GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

X
feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
Document type
Keywords
Publisher
Years
  • 1
    facet.materialart.
    Unknown
    The Global Energy Balance Archive (GEBA) version 2017: A database for worldwide measured surface energy fluxes. Link to database files (2017)
    PANGAEA
    In:  Supplement to: Wild, Martin; Ohmura, Atsumu; Schär, Christoph; Müller, Guido; Folini, Doris; Schwarz, Matthias; Hakuba, Maria Z; Sanchez-Lorenzo, Arturo (2017): The Global Energy Balance Archive (GEBA) version 2017: a database for worldwide measured surface energy fluxes. Earth System Science Data, 9(2), 601-613, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-9-601-2017
    Details
    Publication Date: 2024-02-16
    Description: The Global Energy Balance Archive (GEBA) is a database for the central storage of the worldwide measured energy fluxes at the Earth's surface, maintained at ETH Zurich (Switzerland). This paper documents the status of the GEBA version 2017 dataset, presents the new web interface and user access, and reviews the scientific impact that GEBA data had in various applications. GEBA has continuously been expanded and updated and contains in its 2017 version around 500.000 monthly mean entries of various surface energy balance components measured at 2500 locations. The database contains observations from 15 surface energy flux components, with the most widely measured quantity available in GEBA being the shortwave radiation incident at the Earth's surface (global radiation). Many of the historic records extend over several decades. GEBA contains monthly data from a variety of sources, namely from the World Radiation Data Centre (WRDC) in St. Petersburg, from national weather services, from different research networks (BSRN, ARM, SURFRAD), from peer-reviewed publications, project and data reports, and from personal communications. Quality checks are applied to test for gross errors in the dataset. GEBA has played a key role in various research applications, such as in the quantification of the global energy balance, in the discussion of the anomalous atmospheric shortwave absorption, and in the detection of multi-decadal variations in global radiation, known as "global dimming" and "brightening". GEBA is further extensively used for the evaluation of climate models and satellite-derived surface flux products. On a more applied level, GEBA provides the basis for engineering applications in the context of solar power generation, water management, agricultural production and tourism. GEBA is publicly accessible through the internet via http://www.geba.ethz.ch.
    Type: Dataset
    Format: application/zip, 1.4 MBytes
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    DATA PANGAEA
  • 2
    facet.materialart.
    Unknown
    Harmonized in-situ observations of surface energy fluxes and environmental drivers at 64 Arctic vegetation and glacier sites (2022)
    PANGAEA
    Details
    Publication Date: 2024-04-12
    Description: Despite the importance of surface energy budgets (SEBs) for land-climate interactions in the Arctic, uncertainties in their prediction persist. In-situ observational data of SEB components - useful for research and model validation - are collected at relatively few sites across the terrestrial Arctic, and not all available datasets are readily interoperable. Furthermore, the terrestrial Arctic consists of a diversity of vegetation types, which are generally not well represented in land surface schemes of current Earth system models. Therefore, we here provide four datasets comprising: 1. Harmonized, standardized and aggregated in situ observations of SEB components at 64 vegetated and glaciated sites north of 60° latitude, in the time period 1994-2021 2. A description of all study sites and associated environmental conditions, including the vegetation types, which correspond to the classification of the Circumpolar Arctic Vegetation Map (CAVM, Raynolds et al. 2019). 3. Data generated in a literature synthesis from 358 study sites on vegetation or glacier (〉=60°N latitude) covered by 148 publications. 4. Metadata, including data contributor information and measurement heights of variables associated with Oehri et al. 2022.
    Keywords: Arctic; ArcticTundraSEB; Arctic Tundra Surface Energy Budget; dry tundra; Eddy covariance; eddy heat flux; glacier; graminoids; ground heat flux and net radiation; harmonized data; high latitude; Land-Atmosphere; Land-cover; latent and sensible heat; latent heat flux; longwave radiation; meteorological data; observatory data; Peat bog; Radiation fluxes; Radiative energy budget; sensible heat flux; shortwave radiation; shrub tundra; surface energy balance; synthetic data; tundra vegetation; wetland
    Type: Dataset
    Format: application/zip, 4 datasets
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    DATA PANGAEA
  • 3
    facet.materialart.
    Unknown
    Harmonized in-situ observations of surface energy fluxes and environmental drivers at 64 Arctic vegetation and glacier sites - Metadata (2022)
    PANGAEA
    Details
    Publication Date: 2024-04-12
    Description: Despite the importance of surface energy budgets (SEBs) for land-climate interactions in the Arctic, uncertainties in their prediction persist. In situ observational data of SEB components - useful for research and model validation - are collected at relatively few sites across the terrestrial Arctic, and not all available datasets are readily interoperable. Furthermore, the terrestrial Arctic consists of a diversity of vegetation types, which are generally not well represented in land surface schemes of current Earth system models. This dataset contains metadata information about surface energy budget components measured at 64 tundra and glacier sites 〉60° N across the Arctic. This information was taken from the open-access repositories FLUXNET, Ameriflux, AON, GC-Net and PROMICE. The contained datasets are associated with the publication vegetation type as an important predictor of the Arctic Summer Land Surface Energy Budget by Oehri et al. 2022, and intended to support research of surface energy budgets and their relationship with environmental conditions, in particular vegetation characteristics across the terrestrial Arctic.
