GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Cambridge University Press (CUP) ; 1988
    In:  International Organization Vol. 42, No. 2 ( 1988), p. 347-373
    In: International Organization, Cambridge University Press (CUP), Vol. 42, No. 2 ( 1988), p. 347-373
    Abstract: Socialists at the turn of the century explained modern imperialism as an attempt to escape the crisis of monopoly capitalism. “Super-profits” that could be secured in the periphery, according to Lenin, were necessary to offset declining rates of return in the advanced economies. Today, radical theorists stress the role of the multinational corporations in accounting for neocolonialism. If great national power does produce material benefits for foreign investors, this should be apparent in two cases: the experience of British capitalists in the “high age of imperialism,“ 1870–1913, and the operations of U.S. multinational corporations abroad after World War II. But rates of return on foreign investments have not been significantly different in the developed and less developed regions of the world—a finding that is relevant not only for theories of imperialism but also for understanding development and modernization, the operation of the multinational corporation, and international capital markets.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0020-8183 , 1531-5088
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
    Publication Date: 1988
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1481046-3
    SSG: 3,6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    SAGE Publications ; 1996
    In:  Journal of Peace Research Vol. 33, No. 1 ( 1996-02), p. 11-28
    In: Journal of Peace Research, SAGE Publications, Vol. 33, No. 1 ( 1996-02), p. 11-28
    Abstract: The classical liberals believed that democracy and free trade would reduce the incidence of war. Here we conduct new tests of the `democratic peace', incorporating into the analyses of Maoz & Russett (1993) a measure of economic interdependence based on the economic importance of bilateral trade. This allows us to conduct a simultaneous evaluation of the effects of regime type and interdependence on the likelihood that a pair of states will become involved in a militarized interstate dispute. We control in all our analyses for a number of potentially confounding influences: growth rates in per capita income, alliances, geographic contiguity, and relative power. Our logistic regression analyses of politically relevant dyads (1950-85) indicate that the benefits of the liberals' economic program have not been sufficiently appreciated. Trade is a powerful influence for peace, especially among the war-prone, contiguous pairs of states. Moreover, Kant (1991 [1795]) was right: International conflict is less likely when external economic relations are important, executives are constrained, and societies are governed by non-violent norms of conflict resolution.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0022-3433 , 1460-3578
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: SAGE Publications
    Publication Date: 1996
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1490712-4
    SSG: 3,6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    JSTOR ; 2001
    In:  Foreign Affairs Vol. 80, No. 3 ( 2001), p. 131-
    In: Foreign Affairs, JSTOR, Vol. 80, No. 3 ( 2001), p. 131-
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0015-7120
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: JSTOR
    Publication Date: 2001
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2833911-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 214-8
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2050780-X
    SSG: 7,26
    SSG: 3,6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Cambridge University Press (CUP) ; 1998
    In:  International Organization Vol. 52, No. 3 ( 1998), p. 441-467
    In: International Organization, Cambridge University Press (CUP), Vol. 52, No. 3 ( 1998), p. 441-467
    Abstract: Immanuel Kant believed that democracy, economic interdependence, and international law and organizations could establish the foundations for “perpetual peace.” Our analyses of politically relevant dyads show that each of the three elements of the Kantian peace makes a statistically significant, independent contribution to peaceful interstate relations. These benefits are evident even when the influence of other theoretically interesting factors—such as relative power, alliances, geographic contiguity, and economic growth—is held constant. Increasing the number of shared memberships in intergovernmental organizations (IGOs) by one standard deviation reduces the incidence of militarized disputes by about 23 percent from the baseline rate for a typical pair of bordering states. If both members of a dyad are democratic, conflict is 35 percent less likely than the baseline; increasing both the dyadic trade–GDP ratio and the trend in trade by a standard deviation reduces the chance of conflict by 38 percent. Together, all the Kantian variables lower the probability of a dispute by 72 percent. We check for reverse causation and find reason to believe that a feedback system is at work, with IGOs reducing conflict and low-conflict dyads joining IGOs. Democracies and interdependent states are more likely to join IGOs with one another, bringing together the three elements of a system for Kantian peace.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0020-8183 , 1531-5088
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
    Publication Date: 1998
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1481046-3
    SSG: 3,6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Cambridge University Press (CUP) ; 2012
    In:  International Organization Vol. 66, No. 3 ( 2012-07), p. 491-513
    In: International Organization, Cambridge University Press (CUP), Vol. 66, No. 3 ( 2012-07), p. 491-513
