GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    New York, NY :Springer New York,
    Keywords: Echolocation (Physiology). ; Electronic books.
    Description / Table of Contents: This book offers a conceptual overview of what is known about biosonar in bats and odontocetes. Written by bat and odontocetes experts, it provides a unique insight that will help improve our understanding of biosonar in both animal groups.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    Pages: 1 online resource (312 pages)
    Edition: 1st ed.
    ISBN: 9781461491460
    Series Statement: Springer Handbook of Auditory Research Series ; v.51
    DDC: 599.4
    Language: English
    Note: Intro -- Series Preface -- Preface 1992 -- Volume Preface -- Contents -- Contributors -- Chapter 1: Biosonar of Bats and Toothed Whales: An Overview -- 1.1 Why Bats and Toothed Whales Together? -- 1.2 An Overview of the Volume -- 1.3 Volume Dedication -- 1.4 Conclusions -- References -- Chapter 2: Sonar Signals of Bats and Toothed Whales -- 2.1 Introduction -- 2.2 Signal Production -- 2.2.1 Bats -- 2.2.2 Toothed Whales -- 2.3 Echoreception -- 2.3.1 Bats -- 2.3.2 Toothed Whales -- 2.4 Acoustic Structure of Echolocation Signals from Bats and Toothed Whales -- 2.4.1 Design of Sonar Signals -- 2.4.2 Contributions from the Laboratory and the Field -- 2.4.3 Echolocation Signals of Bats -- 2.4.4 Echolocation Signals of Toothed Whales -- 2.5 Patterns of Call Production -- 2.5.1 Duty Cycle -- 2.5.2 Feeding Buzzes -- 2.5.3 Adaptive Changes in Signal Structure -- 2.5.4 Time-Varying Gain Control -- 2.6 Challenges Faced and Solved -- 2.6.1 Clutter -- 2.6.2 Jamming Avoidance -- 2.6.3 Communication -- 2.6.4 Predator-Prey Interactions -- 2.7 Phylogeny and Diversification of Echolocation in Bats and Toothed Whales -- 2.8 Summary -- References -- Chapter 3: Production of Biosonar Signals: Structure and Form -- 3.1 Introduction -- 3.2 Signal Production in Dolphins -- 3.2.1 Site of the Sound Source -- 3.2.1.1 Propagation Through the Head of Dolphins -- 3.3 Signal Production in Bats -- 3.3.1 Respiratory Dynamics of Sonar Pulse Production -- 3.3.1.1 Timing of Sonar Pulses in Respiratory Cycle -- 3.3.1.2 Respiration and Sonar Pulse Intensity -- 3.3.2 Respiratory Muscle Specializations for Echolocation -- 3.3.3 Respiration, Wingbeat Cycle, and Sonar Pulse Emission -- 3.4 The Larynx -- 3.4.1 Anatomy -- 3.4.2 Innervation -- 3.4.3 Sensory Feedback -- 3.4.4 Vocal Membranes: The Laryngeal Sound Source -- 3.4.5 Laryngeal Control of Sonar Pulse Timing: The Laryngeal Gate. , 3.5 The Biosonar Signal in Dolphins -- 3.5.1 Wave Shapes and Frequency Spectra -- 3.5.2 Transmission Beam Pattern -- 3.5.3 Relationship Between Source Level and Center Frequency -- 3.5.4 Effects of Hearing Loss -- 3.6 Biosonar Signal of Bats -- 3.6.1 Achieving High Pulse Repetition Rates -- 3.6.2 Control of Fundamental Frequency -- 3.6.2.1 Long CF-FM Bats -- 3.6.2.2 FM Bats -- 3.6.3 Acoustic Filters of Laryngeal Sound -- 3.6.3.1 Vocal Tract Filters -- 3.6.3.2 Subglottal Filters -- 3.6.3.3 Beamforming of the Sonar Signal -- 3.7 Echolocation in Air with Clicks -- 3.7.1 Lingual Sonar Clicks -- 3.7.2 Syringeal Sonar Clicks -- 3.8 Conclusions -- References -- Chapter 4: Sound Intensities of Biosonar Signals from Bats and Toothed Whales -- 4.1 Introduction -- 4.2 Methodology -- 4.2.1 Transmission Loss -- 4.2.2 Acoustic Localization -- 4.2.2.1 Different Types of Arrays -- 4.2.2.2 Theory of Acoustic Localization -- 4.2.2.3 Precision in Source Localization -- 4.3 Metrics -- 4.4 Source Levels and Directionality from Bats and Toothed Whales -- 4.5 Modulation of the Source Level -- 4.5.1 The Sonar Equations -- 4.5.2 Modeling the Received Level from Echoes in Clutter -- 4.5.3 Automatic Gain Control -- 4.5.4 Acoustic Predator-Prey Interactions -- 4.6 Summary -- References -- Chapter 5: Hearing During Echolocation in Whales and Bats -- 5.1 Introduction -- 5.2 Hearing Sensation Level Changes -- 5.3 Auditory Evoked Potential Thresholds -- 5.4 Hearing Loud Signals and Quiet Returns -- 5.5 Neural Mechanisms for Hearing in Echolocating Bats -- 5.5.1 Self-Stimulation -- 5.5.2 Masking -- 5.6 Vocal Influence on Auditory Processing and Facilitation -- 5.7 Corollary Discharges and Efferent Influences on Auditory Processing -- 5.8 Echolocation and Passive Listening in Groups -- 5.9 Comparisons of Whale and Bat Hearing Measured During Echolocation -- 5.10 Summary -- References. , Chapter 6: Localization and Classification of Targets by Echolocating Bats and Dolphins -- 6.1 Introduction -- 6.1.1 Limitations on Comparisons Between Dolphins and Bats -- 6.2 Target Detection and the Operating Range of Echolocation in Relation to the Emission Patterns of Broadcast Signals -- 6.3 Perception of Target Range from Echo Delay -- 6.4 Distortions of Perception for Target Range by Flying Bats -- 6.5 Perception of Target Shape: Echo Spectra and Glint Delays -- 6.6 Summary -- References -- Chapter 7: On-Animal Methods for Studying Echolocation in Free-Ranging Animals -- 7.1 Introduction -- 7.2 Animal-Borne Devices for Studying Echolocation -- 7.2.1 Tags for Bats -- 7.2.2 Tags for Toothed Whales -- 7.2.3 Sound Acquisition -- 7.2.4 Nonacoustic Sensors -- 7.2.5 Impact of Tags -- 7.3 Exploring and Visualizing On-Animal Echolocation Data -- 7.3.1 Sensor Fusion -- 7.3.2 Event Detection -- 7.3.3 Visualization -- 7.3.4 Quantifying Tag Data from Echolocating Animals -- 7.3.4.1 Sound Source Parameters -- 7.3.4.2 Echo Parameters -- 7.4 Summary and Future Directions -- References -- Chapter 8: Analysis of Natural Scenes by Echolocation in Bats and Dolphins -- 8.1 Introduction -- 8.2 Characterizing Auditory Scenes of Echolocating Animals -- 8.2.1 Bats -- 8.2.2 Dolphins -- 8.3 Studies of Auditory Scene Analysis in Echolocating Animals -- 8.3.1 Bats -- 8.3.2 Dolphins -- 8.3.2.1 The Littoral Ocean (Noisy, Reverberant, and Cluttered) -- 8.3.2.2 Tracking Prey in the Presence of Conspecifics -- 8.4 Challenges and Future Direction for the Study of Auditory Scene Analysis in Bats and Dolphins -- References -- Chapter 9: Echolocation in Air and Water -- 9.1 Introduction -- 9.2 The Physical Framework of Operating Biosonars in Air and Water -- 9.2.1 Background -- 9.2.2 Source Levels and Acoustic Outputs -- 9.2.3 Directionality, Frequency, and Backscatter. , 9.2.4 Transmission Loss and Masking Noise -- 9.3 Methods for Studying Echolocation in the Wild -- 9.3.1 Historical Background -- 9.3.2 Bats -- 9.3.3 Toothed Whales -- 9.4 Echolocation in the Wild -- 9.4.1 Bat Echolocation in the Wild -- 9.4.2 Toothed Whale Echolocation in the Wild -- 9.4.3 A Case Study: Blainville's Beaked Whale -- 9.4.4 Other Species of Toothed Whales -- 9.5 Predator-Prey Interactions -- 9.5.1 Bats and Their Prey -- 9.5.2 Toothed Whales, Their Prey, and Predators -- 9.6 Summary: Comparison of Biosonars in Air and Water -- References.