    Keywords: Aggregation type; Arctic; Arctic_SEB_CA-SCB; Arctic_SEB_CP1; Arctic_SEB_Dye-2; Arctic_SEB_EGP; Arctic_SEB_FI-Lom; Arctic_SEB_GL-NuF; Arctic_SEB_GL-ZaF; Arctic_SEB_GL-ZaH; Arctic_SEB_KAN_B; Arctic_SEB_KAN_L; Arctic_SEB_KAN_M; Arctic_SEB_KAN_U; Arctic_SEB_KPC_L; Arctic_SEB_KPC_U; Arctic_SEB_MIT; Arctic_SEB_NASA-E; Arctic_SEB_NASA-SE; Arctic_SEB_NASA-U; Arctic_SEB_NUK_K; Arctic_SEB_NUK_L; Arctic_SEB_NUK_N; Arctic_SEB_NUK_U; Arctic_SEB_QAS_A; Arctic_SEB_QAS_L; Arctic_SEB_QAS_M; Arctic_SEB_QAS_U; Arctic_SEB_RU-Che; Arctic_SEB_RU-Cok; Arctic_SEB_RU-Sam; Arctic_SEB_RU-Tks; Arctic_SEB_RU-Vrk; Arctic_SEB_Saddle; Arctic_SEB_SCO_L; Arctic_SEB_SCO_U; Arctic_SEB_SE-St1; Arctic_SEB_SJ-Adv; Arctic_SEB_SJ-Blv; Arctic_SEB_SouthDome; Arctic_SEB_Summit; Arctic_SEB_TAS_A; Arctic_SEB_TAS_L; Arctic_SEB_TAS_U; Arctic_SEB_THU_L; Arctic_SEB_THU_U; Arctic_SEB_Tunu-N; Arctic_SEB_UPE_L; Arctic_SEB_UPE_U; Arctic_SEB_US-A03; Arctic_SEB_US-A10; Arctic_SEB_US-An1; Arctic_SEB_US-An2; Arctic_SEB_US-An3; Arctic_SEB_US-Atq; Arctic_SEB_US-Brw; Arctic_SEB_US-EML; Arctic_SEB_US-HVa; Arctic_SEB_US-ICh; Arctic_SEB_US-ICs; Arctic_SEB_US-ICt; Arctic_SEB_US-Ivo; Arctic_SEB_US-NGB; Arctic_SEB_US-Upa; Arctic_SEB_US-xHE; Arctic_SEB_US-xTL; ArcticTundraSEB; Arctic Tundra Surface Energy Budget; Author(s); Data source; Date/Time of event; Day of the year; Description; dry tundra; Eddy covariance; eddy heat flux; Event label; Field observation; First year of observation; glacier; graminoids; ground heat flux and net radiation; harmonized data; high latitude; Institution; Instrument; Land-Atmosphere; Land-cover; Last year of observation; latent and sensible heat; latent heat flux; LATITUDE; Location ID; LONGITUDE; longwave radiation; meteorological data; Method comment; observatory data; Peat bog; Radiation fluxes; Radiative energy budget; Sample height; sensible heat flux; shortwave radiation; shrub tundra; surface energy balance; synthetic data; tundra vegetation; Type of study; Unit; Variable; wetland
    Type: Dataset
    Format: text/tab-separated-values, 20562 data points
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    DATA PANGAEA
  • 4
    facet.materialart.
    Unknown
    Literature synthesis data of surface energy fluxes and environmental drivers from Arctic vegetation and glacier sites (2022)
    PANGAEA
    Details
    Publication Date: 2024-04-12
    Description: Despite the importance of surface energy budgets (SEBs) for land-climate interactions in the Arctic, uncertainties in their prediction persist. In situ observational data of SEB components - useful for research and model validation - are collected at relatively few sites across the terrestrial Arctic, and not all available datasets are readily interoperable. Furthermore, the terrestrial Arctic consists of a diversity of vegetation types, which are generally not well represented in land surface schemes of current Earth system models. This dataset describes the data generated in a literature synthesis, covering 358 study sites on vegetation or glacier (〉=60°N latitude), which contained surface energy budget observations. The literature synthesis comprised 148 publications searched on the ISI Web of Science Core Collection.
