GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Dordrecht :Springer Netherlands,
    Keywords: Turbulent diffusion (Meteorology)--Measurement. ; Analysis of covariance. ; Eddy correlation. ; Micrometeorology. ; Atmosphärische Turbulenz. swd. ; Electronic books.
    Description / Table of Contents: This handbook provides exhaustive treatment of eddy covariance measurement. The chapters cover measuring fluxes using eddy covariance techniques, from the tower installation and system dimensioning to data collection, correction and analysis.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    Pages: 1 online resource (451 pages)
    Edition: 1st ed.
    ISBN: 9789400723511
    Series Statement: Springer Atmospheric Sciences Series
    DDC: 551.51
    Language: English
    Note: Intro -- Eddy Covariance -- Preface -- Contents -- Contributors -- Chapter 1: The Eddy Covariance Method -- 1.1 History -- 1.2 Preliminaries -- 1.2.1 Context of Eddy Covariance Measurements -- 1.2.2 Reynolds Decomposition -- 1.2.3 Scalar Definition -- 1.3 One Point Conservation Equations -- 1.3.1 Dry Air Mass Conservation (Continuity) Equation -- 1.3.2 Momentum Conservation Equation -- 1.3.3 Scalar Conservation Equation -- 1.3.4 Enthalpy Equation -- 1.4 Integrated Relations -- 1.4.1 Dry Air Budget Equation -- 1.4.2 Scalar Budget Equation (Generalized Eddy Covariance Method) -- 1.5 Spectral Analysis -- 1.5.1 Spectral Analysis of Turbulence -- 1.5.2 Spectral Analysis of Atmospheric Turbulence -- 1.5.3 Sensor Filtering -- 1.5.4 Impacts of Measurement Height and Wind Velocity -- References -- Chapter 2: Measurement, Tower, and Site Design Considerations -- 2.1 Introduction -- 2.2 Tower Considerations -- 2.2.1 Theoretical Considerations for Tower Design -- 2.2.1.1 Diverse Ecosystems and Environments -- 2.2.1.2 Physical Effects on Surrounding Flows Due to the Presence of Tower Structure -- 2.2.1.3 Size of Horizontal Supporting Boom -- 2.2.1.4 Tower Deflection and Oscillations -- 2.2.1.5 Recirculation Zone at the Opening in a Tall Canopy -- 2.2.2 Tower Design and Science Requirements -- 2.2.2.1 Tower Location Requirements -- 2.2.2.2 Tower Structure Requirements -- 2.2.2.3 Tower Height Requirements -- 2.2.2.4 Tower Size Requirements -- 2.2.2.5 Instrument Orientation Requirements -- 2.2.2.6 Tower Installation and Site Impact Requirements -- 2.3 Sonic Anemometer -- 2.3.1 General Principles -- 2.3.2 Problems and Corrections -- 2.3.3 Requirements for Sonic Choice, Positioning, and Use -- 2.4 Eddy CO2/H2O Analyzer -- 2.4.1 General Description -- 2.4.2 Closed-Path System -- 2.4.2.1 Absolute and Differential Mode. , 2.4.2.2 Tubing Requirements for Closed-Path Sensors -- 2.4.2.3 Calibration for CO2 -- 2.4.2.4 Water Vapor Calibration -- 2.4.3 Open-Path Systems -- 2.4.3.1 Installation and Maintenance -- 2.4.3.2 Calibration -- 2.4.4 Open and Closed Path Advantages and Disadvantages -- 2.4.5 Narrow-Band Spectroscopic CO2 Sensors -- 2.5 Profile Measurement -- 2.5.1 Requirements for Measurement Levels -- 2.5.2 Requirements for Profile Mixing Ratio Measurement -- References -- Chapter 3: Data Acquisition and Flux Calculations -- 3.1 Data Transfer and Acquisition -- 3.2 Flux Calculation from Raw Data -- 3.2.1 Signal Transformation in Meteorological Units -- 3.2.1.1 Wind Components and Speed of Sound from the Sonic Anemometer -- 3.2.1.2 Concentration from a Gas Analyzer -- 3.2.2 Quality Control of Raw Data -- 3.2.3 Variance and Covariance Computation -- 3.2.3.1 Mean and Fluctuation Computations -- 3.2.3.2 Time Lag Determination -- 3.2.4 Coordinate Rotation -- 3.2.4.1 Requirements for the Choice of the Coordinate Frame and Its Orientation -- 3.2.4.2 Coordinate Transformation Equations -- 3.2.4.3 Determination of Rotation Angles -- 3.3 Flux Determination -- 3.3.1 Momentum Flux -- 3.3.2 Buoyancy Flux and Sensible Heat Flux -- 3.3.3 Latent Heat Flux and Other Trace Gas Fluxes -- 3.3.4 Derivation of Additional Parameters -- References -- Chapter 4: Corrections and Data Quality Control -- 4.1 Flux Data Correction -- 4.1.1 Corrections Already Included into the Raw Data Analysis (Chap. 3) -- 4.1.2 Conversion of Buoyancy Flux to Sensible Heat Flux (SND-correction) -- 4.1.3 Spectral Corrections -- 4.1.3.1 Introduction -- 4.1.3.2 High-Frequency Loss Corrections -- 4.1.3.3 Low-Cut Frequency -- 4.1.4 WPL Corrections -- 4.1.4.1 Introduction -- 4.1.4.2 Open-Path Systems -- 4.1.4.3 WPL and Imperfect Instrumentation -- 4.1.4.4 Closed-Path Systems -- 4.1.5 Sensor-Specific Corrections. , 4.1.5.1 Flow Distortion Correction of Sonic Anemometers -- 4.1.5.2 Correction Due to Sensor Head Heating of the Open-Path Gas Analyzer LiCor 7500 -- 4.1.5.3 Corrections to the Krypton Hygrometer KH20 -- 4.1.5.4 Corrections for CH4 and N2O Analyzers -- 4.1.6 Nonrecommended Corrections -- 4.1.7 Overall Data Corrections -- 4.2 Effect of the Unclosed Energy Balance -- 4.2.1 Reasons for the Unclosed Energy Balance -- 4.2.2 Correction of the Unclosed Energy Balance -- 4.3 Data Quality Analysis -- 4.3.1 Quality Control of Eddy Covariance Measurements -- 4.3.2 Tests on Fulfilment of Theoretical Requirements -- 4.3.2.1 Steady State Tests -- 4.3.2.2 Test on Developed Turbulent Conditions -- 4.3.3 Overall Quality Flag System -- 4.4 Accuracy of Turbulent Fluxes After Correction and Quality Control -- 4.5 Overview of Available Correction Software -- References -- Chapter 5: Nighttime Flux Correction -- 5.1 Introduction -- 5.1.1 History -- 5.1.2 Signs Substantiating the Night Flux Error -- 5.1.2.1 Comparison with Bottom Up Approaches -- 5.1.2.2 Sensitivity of Flux to Friction Velocity -- 5.1.3 The Causes of the Problem -- 5.2 Is This Problem Really Important? -- 5.2.1 In Which Case Should the Night Flux Error Be Corrected? -- 5.2.2 What Is the Role of Storage in This Error? -- 5.2.3 What Is the Impact of Night Flux Error on Long-Term Carbon Sequestration Estimates? -- 5.2.4 What Is the Impact of the Night Flux Error on Functional Relationships? -- 5.2.5 What Is the Impact of the Night Flux Error on Other Fluxes? -- 5.3 How to Implement the Filtering Procedure? -- 5.3.1 General Principle -- 5.3.2 Choice of the Selection Criterion -- 5.3.3 Filtering Implementation -- 5.3.4 Evaluation -- 5.4 Correction Procedures -- 5.4.1 Filtering=+Gap Filling -- 5.4.2 The ACMB Procedure -- 5.4.2.1 History -- 5.4.2.2 Procedure -- 5.4.2.3 Evaluation -- References. , Chapter 6: Data Gap Filling -- 6.1 Introduction -- 6.2 Gap Filling: Why and When Is It Needed? -- 6.3 Gap-Filling Methods -- 6.3.1 Meteorological Data Gap Filling -- 6.3.2 General Rules and Strategies (Long Gaps) -- 6.3.2.1 Sites with Management and Disturbances -- 6.3.3 Methods Description -- 6.3.3.1 Mean Diurnal Variation -- 6.3.3.2 Look-Up Tables -- 6.3.3.3 Artificial Neural Networks -- 6.3.3.4 