GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Book
    Book
    New York, NY : The Geological Society of America
    Type of Medium: Book
    Pages: X, 97 S , Ill., graph. Darst., Kt , 4 Kt.-Beil.
    Edition: Reprinted
    Series Statement: Memoir / The Geological Society of America 64
    Language: English
    Note: Literaturverz. S. 87 - 91. -
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    ISSN: 1420-9136
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Geosciences , Physics
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    facet.materialart.
    Unknown
    American Institute of Physics
    In:  Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 78 (4). pp. 1348-1355.
    Publication Date: 2020-07-16
    Description: Additional data from sonobuoys and the Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP) justify separating sound‐velocity‐depth functions and velocity gradients (in the first layer of soft marine sediments) into some geographic areas and sediment types. Based on sonobuoy and core measurements (where V is sound velocity in km/s, and h is depth in sediments in km), the following data are obtained: continental shelf basins off Sumatra and Java—V=1.484+0.710h−0.085h2; U. S. Atlantic continental rise—V=1.513+0.828h−0.138h2; deep‐sea terrigenous sediments—V=1.519+1.227h−0.473h2; and siliceous sediments of the Bering Sea— V=1.509+0.869h−0.267h2. Selected DSDP data (through leg 74) in similar areas yield: continental terrace silt–clays—V=1.505+0.712h; deep‐sea terrigenous sediments—V=1.510+1.019h; and deep‐sea siliceous sediments—V=1.533+0.761h. Computed velocity gradients from sonobuoy measurements are generally supported by the DSDP gradients. Only DSDP data give the following: hemipelagic sediments—V=1.501+1.151h; deep‐sea calcareous sediments—V=1.541+0.928h; and deep‐sea pelagic clay—V=1.526+1.046h. Where fast sediment accumulation occurs, there has not been enough time to reduce sediment pore spaces under overburden pressure; areas of slow accumulation may have relatively high sediment structural strength. Both cases have lower velocity gradients because higher porosities and consequent lower velocities persist to deeper depths.
    Type: Article , PeerReviewed
    Format: text
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    facet.materialart.
    Unknown
    American Institute of Physics
    In:  Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 63 (2). pp. 366-377.
    Publication Date: 2020-07-16
    Description: In studies in underwater acoustics,geophysics, and geology, the relations between soundvelocity and density allow assignment of approximate values of density to sediment and rock layers of the earth’s crust and mantle, given a seismicmeasurement of velocity. In the past, single curves of velocity versus density represented all sediment and rock types. A large amount of recent data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP), and reflection and refraction measurements of soundvelocity, allow construction of separate velocity–density curves for the principal marine sediment and rock types. The paper uses carefully selected data from laboratory and i n s i t umeasurements to present empirical sound velocity–density relations (in the form of regression curves and equations) in terrigenous silt clays, turbidites, and shale, in calcareous materials (sediments, chalk, and limestone), and in siliceous materials (sediments, porcelanite, and chert); a published curve for DSDP basalts is included. Speculative curves are presented for composite sections of basalt and sediments. These velocity–density relations, with seismicmeasurements of velocity, should be useful in assigning approximate densities to sea‐floor sediment and rock layers for studies in marine geophysics, and in forming geoacoustic models of the sea floor for underwater acoustic studies.
    Type: Article , PeerReviewed
    Format: text
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    facet.materialart.
    Unknown
    AGU (American Geophysical Union)
    In:  Journal of Geophysical Research, 76 (2). pp. 579-604.
    Publication Date: 2016-03-07
    Description: This report includes discussions of elastic and viscoelastic models for water-saturated porous media, and measurements and computations of elastic constants including compressibility, incompressibility (bulk modulus), rigidity (shear modulus), Lamé's constant, Poisson's ratio, density, and compressional- and shear-wave velocity. The sediments involved are from three major physiographic provinces in the North Pacific and adjacent areas: continental terrace (shelf and slope), abyssal plain (turbidite), and abyssal hill (pelagic). It is concluded that for small stresses (such as from a sound wave), water-saturated sediments respond elastically, and that the elastic equations of the Hookean model can be used to compute unmeasured elastic constants. However, to account for wave attenuation, the favored model is ‘nearly elastic,’ or linear viscoelastic. In this model the rigidity modulus μ and Lamé's constant λ in the equations of elasticity, are replaced by complex Lamé constants (μ + iμ′) and (λ + iλ′), which are independent of frequency; μ and λ represent elastic response (as in the Hookean model), and iμ′ and iλ′ represent damping of wave energy. This model implies that wave velocities and the specific dissipation function 1/Q are independent of frequency, and attenuation in decibels per unit length varies linearly with frequency in the range from a few hertz to the megahertz range. The components of the water-mineral system bulk modulus are porosity, the bulk modulus of pore water, an aggregate bulk modulus of mineral grains, and a bulk modulus of the structure, or frame, formed by the mineral grains. Good values of these components are available in the literature, except for the frame bulk modulus. A relationship between porosity and dynamic frame bulk modulus was established that allowed computation of a system bulk modulus that was used with measured values of density and compressional-wave velocity to compute other elastic constants. Some average laboratory values for common sediment types are given. The underlying methods of computation should apply to any water-saturated sediment. If this is so, values given in this paper predict elastic constants for the major sediment types.
