GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Ihre E-Mail wurde erfolgreich gesendet. Bitte prüfen Sie Ihren Maileingang.

Leider ist ein Fehler beim E-Mail-Versand aufgetreten. Bitte versuchen Sie es erneut.

Vorgang fortführen?

Exportieren
Filter
Materialart
Sprache
Erscheinungszeitraum
  • 1
    In: The Lancet Oncology, Elsevier BV, Vol. 19, No. 10 ( 2018-10), p. e521-e533
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 1470-2045
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: Elsevier BV
    Publikationsdatum: 2018
    ZDB Id: 2049730-1
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 2
    In: British Journal of Surgery, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 107, No. 7 ( 2020-05-28), p. 832-844
    Kurzfassung: Therapeutic mammaplasty (TM) may be an alternative to mastectomy, but few well designed studies have evaluated the success of this approach or compared the short-term outcomes of TM with mastectomy with or without immediate breast reconstruction (IBR). Data from the national iBRA-2 and TeaM studies were combined to compare the safety and short-term outcomes of TM and mastectomy with or without IBR. Methods The subgroup of patients in the TeaM study who underwent TM to avoid mastectomy were identified, and data on demographics, complications, oncology and adjuvant treatment were compared with those of patients undergoing mastectomy with or without IBR in the iBRA-2 study. The primary outcome was the percentage of successful breast-conserving procedures in the TM group. Secondary outcomes included postoperative complications and time to adjuvant therapy. Results A total of 2916 patients (TM 376; mastectomy 1532; mastectomy and IBR 1008) were included in the analysis. Patients undergoing TM were more likely to be obese and to have undergone bilateral surgery than those having IBR. However, patients undergoing mastectomy with or without IBR were more likely to experience complications than the TM group (TM: 79, 21·0 per cent; mastectomy: 570, 37·2 per cent; mastectomy and IBR: 359, 35·6 per cent; P & lt; 0·001). Breast conservation was possible in 87·0 per cent of patients who had TM, and TM did not delay adjuvant treatment. Conclusion TM may allow high-risk patients who would not be candidates for IBR to avoid mastectomy safely. Further work is needed to explore the comparative patient-reported and cosmetic outcomes of the different approaches, and to establish long-term oncological safety.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0007-1323 , 1365-2168
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publikationsdatum: 2020
    ZDB Id: 2006309-X
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 3
    In: British Journal of Cancer, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 124, No. 11 ( 2021-05-25), p. 1785-1794
    Kurzfassung: The B-MaP-C study aimed to determine alterations to breast cancer (BC) management during the peak transmission period of the UK COVID-19 pandemic and the potential impact of these treatment decisions. Methods This was a national cohort study of patients with early BC undergoing multidisciplinary team (MDT)-guided treatment recommendations during the pandemic, designated ‘standard’ or ‘COVID-altered’, in the preoperative, operative and post-operative setting. Findings Of 3776 patients (from 64 UK units) in the study, 2246 (59%) had ‘COVID-altered’ management. ‘Bridging’ endocrine therapy was used ( n  = 951) where theatre capacity was reduced. There was increasing access to COVID-19 low-risk theatres during the study period (59%). In line with national guidance, immediate breast reconstruction was avoided ( n  = 299). Where adjuvant chemotherapy was omitted ( n  = 81), the median benefit was only 3% (IQR 2–9%) using ‘NHS Predict’. There was the rapid adoption of new evidence-based hypofractionated radiotherapy ( n  = 781, from 46 units). Only 14 patients (1%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 during their treatment journey. Conclusions The majority of ‘COVID-altered’ management decisions were largely in line with pre-COVID evidence-based guidelines, implying that breast cancer survival outcomes are unlikely to be negatively impacted by the pandemic. However, in this study, the potential impact of delays to BC presentation or diagnosis remains unknown.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0007-0920 , 1532-1827
