GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Oxford :Oxford University Press, Incorporated,
    Keywords: Mutualism (Biology). ; Electronic books.
    Description / Table of Contents: The first synthetic, conceptual overview of mutualism in more than 25 years, edited by the leading figure in the field, identifying the ecological and evolutionary features that unite and divide mutualisms and placing them in clear relation to other pairwise, interspecific interactions.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    Pages: 1 online resource (315 pages)
    Edition: 1st ed.
    ISBN: 9780191663192
    DDC: 577.8/52
    Language: English
    Note: Cover -- Contents -- Contributors -- Section 1 Introduction to Section 1 -- Judith L. Bronstein -- 1 The study of mutualism -- Judith L. Bronstein -- 1.1 Introduction -- 1.2 The semantics of mutualism -- 1.2.1 Classifying interactions -- 1.2.2 Defining mutualism -- 1.2.3 Categorizing mutualisms -- 1.2.4 Suggested terminological standards -- 1.3 A history of mutualism studies -- 1.3.1 Mutualism before 1850 -- 1.3.2 Mutualism and Darwinism -- 1.3.3 Mutualism in the nineteenth century: political and biological contexts -- 1.3.4 The waning (or flowering?) of mutualism studies -- 1.3.5 Mutualism coalesces as a research field -- 1.3.6 Conceptual synthesis and new themes -- 1.4 This volume, and beyond -- References -- 2 The special case of symbioses: mutualisms with persistent contact -- Angela E. Douglas -- 2.1 Introduction -- 2.2 Interactions between symbiotic partners -- 2.2.1 The services underpinning reciprocity -- 2.2.2 Byproduct mutualisms -- 2.2.3 Addiction in symbioses -- Box 2.1 The changing face of Wolbachia -- Gregory Hurst -- 2.3 The persistence of symbioses -- 2.3.1 Open and closed symbioses -- 2.3.2 The resilience of symbioses -- Box 2.2 The human microbiome -- John Rawls -- 2.4 Partner fidelity and its consequences -- Box 2.3 Genomic decay and bacterial-derived organelles -- John McCutcheon -- 2.5 Concluding comments -- References -- Section 2 Introduction to Section 2 -- Judith L. Bronstein -- 3 Evolutionary origins and diversification of mutualism -- George D. Weiblen and Erin L. Treiber -- 3.1 Webs in the tree of life -- 3.2 Investigating origin and diversification -- 3.2.1 The fossil record -- Box 3.1 The fossil record of mutualisms -- Peter Wilf and Conrad C. Labandeira -- 3.2.2 Phylogeny estimation -- 3.3 Origins of mutualism -- 3.3.1 Chance and opportunity -- 3.3.2 From antagonism to mutualism and back. , 3.4 Diversification of mutualism -- 3.4.1 Comparing relatives -- 3.4.2 Comparing partners -- Box 3.2 Phylogenetics in symbiology -- Jiri Hulcr -- 3.5 Innovation and adaptation -- 3.6 Conclusion -- Acknowledgments -- References -- 4 Evolutionary models of mutualism -- Erol Akçay -- 4.1 Introduction -- 4.2 Vertical transmission of symbioses -- Box 4.1 Adaptive dynamics -- Erol Akçay -- 4.3 Population structure and genetic associations -- 4.3.1 The Price equation -- 4.4 Modeling phenotypic feedbacks -- 4.5 Partner choice and beyond: economic theory of mutualism -- 4.5.1 Supply and demand: biological markets -- 4.5.2 The paradox of the market -- 4.5.3 Sanctions: partner choice in the legume-rhizobium symbiosis -- 4.5.4 Control, negotiation, and outside options in mutualisms -- 4.5.5 Screening -- 4.5.6 