GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Keywords: Impact craters -- Barents Sea. ; Submarine geology. ; Cratering. ; Impact. ; Electronic books.
    Description / Table of Contents: This book describes the Mjølnir impact event in the context of the geological and geophysical history of the Barents Sea region, and goes on to present elaborative numerical models of its formation and associated tsunami generation.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    Pages: 1 online resource (324 pages)
    Edition: 1st ed.
    ISBN: 9783540882602
    Series Statement: Impact Studies
    Language: English
    Note: Intro -- Preface -- Acknowledgements -- Contents -- Contributors -- 1 Introduction -- 1.1 Background -- 1.2 Barents Sea Geology -- 1.3 Mjlnir Impact at Volgian/Ryazanian Boundary -- 1.4 The Investigation History of Mjlnir -- 1.5 The Search for Oil and Gas in the Barents Sea -- 1.6 Future Mjlnir Studies -- 1.7 Etymology -- 2 Geological Framework -- 2.1 Plate Tectonic Evolution of the Arctic -- 2.2 Mesozoic Stratigraphy and Depositional Environments of the Arctic -- 2.2.1 Geological and Palaeogeographical Setting -- 2.2.1.1 Cretaceous Palaeogeographic Setting -- 2.2.1.2 The Barents Sea in Time and Space -- 2.2.2 Svalbard -- 2.2.3 Barents Sea -- 2.2.4 Greenland -- 2.2.5 Siberia -- 2.2.6 Late Jurassic and Early Cretaceous Depositional Configuration -- 3 Impact Structure and Morphology -- 3.1 Seismic Reflection Database -- 3.2 Shallow Structure -- 3.2.1 Main Features -- 3.2.2 Detailed Seismic Correlation to Nearby Shallow Boreholes -- 3.2.2.1 Borehole 7430/10-U-01 -- 3.2.2.2 Borehole 7329/03-U-01 -- 3.2.2.3 Impact Timing as Revealed from Seismic Correlation -- 3.2.3 Impact-Induced Deformation -- 3.2.4 Near-Field Erosional Features -- 3.2.4.1 Resurge Gullies -- 3.2.4.2 Crater Rim -- 3.3 Deep Structure -- 3.3.1 Impact-Induced Disturbance -- 3.3.1.1 Seismic Reflectivity Patterns -- 3.3.1.2 Shape and Dimensions -- 4 Impact Geophysics and Modelling -- 4.1 Features Related to the Cratering Process -- 4.1.1 Excavated Crater and Breccia -- 4.1.2 Impact Melts -- 4.1.3 Gravitational Collapse -- 4.1.4 Structural Uplift -- 4.2 Impact into a Marine Sedimentary Basin -- 4.3 Impact Crater Modelling -- 4.3.1 Potential Field Data -- 4.3.2 Marine Gravity Anomalies and Modelling -- 4.3.3 Marine Magnetic Anomalies and Modelling -- 4.3.4 Traveltime/Velocity Anomalies and Modelling -- 4.4 Modelled Porosity Anomalies -- 4.4.1 Density-Derived Porosity Anomaly. , 4.4.2 Velocity-Derived Porosity Anomaly -- 4.4.3 Postimpact Deformation-Derived Porosity Anomaly -- 4.4.4 Porosity Anomaly and Pore Space Volume -- 4.4.5 Porosity Anomaly and Hydrocarbon Potential -- 4.5 Potential Non-impact Origin -- 4.5.1 Clay Diapir -- 4.5.2 Salt Diapir -- 4.5.3 Igneous Feature -- 4.6 Alternative Interpretation of Mjlnir Crater Dimensions Based on Regional Gravity and Aero-magnetic Profiles and Modelling -- 4.6.1 The Mjølnir Aero-magnetic Anomaly -- 4.6.2 The Mjølnir Regional Free-Air Gravity Anomaly -- 4.6.3 Alternative Interpretation of Mjølnir Crater Dimensions -- 4.7 Impact-Induced Changes in Physical Properties -- 4.8 Mjlnir as an Oblique Impact Event -- 4.8.1 Elongated Crater Diameter -- 4.8.2 Seismic Disturbance Asymmetry -- 4.8.3 Peak-Ring Character -- 4.8.4 Offsets in Brecciation and Structural Uplift -- 4.8.5 Impact Direction and Angle -- 4.8.6 Mjølnir Impact Obliquity Constrains Models for Near-Field Perturbations -- 4.8.6.1 Nature and Distribution of Proximal Ejecta -- 4.8.6.2 Tsunami-Wave Distribution -- 5 Impact Cratering and Post-impact Sedimentation -- 5.1 Introduction -- 5.2 The Mjlnir Crater Core (7329/03-U-01) -- 5.2.1 The Ragnarok Formation -- 5.2.2 Ragnarok Formation, Unit I -- 5.2.3 Ragnarok Formation, Unit II -- 5.2.4 Hekkingen Formation -- 5.2.5 Klippfisk Formation -- 5.2.6 Spectral Gamma Results -- 5.2.7 Paleontology of the Ragnarok Formation -- 5.2.8 Paleontology of the Hekkingen Formation -- 5.2.9 Magnetic Properties and Densities of the Mjølnir Crater Core (7329/03-U-01) -- 5.3 The Mjlnir Impact Event in a Sequence Stratigraphical Framework -- 5.4 The Evidence for Impact Crater Formation -- 5.4.1 The Crater: Its Structure and Shape -- 5.4.2 Fracturing and Conglomerates -- 5.4.3 Mineralogical Evidence of Impact Cratering -- 5.4.4 Geochemistry -- 5.4.5 Paleontological Evidence of Impact Cratering. , 6 Ejecta Geology -- 6.1 The Identification