GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Washington, D.C. :National Academies Press,
    Keywords: Electronic books.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    Pages: 1 online resource (205 pages)
    Edition: 1st ed.
    ISBN: 9780309479172
    DDC: 500.2072
    Language: English
    Note: Intro -- FrontMatter -- Preface -- Acknowledgments -- Contents -- List of Boxes, Tables, and Figure -- Summary -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Mapping the Landscape -- 3 Overview of Citizen Science as a Context for Learning -- 4 Processes of Learning and Learning in Science -- 5 Citizen Science as an Opportunity for Science Learning -- 6 Designing for Learning -- 7 Conclusions and Recommendations -- Appendix A: Demographic Analyses of Citizen Science -- Appendix B: The Evolution of Learning for Design -- Appendix C: Characteristics of Science Learning in Citizen Science Projects: An Ad Hoc Review -- Appendix D: Biographical Sketches of Committee Members and Staff.
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Cham :Springer International Publishing AG,
    Keywords: Climatic changes -- United States. ; Electronic books.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    Pages: 1 online resource (178 pages)
    Edition: 1st ed.
    ISBN: 9783319052663
    DDC: 363.738/7408997073
    Language: English
    Note: Intro -- Preface -- Contents -- Introduction: climate change and indigenous peoples of the USA -- Justice forward: Tribes, climate adaptation and responsibility -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Formal and retrospective justice -- 2.1 Climate change and collective continuance -- 2.2 Institutions and collective continuance -- 2.3 Coupled political obstructions and ecological challenges -- 2.4 Injustice and responsibility -- 3 Justice and systems of responsibilities -- 3.1 Justice and institutions -- 3.2 The function of institutions -- 4 Interpreting four policies as systems of responsibilities -- 4.1 Beyond compliance -- 4.2 Government-to-government relationship -- 4.3 Trust responsibility -- 4.4 Integrating tribal and non-tribal sciences -- 4.5 Multiparty governance -- 5 Conclusion -- References -- Culture, law, risk and governance: contexts of traditional knowledge in climate change adaptation -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Traditional knowledge in the context of climate change -- 3 Cultural contexts of traditional knowledge -- 4 Legal contexts of traditional knowledge -- 4.1 Intellectual property laws -- 4.1.1 Copyrights -- 4.2 Non-intellectual property laws: freedom of information Act (USA) / freedom of expression / the common heritage of humankind -- 5 Risk contexts of traditional knowledge -- 5.1 Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) -- 5.2 Risks of sharing climate-relevant traditional knowledge in the coast Salish -- 6 Traditional knowledge governance -- 7 Respect for indigenous governance in a climate change context -- 8 Conclusion -- References -- The impacts of climate change on tribal traditional foods -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Cultural context: understanding the impacts of climate change on traditional foods -- 2.1 Indigenous people, berry plants, and climate change -- 3 Climate impacts on traditional foods -- 4 Tribal adaptation in a changing environment. , 4.1 Historic tribal approaches to adaptation -- 4.2 Informing contemporary adaptation strategies -- 5 Conclusion -- References -- Indigenous frameworks for observing and responding to climate change in Alaska -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Traditional knowledge as a lens for observing climate change -- 3 Climate-change impacts on Alaskan indigenous communities -- 4 Interactions of climate change and development -- 5 Preparing for the future -- References -- Climate change impacts on the water resources of American Indians and Alaska Natives in the U.S. -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Framework for understanding impacts -- 3 Hazards and vulnerability context -- 3.1 Climate, hydrologic, and ecosystem change hazards -- 3.2 Socioeconomic factors -- 3.3 Political factors -- 3.4 Infrastructural factors -- 3.5 Ecosystem services and land-use factors -- 3.6 Spiritual and cultural factors -- 4 Impacts -- 4.1 Alaska -- 4.2 Pacific Northwest -- 4.3 Southwest -- 4.4 Great Plains -- 4.5 Midwest -- 4.6 East -- 5 Concluding thoughts -- References -- Climate change in arid lands and Native American socioeconomic vulnerability: The case of the Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Methods -- 2.1 Surveys and interviews -- 2.2 Vulnerability assessment framework -- 3 Context and community life -- 4 Results for socio-economic vulnerability factors -- 4.1 Internal factors -- 4.1.1 Education