Description: Algal pigment concentrations were retrieved from ocean samples, during the whole MOSAiC expedition (Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate) in 2019 to 2020. During MOSAiC, RV Polarstern anchored into an ice floe to gain new insights into Arctic climate over a full annual cycle. Ocean data were collected starting with the onset of the study, at 85 degrees north and 137 degrees east, following the drift towards the Fram Strait, and returning to the North Pole in the last leg of the expedition. Ocean samples were collected with a CTD, either from the ship, or from the ice floe in Ocean City (Rabe et al. 2022). Altogether 216 samples have been collected and analysed. After extraction in 90 % acetone, samples were analysed using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) on a Waters system. Algal pigments contain a multiple set of information. Firstly, pigment concentrations can show the presence of algal biomass in the various water masses sampled. Secondly, marker pigments can reveal seasonal and temporal dynamics in algal community structure, by discerning specific algal classes like diatoms, cryptophytes, haptophytes and chlorophytes that have specific roles in biogeochemical cycles. Thirdly, certain pigments are indicative of the (photo)-physiological state of micro-algae and fourth, degradation products of the main chlorophyll a pigment further give an indication about senescence and grazing in the various habitats.

Description: The Baltic Sea is a unique environment as the largest body of brackish water in the world. Acidification of the surface oceans due to absorption of anthropogenic CO2 emissions is an additional stressor facing the pelagic community of the already challenging Baltic Sea. To investigate its impact on trace gas biogeochemistry, a large-scale mesocosm experiment was performed off Tvärminne Research Station, Finland in summer 2012. During the second half of the experiment, dimethylsulphide (DMS) concentrations in the highest fCO2 mesocosms (1075-1333 µatm) were 34 % lower than at ambient CO2 (350 µatm). However the net production (as measured by concentration change) of seven halocarbons analysed was not significantly affected by even the highest CO2 levels after 5 weeks exposure. Methyl iodide (CH3I) and diiodomethane (CH2I2) showed 15 % and 57 % increases in mean mesocosm concentration (3.8 ± 0.6 pmol L-1 increasing to 4.3 ± 0.4 pmol L-1 and 87.4 ± 14.9 pmol L-1 increasing to 134.4 ± 24.1 pmol L-1 respectively) during Phase II of the experiment, which were unrelated to CO2 and corresponded to 30 % lower Chl-? concentrations compared to Phase I. No other iodocarbons increased or showed a peak, with mean chloroiodomethane (CH2ClI) concentrations measured at 5.3 (± 0.9) pmol L-1 and iodoethane (C2H5I) at 0.5 (± 0.1) pmol L-1. Of the concentrations of bromoform (CHBr3; mean 88.1 ± 13.2 pmol L-1), dibromomethane (CH2Br2; mean 5.3 ± 0.8 pmol L-1) and dibromochloromethane (CHBr2Cl, mean 3.0 ± 0.5 pmol L-1), only CH2Br2 showed a decrease of 17 % between Phases I and II, with CHBr3 and CHBr2Cl showing similar mean concentrations in both Phases. Outside the mesocosms, an upwelling event was responsible for bringing colder, high CO2, low pH water to the surface starting on day t16 of the experiment; this variable CO2 system with frequent upwelling events implies the community of the Baltic Sea is acclimated to regular significant declines in pH caused by up to 800 µatm fCO2. After this upwelling, DMS concentrations declined, but halocarbon concentrations remained similar or increased compared to measurements prior to the change in conditions. Based on our findings, with future acidification of Baltic Sea waters, biogenic halocarbon emissions are likely to remain at similar values to today, however emissions of biogenic sulphur could significantly decrease from this region.

Description: Melt ponds water sampling for biogeochemical parameters such as dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC), total alkalinity (TA), oxygen isotopes were examined from August to September 2020. To obtain discrete water samples from the melt ponds and leads, we checked the vertical structure and depth of the meltwater layer from the same hole used for the RINKO Profiler by attaching a conductivity sensor (Cond 315i, WTW GmbH, Germany) to a 2-m-long ruler and inserting the ruler into the lead water until the salinity measured with the Cond 315i increased at the meltwater–seawater interface (Nomura et al., 2024) . Water was pumped up with a peristaltic pump through a 2-m-long PTFE tube (L/S Pump Tubing, Masterflex, USA) at depths corresponding to meltwater (surface), the interface between meltwater and seawater (interface), and seawater (bottom). Salinity was measured at each depth by attaching a Cond 315i conductivity sensor to the bottom of the ruler. The tube intake was likewise attached to the bottom of the ruler. Seawater was subsampled into a 250-mL glass vial (Duran Co., Ltd., Germany) for measurement of dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) and total alkalinity (TA) and a 50-mL glass, screw-cap, narrow-neck vial (VWR international LLC, Germany) for measurement of the oxygen isotopic ratio (δ18O) of the water. Immediately after subsampling for measurement of DIC and TA, a 6.0% (wt.) mercuric chloride (HgCl2) solution (100 µL) was added to stop biological activity. Samples for DIC and TA were stored at +4°C on the R/V Polarstern. Samples for δ18O were stored at room temperature (20°C). During the discrete water sampling, the CO2 concentration in the water column was measured directly on site by passing the water through an equilibrator Liqui-Cel® (G542, S/N: 132462, 3M Company, USA) connected to an infrared gas analyzer (LI-8100A, LI-COR Inc., USA). The analyzer was calibrated with standard gases containing 0.0, 299.3, and 501.3 ppm CO2 before MOSAiC Leg 5. RMS (root means square) noise at 370 ppm with 1 sec signal averaging is 〈1 ppm (https://www.licor.com/env/products/soil-flux/LI-8100a). The equilibrator was connected in the loop for water sampling (vide supra), and a 2-m-long ruler was inserted into the water and kept at that depth until the CO2 was equilibrated with air (about 1 minute) by monitoring the CO2 values. The CO2 concentration was measured at each depth (i.e., surface, interface, and bottom). At the ROV lead sites, vertical CO2 measurements were made every 0.05 m for detailed profiles. The DIC of water was determined by coulometry (Johnson et al., 1985; Johnson, 1992) using a home-made CO2 extraction system (Ono et al., 1998) and a coulometer (CM5012, UIC, Inc., Binghamton, NY, USA). The TA of water was determined by titration (Dickson et al., 2007) using a TA analyzer (ATT-05, Kimoto Electric Co., Ltd., Japan). Both DIC and TA measurements were calibrated with reference seawater materials (Batch AR, AU, and AV; KANSO Technos Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan) traceable to the Certified Reference Material distributed by Prof. A. G. Dickson (Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, CA, USA). Oxygen isotope analyses were carried out at the ISOLAB Facility at AWI Potsdam (hdl:10013/sensor.ddc92f54-4c63-492d-81c7-696260694001) with mass spectrometers (DELTA-S Finnigan MAT, USA): hdl:10013/sensor.af148dea-fe65-4c87-9744-50dc4c81f7c9 and hdl:10013/sensor.62e86761-9fae-4f12-9c10-9b245028ea4c employing the equilibration method (details in Meyer et al., 2000). δ18O values were given in per mil (‰) vs. Vienna standard mean ocean water (V-SMOW) as the standard.