 19 resistant pts had low hOCT1 expression (median: 2.032 (expressed as %hOCT1/ABL); range 0.18–4.24). Although the median hOCT1 expression at diagnosis in the responders was higher (median 8.417) the range was very heterogeneous (0.45–188.2) with only 30% of all responders having a significantly higher expression than the resistant pts. As in vitro studies have shown that genetic variants of the SLC22A1 gene that codes for hOCT1 can have a negative effect on the transport of some substrates we hypothesized that not only certain hOTC1 expression levels but also different genetic variants within the SLC22A1 gene may be associated with different efficiencies of imatinib uptake. Using high resoluting melting and subsequent sequencing we have genotyped exons 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, and 11 in 109 responders as well as in 55 resistant pts, thus each 326 alleles were evaluated. We detected 12 different exonic polymorphisms. Two of these, a G38D and a Y404C were so far undescribed variants. Both nonsynonymous variants were detected in heterozygeous forms, the G38D in one responder and the Y404C variant in one resistant pt. All other variants were detected in frequencies similar to those that have already been described (R61C: 0.07, L160F: 0.76, P341L: 0.01, G401S: & lt;0.01, M408V: 0.60, delM420: 0.19, G465R: 0.05, V519I: & lt;0.01). In addition the silent variants S51S and V501V were detected with frequencies of 0.26% and 0.01% respectively. All variants in heterozygous as well as in homozygous form were distributed equally between responders and resistant patients. Thus we did not find any correlation between SLC22A1 genotype and imatinib response. In addition there was also no correlation of any of these polymorphisms to the high expressers. We found that those polymorphisms that have been described to severely affect hOTC1 functions in vitro were very rare (P341L and G401S with & lt;0.01% each) or even never detected (P283L and R287L) in our cohort. Thus, although in vitro studies have shown that hOCT1 polymorphisms may severely affect function with respect to substrat specificity and transport efficiency of imatinib they do not seem to play a major role in response of CML patients to imatinib. In addition, we analyzed the three most frequent polymorphisms in exons 12, 21, and 26 in the multidrug resistence gene (MDR1) that codes for an efflux transporter implicated in imatinib efflux. In total 84 responders and 38 resistant patients were analyzed. We found that the exon12 nt1236t allele is more frequently observerd in resistant patients (p=0.045) whereas there was only a week association for the exon21 nt 2677t allele (p=0.121) and the exon26 nt3435t allele (p=0.139) to resistance. In conclusion, it seems to be unlikely that genetic variants of hOCT1 play a major role in imatinib resistance if at all, also the hOCT1 expression levels account for the response of only a few cases. It remains unclear whether hOCT1 plays a role in influx of imatinib or whether its function may be overwritten by other influx transporters like the very homologous and functionally redundant hOCT3 just in the vicinity of hOCT1. 3) The role of efflux transporters in imatinb resistance may be more important, however we detected only a weak association to certain polymorphisms in MDR1 to resistance in our cohort.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2008
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 114, No. 22 ( 2009-11-20), p. 438-438
    Abstract: Abstract 438 TET2 mutations have recently been described in various myeloid malignancies. To further evaluate the role of TET2 mutations in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) we have analysed 96 MPN that have been well characterized by cytomorphology, cytogenetics and molecular genetics. The cohort consisted of 53 males and 43 females with a median age of 64.9 years (range: 16.6-86.3 years). Diagnosis was ET (n=22), HES (n=5), PMF (n=12), PV (n=32), MPN unclassifiable (MPN-u) (n=25). The ET, PMF and MPN-u were mainly selected for unmutated JAK2 status. Cytogenetics was availabel in 94/96 cases (98%). All ET and HES cases had a normal karyotype. In MPN-u 3 of 25 (12%), in OMF 3 of 12 (25%) and in PV 4 of 31(12.9%) revealed chromosomal aberrations. In all cases a BCR-ABL rearrangement was excluded. In addition in all cases mutation analysis for JAK2V617F, JAK2exon12, MPLW515 and CBL was performed. The total cohort was composed of 39 cases with JAK2V617F (3 × ET, 6 × PMF, 27 × PV, 3 × MPN-u), 5 cases with JAK2exon12 (all PV), 4 cases with MPLW515 (3 × ET, 1 × PMF), 2 cases with CBL mutation (both MPN-u). TET2 mutations were analyzed by amplification and sequencing of 21 PCR fragments covering the total coding region. Within the total cohort 20/96 cases (20.8%) revealed a TET2 mutation. Two different TET2 mutations in parallel were detected in three cases: one with MPN-u and two PV with homozygous JAK2V617F mutations. Throughout the gene the mutations were distributed as follows: exon4 (n=11), exon6 (n=4), exon7 (n=3), exon11 (n=5). 