Summary
Temporal coding in the moth ear was inferred from the response of the auditory receptor to acoustic stimuli with different temporal characteristics.
-
1.
Determinations of the threshold with different stimulus pulse durations showed that the moth ear behaves as an energy detector with a maximum time constant (the integration time) of 25 ms. Pulse durations beyond this value did not result in decreased thresholds (Fig. 1).
-
2.
The synchronization to amplitude modulations was determined by stimulating the moth ear with amplitude modulated (AM) tones (carrier frequency: 40 kHz) and AM white noise presented as 450 ms pulses separated by pauses of similar length. The modulation depth was constant (100%) whereas the modulation frequency,f m, was varied. The maximumf m which the auditory receptors could follow was 200 Hz (P<0.05) (Figs. 2, 3, 4).
-
3.
The relatively broad tuning of the only receptor which was functional at the relevant stimulus intensities suggested that AM detection could only be based on temporal cues. This was confirmed by the results showing the same degree of synchronization independent of carrier.
-
4.
A minimum time constant for the receptor was also determined by interrupting a 400 ms noise pulse by a gap (Figs. 5, 6). The threshold for gap detection of the moth ear was ca. 2 ms on a 2.5% significance level (one sided test).
-
5.
The temporal acuity reported here seems to be fine enough to explain the temporal resolution suggested by behavioral results from other insect species. The results are discussed in relation to acoustic communication in insects as well as in relation to temporal resolution in vertebrates.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- AM :
-
amplitude modulated
- SL :
-
sensory level
- PST :
-
poststimulus time
- f c :
-
carrier frequency
- f cm :
-
modulation frequency
References
Dooling RJ, Searcy MH (1981) Amplitude modulation thresholds for the parakeet (Melopsittacus undulatus). J Comp Physiol 143:383–388
Fay RR (1985) Temporal processing by the auditory system of fishes. In: Michelsen A (ed) Time resolution in auditory systems. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 28–57
Fitzgibbon PJ (1984) Temporal gap resolution in narrow-band noises with center frequencies from 6000–14000 Hz. J Acoust Soc Am 75:552–557
Green DM (1985) Temporal factors in psychoacoustics. In: Michelsen A (ed) Time resolution in auditory systems. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 122–140
Goldberg JM, Brown PB (1969) Response to binaural neurons of dog superior olivary complex to dichotic tonal stimuli: some physiological mechanisms of sound localization. J Neurophysiol 32:613–636
Hartmann W (1979) Detection of amplitude modulation. J Acoust Soc Am 65:S59
Heiversen D von (1972) Gesang des Männchens und Lautschema des Weibchens bei der FeldheuschreckeChorthippus biguttulus (Orthoptera, Acrididae). J Comp Physiol 81:381–422
Heiversen D von, Heiversen O von (1983) Species recognition and acoustic localization in acridid grasshoppers: a behavioral approach. In: Huber F, Markl H (eds) Neuroethology and behavioral physiology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 94–107
Hillery CM, Narins PM (1987) Frequency and time domain comparison of low-frequency auditory fiber responses in two anuran amphibians. Hearing Res 25:233–248
Hutchings M, Lewis B (1984) The role of two-tone suppression in song coding by ventral cord neurones in the cricketTeleogryllus oceanicus (Le Guillou). J Comp Physiol A 154:103–112
Latimer W, Lewis DB (1986) Song harmonic content as a parameter determining acoustic orientation behavior in the cricketTeleogryllus oceanicus (Le Guillou). J Comp Physiol A 158:583–591
Mardia KV (1972) Statistics of directional data. Academic Press, London New York, pp 132–137
Michelsen A (1979) Insect ears as mechanical systems. Am Sci 67:696–706
Michelsen A, Larsen ON, Surlykke A (1985) Auditory processing of temporal cues in insect songs: frequency domain or time domain? In: Michelsen A (ed) Time resolution in auditory systems. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 3–27
Penner MJ (1977) Detection of temporal gaps in noise as measure of the decay of auditory sensation. J Acoust Soc Am 61:552–557
Roeder KD (1974) Acoustic sensory responses and possible bat-evasion tactics of certain moths. Proc Can Soc Zool Annu Meet: 71–78
Ronacher B, Römer H (1985) Spike synchronization of tympanic receptor fibres in a grasshopper (Chorthippus biguttulus L., Acrididae). A possible mechanism for detection of short gaps in model songs. J Comp Physiol A 157:631–642
Schildberger K (1984) Temporal selectivity of identified auditory neurons in the cricket brain. J Comp Physiol A 155:171–185
Shailer MJ, Moore CJ (1983) Gap detection as a function of frequency, bandwidth, and level. J Acoust Soc Am 74:467–473
Surlykke A (1984) Hearing in notodontid moths: a tympanic organ with a single auditory neurone. J Exp Biol 113:323–335
Surlykke A, Miller LA (1982) Central branchings of three sensory axons from a moth ear (Agrotis segetum, Noctuidae). J Insect Physiol 28:357–364
Viemeister NF (1979) Temporal modulation transfer functions based upon modulation thresholds. J Acoust Soc Am 66:1364–1380
Yager DD, Hoy RR (1986) The cyclopean ear: a new sense for the praying mantis. Science 231:727–729
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Surlykke, A., Larsen, O.N. & Michelsen, A. Temporal coding in the auditory receptor of the moth ear. J. Comp. Physiol. 162, 367–374 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00606123
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00606123