of Ejecta Beds -- 6.1.1 Introduction -- 6.1.2 The Ragnarok Formation and Sindre Bed -- 6.1.3 The Discoveries of Large Amounts of Soot in Mjølnir Related Sediments -- 6.2 The Stratigraphical Distribution of the Ejecta Beds -- 6.2.1 Borehole 7430/10-U-01 -- 6.2.2 Borehole 7018/05-U-01 -- 6.2.3 Janusfjellet, Central Spitsbergen -- 6.2.4 Nordvik Peninsula, North-Western Siberia -- 6.2.5 The Mjølnir Ejecta as a Regional Stratigraphic Marker -- 7 The Impact Dynamics -- 7.1 Introduction -- 7.2 Numerical Model -- 7.3 Cratering Process -- 7.4 Ejecta Formation and Distribution -- 7.5 Resurge Flow and Tsunami Generation -- 7.6 Conclusions -- 8 Structural Analysis of Deformed Central Peak Sediments -- 8.1 Structural Position of the Mjlnir Impact Crater -- 8.2 Structural Geological Analysis -- 8.2.1 Type A Structures: Early Extensional Micro-faults and Fissures -- 8.2.2 Type B-Structures: Fragmentation of Semi-consolidated or Consolidated Beds -- 8.2.3 Type C-Structures: Liquefaction and Shearing -- 8.2.4 Type D-Structures: Folds, Rotated Strata and Shear Bands -- 8.2.5 Type E-Structures: Intensely Sheared Sequences -- 8.2.6 Type F-Structures: Late Brittle Fractures and Microfaults -- 8.3 Deformation History of the Ragnarok Formation -- 9 Postimpact Deformation Due to Sediment Loading: The Mjlnir Paradigm -- 9.1 Postimpact Burial -- 9.2 Mjlnir Crater -- 9.2.1 Postimpact Infilling -- 9.2.2 Faulting and Differential Vertical Movements -- 9.3 Other Craters: Chesapeake Bay, Chicxulub, Bosumtwi, and Montagnais -- 9.4 Original Crater Relief Reconstruction -- 9.4.1 Mjølnir -- 9.4.2 Chicxulub -- 9.4.3 Bosumtwi -- 9.4.4 Chesapeake Bay -- 9.5 Correction of Crater Morphological and Structural Parameters -- 9.5.1 Parameters Prone to Postimpact Burial Modification -- 9.5.2 Postimpact Modification Correction Factor. , 10 The Mjlnir Tsunami -- 10.1 Introduction -- 10.2 Tsunami Models -- 10.3 Tsunami Generation -- 10.3.1 Near Field Evolution -- 10.3.2 Far Field Propagation -- 10.3.2.1 Estimates of Far-Field Behaviour -- 10.3.2.2 Computations of Far-Field Behaviour -- 10.4 Discussion -- References -- Index -- Index.
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Publication Date: 2023-01-04
    Description: An extensive, reprocessed two‐dimensional (2D) seismic data set was utilized together with available well data to study the Tiddlybanken Basin in the southeastern Norwegian Barents Sea, which is revealed to be an excellent example of base salt rift structures, evaporite accumulations and evolution of salt structures. Late Devonian–early Carboniferous NE‐SW regional extensional stress affected the study area and gave rise to three half‐grabens that are separated by a NW‐SE to NNW‐SSE trending horst and an affiliated interference transfer zone. The arcuate nature of the horst is believed to be the effect of pre‐existing Timanian basement grain, whereas the interference zone formed due to the combined effect of a Timanian (basement) lineament and the geometrical arrangement of the opposing master faults. The interference transfer zone acted as a physical barrier, controlling the facies distribution and sedimentary thickness of three‐layered evaporitic sequences (LES). During the late Triassic, the northwestern part of a salt wall was developed due to passive diapirism and its evolution was influenced by halite lithology between the three‐LES. The central and southeastern parts of the salt wall did not progress beyond the pedestal stage due to lack of halite in the deepest evaporitic sequence. During the Triassic–Jurassic transition, far‐field stresses from the Novaya Zemlya fold‐and‐thrust belt reactivated the pre‐salt Carboniferous rift structures. The reactivation led to the development of the Signalhorn Dome, rejuvenated the northwestern part of the salt wall and affected the sedimentation rates in the southeastern broad basin. The salt wall together with the Signalhorn Dome and the Carboniferous pre‐salt structures were again reactivated during post‐Early Cretaceous, in response to regional compressional stresses. During this main tectonic inversion phase, the northwestern and southeastern parts of the salt wall were rejuvenated; however, salt reactivation was minimized towards the interference transfer zone beneath the centre of the salt wall.
    Type: Article , PeerReviewed
    Format: text
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...