14 were missense, 3 nonsense and 6 were frameshift mutations. To analyze a further potential gene defect based on a TET2 deletion 15/20 cases from which methanol/acidic acid fixed cells were availabel were also analyzed by FISH (fluorescence in situ hybridization) for TET2 deletions. No deletion was detected in any of these cases. Thus with the exception of three cases with two different mutations all other mutated cases probably have retained one intact TET2 allele. With respect to diagnostic entities the TET2 mutations were distributed as follows, ET: 2/22 (9.1%), HES: 1/5 (20%), PMF: 4/12 (33.3%), PV: 9/31 (29%) and MPN-u: 4/27 (14.8%). With respect to other molecular genetic markers the TET2 mutations were distributed as follows: JAK2V617F: 10/20 (50%) (PV: n=8; PMF: n=2) from which 7/10 had JAK2V617F with a high mutation load (classified on the absence of a JAK2 wildtype allele) (PV: n=7; PMF: n=1), JAK2exon12: 1/5 (PV), MPLW515: 1/4 (PMF), CBL: 1/2 (MPN-u) , FIP1L1-PDGFRA: 1/5 case. Thus, 14/20 TET2 mutated cases (70%) revealed a detectable second mutation, 7 (50%) of which even with a high JAK2V617F mutation load. Taking also cytogenetics into account three further cases revealed aberrations resulting in a total of 17/20 TET2 mutated cases (85%) that had genetic markers in addition. 8/20 (40%) even had two or more genetic events in addition to the TET2 mutation. 2/3 cases with two TET2 mutation also had a very high JAK2V617F load. And five high load JAK2V617F cases had only a 50% TET2 mutation load, indicating that JAK2V617F was the first mutation in these cases followed by TET2 mutation as a second hit. There was no independent correlation of TET2 mutation with any of the analyzed MPN entities (p=0.359, n.s.). On the other hand TET2 mutations are more frequent in cases with further mutations compared to those without any other mutation irrespective of diagnosis (p=0.059). These data indicate that TET2 mutations 1) occur in all different subtypes of MPN and thus are no markers that indicate a specific entity, 2) are associated with other genetic markers that are more specific for certain MPN entities like FIP1L1-PDGFRA for HES, MPL for ET and PMF, JAK2exon12 for PV , 3) seem to be more likely associated with progression of MPN e.g. accumulation of mutations at least in MPN. Disclosures: Schnittger: MLL Munich Leukemia Lab: Equity Ownership. Tschulik:MLL Munich Leukemia Lab: Employment. Wendland:MLL Munich Leukemia Lab: Employment. Schindela:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment. Dicker:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment. Kern:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Equity Ownership. Haferlach:MLL Munich Leukemia Lab: Equity Ownership. Haferlach:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Equity Ownership.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2009
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 132, No. Supplement 1 ( 2018-11-29), p. 2766-2766
    Abstract: Introduction Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with inv(3)(q21q26) or t(3;3)(q21;q26) overexpress EVI1 and have a very poor prognosis. EVI1 is part of the MECOM (MDS1-EVI1-Combination) locus from which MDS1-EVI1 and EVI1 can be transcribed from two different promoters. Although EVI1 is expressed at high levels, MDS1-EVI1 is absent or expressed at very low levels in inv(3)/t(3;3)-AMLs. Aberrant EVI1 expression in these leukemias is driven by the long-distant GATA2 enhancer, translocated from 3q21 to EVI1 at 3q26 (Gröschel et al, 2014). As a result of this GATA2 enhancer hijack by EVI1, GATA2 is switched off on the rearranged allele, resulting in mono-allelic and low GATA2 expression. We hypothesize that leukemic transformation of inv(3)/t(3;3)-AMLs is driven by EVI1 overexpression and by low GATA2 and that these leukemias are marked by the absence of MDS1-EVI1 expression. We previously reported about a group of AML patients that presented with complex rearrangements of 3q26 (refer to as variant-3q26-AML) with frequent MECOM involvement and very poor survival (Lugthart et al, 2010). Here we address the questions if these variant-3q26-AMLs 