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd
    Marine mammal science 11 (1995), S. 0 
    ISSN: 1748-7692
    Source: Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005
    Topics: Biology
    Notes: We studied the sounds of narwhals (Monodon monoceros) foraging in the open waters in Northwest Greenland. We used a linear, vertical array of three hydrophones (depth 10 m, 30 m, 100 m) with a fourth hydrophone (depth 30 m) about 20 m from the vertical array. A smaller fifth hydrophone (depth 2 m) allowed for registering frequencies up to 125 kHz (± 2 dB) when signals were recorded at 762 mm/set on an instrumentation tape recorder. Clicks were the prevalent signals, but we heard whistles occasionally. We separated the clicks into two classes: click trains that had rates of 3-10 clicks/sec and click bursts having rates of 110-150 clicks/sec. The spectra of train clicks had maximum amplitudes at 48 ± 10 kHz and a duration of 29 ± 6 psec. The spectra of burst clicks had maximum amplitudes at 19 ± 1 kHz and a duration of 40 ± 3 psec. By analogy with other dolphin species, narwhals presumably use the clicks for echolocation during orientation and for locating prey. The narwhal click patterns resemble those of insectivorous bats. Click trains might correspond to bat searching signals and click bursts to the bat's terminal “buzz”, emitted just before prey capture.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Journal of comparative physiology 181 (1997), S. 477-483 
    ISSN: 1432-1351
    Keywords: Key words Insects ; Bats ; Ears ; Evolution ; Neotropics
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Biology , Medicine
    Notes: Abstract Assuming that bat-detection is the primary function of moth ears, the ears of moths that are no longer exposed to bats should be deaf to echolocation call frequencies. To test this, we compared the auditory threshold curves of 7 species of Venezuelan day-flying moths (Notodontidae: Dioptinae) to those of 12 sympatric species of nocturnal moths (Notodontidae: Dudusinae, Noctuidae and Arctiidae). Whereas 2 dioptines (Josia turgida, Zunacetha annulata) revealed normal ears, 2 (J. radians, J. gopala) had reduced hearing at bat-specific frequencies (20–80 kHz) and the remaining 3 (Thirmida discinota, Polypoetes circumfumata and Xenorma cytheris) revealed pronounced to complete levels of high-frequency deafness. Although the bat-deaf ears of dioptines could function in other purposes (e.g., social communication), the poor sensitivities of these species even at their best frequencies suggest that these moths represent a state of advanced auditory degeneration brought about by their diurnal life history. The phylogeny of the Notodontidae further suggests that this deafness is a derived (apomorphic) condition and not a retention of a primitive (pleisiomorphic), insensitive state.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Journal of comparative physiology 162 (1988), S. 367-374 
    ISSN: 1432-1351
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Biology , Medicine
    Notes: Summary Temporal coding in the moth ear was inferred from the response of the auditory receptor to acoustic stimuli with different temporal characteristics. 1. Determinations of the threshold with different stimulus pulse durations showed that the moth ear behaves as an energy detector with a maximum time constant (the integration time) of 25 ms. Pulse durations beyond this value did not result in decreased thresholds (Fig. 1). 2. The synchronization to amplitude modulations was determined by stimulating the moth ear with amplitude modulated (AM) tones (carrier frequency: 40 kHz) and AM white noise presented as 450 ms pulses separated by pauses of similar length. The modulation depth was constant (100%) whereas the modulation frequency,f m, was varied. The maximumf m which the auditory receptors could follow was 200 Hz (P〈0.05) (Figs. 2, 3, 4). 3. The relatively broad tuning of the only receptor which was functional at the relevant stimulus intensities suggested that AM detection could only be based on temporal cues. This was confirmed by the results showing the same degree of synchronization independent of carrier. 4. A minimum time constant for the receptor was also determined by interrupting a 400 ms noise pulse by a gap (Figs. 5, 6). The threshold for gap detection of the moth ear was ca. 2 ms on a 2.5% significance level (one sided test). 5. The temporal acuity reported here seems to be fine enough to explain the temporal resolution suggested by behavioral results from other insect species. The results are discussed in relation to acoustic communication in insects as well as in relation to temporal resolution in vertebrates.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Journal of comparative physiology 170 (1992), S. 83-92 
    ISSN: 1432-1351
    Keywords: Bat ; Sonar ; Fm Sweep ; Ranging
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Biology , Medicine