Nonlinear Regressions -- 6.3.3.5 Process Models -- 6.4 Uncertainty and Quality Flags -- 6.5 Final Remarks -- References -- Chapter 7: Uncertainty Quantification -- 7.1 Introduction -- 7.1.1 Definitions -- 7.1.2 Types of Errors -- 7.1.3 Characterizing Uncertainty -- 7.1.4 Objectives -- 7.2 Random Errors in Flux Measurements -- 7.2.1 Turbulence Sampling Error -- 7.2.2 Instrument Errors -- 7.2.3 Footprint Variability -- 7.2.4 Quantifying the Total Random Uncertainty -- 7.2.5 Overall Patterns of the Random Uncertainty -- 7.2.6 Random Uncertainties at Longer Time Scales -- 7.3 Systematic Errors in Flux Measurements -- 7.3.1 Systematic Errors Resulting from Unmet Assumptions and Methodological Challenges -- 7.3.2 Systematic Errors Resulting from Instrument Calibration and Design -- 7.3.2.1 Calibration Uncertainties -- 7.3.2.2 Spikes -- 7.3.2.3 Sonic Anemometer Errors -- 7.3.2.4 Infrared Gas Analyzer Errors -- 7.3.2.5 High-Frequency Losses -- 7.3.2.6 Density Fluctuations -- 7.3.2.7 Instrument Surface Heat Exchange -- 7.3.3 Systematic Errors Associated with Data Processing -- 7.3.3.1 Detrending and High-Pass Filtering -- 7.3.3.2 Coordinate Rotation -- 7.3.3.3 Gap Filling -- 7.3.3.4 Flux Partitioning -- 7.4 Closing Ecosystem Carbon Budgets -- 7.5 Conclusion -- References -- Chapter 8: Footprint Analysis -- 8.1 Concept of Footprint -- 8.2 Footprint Models for Atmospheric Boundary Layer -- 8.2.1 Analytical Footprint Models -- 8.2.2 Lagrangian Stochastic Approach. , 8.2.3 Forward and Backward Approach by LS Models -- 8.2.4 Footprints for Atmospheric Boundary Layer -- 8.2.5 Large-Eddy Simulations for ABL -- 8.3 Footprint Models for High Vegetation -- 8.3.1 Footprints for Forest Canopy -- 8.3.2 Footprint Dependence on Sensor and Source Heights -- 8.3.3 Influence of Higher-Order Moments -- 8.4 Complicated Landscapes and Inhomogeneous Canopies -- 8.4.1 Closure Model Approach -- 8.4.2 Model Validation -- 8.4.3 Footprint Estimation by Closure Models -- 8.4.4 Footprints over Complex Terrain -- 8.4.5 Modeling over Urban Areas -- 8.5 Quality Assessment Using Footprint Models -- 8.5.1 Quality Assessment Methodology -- 8.5.2 Site Evaluation with Analytical and LS Footprint Models -- 8.5.3 Applicability and Limitations -- 8.6 Validation of Footprint Models -- References -- Chapter 9: Partitioning of Net Fluxes -- 9.1 Motivation -- 9.2 Definitions -- 9.3 Standard Methods -- 9.3.1 Overview -- 9.3.2 Nighttime Data-Based Methods -- 9.3.2.1 Model Formulation: Temperature - Measurements -- 9.3.2.2 Reco Model Formulation -- 9.3.2.3 Challenges: Additional Drivers of Respiration -- 9.3.2.4 Challenges: Photosynthesis - Respiration Coupling and Within-Ecosystem Transport -- 9.3.3 Daytime Data-Based Methods -- 9.3.3.1 Model Formulation: The NEE Light Response -- 9.3.3.2 Challenges: Additional Drivers and the FLUXNET Database Approach -- 9.3.3.3 Unresolved Issues and Future Work -- 9.4 Additional Considerations and New Approaches -- 9.4.1 Oscillatory Patterns -- 9.4.2 Model Parameterization -- 9.4.3 Flux Partitioning Using High-Frequency Data -- 9.4.4 Flux Partitioning Using Stable Isotopes -- 9.4.5 Chamber-Based Approaches -- 9.4.6 Partitioning Water Vapor Fluxes -- 9.5 Recommendations -- References -- Chapter 10: Disjunct Eddy Covariance Method -- 10.1 Introduction -- 10.2 Theory -- 10.2.1 Sample Interval -- 10.2.2 Response Time. , 10.2.3 Definition of DEC.