1) overexpress EVI1 by enhancer hijacking, 2) are marked by absent MDS1-EVI1 and 3) express low levels of GATA2. Accordingly, the variant-3q26-AMLs should be classified as inv(3)/t(3;3)-AMLs. Results We identified 37 variant-3q26-AMLs with MECOM rearrangement as determined by Fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH). RNA-seq of these AMLs revealed EVI1 overexpression but also demonstrated the absence of MDS1-EVI1 in 90% of patient samples. Applying 3q-capture DNA-seq, we found that in 2 cases the patient cells harboured a "hidden" inv(3)(q21q26) with involvement of the GATA2 enhancer. In 7 cases recurrent 3q26/EVI1 translocations were identified, e.g. t(2;3)(p21;q26), t(3;8)(q26;q24), t(3;7)(q26;q11), involving the THADA, MYC or CDK6 loci respectively as previously described. Interestingly, we identified new translocations to the EVI1 locus in 13 AMLs, including a t(3;6)(q26;q21) and a t(3;4)(q26;p15), involving the CD164, and PROM1 loci respectively. In these samples we find clearly skewed expression of these genes to one allele, suggestively caused by the rearrangement and enhancer hijacking. CD164 plays a key role in adhesion, proliferation and migration of CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells (Watt et al, 2000). PROM1 (CD133) is expressed in human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells and is thought to be involved in maintaining stem cell properties by suppressing differentiation (Bauer et al, 2008). We argue that EVI1 overexpression in these variant-3q26-AMLs is driven by hijacking enhancers of genes that are normally active in myeloid progenitors. In most of the patients the translocation breakpoints are in between the promoters of MDS1 and EVI1, explaining absence of MDS1-EVI1 expression. In addition, analysis of SNP-array data of these patients (N=33) showed Copy Number Loss (CNL) of the MDS1 exon(s) and not the EVI1 exons in at least 5 cases. Together these data suggest the importance of MDS1-EVI1 loss in 3q26-AMLs. Furthermore we wondered whether low GATA2 expression is an important event in variant-3q26-AMLs. Similar to inv(3)/t(3;3)-AMLs (Gröschel et al, 2014), RNA-seq revealed that the GATA2 expression was on average a two-fold lower in the variant-3q26-AMLs (N=37), compared to non-3q26 rearranged AMLs (N=114). Surprisingly, SNP-array analysis in 26 variant-3q26-AMLs revealed CNLs of GATA2 and/or its enhancer in 7 patients. Detailed SNP analysis in GATA2 exons by combined 3q-capture DNA-seq and RNA-seq uncovered another 7 cases with mono-allelic GATA2 expression or skewing to expression of one allele (allele_freq 〈 0.4, P 〈 0.05). Hence, in 53% of these patient samples one of the GATA2 alleles appeared to be affected. These results are unexpected, as the GATA2 locus was not involved in any of these rearrangements. Conclusion Given their complex karyotype, variant-3q26-AMLs are often not recognised as 3q26/EVI1 AMLs. Although the exact mechanism remains elusive, the overall effect seems to be alike. EVI1 overexpression, potentially driven by enhancer hijacking of genes that are active in early myeloid progenitors, combined with absent MDS1-EVI1 and mono-allelic/low GATA2 expression results in AML with very poor survival. Given these data we believe variant-3q26-AMLs genocopy inv(3)/t(3;3)-AMLs and should be classified as such. Disclosures Haferlach: MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment, Equity Ownership. Haferlach:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment, Equity Ownership.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 112, No. 11 ( 2008-11-16), p. 698-698
    Abstract: The aim of this study was to further evaluate the impact of minimal residual disease (MRD) in NPM1 mutated AML in comparison to other factors like FAB, cytogenetics, FLT3 mutations, NPM1 mutation type and age. In total 1002 samples of 219 NPM1 mutated (NPM1mut) patients (pts) were analysed at diagnosis, during, and after therapy. Pts were treated within different AML trials, and follow-up samples were referred to perform an NPM1 specific RQ-PCR for MRD. The cohort was comprised of 112 females and 107 males, median age was 58.8 years (range: 20–79 years). 