Economics and mutualisms: a bright future -- 4.6 Evolution and maintenance of diversity in mutualisms -- 4.7 Future directions -- 4.7.1 Integrating mechanisms and modeling approaches -- Box 4.2 Phenotypic feedbacks and multilevel selection in mutualisms -- Ellen Simms and Stephanie Porter -- 4.7.2 Context dependency -- 4.7.3 Alignment of evolutionary interests -- 4.7.4 Conclusion -- References -- 5 Evolution and genetics of mutualism -- Carina A. Baskett and Douglas W. Schemske -- 5.1 Introduction -- Box 5.1 The attine ant-fungus mutualism -- Ulrich G. Mueller -- 5.2 Natural selection in mutualisms -- 5.3 The genetics of mutualism evolution -- Box 5.2 The legume-rhizobia mutualism -- Maren L. Friesen -- 5.3.1 Advanced stages -- 5.3.2 Early stages -- 5.4 Emerging systems and tools -- 5.4.1 Moving beyond pollination -- 5.4.2 Genomic approaches -- Box 5.3 Bobtail squids light the way to study marine mutualisms -- Michele K. Nishiguchi -- 5.4.3 Experimental evolution -- 5.5 Future directions -- 5.5.1 Comparison to antagonisms -- 5.5.2 Speciation. , 5.5.3 The latitudinal diversity gradient -- 5.5.4 Anthropogenic environmental change -- 5.5.5 Conclusions -- Acknowledgments -- References -- 6 The exploitation of mutualisms -- Joel L. Sachs -- 6.1 Introduction -- 6.2 Empirical evidence for the exploitation of mutualisms -- 6.2.1 Pollination mutualisms -- 6.2.2 Legume-rhizobium symbiosis -- 6.2.3 Invertebrate-algal symbiosis -- 6.2.4 Phylogenetic analyses of mutualist lineages -- 6.2.5 Summary of empirical evidence -- 6.3 Theoretical predictions for the conditions that stabilize mutualism -- Box 6.1 Some ants sterilize their host plants, but are they "cheaters"? -- Megan E. Frederickson -- Box 6.2 Mechanisms and examples of cheating in cleaning mutualisms -- Redouan Bshary -- 6.4 A new paradox for mutualism? -- 6.5 Conclusion -- References -- 7 Coevolution in mutualisms -- Bruce Anderson -- 7.1 Introduction -- 7.2 A short history of coevolution -- 7.2.1 Geographic mosaic of coevolution -- 7.3 Demonstrating coevolution -- Box 7.1 Coevolutionary genomics -- Noah Whiteman -- 7.4 Coevolutionary patterns -- 7.4.1 Matching of traits -- 7.4.2 Mismatching of traits -- 7.4.3 Trait divergence between sites -- Box 7.2 When do trait mismatches coevolve? -- Scott L. Nuismer -- 7.4.4 Convergence of traits -- 7.4.5 Matching of phylogenies -- Box 7.3 Using phylogenetics to study coevolution -- Noah Whiteman -- 7.5 Conclusion -- Acknowledgments -- References -- Section 3 Introduction to Section 3 -- Judith L. Bronstein -- 8 Population ecology of mutualism -- J. Nathaniel Holland -- 8.1 Population ecology and interspecific interactions -- Box 8.1 Metapopulation ecology and mutualism -- Anna-Liisa Laine -- 8.2 Historic Lotka-Volterra theory -- Box 8.2 Population dynamics and phase-plane analysis of interspecific interactions -- Kevin McCann -- 8.3 Interspecific density dependence and saturating functional responses. , Box 8.3 Interaction strengths and mutualism -- J. Timothy Wootton -- 8.4 Contemporary theory for density dependence and population dynamics -- 8.4.1 Benefits and costs of mutualism -- 8.4.2 Consumer-resource interactions of mutualism -- 8.5 Empirical studies of density dependence and population dynamics -- 8.6 Conclusions -- References -- 9 Mutualism in a community context -- Todd