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Berlin : Weierstraß-Institut für Angewandte Analysis und Stochastik (WIAS)
    Keywords: Forschungsbericht
    Description / Table of Contents: Forward and backward stochastic Lagrangian trajectory simulation methods are developed to calculate the footprint and cumulative footprint functions of concentration and fluxes in the case when the ground surface has an abrupt change of the roughness height. The statistical characteristics to the stochastic model are extracted numerically from a closure model we developed for the atmospheric boundary layer. The flux footprint function is perturbed in comparison with the footprint function for surface without change in properties. The perturbation depends on the observation level as well as roughness change and distance from the observation point. It is concluded that the footprint function for horizontally homogeneous surface, widely used in estimation of sufficient fetch for measurements, can be seriously biased in many cases of practical importance.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    Pages: 1 Online-Ressource (24 Seiten, 1,30 MB) , Diagramme
    Series Statement: Preprint / Weierstraß-Institut für Angewandte Analysis und Stochastik no. 829
    Language: English
    Note: Literaturverzeichnis: Seite 21-22
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    College Park, Md. : American Institute of Physics (AIP)
    The Journal of Chemical Physics 94 (1991), S. 7411-7413 
    ISSN: 1089-7690
    Source: AIP Digital Archive
    Topics: Physics , Chemistry and Pharmacology
    Notes: The classical hydrates interaction model presented by Jaecker-Voirol et al. is extended into systems where the gas-phase number concentrations of acid and water molecules are of the same order of magnitude. Besides the sulfuric acid–water system, the hydrogen iodide–water and the nitric acid–water systems are considered. The distribution Nh,k of hydrates containing h water and k acid molecules has been calculated as a function of relative humidity and relative acidity. An extended formula for the Gibbs free energy of droplet formation is derived. The fraction of free molecules to the total number of molecules (free molecules+hydrates) is solved numerically and therefore the equilibrium constants of hydrate formation are not needed. Hydrate formation often has a significant effect on energetics of nucleation in the acid–water systems and the extended hydrates interaction model represents a definite improvement over the older hydrates interaction model.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    ISSN: 1365-2486
    Source: Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005
    Topics: Biology , Energy, Environment Protection, Nuclear Power Engineering , Geography
    Notes: The timing of the commencement of photosynthesis (P*) in spring is an important determinant of growing-season length and thus of the productivity of boreal forests. Although controlled experiments have shed light on environmental mechanisms triggering release from photoinhibition after winter, quantitative research for trees growing naturally in the field is scarce. In this study, we investigated the environmental cues initiating the spring recovery of boreal coniferous forest ecosystems under field conditions. We used meteorological data and above-canopy eddy covariance measurements of the net ecosystem CO2 exchange (NEE) from five field stations located in northern and southern Finland, northern and southern Sweden, and central Siberia. The within- and intersite variability for P* was large, 30–60 days. Of the different climate variables examined, air temperature emerged as the best predictor for P* in spring. We also found that ‘soil thaw’, defined as the time when near-surface soil temperature rapidly increases above 0°C, is not a useful criterion for P*. In one case, photosynthesis commenced 1.5 months before soil temperatures increased significantly above 0°C. At most sites, we were able to determine a threshold for air-temperature-related variables, the exceeding of which was required for P*. A 5-day running-average temperature (T5) produced the best predictions, but a developmental-stage model (S) utilizing a modified temperature sum concept also worked well. But for both T5 and S, the threshold values varied from site to site, perhaps reflecting genetic differences among the stands or climate-induced differences in the physiological state of trees in late winter/early spring. Only at the warmest site, in southern Sweden, could we obtain no threshold values for T5 or S that could predict P* reliably. This suggests that although air temperature appears to be a good predictor for P* at high latitudes, there may be no unifying ecophysiological relationship applicable across the entire boreal zone.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    [s.l.] : Nature Publishing Group