207 had de novo AML (M0: n=5; M1: n=49; M2: n=55; M4=57; M5: n=28, M5: n=6; M7: n=1, nd: n=6), 4 s-AML and 5 t-AML. Cytogenetic data was available in 215 pts: 178 with normal (NK) and 37 with aberrant karyotypes (+4: n=4; +8: n=7; +21: n=2, two or more trisomies: n=4; -Y: n=4; del(7q): n=2; del(9q): n=3; del(20q): n=2; rare translocations: n=9). At diagnosis 87/219 pts (39.7%) had FLT3-ITDs in addition to the NPM1mut. FLT3-TKD status was available in 206 cases (14 mutated (6.7%) and 192 WT). The NPM1 mutation types were A (n=174), B (n=13), D (n=14), I: (n=4), L: (n=2), R: (n=4) and 8 with individual rare types. Univariate analysis for overall survival (OS) revealed unfavourable impact for age (p=0.049), and for FLT3-ITD (p=0.002), favourable impact for FLT3-TKD (p=0.046), and no impact for FAB, chromosomal aberrations or NPM1 mutation type. For MRD assessment for all 14 different NPM1 mutation types mRNA based RQ-PCR assays were established with sensitivities of 10,000–1,000,000. For each patient 2–17 samples (spls) were analyzed (median: 4) spanning a median follow up time of 252 days (range: 18–2347 days). Paired samples of diagnosis and relapse were available in 71 pts, in 8 pts also from second relapse. At relapse all cases had high NPM1 levels comparable to those at diagnosis. The FLT3-ITD status was mutated (+/+) at both time points in 25 pts and −/− in another 25 pts. 10 pts gained FLT3-ITD at relapse and 3 lost it. For 48 paired samples cytogenetics was available for both time points. A normal karyotype (NK) at both time points was detected in 36 pts, 7 cases showed a normal or aberrant karyotype (AK) at diagnosis and and AK at relapse (two of these gained additional aberrations at relapse), 2 different AK at both time points in were detected in 3 cases and a regression from AK to NK in 2 cases. These data show that NPM1 seems to be the primary genetic aberration in these cases and detection of NPM1 is more reliable to detect relapse than cytogenetics. To analyse the impact of NPM1 mutation levels on prognosis four different follow-up intervals were defined: interval 1: days 21–60 after start of therapy; interval 2: days 61–120; interval 3: days 121–365, 4: 〉 365 days. First a set of 605 samples referred for analysis during first line treatment were analysed. Using Cox regression analysis a significant impact of MRD levels (as continuous variable) on EFS was detected for interval 2 (128 spls, p=0.008), interval 3 (214 spl; p 〈 0.001), interval 4 (171 spls; p 〈 0.001) but not for the early interval up to day 60 showing that early molecular response is not relevant for long time outcome. A multivariate analysis showed that MRD was the most significant prognostic parameter (p 〈 0.001) (p-values for interval 3), followed by age (p=0.003), and pretreatment FLT3-ITD status (p=0.065). The same analysis was performed for a second set of 183 spls taken from 50 pts during salvage therapy after relapse. The most relevant interval for this group was between days 30–60 (26 spls; p=0.003). In a third set 87 spls from 28 pts after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation were analyzed. A prognostic impact of MRD could be shown for interval 2 (17 spls; p=0.005) and 3 (23 spls; p=0.006) (no samples from later intervals available). Of the total cohort 325 spls were analysed in parallel with RQ-PCR for NPM1 and genescan for the FLT3-ITD. A high correlation of both follow up markers was observed (r=0.807, p 〈 0.001). Although the method for NPM1 detection is 3–4 log ranges more sensitive our data suggest parallel assessment for FLT3-ITD for high risk patients as many of them aquired FLT3-ITD as additional marker during progression. In conclusion, MRD is the most relevant prognostic marker in NPM1 mutated AML and it is a very useful tool to assess therapy response and to guide therapy.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2008
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: British Journal of Haematology, Wiley, Vol. 146, No. 6 ( 2009-09), p. 665-668
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0007-1048 , 1365-2141
    URL: Issue
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2009
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1475751-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 136, No. 2 ( 2020-07-9), p. 224-234
    Abstract: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with inv(3)/t(3;3)(q21q26) is a distinct World Health Organization recognized entity, characterized by its aggressive course and poor prognosis. In this subtype of AML, the translocation of a GATA2 enhancer (3q21) to MECOM (3q26) results in overexpression of the MECOM isoform EVI1 and monoallelic expression of GATA2 from the unaffected allele. The full-length MECOM transcript, MDS1-EVI1, is not expressed as the result of the 3q26 rearrangement. Besides the classical inv(3)/t(3;3), a number of other 3q26/MECOM rearrangements with poor treatment response have been reported in AML. Here, we demonstrate, in a group of 33 AML patients with