M. Palmer, Elizabeth G. Pringle, Adrian Stier, and Robert D. Holt -- 9.1 Introduction -- Box 9.1 The community ecology of coral-algal mutualism -- Michael Stat -- 9.2 Complexity within mutualism -- 9.2.1 Maintenance of mutualist diversity -- 9.2.2 Consequences of diversity for mutualistic outcomes -- Box 9.2 How imperfect relationships with multiple, exploiting partners can lead to mutualistic success -- Daniel F. Doak -- 9.2.3 Approaches to studying complex mutualisms -- 9.3 How communities influence mutualisms -- 9.3.1 Mechanisms of third-party effects -- 9.3.2 How do we study the effects of third-party species? -- 9.4 How mutualisms affect communities -- 9.4.1 Effects of mutualisms on community diversity -- 9.4.2 Mutualism and species range limits -- Box 9.3 Mutualism alters competition: coexistence of mutualists and exploiters -- Charlotte T. Lee, Brian D. Inouye,and Tom E. X. Miller -- 9.4.3 Mutualism and community stability -- 9.5 Conclusions and future directions -- References -- 10 Context-dependent outcomes of mutualistic interactions -- Jason D. Hoeksema and Emilio M. Bruna -- 10.1 Introduction -- 10.2 Tools for studying context dependency of mutualisms -- 10.2.1 Mathematical, graphical, and conceptual models -- Box 10.1 Context dependency in defensive endosymbioses -- John Jaenike -- 10.2.2 Observational field studies -- Box 10.2 Elucidating context dependency in seed dispersal interactions -- Silvia B. Lomáscolo. , 10.2.3 Manipulative field and laboratory experiments -- 10.2.4 Meta-analyses -- 10.3 Eight big questions on context dependency in mutualisms -- 10.3.1 Question 1: What is the relative importance of multiple contextual factors for outcomes of mutualisms, and when do they interact to alter these outcomes? -- 10.3.2 Question 2: Which aspects of biotic context have the most substantial effects on outcomes of mutualisms? -- 10.3.3 Question 3: How do mutualisms shift along gradients of environmental productivity? -- 10.3.4 Question 4: How do mutualisms shift along gradients of diversity? -- 10.3.5 Question 5: Are mutualism outcomes density dependent, and if so, in what manner? -- 10.3.6 Question 6: Are patterns and consequences of context dependency typically similar for both partner species in mutualisms? -- Box 10.3 The importance of the combined host-symbiont (holobiont) perspective in studies of cnidarian-Symbiodinium mutualisms -- Tamar L. Goulet -- 10.3.7 Question 7: How important are "cryptic" benefits for outcomes of context-dependent mutualisms? -- 10.3.8 Question 8: How often do outcomes of mutualisms depend on G × E, G × G, and G × G × E interactions? -- 10.4 Concluding thoughts -- Acknowledgments -- References -- 11 Mutualistic networks -- Jordi Bascompte and Jens M. Olesen -- 11.1 A historical perspective on network thinking in mutualism -- 11.2 Rationale for a network approach to mutualism -- 11.2.1 The example of asymmetric specialization -- Box 11.1 Conservation and restoration implications of network studies -- Jason Tylianakis -- 11.3 Syndromes, modularity, and coevolutionary units -- Box 11.2 Definition and measure of modularity -- Roger Guimerà -- 11.4 Modularity and the basic building blocks of mutualistic networks -- 11.5 Phylogenetic signal of modularity -- 11.6 Types of modules -- 11.7 Species roles within modular networks. , 11.8 Conclusions.