    Notes: Summary Echolocating bats judge the distance to a target on basis of the delay between the emitted cry and the returning echo. In a phantom echo set-up it was investigated how changes in the time-frequency structure of synthetic echoes affect ranging accuracy of big brown bats, Eptesicus fuscus. A one channel phantom target simulator and a Y/N paradigm was used. Five Eptesicus fuscus were trained to discriminate between phantom targets with different virtual distances (delays). The phantom echo was stored in a memory and broadcast from a loudspeaker after a certain delay following the bat's triggering of the system via a trigger microphone. The ranging accuracy was compared using 5 different signals with equal energy as phantom echoes: a standard cry (a natural bat cry), two kinds of noise signals, a high pass, and a low pass filtered version of the standard cry. The standard cry was recorded from one of the bats while judging the distance to a real target. The duration was 1.1 ms, the first harmonic swept down from 55 to 25 kHz and there was energy also in the second and third harmonic. Both noise signals had the same duration, power spectrum, and energy as the standard cry. One noise signal was stored in a memory and hence was exactly the same each time the bat triggered the system. The other variable noise signal was produced by storing the envelope of the standard cry and multiplying on-line with band pass filtered noise. The time-frequency structure (e.g. rise time) of this noise signal changed from triggering to triggering. The filtered signals were produced by either 40 kHz high pass or 40 kHz low pass filtering of the standard cry. The range difference thresholds for the 5 bats were around 1–2 cm (51–119 us) using the standard cry as echo. The range difference threshold with both noise signals was 7–8 cm (around 450 μs delay difference). The 40 kHz high pass filtered cry increased the threshold to approximately twice the threshold with the standard cry. With the 40 kHz low pass filtered cry the threshold was increased 2.5–3 times relative to the threshold with the standard cry. A single bat was tested with a signal filtered with a 55 kHz low pass filter leaving the whole first harmonic. The threshold was the same as that with the standard signal. The reduced ranging accuracy with the filtered signals indicates that the full band width of the first harmonic is utilised for ranging by the bats. The substantial reduction in accuracy with the noise signals indicates that not only the full band width but also the orderly time-frequency structure (the FM sweep) of the cry is important for ranging in echolocating bats.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Journal of comparative physiology 161 (1987), S. 267-274 
    ISSN: 1432-1351
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Biology , Medicine
    Notes: Summary The echolocation and hunting behavior ofPipistrellus kuhli was studied in the field using multi-exposure photography synchronized with high-speed tape recordings. During the search phase, the bats used 8–12 ms signals with sweeps (sweep width 3–6 kHz) and pulse intervals near 100 ms or less often near 200 ms (Figs. 1 and 2). The bats seemed to have individual terminal frequencies that could lie between 35 and 40 kHz. The duty cycle of searching signals was about 8%. The flight speed of hunting bats was between 4.0 and 4.5 m/s. The bats reacted to insect prey at distances of about 70 to 120 cm. Given the flight speed, the detection distance was estimated to about 110 to 160 cm. Following detection the bat went into the approach phase where the FM sweep steepened (to about 60 kHz bandwidth) and the repetition rate increased (to about 30 Hz). The terminal phase or ‘buzz’, which indicates prey capture (or attempted capture), was composed of two sections. The first section contained signals similar to those in the approach phase except that the pulse duration decreased and the repetition rate increased. The second section was characterized by a sharp drop in the terminal frequency (to about 20 kHz) and by very short pulses (0.3 ms) at rates of up to 200 Hz (Figs. 1 and 3). Near the beginning of the buzz the bat prepared for capturing the prey by extending the wings and forming a tail pouch (Fig. 4). A pause of about 100 ms in sound emission after the buzz indicated a successful capture (Fig. 4). Pulse duration is discussed in relation to glint detection and detection distance. It is argued that the minimum detection distance can be estimated from the pulse duration as the distance where pulse-echo overlap is avoided.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Journal of comparative physiology 156 (1985), S. 831-843 
    ISSN: 1432-1351
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Biology , Medicine
    Notes: Summary 1. Many arctiid and ctenuchid moths produce clicking sounds in response to the ultrasonic cries of bats. Clicks were recorded from the two arctiid moth speciesArctia caja, the garden tiger, andPhragmatobia fuliginosa, the ruby tiger. The threshold for eliciting clicks was around 60 to 75 dB pe SPL in both species.A. caja produced single clicks, andP. fuliginosa bursts of clicks. The maximum intensity of the clicks was 90 to 94 dB pe SPL at 5 cm forA. caja and 85 dB pe SPL at 5 cm forP. fuliginosa. The clicks contain most energy in the frequency range from 40 to 80 kHz (Figs. 2, 3). 