atypical 3q26 rearrangements, MECOM involvement with EVI1 overexpression but no or low MDS1-EVI1 levels. Moreover, the 3q26 translocations in these AML patients often involve superenhancers of genes active in myeloid development (eg, CD164, PROM1, CDK6, or MYC). In & gt;50% of these cases, allele-specific GATA2 expression was observed, either by copy-number loss or by an unexplained allelic imbalance. Altogether, atypical 3q26 recapitulate the main leukemic mechanism of inv(3)/t(3;3) AML, namely EVI1 overexpression driven by enhancer hijacking, absent MDS1-EVI1 expression and potential GATA2 involvement. Therefore, we conclude that both atypical 3q26/MECOM and inv(3)/t(3;3) can be classified as a single entity of 3q26-rearranged AMLs. Routine analyses determining MECOM rearrangements and EVI1 and MDS1-EVI1 expression are required to recognize 3q-rearranged AML cases.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 114, No. 11 ( 2009-09-10), p. 2220-2231
    Abstract: Nucleophosmin (NPM1)–mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML), which is recognized as a provisional entity in the World Health Organization 2008 classification of myeloid neoplasms, accounts for 30% of AML. We analyzed 1227 diagnostic and follow-up samples in 252 NPM1-mutated AML patients with 17 different NPM1 mutation–specific real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) assays. Paired diagnostic/relapse samples of 84 patients revealed stable NPM1 mutations in all cases, suggesting that they are pathogenetically early events and thus applicable for minimal residual disease detection. A total of 47 relapses were predictable because of an NPM1 mutation level (%NPM1/ABL1) increase of at least 1 log or in 15 cases because of NPM1 mutation levels not decreasing less than 3 log ranges. A high prognostic value of NPM1 levels was shown for 4 different intervals after therapy was initiated. Furthermore, thresholds of 0.1 and 0.01%NPM1/ABL1 during/after treatment discriminated between prognostic subgroups. Univariate analyses, including age, white blood cell count, blast count, CD34 positivity, FLT3 mutations status, FAB type, karyotype, NPM1 mutation type, and pretreatment NPM1 mutational level, showed that, besides NPM1 mutation level, only age and FLT3-LM mutation status were prognostically significant for EFS. Multivariate analysis, including age, FLT3-LM status, and NPM1 mutation level at different time points, demonstrated that NPM1 level was the most relevant prognostic factor during first-line treatment. Similar results were obtained in patients undergoing second-line chemotherapy or allogeneic stem cell transplantation.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2009
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: Nature Communications, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 12, No. 1 ( 2021-09-28)
    Abstract: Chromosomal rearrangements are a frequent cause of oncogene deregulation in human malignancies. Overexpression of EVI1 is found in a subgroup of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with 3q26 chromosomal rearrangements, which is often therapy resistant. In AMLs harboring a t(3;8)(q26;q24), we observed the translocation of a MYC super-enhancer ( MYC SE) to the EVI1 locus. We generated an in vitro model mimicking a patient-based t(3;8)(q26;q24) using CRISPR-Cas9 technology and demonstrated hyperactivation of EVI1 by the hijacked MYC SE. This MYC SE contains multiple enhancer modules, of which only one recruits transcription factors active in early hematopoiesis. This enhancer module is critical for EVI1 overexpression as well as enhancer-promoter interaction. Multiple CTCF binding regions in the MYC SE facilitate this enhancer-promoter interaction, which also involves a CTCF binding site upstream of the EVI1 promoter. We hypothesize that this CTCF site acts as an enhancer-docking site in t(3;8) AML. Genomic analyses of other 3q26-rearranged AML patient cells point to a common mechanism by which EVI1 uses this docking site to hijack enhancers active in early hematopoiesis.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2041-1723
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2553671-0
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 116, No. 21 ( 2010-11-19), p. 884-884