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publikationsdatum: 2021
    ZDB Id: 2002452-6
    ZDB Id: 80075-2
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 4
    In: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 199, No. 2 ( 2023-06), p. 265-279
    Kurzfassung: The B-MaP-C study investigated changes to breast cancer care that were necessitated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Here we present a follow-up analysis of those patients commenced on bridging endocrine therapy (BrET), whilst they were awaiting surgery due to reprioritisation of resources. Methods This multicentre, multinational cohort study recruited 6045 patients from the UK, Spain and Portugal during the peak pandemic period (Feb–July 2020). Patients on BrET were followed up to investigate the duration of, and response to, BrET. This included changes in tumour size to reflect downstaging potential, and changes in cellular proliferation (Ki67), as a marker of prognosis. Results 1094 patients were prescribed BrET, over a median period of 53 days (IQR 32–81 days). The majority of patients (95.6%) had strong ER expression (Allred score 7–8/8). Very few patients required expedited surgery, due to lack of response (1.2%) or due to lack of tolerance/compliance (0.8%). There were small reductions in median tumour size after 3 months’ treatment duration; median of 4 mm [IQR − 20, 4]. In a small subset of patients ( n  = 47), a drop in cellular proliferation (Ki67) occurred in 26 patients (55%), from high (Ki67 ≥ 10%) to low ( 〈  10%), with at least one month’s duration of BrET. Discussion This study describes real-world usage of pre-operative endocrine therapy as necessitated by the pandemic. BrET was found to be tolerable and safe. The data support short-term (≤ 3 months) usage of pre-operative endocrine therapy. Longer-term use should be investigated in future trials.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0167-6806 , 1573-7217
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publikationsdatum: 2023
    ZDB Id: 2004077-5
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 5
    In: The Lancet, Elsevier BV, Vol. 399, No. 10330 ( 2022-03), p. 1101-1103
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0140-6736
    RVK:
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: Elsevier BV
    Publikationsdatum: 2022
    ZDB Id: 2067452-1
    ZDB Id: 3306-6
    ZDB Id: 1476593-7
    SSG: 5,21
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 6
    In: British Journal of Surgery, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 109, No. 9 ( 2022-08-16), p. 800-803
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0007-1323 , 1365-2168
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publikationsdatum: 2022
    ZDB Id: 2006309-X
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 7
    In: Clinical Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 28, No. 7 ( 2022-04-01), p. 1323-1334
    Kurzfassung: EPHOS-B aimed to determine whether perioperative anti-HER2 therapy inhibited proliferation and/or increased apoptosis in HER2-positive breast cancer. Patients and Methods: This randomized phase II, two-part, multicenter trial included newly diagnosed women with HER2-positive invasive breast cancer due to undergo surgery. Patients were randomized to: part 1 (1:2:2), no treatment (control), trastuzumab or lapatinib; part 2 (1:1:2) control, trastuzumab, or lapatinib and trastuzumab combination. Treatment was given for 11 days presurgery. Coprimary endpoints were change in Ki67 and apoptosis between baseline and surgery tumor samples (biologic response: ≥30% change). Central pathology review scored residual cancer burden (RCB). Relapse-free survival (RFS) explored long-term effects. Results: Between November 2010 and September 2015, 257 patients were randomized (part 1: control 22, trastuzumab 57, lapatinib 51; part 2: control 29, trastuzumab 32, combination 66). Ki67 response was evaluable for 223 patients: in part 1 Ki67 response occurred in 29/44 (66%) lapatinib versus 18/49 (37%) trastuzumab (P = 0.007) and 1/22 (5%) control (P & lt; 0.0001); in part 2 in 36/49 (74%) combination