    Nature 422 (2003), S. 134-134 
    ISSN: 1476-4687
    Source: Nature Archives 1869 - 2009
    Topics: Biology , Chemistry and Pharmacology , Medicine , Natural Sciences in General , Physics
    Notes: [Auszug] Nitrogen oxides are trace gases that critically affect atmospheric chemistry and aerosol formation. Vegetation is usually regarded as a sink for these gases, although nitric oxide and nitrogen dioxide have been detected as natural emissions from plants. Here we use in situ measurements to show ...
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Boundary layer meteorology 91 (1999), S. 259-280 
    ISSN: 1573-1472
    Keywords: Turbulent fluxes ; Filtering ; Linear detrending ; Eddy covariance method
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Geosciences , Physics
    Notes: Abstract The application of autoregressive running mean filtering (RMF) and linear detrending (LDT) in the estimation of turbulent fluxes by the eddy covariance method is analysed. The systematic, as well as the random, errors of the fluxes arising from filtering and/or limited observation time effects are described. To observe negligible systematic errors in fluxes, the RMF has to be applied with moderately long time constants. However, the obtained flux values are subject to increased random errors during periods of non-stationarity and the method leads to systematic overestimation of variances. These shortcomings are not inherent in the LDT approach, which is recommended for use. But the systematic errors of fluxes due to LDT are not negligible under certain experimental conditions and have to be accounted for. The corrections are important because the relatively small errors in short-period fluxes can translate to significant errors in long-period averages. The corrections depend on the turbulence time scales, which should be preferably estimated as ensemble mean variables for a particular site.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    facet.materialart.
    Unknown
    PANGAEA
    In:  Supplement to: Korrensalo, Aino; Alekseychik, Pavel; Hájek, Tomas; Rinne, Janne; Vesala, Timo; Mehtätalo, Lauri; Mammarella, Ivan; Tuittila, Eeva-Stiina (2017): Species-specific temporal variation in photosynthesis as a moderator of peatland carbon sequestration. Biogeosciences, 14(2), 257-269, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-257-2017
    Publication Date: 2023-01-13
    Description: In boreal bogs plant species are low in number, but they differ greatly in their growth forms and photosynthetic properties. We assessed how ecosystem carbon (C) sink dynamics were affected by seasonal variations in photosynthetic rate and leaf area of different species. Photosynthetic properties (light-response parameters), leaf area development and areal cover (abundance) of the species were used to quantify species-specific net and gross photosynthesis rates (PN and PG, respectively), which were summed to express ecosystem-level PN and PG. The ecosystem-level PG was compared with a gross primary production (GPP) estimate derived from eddy covariance measurements (EC). Species areal cover rather than differences in photosynthetic properties determined the species with the highest PG of both vascular plants and Sphagna. Species-specific contributions to the ecosystem PG varied over the growing season, which in turn determined the seasonal variation in ecosystem PG. The upscaled growing-season PG estimate, 230 g C/m**2, agreed well with the GPP estimated by the EC, 243 g C/m**2. Sphagna were superior to vascular plants in ecosystem-level PG throughout the growing season but had a lower PN. PN results indicated that areal cover of the species together with their differences in photosynthetic parameters shape the ecosystem-level C balance. Species with low areal cover but high photosynthetic efficiency appear to be potentially important for the ecosystem C sink. Results imply that functional diversity may increase the stability of C sink of boreal bogs.