    Type: Article , PeerReviewed
    Format: text
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    facet.materialart.
    Unknown
    American Institute of Physics
    In:  Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 66 (4). pp. 1093-1101.
    Publication Date: 2020-07-16
    Description: The ratio of compressional wavevelocityV p to shear wavevelocityV s , and Poisson’s ratio in marine sediments and rocks are important in modeling the sea floor for underwater acoustics,geophysics, and foundation engineering. V p and V s versus depth information was linked at common depths in terrigenous sediments (to 1000 m) and in sands (to 20 m) to yield data on V p vs V s , and V p /V s and Poisson’s ratios versus depth. Soft, terrigenous sediments usually grade with depth into mudstones and shales; V p /V s ratios vary from about 13 or more at the sea floor to about 2.6 at 1000 m. Poisson’s ratios vary from above 0.49 at the sea floor to about 0.41 at 1000 m. In sands, V p , V s , and V p /V s have very high gradients in the first few meters; below about 5 m, V p /V s ratios decrease from about 9 to about 6 at 20 m; Poisson’s ratios vary from above 0.49 at the surface to above 0.48 at 20 m. The mean value of V p /V s in 30 laboratory samples of chalk and limestone is 1.90 (standard error: 0.03); mean Poisson’s ratio is 0.31. Literature data on basalts from the sea floor are reviewed. Equations relating V p to V s are given for terrigenous sediments, sands, and basalts.
    Type: Article , PeerReviewed
    Format: text
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    facet.materialart.
    Unknown
    AGU (American Geophysical Union)
    In:  Journal of Geophysical Research, 76 (2). pp. 579-604.
    Publication Date: 2020-11-25
    Description: This report includes discussions of elastic and viscoelastic models for water‐saturated porous media, and measurements and computations of elastic constants including compressibility, incompressibility (bulk modulus), rigidity (shear modulus), Lamé's constant, Poisson's ratio, density, and compressional‐ and shear‐wave velocity. The sediments involved are from three major physiographic provinces in the North Pacific and adjacent areas: continental terrace (shelf and slope), abyssal plain (turbidite), and abyssal hill (pelagic). It is concluded that for small stresses (such as from a sound wave), water‐saturated sediments respond elastically, and that the elastic equations of the Hookean model can be used to compute unmeasured elastic constants. However, to account for wave attenuation, the favored model is ‘nearly elastic,’ or linear viscoelastic. In this model the rigidity modulus μ and Lamé's constant λ in the equations of elasticity, are replaced by complex Lamé constants (μ + iμ′) and (λ + iλ′), which are independent of frequency; μ and λ represent elastic response (as in the Hookean model), and iμ′ and iλ′ represent damping of wave energy. This model implies that wave velocities and the specific dissipation function 1/Q are independent of frequency, and attenuation in decibels per unit length varies linearly with frequency in the range from a few hertz to the megahertz range. The components of the water‐mineral system bulk modulus are porosity, the bulk modulus of pore water, an aggregate bulk modulus of mineral grains, and a bulk modulus of the structure, or frame, formed by the mineral grains. Good values of these components are available in the literature, except for the frame bulk modulus. A relationship between porosity and dynamic frame bulk modulus was established that allowed computation of a system bulk modulus that was used with measured values of density and compressional‐wave velocity to compute other elastic constants. Some average laboratory values for common sediment types are given. The underlying methods of computation should apply to any water‐saturated sediment. If this is so, values given in this paper predict elastic constants for the major sediment types.
    Type: Article , PeerReviewed
    Format: text
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...