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Oecologia 112 (1997), S. 379-385 
    ISSN: 1432-1939
    Keywords: Key wordsYucca ; Tegeticula ; Yucca moth ; Mutualism ; Seed predation
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Biology
    Notes: Abstract Mutualisms often involve significant costs for participants. Costs are inflicted by mutualists themselves, as well as by associated, non-mutualistic species. These costs are rarely quantified, however, particularly the ones extrinsic to the pairwise interaction. We compare costs inflicted by an obligate mutualist pollinator and two common exploiters of an Arizona yucca over a 2-year period. The magnitude of seed damage from seed and fruit-feeding beetle larvae (Carpophilus longus, Nitidulidae) was similar to damage from the seed-eating larvae of Yucca schottii's pollinator moth Tegeticula yuccasella (Prodoxidae), averaging about 15 seeds destroyed per fruit in each case. The two seed predators usually fed within the same fruits, although rarely side by side. In contrast, the presence of fruit-galling moth larvae (Prodoxusy-inversus, Prodoxidae) appeared to benefit the yucca: individual Tegeticula destroyed only half as many seeds in galled fruits as they did in ungalled fruits. We discuss three general implications of these results. Firstly, the costs of non-mutualists to the two mutualistic partners are not necessarily parallel. Secondly, measurable costs of non-mutualists do not necessarily translate into an impact on the success of the mutualism itself, because they may be incurred after mutualistic activities take place. Finally, the costs of mutualists to each other can differ substantially depending on the presence or absence of non-mutualistic species.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Entomologia experimentalis et applicata 87 (1998), S. 321-324 
    ISSN: 1570-7458
    Keywords: mutualism ; fig ; Agaonidae ; competition ; interference
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Biology
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Evolutionary ecology 10 (1996), S. 63-76 
    ISSN: 1573-8477
    Keywords: obligate mutualism ; yucca-yucca moth interaction ; seed predation ; resource limitation ; pollination
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Biology
    Notes: Summary The yucca-yucca moth interaction is a classic case of obligate mutualism. Female moths pollinate and oviposit in the gynoecium of the flower; however, maturing larvae eat a fraction of the developing seeds. We studied within-fruit distributions of four seed types (fertile, infertile, eaten and uneaten seeds) in order to evaluate costs and benefits in aYucca schottii population in southeastern Arizona. We focused on how the spatial arrangement of seeds affected larval behaviour and, hence, the costs of the mutualism to the yucca. Infertile seeds were distributed throughout both infested and uninfested locules. Additionally, moth larvae feeding in a single locule preferred fertile seeds and even avoided infertile seeds and left the fruit significantly more often when they encountered infertile seeds. We suggest that, regardless of the cause of infertile seeds, they function as blocking units within seed locules and therefore reduce seed predation by moth larvae. We also suggest that, together with certain other fruit traits, the presence of infertile seeds promotes the evolutionary stability of this pollination mutualism.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Publication Date: 2022-05-26
    Description: © The Author(s), 2020. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. The definitive version was published in Beckman, N. G., Asian, C. E., Rogers, H. S., Kogan, O., Bronstein, J. L., Bullock, J. M., Hartig, F., HilleRisLambers, J., Zhou, Y., Zurell, D., Brodie, J. F., Bruna, E. M., Cantrell, R. S., Decker, R. R., Efiom, E., Fricke, E. C., Gurski, K., Hastings, A., Johnson, J. S., Loiselle, B. A., Miriti, M. N., Neubert, M. G., Pejchar, L., Poulsen, J. R., Pufal, G., Razafindratsima, O. H., Sandor, M. E., Shea, K., Schreiber, S., Schupp, E. W., Snell, R. S., Strickland, C., & Zambrano, J. Advancing an interdisciplinary framework to study seed dispersal ecology. Aob Plants, 12(2), (2020): plz048, doi:10.1093/aobpla/plz048.
    Description: Although dispersal is generally viewed as a crucial determinant for the fitness of any organism, our understanding of its role in the persistence and spread of plant populations remains incomplete. Generalizing and predicting dispersal processes are challenging due to context dependence of seed dispersal, environmental heterogeneity and interdependent processes occurring over multiple spatial and temporal scales. Current population models often use simple phenomenological descriptions of dispersal processes, limiting their ability to examine the role of population persistence and spread, especially under global change. To move seed dispersal ecology forward, we need to evaluate the impact of any single seed dispersal event within the full spatial and temporal context of a plant’s life history and environmental variability that ultimately influences a population’s ability to persist and spread. In this perspective, we provide guidance on integrating empirical and theoretical approaches that account for the context dependency of seed dispersal to improve our ability to generalize and predict the consequences of dispersal, and its anthropogenic alteration, across systems. We synthesize suitable theoretical frameworks for this work and discuss concepts, approaches and available data from diverse subdisciplines to help operationalize concepts, highlight recent breakthroughs across research areas and discuss ongoing challenges and open questions. We address knowledge gaps in the movement ecology of seeds and the integration of dispersal and demography that could benefit from such a synthesis. With an interdisciplinary perspective, we will be able to better understand how global change will impact seed dispersal processes, and potential cascading effects on plant population persistence, spread and biodiversity.