versus 14/31 (45%) trastuzumab (P = 0.02) and 2/28 (7%) control (P & lt; 0.0001). No significant increase in apoptosis after 11 days was seen in treatment groups. Six patients achieved complete pathologic response (pCR, RCB0) and 13 RCB1, all but two in the combination group. After 6 years median follow-up, 28 (11%) had recurrence and 19 (7%) died. No recurrences or deaths were observed among patients who achieved a pCR. Ki67% falls ≥50% associated with fewer recurrences (P = 0.002). Conclusions: Early response after short duration anti-HER2 dual therapy identifies cancers dependent on the HER2 pathway providing a strategy for exploring risk-adapted individualized treatment de-escalation.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 1078-0432 , 1557-3265
    RVK:
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publikationsdatum: 2022
    ZDB Id: 1225457-5
    ZDB Id: 2036787-9
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 8
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 80, No. 4_Supplement ( 2020-02-15), p. OT3-17-01-OT3-17-01
    Kurzfassung: Background: Multi-parameter tumour gene expression assays (MPAs) are widely used to estimate individual patient risk and to guide chemotherapy use in hormone-sensitive, HER2-negative early breast cancer. The TAILORx trial supports MPA use in a node-negative population. Evidence in node-positive breast cancer is limited. OPTIMA (Optimal Personalised Treatment of early breast cancer usIng Multi-parameter Analysis) (ISRCTN42400492) is a prospective international randomised controlled trial (RCT) designed to validate MPA’s as predictors of chemotherapy sensitivity in a largely node-positive breast cancer population. Methods: OPTIMA is a partially blinded study with an adaptive two-stage design. The main eligibility criteria are women and men age 40 or older with resected ER-positive, HER2-negative invasive breast cancer and up to 9 involved axillary lymph nodes. Randomisation is to standard management (chemotherapy and endocrine therapy) or to MPA-directed treatment using the Prosigna (PAM50) test. Those with a Prosigna tumour Score (ROR_PT) & gt;60 receive standard management whilst those with a low score (≤60) are treated with endocrine therapy alone. Endocrine therapy for pre-menopausal women includes ovarian suppression. Prosigna tests are currently performed only for participants randomised to MPA-directed treatment. More than 1 tumour may be tested if participants have multi-focal tumours with discordant features and/or are considered clinically significant. The co-primary outcomes are: (1) Invasive Disease Free Survival (IDFS) and (2) cost-effectiveness. Secondary outcomes include IDFS in patients with low-score tumours and quality of life. Recruitment of 4500 patients over 5 years will permit demonstration of 3% non-inferiority of test-directed treatment, assuming 5-year IDFS of 85% with standard management. An integrated qualitative recruitment study addresses challenges to consent and recruitment, building on experience from the feasibility study which found that a multidisciplinary approach is important for recruitment success. Results: The OPTIMA main trial opened in January 2017. Overall recruitment as of 1 July 2019 was 1123 (1100 from UK, 13 from Norway); 91% had axillary node macro-metastases. Median time from consent to treatment allocation was 12 days (interquartile range 10-14 days). The withdrawal rate from trial treatment is 3%; 50% of these continue with follow up. Prosigna tests have been performed on 608 tumours for 549 participants; 59% were luminal A, 38% were luminal B and 3% non-luminal (6 patients with non-luminal tumours [1% overall] were ineligible on receptor retesting). Of the 53 (10%) participants with & gt;1 tumour tested, 3 (6%) had discordant scores only, 7 (13%) had discordant subtypes only and 8 (15%) had both discordant scores and subtypes. Two thirds of the MPA-directed arm participants have been allocated to endocrine therapy only. The test failure rate is & lt;1%. Conclusion: OPTIMA is one of two large scale prospective trials validating the use of test-guided chemotherapy decisions in node-positive early breast cancer. It is expected to have a global impact on breast cancer treatment. Funding: OPTIMA is funded by the UK