    Abstract: Abstract 884 Blast crisis is the terminal phase of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) with a short median survival of approximately six months. At present, little is known about molecular mechanisms underlying disease progression. We hypothesized that mutations occurring in other myeloid and lymphatic malignancies are acquired during disease progression from chronic phase to blast crisis. Here, in total 40 blast crisis CML cases (n=25 myeloid, n=10 lymphoid, n=5 not specified) were analyzed, all diagnosed between 9/2005 and 7/2009. First, all cases were investigated for IKZF1 deletions by PCR using specific primer pairs for the common intragenic deletions spanning from exon 2–7, or exon 4–7 as published by Iacobucci et al. (Blood, 114:2159-67, 2009). In total, in 17.5% (7/40) of cases intragenic IKZF1 deletions were detected. Secondly, next-generation deep-sequencing (454 Life Sciences, Branford, CT) was used to investigate 11 candidate genes in all 40 patients for a broad molecular screening. Known hotspot regions were sequenced for CBL (exons 8 and 9), NRAS (exons 2 and 3), KRAS (exons 2 and 3), IDH1 (exon 4), IDH2 (exon 4), and NPM1 (exon 12). Complete coding regions were analyzed for RUNX1, TET2, WT1, and TP53. To perform this comprehensive study, amplicon-based deep-sequencing was applied using the small volume Titanium chemistry assay. To cope with the great number of amplicons, in total 59, 48.48 Access Arrays were applied (Fluidigm, South San Francisco, CA), amplifying and barcode-tagging 48 amplicons across 48 samples in one single array (2,304 reactions). In median, 430 reads per amplicon were obtained, thus yielding sufficient coverage for detection of mutations with high sensitivity. Further, ASXL1 exon 12 aberrations were investigated by Sanger sequencing. In summary, after excluding known polymorphisms and silent mutations in 33/40 patients 53 mutations were identified: RUNX1 (16/40; 40.0%), ASXL1 (12/40; 30.0%), WT1 (6/40; 15.0%), NRAS (2/40; 5.0%), KRAS (2/40; 5.0%), TET2 (3/40; 7.5%), CBL (1/40; 2.5%), TP53 (1/40; 2.5%), IDH1 (3/40; 7.5%), IDH2 (0/40), and NPM1 (0/40). Thus, 82.5% of blast crisis CML patients harbored at least one molecular aberration. In median, one affected gene per patient was observed (range 1–5). In detail, RUNX1 was associated with additional mutations in other genes, i.e. 9/16 cases were harboring additional mutations in combination with RUNX1. Similarly, in 8/12 patients with ASXL1 mutations additional aberrations were detected. With respect to myeloid or lymphoid features ASXL1 mutations (n=11) were exclusively observed in patients with myeloid blast crisis (n=1 not specified), in contrast 5/7 IKZF1 cases were detected in cases with lymphoid features (n=1 myeloid, n=1 not specified). Interestingly, besides IKZF1 (n=5) and RUNX1 (n=3) alterations there was no other mutated gene occurring in lymphoid blast crisis CML. In addition, no aberration was detected in NPM1, and in contrast to published data, in our cohort only one patient harbored a mutation in TP53. Moreover, for 8 patients with mutations in IKZF1 (n=3), RUNX1 (n=3), ASXL1 (n=1), WT1 (n=2), and IDH1 (n=2), matched DNA from the initial diagnosis at chronic state was available. In these specimens respective IKZF1 deletions, RUNX1, and ASXL1 mutations were not detectable indicating that IKZF1, RUNX1, and ASXL1 mutations had been developed during disease progression and act as driver mutations in these cases. WT1 and IDH1 mutations occurred at first diagnosis in one case each, indicating these genes would constitute passenger mutations. In conclusion, this comprehensive study on 12 molecular markers enabled to characterize for the first time that 82.5% of blast crisis CML cases harbor specific molecular mutations. IKZF1 and RUNX1 alterations were identified as important markers of disease progression from chronic state to blast crisis. Moreover, technically, a novel combination of a high-throughput sample preparation assay for targeted PCR-based next-generation deep-sequencing was developed and allowed to broaden our molecular understanding in blast crisis CML. Disclosures: Grossmann: MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment. Eder:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment. Schindela:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment. Kohlmann:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment. Wille:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment. Schnittger:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kern:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment, Equity Ownership. Haferlach:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment, Equity Ownership. Haferlach:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment, Equity Ownership, Research Funding.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2010
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...