and employment -- 4.1.2 Climate change perceptions -- 4.1.3 Institutional capacity -- 4.1.4 Technology -- 4.1.5 Physical capital -- 4.1.6 Economic resources and financial capital -- 4.1.7 Social capital -- 4.1.8 Natural capital -- 4.2 External factors In our analysis, the external socio-economic vulnerability factors were linked to social, economic, legal, -- 4.2.1 Federal support and entitlement -- 4.2.2 Power relation and legal stressor -- 4.2.3 Job opportunity and migration. , 5 Discussion -- 6 Conclusion -- References -- The impact of climate change on tribal communities in the US: displacement, relocation, and human rights -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Case studies -- 2.1 Kivalina -- 2.2 Isle de Jean Charles -- 2.3 Newtok -- 3 Legal aspects and policy implications -- 4 Lessons learned from past relocations -- 5 A human rights approach to relocation -- 6 Concluding statement -- References -- Cultural impacts to tribes from climate change influences on forests -- 1 Introduction -- 1.1 Traditional ecological knowledge and climate impacts on forests -- 1.2 Tribal adaptation to changing fire regimes and climate -- 2 Climate impacts on tribally-valued forest resources -- 2.1 Climate-related impacts from invasive species and pests -- 3 Tribal adaptation in response to forest changes and wildfire threats -- 3.1 Tribal engagement in Landscape Conservation -- 3.2 Collaboration in tribal forest management -- 4 Conclusion -- Forest disruption and changes in species composition resulting from climate change could lead to the loss of culturally importan -- Tribal involvement in agency resource management and climate change initiatives could include monitoring for species changes in -- always [be] preceded by trust-building, development of working relationships, and respect for areas that should not be researche -- indigenous knowledge systems seem to build holistic pictures of the environment by considering a large number of variables quali -- References -- Changing streamflow on Columbia basin tribal lands-climate change and salmon -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Methods -- 2.1 Temperature and precipitation -- 2.2 Flow data -- 2.3 Tributary basins Thirty-two snowmelt-dominant basins located on or near tribal ceded lands, were selected (Fig. 1, Online Re -- 2.4 Flow measures -- 2.5 Trend analysis and hydroclimatology -- 3 Results. , 3.1 Temperature and precipitation data -- 3.2 Seasonal flow fraction -- 3.3 Center timing -- 3.4 Spring flow onset -- 3.5 High flows -- 3.6 Low flows -- 3.7 Basin elevation analysis -- 4 Discussion -- 4.1 Trends in streamflow timing -- 4.2 Pacific Ocean and Pacific Northwest hydroclimatology -- 4.3 Fishery restoration -- 5 Conclusions -- References -- Exploring effects of climate change on Northern Plains American Indian health -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Crow elder observations -- 3 Confirmation of Elders' observations of recent climate change using monitoring data -- 4 Anticipated vulnerabilities for the Crow community and local ecosystems -- 5 Conclusion -- References -- The effect of climate change on glacier ablation and baseflow support in the Nooksack River basin and implications on Pacific salmonid species protection -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Recorded trends in climate, streamflow, and glaciers -- 2.1 Climate trends of the PNW -- 2.2 Climate trends in the Nooksack River watershed -- 2.3 Trends in glacier mass balance -- 2.4 Trends in Nooksack River streamflow and temperature -- 3 Climate projections with climate change -- 3.1 Climate projections for the PNW -- 3.2 Projections for the North Cascade and Mount Baker glaciers -- 3.3 Projected changes in streamflow -- 4 Implications for salmonids -- 5 Conclusions -- References -- Re-thinking colonialism to prepare for the impacts of rapid environmental change -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Key ecological concepts and contemporary environmental change -- 2.1 Coupled human and natural systems -- 2.2 Feedback loops -- 2.3 Thresholds -- 3 Linked environmental and social change in colonial New England -- 3.1 Pre-contact coupled human and natural systems -- 3.2 Contact and rapid demographic change -- 3.3 A tipping point for New England CHANS -- 3.4 Amplifying feedbacks in colonial CHANS -- 4 Discussion -- 5 Conclusions. , In this paper, we demonstrated a line of research that studies colonial history to gain insights for responding to rapid environ -- The challenge remains to develop an outline for comprehensive, integrated models that convincingly explicate past socio-ecologic -- Climatic Change -- focuses on tribal communities in the U.S., our recommendations for future research are applicable in any location where colonial -- References.