    Description: Ideas for this manuscript initiated during the Seed Dispersal Workshop held in May 2016 at the Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center in Annapolis, MD and supported by the US National Science Foundation Grant DEB-1548194 to N.G.B. and the National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center under the US National Science Foundation Grant DBI-1052875. D.Z. received funding from the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF, grant: PZ00P3_168136/1) and from the German Science Foundation (DFG, grant: ZU 361/1-1).
    Keywords: Analytical models ; demography ; global change ; individual-based models ; long-distance seed dispersal ; population models ; seed dispersal
    Repository Name: Woods Hole Open Access Server
    Type: Article
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    Publication Date: 2022-05-26
    Description: © The Author(s), 2019. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. The definitive version was published in Aslan, C., Beckman, N. G., Rogers, H. S., Bronstein, J., Zurell, D., Hartig, F., Shea, K., Pejchar, L., Neubert, M., Poulsen, J., HilleRisLambers, J., Miriti, M., Loiselle, B., Effiom, E., Zambrano, J., Schupp, G., Pufal, G., Johnson, J., Bullock, J. M., Brodie, J., Bruna, E., Cantrell, R. S., Decker, R., Fricke, E., Gurski, K., Hastings, A., Kogan, O., Razafindratsima, O., Sandor, M., Schreiber, S., Snell, R., Strickland, C., & Zhou, Y. Employing plant functional groups to advance seed dispersal ecology and conservation. AoB Plants, 11(2), (2019):plz006, doi:10.1093/aobpla/plz006.
    Description: Seed dispersal enables plants to reach hospitable germination sites and escape natural enemies. Understanding when and how much seed dispersal matters to plant fitness is critical for understanding plant population and community dynamics. At the same time, the complexity of factors that determine if a seed will be successfully dispersed and subsequently develop into a reproductive plant is daunting. Quantifying all factors that may influence seed dispersal effectiveness for any potential seed-vector relationship would require an unrealistically large amount of time, materials and financial resources. On the other hand, being able to make dispersal predictions is critical for predicting whether single species and entire ecosystems will be resilient to global change. Building on current frameworks, we here posit that seed dispersal ecology should adopt plant functional groups as analytical units to reduce this complexity to manageable levels. Functional groups can be used to distinguish, for their constituent species, whether it matters (i) if seeds are dispersed, (ii) into what context they are dispersed and (iii) what vectors disperse them. To avoid overgeneralization, we propose that the utility of these functional groups may be assessed by generating predictions based on the groups and then testing those predictions against species-specific data. We suggest that data collection and analysis can then be guided by robust functional group definitions. Generalizing across similar species in this way could help us to better understand the population and community dynamics of plants and tackle the complexity of seed dispersal as well as its disruption.
    Description: Ideas for this manuscript initiated during the Seed Dispersal Workshop held in May 2016 at the Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center in Annapolis, MD and supported by the US National Science Foundation Grant DEB-1548194 to N.G.B. and the National Socio‐Environmental Synthesis Center under the US National Science Foundation Grant DBI‐1052875. D.Z. received funding from the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF, grant: PZ00P3_168136/1) and from the German Science Foundation (DFG, grant: ZU 361/1- 1). Contributions by the authors C.A. led the development of the concepts, writing, and revising of the manuscript with input from N.G.B. and H.S.R. All authors contributed to the development of concepts and are listed in order of contribution and alphabetical order within each level of contribution.
    Keywords: dependency ; directed dispersal ; dispersal vectors ; generalization ; mutualism ; seed dispersal effectiveness
    Repository Name: Woods Hole Open Access Server
    Type: Article
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...