NIHR HTA Programme (10/34/501). Views expressed are those of the authors and not those of the HTA Programme, NIHR, NHS or the Department of Health. Trial Inquiries: OPTIMA@warwick.ac.uk Citation Format: Robert C Stein, Andrea Marshall, Andreas Makris, Luke Hughes-Davies, Iain R MacPherson, Carmel Conefrey, Leila Rooshenas, Sarah E Pinder, Abeer M Shaaban, Bjørn Naume, David A Cameron, Daniel W Rea, Helena M Earl, Christopher J Poole, Peter S Hall, Georgina Dotchin, Stuart A McIntosh, Victoria Harmer, Adrienne Morgan, Bethany Shinkins, Nigel Stallard, Christopher McCabe, Jenny L Donovan, John MS Bartlett, Janet A Dunn. OPTIMA: A prospective randomized trial to validate the clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of gene expression test-directed chemotherapy decisions in mostly node-positive early breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-17-01.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publikationsdatum: 2020
    ZDB Id: 2036785-5
    ZDB Id: 1432-1
    ZDB Id: 410466-3
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 9
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 83, No. 5_Supplement ( 2023-03-01), p. OT3-32-01-OT3-32-01
    Kurzfassung: Background: Multi-parameter tumor gene expression assays (MPAs) are used to estimate individual patient risk and guide chemotherapy use in hormone-sensitive, HER2-negative early breast cancer. The TAILORx trial supports MPA use in a node-negative population. Evidence for MPA use in postmenopausal node-positive breast cancer has been provided by the RxPONDER trial interim analysis but this relies on the absence of superiority in an analysis where & gt;50% of events were unrelated to breast cancer. There is much uncertainty about MPA use for premenopausal patients. OPTIMA (Optimal Personalised Treatment of early breast cancer usIng Multi-parameter Analysis) (ISRCTN42400492) is a prospective international randomized controlled trial designed to validate MPAs as predictors of chemotherapy sensitivity in a largely node-positive breast cancer population. Methods: OPTIMA is a partially blinded study with an adaptive two-stage design. The trial recruits women and men age 40 or older with resected ER-positive, HER2-negative invasive breast cancer and up to 9 involved axillary lymph nodes. Randomization is to standard management (chemotherapy and endocrine therapy) or to MPA-directed treatment using the Prosigna (PAM50) test. Those with a Prosigna tumor Score (ROR_PT) & gt;60 receive standard management whilst those with a low score (≤60) tumor are treated with endocrine therapy alone. Endocrine therapy for pre-menopausal women includes ovarian suppression for all participants unless they experience a chemotherapy-induced menopause. Adjuvant abemaciclib is permitted. The trial will be analyzed for (1) non-inferiority of recurrence according to randomization and (2) cost-effectiveness. The key secondary outcome is non-inferiority of recurrence for patients with low ROR_PT score tumors. The efficacy analyses will be performed Per Protocol using Invasive Breast Cancer Free Survival (IBCFS) as the primary outcome measure to limit the risk of a false non-inferiority conclusion. Recruitment of 4500 patients over 8 years will permit demonstration of up to 3% non-inferiority of test-directed treatment with at least 83% power, assuming 5-year IBCFS is 87% with standard management. An integrated qualitative recruitment study addresses challenges to consent and recruitment, building on experience from the feasibility study which found that a multidisciplinary approach is important for recruitment success. OPTIMA is strongly supported by a patient group which has helped design all patient documents and which is represented on the TMG. Results: The OPTIMA main trial opened in January 2017 and has continued to recruit throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Overall recruitment as of 1 July 2022 was 2814 (2593 from UK, 221 from Norway). Patient characteristics are well balanced between the trial arms. Currently 95% of randomized participants are eligible for inclusion in the PP analysis. 