Description: Sulfate reduction could go through dissimilatory sulfate reduction and anaerobic methane oxidation couple with sulfate reduction (AOM-SR) with pyrite the end product. While AOM-SR is an important process in oxidizing methane and limiting methane entering the ocean, there is limited information available regarding pyrite formation and preservation under methane dominated environment. The purpose of this study is to report pyrite formation and preservation at a methane dominated environment, the YuanAn Ridge, where methane seeps have been observed, and to evaluate how would that differ from typical anoxic environment. Pore water methane, sulfate, dissolved sulfide, barium, and sediment pyrite, barium/Al ratio and organic carbon in sediments were analyzed from sediments collected by piston cores on board the R/V Ocean Researcher I (OR-I) from the study environment. The results showed methane flux is controlling pyrite formation in this methane dominated environment. Pyrite concentration is linearly correlated with methane flux with exceptions to shallower sulfate methane transition zone (SMTZ) sites where methane could have vent directly to the overlying water and contribute less to the pyrite formation. The more methane entering the SMTZ, the more pyrite formed and preserved in the sulfate methane transition zone sediments. Authigenic pyrite from dissimilatory sulfate reduction is a small fraction of the pyrite found in the methane dominant and low in organic carbon environment, with majority of pyrite derived from AOM-SR. Large spatial variations on rate of sulfate reduction, pyrite and methane concentrations were observed in the studied area sediments. Depth of sulfate methane transition zone varied between 1 and 14 m and is a log function of methane flux. Pore water sulfate profiles displayed three different types, linear, concave up and down, indicating methane flux have varied in time. Pyrite burial efficiency is high, approximately 50% of sulfate entering the SMTZ were preserved in sediments as pyrite. This efficiency of sulfate reduction through AOM-SR is much higher than pyrite formation from dissimilatory sulfate reduction in normal marine sediments. The AOM-SR and pyrite formation occurred at depth within the SMTZ favor a higher degree of pyrite preservation. Time require for the pyrite formation is about 4400 years in the YAR sediments, based on diffusion model calculation of barium sulfate precipitation.

Description: Supplies of conventional natural gas and oil are declining fast worldwide, and therefore new, unconventional forms of energy resources are needed to meet the ever-increasing demand. Amongst the many different unconventional natural resources are gas hydrates, a solid, ice-like crystalline compound of methane and water formed under specific low temperature and high pressure conditions. Gas hydrates are believed to exist in large quantities worldwide in oceanic regions of continental margins, as well as associated with permafrost regions in the Arctic. Some studies to estimate the global abundance of gas hydrate suggest that the total volume of natural gas locked up in form of gas hydrates may exceed all known conventional natural gas reserves, although large uncertainties exist in these assessments. Gas hydrates have been intensively studied in the last two decades also due to connections between climate forcing (natural and/or anthropogenic) and the potential large volumes of methane trapped in gas hydrate accumulations. The presence of gas hydrate within unconsolidated sediments of the upper few hundred meters below seafloor may also pose a geo-hazard to conventional oil and gas production. Additionally, climate variability and associated changes in pressure-temperature regimes and thus shifts in the gas hydrate stability zone may cause the occurrence of submarine slope failures. Several large-scale national gas hydrate programs exist especially in countries such as Japan, Korea, Taiwan, China, India, and New Zealand, where large demands of energy cannot be met by domestic supplies from natural resources. The past five years have seen several dedicated deep drilling expeditions and other scientific studies conducted throughout Asia and Oceania to understand gas hydrates off India, China, and Korea. This thematic set of publications is dedicated to summarize the most recent findings and results of geo-scientific studies of gas hydrates in the marginal seas and continental margin of the Asia, and Oceania region.

Description: The major processes that determine the distribution of methane (CH4) in anoxic marine sediments are methanogenesis and the anaerobic oxidation of methane (AOM), with organoclastic sulfate reduction exerting an important secondary control. However, the factors leading to the distribution of stable carbon isotopes (δ13C) of CH4 are currently poorly understood, in particular the commonly-observed minimum in δ13C-CH4 at the sulfate-methane transition (SMT) where AOM rates reach maximum values. Conventional isotope systematics predict 13C-enrichment of CH4 in the SMT due to preferential 12CH4 consumption by AOM. Two hypotheses put forward to explain this discrepancy are the addition of 12C-enriched CH4 to porewaters by methanogenesis in close proximity to AOM, and enzymatically-mediated carbon isotope equilibrium between forward and backward AOM at low concentrations of sulfate. To examine this in more detail, field data including δ13C of CH4 and dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) from the continental margin offshore southwestern Taiwan were simulated with a reaction-transport model. Model simulations showed that the minima in δ13C-CH4 and δ13C-DIC in the SMT could only be simulated with carbon isotope equilibrium during AOM. The potential for carbon cycling between methanogenesis and AOM in and just below the SMT was insignificant due to very low rates of methanogenesis. Backward AOM also gives rise to a pronounced kink in the δ13C-DIC profile several meters below the SMT that has been observed in previous studies. We suggest that this kink marks the true base of the SMT where forward and backward AOM are operating at very low rates, possibly sustained by cryptic sulfur cycling or barite dissolution.

Description: Highlights • The developed joint inversion quantifies both free gas and hydrate concentration. • The robust method uses sonic and conductivity logs as main input parameters. • For the test site it reveals two hydrate accumulations with very different characteristics. • The whole range of concentrations is shown that can explain the observed data. • The method is applicable to most continental margins when there is borehole control. Abstract Quantification of gas hydrates in marine sediments is crucial for understanding gas hydrate systems. By empirical relationships or effective medium modelling, gas hydrate concentrations can be derived from velocity and/or conductivity logs. However, these approaches do not take the co-occurrence of free gas and gas hydrate into account leading to large uncertainties in the calculated free gas and gas hydrate concentrations. To overcome this issue we adopt a joint elastic and electric self-consistent/differential effective medium model as the basis for a new joint inversion scheme that distinguishes between both phases. We apply this scheme to p-wave velocity and electric induction data measured by downhole-logging of boreholes at Formosa Ridge off Taiwan - a known hydrate province with an active gas conduit. Gaussian Mixture Modeling separates the background signal of the host medium from anomalies and allows to determine a background porosity as a probability density function of depth. We use this derived porosity to jointly invert electrical conductivity and velocity data for hydrate and free gas concentrations. At Formosa Ridge, we find two resistive anomalies, one in the shallow and another in the deep part of the borehole. Only the deep anomaly in conductivity coincides with a high-velocity anomaly. This is consistent with ∼30% hydrate with ∼1% free gas concentration. For the shallow anomaly, increased velocities due to hydrate concentrations of ∼15% are compensated by a decrease in velocity due to ∼1% of free gas. The method reconciles the different sensitivities of the two data types and yields hydrate and free gas concentrations that are largely consistent with geochemically derived values.