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Keywords: Climatic changes Environmental aspects ; Indians of North America Social conditions ; Indians of North America Economic conditions ; Human beings Effect of climate on ; Indigenous peoples Ecology ; Traditional ecological knowledge ; Climate change mitigation
    Type of Medium: Book
    Pages: S. 509 - 682 , graph. Darst
    Series Statement: Climatic change 120.2013,3
    DDC: 363.738/7408997073
    Language: English
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Publication Date: 2022-05-26
    Description: Author Posting. © American Meteorological Society, 2019. This article is posted here by permission of American Meteorological Society for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 100(5), (2019): 897-908, doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-19-0130.1.
    Description: As states, cities, tribes, and private interests cope with climate damages and seek to increase preparedness and resilience, they will need to navigate myriad choices and options available to them. Making these choices in ways that identify pathways for climate action that support their development objectives will require constructive public dialogue, community participation, and flexible and ongoing access to science- and experience-based knowledge. In 2016, a Federal Advisory Committee (FAC) was convened to recommend how to conduct a sustained National Climate Assessment (NCA) to increase the relevance and usability of assessments for informing action. The FAC was disbanded in 2017, but members and additional experts reconvened to complete the report that is presented here. A key recommendation is establishing a new nonfederal “climate assessment consortium” to increase the role of state/local/tribal government and civil society in assessments. The expanded process would 1) focus on applied problems faced by practitioners, 2) organize sustained partnerships for collaborative learning across similar projects and case studies to identify effective tested practices, and 3) assess and improve knowledge-based methods for project implementation. Specific recommendations include evaluating climate models and data using user-defined metrics; improving benefit–cost assessment and supporting decision-making under uncertainty; and accelerating application of tools and methods such as citizen science, artificial intelligence, indicators, and geospatial analysis. The recommendations are the result of broad consultation and present an ambitious agenda for federal agencies, state/local/tribal jurisdictions, universities and the research sector, professional associations, nongovernmental and community-based organizations, and private-sector firms.
    Description: This report would not have been possible without the support and participation of numerous organizations and individuals. We thank New York State Governor Andrew M. Cuomo for announcing in his 2018 State of the State agenda that the IAC would be reconvened. The New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (Contract ID 123416), Columbia University’s Earth Institute, and the American Meteorological Society provided essential financial support and much more, including sage advice and moral support from John O’Leary, Shara Mohtadi, Steve Cohen, Alex Halliday, Peter deMenocal, Keith Seitter, Paul Higgins, and Bill Hooke. We thank the attendees of a workshop, generously funded by the Kresge Foundation in November of 2017, that laid a foundation for the idea to establish a civil-society-based assessment consortium. During the course of preparing the report, IAC members consulted with individuals too numerous to list here—state, local, and tribal officials; researchers; experts in nongovernmental and community-based organizations; and professionals in engineering, architecture, public health, adaptation, and other areas. We are so grateful for their time and expertise. We thank the members and staff of the National Academy of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine’s Committee to Advise the U.S. Global Change Research Program for providing individual comments on preliminary recommendations during several discussions in open sessions of their meetings. The following individuals provided detailed comments on an earlier version of this report, which greatly sharpened our thinking and recommendations: John Balbus, Tom Dietz, Phil Duffy, Baruch Fischhoff, Brenda Hoppe, Melissa Kenney, Linda Mearns, Claudia Nierenberg, Kathleen Segerson, Soroosh Sorooshian, Chris Weaver, and Brian Zuckerman. Mary Black provided insightful copy editing of several versions of the report. We also thank four anonymous reviewers for their effort and care in critiquing and improving the report. It is the dedication, thoughtful feedback, expertise, care, and commitment of all these people and more that not only made this report possible, but allow us all to continue to support smart and insightful actions in a changing climate. We are grateful as authors and as global citizens. Author contributions: RM, SA, KB, MB, AC, JD, PF, KJ, AJ, KK, JK, ML, JM, RP, TR, LS, JS, JW, and DZ were members of the IAC and shared in researching, discussing, drafting, and approving the report. BA, JF, AG, LJ, SJ, PK, RK, AM, RM, JN, WS, JS, PT, GY, and RZ contributed to specific sections of the report.