66% of the MPA-directed arm participants have been allocated to endocrine therapy only. The test failure rate is & lt; 1%. Conclusion: OPTIMA will provide robust unbiased evidence on test-directed chemotherapy safety for both postmenopausal and premenopausal women with 1-3 involved nodes as well as for patients with 4-9 involved nodes and for patients treated with abemaciclib. Funding: OPTIMA is funded by the UK NIHR HTA Programme (10/34/501) and in Norway by KLINBEFORSK and the Norwegian Cancer Society. Views expressed are those of the authors and not those of the HTA Programme, NIHR, NHS or the Department of Health. Trial Inquiries: OPTIMA@warwick.ac.uk Patient characteristics Citation Format: Robert Stein, Andreas Makris, Iain Macpherson, Luke Hughes-Davies, Andrea Marshall, Georgina Dotchin, David A. Cameron, Belinda E. Kiely, Caroline Wilson, Anne Armstrong, Helena M. Earl, Christopher J. Poole, Janice Tsang, Bjørn Naume, Daniel Rea, Hege Ohnstad, Peter S. Hall, Stuart A. McIntosh, Bethany Shinkins, Christopher McCabe, Adrienne Morgan, John MS Bartlett, Janet A. Dunn. OPTIMA, a prospective randomized trial to validate the clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of gene expression test-directed chemotherapy decisions in high clinical risk early breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-32-01.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 1538-7445
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publikationsdatum: 2023
    ZDB Id: 2036785-5
    ZDB Id: 1432-1
    ZDB Id: 410466-3
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 10
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 37, No. 3 ( 2019-01-20), p. 178-189
    Kurzfassung: CDK4/6 inhibitors are used to treat estrogen receptor (ER)–positive metastatic breast cancer (BC) in combination with endocrine therapy. PALLET is a phase II randomized trial that evaluated the effects of combination palbociclib plus letrozole as neoadjuvant therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Postmenopausal women with ER-positive primary BC and tumors greater than or equal to 2.0 cm were randomly assigned 3:2:2:2 to letrozole (2.5 mg/d) for 14 weeks (A); letrozole for 2 weeks, then palbociclib plus letrozole to 14 weeks (B); palbociclib for 2 weeks, then palbociclib plus letrozole to 14 weeks (C); or palbociclib plus letrozole for 14 weeks. Palbociclib 125 mg/d was administered orally on a 21-days-on, 7-days-off schedule. Core-cut biopsies were taken at baseline and 2 and 14 weeks. Coprimary end points for letrozole versus palbociclib plus letrozole groups (A v B + C + D) were change in Ki-67 (protein encoded by the  MKI67 gene; immunohistochemistry) between baseline and 14 weeks and clinical response (ordinal and ultrasound) after 14 weeks. Complete cell-cycle arrest was defined as Ki-67 less than or equal to 2.7%. Apoptosis was characterized by cleaved poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase. RESULTS Three hundred seven patients were recruited. Clinical response was not significantly different between palbociclib plus letrozole and letrozole groups ( P = .20; complete response + partial response, 54.3% v 49.5%), and progressive disease was 3.2% versus 5.4%, respectively. Median log-fold change in Ki-67 was greater with palbociclib plus letrozole compared with letrozole (−4.1 v −2.2; P 〈 .001) in the 190 evaluable patients (61.9%), corresponding to a geometric mean change of −97.4% versus −88.5%. More patients on palbociclib plus letrozole achieved complete cell-cycle arrest (90% v 59%; P 〈 .001). Median log-fold change (suppression) of cleaved poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase was greater with palbociclib plus letrozole versus letrozole (−0.80 v −0.42; P 〈 .001). More patients had grade 3 or greater toxicity on palbociclib plus letrozole (49.8% v 17.0%; P 〈 .001) mainly because of asymptomatic neutropenia. CONCLUSION Adding palbociclib to letrozole significantly enhanced the suppression of malignant cell proliferation (Ki-67) in primary ER-positive BC, but did not increase the clinical response rate over 14 weeks, which was possibly related to a concurrent reduction in apoptosis.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publikationsdatum: 2019
    ZDB Id: 2005181-5
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
Schließen ⊗
Diese Webseite nutzt Cookies und das Analyse-Tool Matomo. Weitere Informationen finden Sie hier...