    Abstract: We consider the influence of countries' external security environments on their military spending. We first estimate the ex ante probability that a country will become involved in a fatal militarized interstate dispute using a model of dyadic conflict that incorporates key elements of liberal and realist theories of international relations. We then estimate military spending as a function of the threat of armed interstate conflict and other influences: arms races, the defense expenditures of friendly countries, actual military conflict, democracy, civil war, and national economic output. In a panel of 165 countries, 1950 to 2000, we find our prospectively generated estimate of the external threat to be a powerful variable in explaining military spending. A 1 percentage point increase in the aggregate probability of a fatal militarized dispute, as predicted by our liberal-realist model, leads to a 3 percent increase in a country's military expenditures.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0020-8183 , 1531-5088
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1481046-3
    SSG: 3,6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Oxford University Press (OUP) ; 1989
    In:  International Studies Quarterly Vol. 33, No. 4 ( 1989-12), p. 435-
    In: International Studies Quarterly, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 33, No. 4 ( 1989-12), p. 435-
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0020-8833
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 1989
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1479800-1
    SSG: 8
    SSG: 3,6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    SAGE Publications ; 2000
    In:  Journal of Peace Research Vol. 37, No. 5 ( 2000-09), p. 583-608
    In: Journal of Peace Research, SAGE Publications, Vol. 37, No. 5 ( 2000-09), p. 583-608
    Abstract: We assess the degree to which propositions from Samuel Huntington's The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order can account for the incidence of militarized interstate disputes between countries during the period 1950-92. We find that such traditional realist influences as contiguity, alliances, and relative power, and liberal influences of joint democracy and interdependence, provide a much better account of interstate conflict. Pairs of states split across civilizational boundaries are no more likely to become engaged in disputes than are other states ceteris paribus. Even disputes between the West and the rest of the world, or with Islam, were no more common than those between or within most other groups. Among Huntington's eight civilizations, interstate conflict was significantly less likely only within the West; dyads in other civilizations were as likely to fight as were states split across civilizations, when realist and liberal influences are held constant. The dominance of a civilization by a core state, democratic or not, does little to inhibit violence within the civilization. Contrary to the thesis that the clash of civilizations will replace Cold War rivalries as the greatest source of conflict, militarized interstate disputes across civilizational boundaries became less common, not more so, as the Cold War waned. Nor do civilizations appear to have an important indirect influence on interstate conflict through the realist or liberal variables. They help to predict alliance patterns but make little contribution to explaining political institutions or commercial interactions. We can be grateful that Huntington challenged us to consider the role that civilizations might play in international relations, but there is little evidence that they define the fault lines along which international conflict is apt to occur.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0022-3433 , 1460-3578
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: SAGE Publications
    Publication Date: 2000
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1490712-4
    SSG: 3,6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    SAGE Publications ; 1997
    In:  Journal of Conflict Resolution Vol. 41, No. 4 ( 1997-08), p. 509-528
    In: Journal of Conflict Resolution, SAGE Publications, Vol. 41, No. 4 ( 1997-08), p. 509-528
    Abstract: There has been a long debate over whether peace is best preserved by a balance or preponderance of power. Organski and Kugler suggested that the dynamics of relative dyadic power matter most. Using GNP to measure national capabilities, they found support for their power-transition theory, but only for states considered to be contenders for dominance in the international system. Subsequently, Houweling and Siccama reported important new evidence in support of the theory. They concluded that power transitions are a potent predictor of war for all major powers, not just a small subset; but it has been unclear whether their stronger results were a consequence of genuine improvements in methods, the use of a different measure of power, or alterations to the list of major powers. The authors replicate Houweling and Siccama's analysis using the two most common, and recently revised, measures of national capabilities—the Correlates of War composite index and GDP—and investigate the effects of modifying the set of major powers. They find substantial support for the power-transition theory, but the strength of the evidence depends importantly on how power is measured and the set of cases analyzed.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0022-0027 , 1552-8766
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: SAGE Publications
    Publication Date: 1997
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1500229-9
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 3013-2
    SSG: 5,2
    SSG: 3,6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    SAGE Publications ; 1998
    In:  Journal of Conflict Resolution Vol. 42, No. 4 ( 1998-08), p. 517-520
    In: Journal of Conflict Resolution, SAGE Publications, Vol. 42, No. 4 ( 1998-08), p. 517-520
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0022-0027 , 1552-8766
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: SAGE Publications
    Publication Date: 1998
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1500229-9
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 3013-2
    SSG: 5,2
    SSG: 3,6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    SAGE Publications ; 2000
    In:  Journal of Peace Research Vol. 37, No. 5 ( 2000-09), p. 611-612
    In: Journal of Peace Research, SAGE Publications, Vol. 37, No. 5 ( 2000-09), p. 611-612
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0022-3433 , 1460-3578
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: SAGE Publications
    Publication Date: 2000
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1490712-4
    SSG: 3,6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...