    Repository Name: Woods Hole Open Access Server
    Type: Article
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Publication Date: 2022-05-26
    Description: Author Posting. © American Meteorological Society, 2019. This article is posted here by permission of American Meteorological Society for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Weather Climate and Society 11(3), (2019):465-487, doi: 10.1175/WCAS-D-18-0134.1.
    Description: As states, cities, tribes, and private interests cope with climate damages and seek to increase preparedness and resilience, they will need to navigate myriad choices and options available to them. Making these choices in ways that identify pathways for climate action that support their development objectives will require constructive public dialogue, community participation, and flexible and ongoing access to science- and experience-based knowledge. In 2016, a Federal Advisory Committee (FAC) was convened to recommend how to conduct a sustained National Climate Assessment (NCA) to increase the relevance and usability of assessments for informing action. The FAC was disbanded in 2017, but members and additional experts reconvened to complete the report that is presented here. A key recommendation is establishing a new nonfederal “climate assessment consortium” to increase the role of state/local/tribal government and civil society in assessments. The expanded process would 1) focus on applied problems faced by practitioners, 2) organize sustained partnerships for collaborative learning across similar projects and case studies to identify effective tested practices, and 3) assess and improve knowledge-based methods for project implementation. Specific recommendations include evaluating climate models and data using user-defined metrics; improving benefit–cost assessment and supporting decision-making under uncertainty; and accelerating application of tools and methods such as citizen science, artificial intelligence, indicators, and geospatial analysis. The recommendations are the result of broad consultation and present an ambitious agenda for federal agencies, state/local/tribal jurisdictions, universities and the research sector, professional associations, nongovernmental and community-based organizations, and private-sector firms.
    Description: This report would not have been possible without the support and participation of numerous organizations and individuals. We thank New York State Governor Andrew M. Cuomo for announcing in his 2018 State of the State agenda that the IAC would be reconvened. The New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (Contract ID 123416), Columbia University’s Earth Institute, and the American Meteorological Society provided essential financial support and much more, including sage advice and moral support from John O’Leary, Shara Mohtadi, Steve Cohen, Alex Halliday, Peter deMenocal, Keith Seitter, Paul Higgins, and Bill Hooke. We thank the attendees of a workshop, generously funded by the Kresge Foundation in November of 2017, that laid a foundation for the idea to establish a civil-society-based assessment consortium. During the course of preparing the report, IAC members consulted with individuals too numerous to list here—state, local, and tribal officials; researchers; experts in nongovernmental and community-based organizations; and professionals in engineering, architecture, public health, adaptation, and other areas. We are so grateful for their time and expertise. We thank the members and staff of the National Academy of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine’s Committee to Advise the U.S. Global Change Research Program for providing individual comments on preliminary recommendations during several discussions in open sessions of their meetings. The following individuals provided detailed comments on an earlier version of this report, which greatly sharpened our thinking and recommendations: John Balbus, Tom Dietz, Phil Duffy, Baruch Fischhoff, Brenda Hoppe, Melissa Kenney, Linda Mearns, Claudia Nierenberg, Kathleen Segerson, Soroosh Sorooshian, Chris Weaver, and Brian Zuckerman. Mary Black provided insightful copy editing of several versions of the report. We also thank four anonymous reviewers for their effort and care in critiquing and improving the report. It is the dedication, thoughtful feedback, expertise, care, and commitment of all these people and more that not only made this report possible, but allow us all to continue to support smart and insightful actions in a changing climate. We are grateful as authors and as global citizens. Author contributions: RM, SA, KB, MB, AC, JD, PF, KJ, AJ, KK, JK, ML, JM, RP, TR, LS, JS, JW, and DZ were members of the IAC and shared in researching, discussing, drafting, and approving the report. BA, JF, AG, LJ, SJ, PK, RK, AM, RM, JN, WS, JS, PT, GY, and RZ contributed to specific sections of the report.
    Description: 2020-05-21
    Keywords: North America ; Climate prediction ; Planning ; Policy ; Risk assessment ; Societal impacts
    Repository Name: Woods Hole Open Access Server
    Type: Article
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...