    Keywords: DATE/TIME; Day of the year; Finland; Gross primary production of carbon dioxide; Leaf area index; South_Finland; Water table level
    Type: Dataset
    Format: text/tab-separated-values, 2253 data points
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    Publication Date: 2021-02-08
    Description: For the past decade, observations of carbonyl sulfide (OCS or COS) have been investigated as a proxy for carbon uptake by plants. OCS is destroyed by enzymes that interact with CO2 during photosynthesis, namely carbonic anhydrase (CA) and RuBisCO, where CA is the more important one. The majority of sources of OCS to the atmosphere are geographically separated from this large plant sink, whereas the sources and sinks of CO2 are co-located in ecosystems. The drawdown of OCS can therefore be related to the uptake of CO2 without the added complication of co-located emissions comparable in magnitude. Here we review the state of our understanding of the global OCS cycle and its applications to ecosystem carbon cycle science. OCS uptake is correlated well to plant carbon uptake, especially at the regional scale. OCS can be used in conjunction with other independent measures of ecosystem function, like solar-induced fluorescence and carbon and water isotope studies. More work needs to be done to generate global coverage for OCS observations and to link this powerful atmospheric tracer to systems where fundamental questions concerning the carbon and water cycle remain.
    Type: Article , PeerReviewed
    Format: text
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    Publication Date: 2018-12-17
    Description: Current climate models disagree on how much carbon dioxide land ecosystems take up for photosynthesis. Tracking the stronger carbonyl sulfide signal could help.
    Type: Article , PeerReviewed
    Format: text
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    Publication Date: 2021-12-13
    Description: Wetlands are one of the most significant natural sources of methane (CH4) to the atmosphere. They emit CH4 because decomposition of soil organic matter in waterlogged anoxic conditions produces CH4, in addition to carbon dioxide (CO2). Production of CH4 and how much of it escapes to the atmosphere depend on a multitude of environmental drivers. Models simulating the processes leading to CH4 emissions are thus needed for upscaling observations to estimate present CH4 emissions and for producing scenarios of future atmospheric CH4 concentrations. Aiming at a CH4 model that can be added to models describing peatland carbon cycling, we composed a model called HIMMELI that describes CH4 build-up in and emissions from peatland soils. It is not a full peatland carbon cycle model but it requires the rate of anoxic soil respiration as input. Driven by soil temperature, leaf area index (LAI) of aerenchymatous peatland vegetation, and water table depth (WTD), it simulates the concentrations and transport of CH4, CO2, and oxygen (O2) in a layered one-dimensional peat column. Here, we present the HIMMELI model structure and results of tests on the model sensitivity to the input data and to the description of the peat column (peat depth and layer thickness), and demonstrate that HIMMELI outputs realistic fluxes by comparing modeled and measured fluxes at two peatland sites. As HIMMELI describes only the CH4-related processes, not the full carbon cycle, our analysis revealed mechanisms and dependencies that may remain hidden when testing CH4 models connected to complete peatland carbon models, which is usually the case. Our results indicated that (1) the model is flexible and robust and thus suitable for different environments; (2) the simulated CH4 emissions largely depend on the prescribed rate of anoxic respiration; (3) the sensitivity of the total CH4 emission to other input variables is mainly mediated via the concentrations of dissolved gases, in particular, the O2 concentrations that affect the CH4 production and oxidation rates; (4) with given input respiration, the peat column description does not significantly affect the simulated CH4 emissions in this model version.
    Type: Article , PeerReviewed
    Format: text
    Format: archive
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...