2. Pipistrelle bats (Pipistrellus pipistrellus) were trained to sit on a platform and discriminate the difference in range,Δd, to two targets. The minimum Δd the bats could discriminate with more than 75% success rate was 1.5 cm. 3. The targets had built-in electrostatic loudspeakers through which different sounds could be played back to the bat. Playback of arctiid moth clicks from both targets did not disturb the bat's discrimination accuracy. The success rate did not decrease at anyΔd, and the minimumΔ d in the presence of clicks was 1 cm. 4. The clicks played from both loudspeakers did not influence the acoustic behavior or discrimination behavior of the bats in any obvious way. In all trials the bats went through a period with long (3 ms) slowly repeated (12–15 pulses/s) cries, a period with shorter cries and increased PRR (20 pulses/s) in which the decision seemed to be made, and finally a period with very short cries (0.5 ms) repeated at rates of up to 150 pulses/s (Figs. 4 and 5). The cries were FM sweeps from 120 kHz to 55 kHz with a second harmonic, which was strongest in the short cries. 5. The bats' response to the playback of different sounds, such as noise and recorded bat cries, from either the left or right loudspeaker, suggested that the bats reacted to clicks as if they were noise. The playback of sounds from only one speaker at a time decreased the bats' success rate, since the bats were attracted to the sounds (Figs. 6 and 7). 6. A secretion from the cervical glands ofA. caja, which contains choline ester, was given to a bat if it crawled towards a clicking target. Both bats tested in this way learned to associate the clicks with a noxious reward and avoided the clicks after just one or two trials (Fig. 8). 7. These results suggest that the function of the garden tiger and ruby tiger clicks in nature is to warn the bat of the moth's distastefulness, and not to ‘jam’ the bat's sonar system.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Journal of comparative physiology 165 (1989), S. 119-124 
    ISSN: 1432-1351
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Biology , Medicine
    Notes: Summary Two big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) were trained to report the presence or absence of a virtual sonar target. The bats' sensitivity to transient masking was investigated by adding 5 ms pulses of white noise delayed from 0 to 16 ms relative to the target echo. When signal and masker occurred simultaneously, the bats required a signal energy to noise spectrum level ratio of 35 dB for 50% probability of detection. When the masker was delayed by 2 ms or more there was no significant masking and echo energy could be reduced by 30 dB for the same probability of detection. The average duration of the most energetic sonar signal of each trial was measured to be 1.7 ms and 2.4 ms for the two bats, but a simple relation between detection performance and pulse duration was not found. In a different experiment the masking noise pulses coincided with the echo, and the duration of the masker was varied from 2 to 37.5 ms. The duration of the masker had little or no effect on the probability of detection. The findings are consistent with an aural integration time constant of about 2 ms, which is comparable to the duration of the cries. This is an order of magnitude less than found in backward masking experiments with humans and may be an adaptation to the special constraints of echolocation. The short time of sensitivity to masking may indicate that the broad band clicks of arctiid moths produced as a countermeasure to bat predation are unlikely to function by masking the echo of the moth.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Journal of comparative physiology 159 (1986), S. 267-273 
    ISSN: 1432-1351
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Biology , Medicine
    Notes: Summary MaleThecophora fovea (Tr.) (Noctuidae) ‘sing’ continuously for several minutes by rubbing the 1. tarsal segment of the metathoracic leg against a stridulatory swelling on the hindwing. In Northern Yugoslavia (Slovenia) the males emerge in late October and start stridulating about a week later when the females emerge. The sounds are pulse trains consisting of 10–12 ms long sound pulses with main energy around 32 kHz and a PRR of 20 pulses/s. The mechanics of the sound producing apparatus was studied by activating the stridulatory swelling with short sound impulses. The impulse response of the swelling was recorded by laser vibrometry and amplitude spectra of the vibrations showed maximum velocities between 25 and 35 kHz. Hence, it seems likely that the stridulatory swelling is driven as a mechanical oscillator with a resonance frequency which determines the carrier frequency of the sounds. Audiograms of both males and females showed peak sensitivities at 25–30 kHz. The median threshold at the BF was 36 dB SPL. The peak intensity of the sound pulses was 83 dB SPL at 1 m, which should enable the moths to hear each other at distances of around 30 m. Therefore sound production inT. fovea might function in long distance calling. It is argued thatT. fovea can survive making such a noise in spite of being palatable to bats because it flies so late in the year that it is temporally isolated from bats.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Naturwissenschaften 84 (1997), S. 356-359 
    ISSN: 1432-1904
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Biology , Chemistry and Pharmacology , Natural Sciences in General
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...