    Keywords: Arctic; Arctic_SEB_1; Arctic_SEB_1951-2009_1; Arctic_SEB_1965-2000_1; Arctic_SEB_1965-2000_2; Arctic_SEB_1965-2000_3; Arctic_SEB_1965-2000_4; Arctic_SEB_1969-2013_1; Arctic_SEB_1970-1972_1; Arctic_SEB_1970-1979_1; Arctic_SEB_1972-2004_1; Arctic_SEB_1972-2004_10; Arctic_SEB_1972-2004_11; Arctic_SEB_1972-2004_2; Arctic_SEB_1972-2004_3; Arctic_SEB_1972-2004_4; Arctic_SEB_1972-2004_5; Arctic_SEB_1972-2004_6; Arctic_SEB_1972-2004_7; Arctic_SEB_1972-2004_8; Arctic_SEB_1972-2004_9; Arctic_SEB_1979-1995_1; Arctic_SEB_1979-1995_2; Arctic_SEB_1979-1995_3; Arctic_SEB_1979-1995_4; Arctic_SEB_1979-2005_1; Arctic_SEB_1980-1981_1; Arctic_SEB_1981-1997_1; Arctic_SEB_1981-1997_2; Arctic_SEB_1983-2005_1; Arctic_SEB_1983-2005_2; Arctic_SEB_1983-2005_3; Arctic_SEB_1984-1991_1; Arctic_SEB_1985-1989_1; Arctic_SEB_1985-2016_1; Arctic_SEB_1988-1988_1; Arctic_SEB_1988-1988_2; Arctic_SEB_1988-1988_3; Arctic_SEB_1988-1988_4; Arctic_SEB_1988-1988_5; Arctic_SEB_1989-1990_1; Arctic_SEB_1990-1991_1; Arctic_SEB_1991-1991_1; Arctic_SEB_1991-1999_1; Arctic_SEB_1991-1999_2; Arctic_SEB_1991-1999_3; Arctic_SEB_1992-1992_1; Arctic_SEB_1992-1997_1; Arctic_SEB_1994-1994_1; Arctic_SEB_1994-1994_2; Arctic_SEB_1994-1994_3; Arctic_SEB_1994-1994_4; Arctic_SEB_1994-1996_1; Arctic_SEB_1994-1996_10; Arctic_SEB_1994-1996_11; Arctic_SEB_1994-1996_12; Arctic_SEB_1994-1996_13; Arctic_SEB_1994-1996_14; Arctic_SEB_1994-1996_15; Arctic_SEB_1994-1996_16; Arctic_SEB_1994-1996_17; Arctic_SEB_1994-1996_2; Arctic_SEB_1994-1996_3; Arctic_SEB_1994-1996_4; Arctic_SEB_1994-1996_5; Arctic_SEB_1994-1996_6; Arctic_SEB_1994-1996_7; Arctic_SEB_1994-1996_8; Arctic_SEB_1994-1996_9; Arctic_SEB_1994-2008_1; Arctic_SEB_1994-2008_2; Arctic_SEB_1994-2009_1; Arctic_SEB_1994-2015_1; Arctic_SEB_1994-2015_2; Arctic_SEB_1994-2015_3; Arctic_SEB_1994-2015_4; Arctic_SEB_1994-2015_5; Arctic_SEB_1994-2015_6; Arctic_SEB_1995-1995_1; Arctic_SEB_1995-1995_2; Arctic_SEB_1995-1996_1; Arctic_SEB_1995-1997_1; Arctic_SEB_1995-1997_2; Arctic_SEB_1995-1997_3; Arctic_SEB_1995-1997_4; Arctic_SEB_1995-1998_1; Arctic_SEB_1995-1999_1; Arctic_SEB_1996-1997_1; Arctic_SEB_1996-1999_1; Arctic_SEB_1996-2005_1; Arctic_SEB_1996-2005_2; Arctic_SEB_1996-2005_3; Arctic_SEB_1997-1998_1; Arctic_SEB_1997-1999_1; Arctic_SEB_1997-2018_1; Arctic_SEB_1997-2018_10; Arctic_SEB_1997-2018_11; Arctic_SEB_1997-2018_12; Arctic_SEB_1997-2018_13; Arctic_SEB_1997-2018_14; Arctic_SEB_1997-2018_15; Arctic_SEB_1997-2018_16; Arctic_SEB_1997-2018_17; Arctic_SEB_1997-2018_18; Arctic_SEB_1997-2018_19; Arctic_SEB_1997-2018_2; Arctic_SEB_1997-2018_20; Arctic_SEB_1997-2018_21; Arctic_SEB_1997-2018_22; Arctic_SEB_1997-2018_23; Arctic_SEB_1997-2018_24; Arctic_SEB_1997-2018_25; Arctic_SEB_1997-2018_3; Arctic_SEB_1997-2018_4; Arctic_SEB_1997-2018_5; Arctic_SEB_1997-2018_6; Arctic_SEB_1997-2018_7; Arctic_SEB_1997-2018_8; Arctic_SEB_1997-2018_9; Arctic_SEB_1998-1998_1; Arctic_SEB_1998-1999_1; Arctic_SEB_1998-2000_1; Arctic_SEB_1998-2001_1; Arctic_SEB_1998-2005_1; Arctic_SEB_1998-2011_1; Arctic_SEB_1998-2011_2; Arctic_SEB_1998-2011_3; Arctic_SEB_1998-2013_1; Arctic_SEB_1999-1999_1; Arctic_SEB_1999-2000_1; Arctic_SEB_1999-2008_1; Arctic_SEB_1999-2008_2; Arctic_SEB_1999-2009_1; Arctic_SEB_1999-2014_1; Arctic_SEB_2000-2000_1; Arctic_SEB_2000-2000_2; Arctic_SEB_2000-2000_3; Arctic_SEB_2000-2000_4; Arctic_SEB_2000-2002_1; Arctic_SEB_2000-2002_2; Arctic_SEB_2000-2002_3; Arctic_SEB_2000-2003_1; Arctic_SEB_2000-2003_2; Arctic_SEB_2000-2003_3; Arctic_SEB_2000-2007_1; Arctic_SEB_2000-2007_2; Arctic_SEB_2000-2007_3; Arctic_SEB_2000-2007_4; Arctic_SEB_2000-2008_1; Arctic_SEB_2000-2010_1; Arctic_SEB_2000-2011_1; Arctic_SEB_2000-2011_10; Arctic_SEB_2000-2011_11; Arctic_SEB_2000-2011_2; Arctic_SEB_2000-2011_3; Arctic_SEB_2000-2011_4; Arctic_SEB_2000-2011_5; Arctic_SEB_2000-2011_6; Arctic_SEB_2000-2011_7; Arctic_SEB_2000-2011_8; Arctic_SEB_2000-2011_9; Arctic_SEB_2000-2014_1; Arctic_SEB_2001-2003_1; Arctic_SEB_2002-2002_1; Arctic_SEB_2002-2003_1; Arctic_SEB_2002-2003_2; Arctic_SEB_2002-2004_1; Arctic_SEB_2002-2010_1; Arctic_SEB_2002-2012_1; Arctic_SEB_2002-2012_2; Arctic_SEB_2002-2012_3; Arctic_SEB_2003-2003_1; Arctic_SEB_2003-2004_1; Arctic_SEB_2003-2007_1; Arctic_SEB_2003-2008_1; Arctic_SEB_2003-2008_2; Arctic_SEB_2003-2010_1; Arctic_SEB_2003-2010_2; Arctic_SEB_2003-2010_3; Arctic_SEB_2003-2011_1; Arctic_SEB_2004-2004_1; Arctic_SEB_2004-2006_1; Arctic_SEB_2004-2013_1; Arctic_SEB_2005-2005_1; Arctic_SEB_2006-2006_1; Arctic_SEB_2006-2006_2; Arctic_SEB_2006-2007_1; Arctic_SEB_2006-2007_10; Arctic_SEB_2006-2007_11; Arctic_SEB_2006-2007_12; Arctic_SEB_2006-2007_13; Arctic_SEB_2006-2007_14; Arctic_SEB_2006-2007_2; Arctic_SEB_2006-2007_3; Arctic_SEB_2006-2007_4; Arctic_SEB_2006-2007_5; Arctic_SEB_2006-2007_6; Arctic_SEB_2006-2007_7; Arctic_SEB_2006-2007_8; Arctic_SEB_2006-2007_9; Arctic_SEB_2006-2008_1; Arctic_SEB_2006-2008_2; Arctic_SEB_2006-2009_1; Arctic_SEB_2007-2007_1; Arctic_SEB_2007-2008_1; Arctic_SEB_2007-2009_1; Arctic_SEB_2007-2009_2; Arctic_SEB_2007-2010_1; Arctic_SEB_2007-2014_1; Arctic_SEB_2007-2015_1; Arctic_SEB_2007-2015_2; Arctic_SEB_2008-2008_1; Arctic_SEB_2008-2008_2; Arctic_SEB_2008-2008_3; Arctic_SEB_2008-2009_1; Arctic_SEB_2008-2010_1; Arctic_SEB_2008-2010_2; Arctic_SEB_2008-2010_3; Arctic_SEB_2008-2011_1; Arctic_SEB_2008-2012_1; Arctic_SEB_2008-2012_2; Arctic_SEB_2008-2012_3; Arctic_SEB_2009-2012_1; Arctic_SEB_2009-2012_2; Arctic_SEB_2009-2012_3; Arctic_SEB_2009-2012_4; Arctic_SEB_2009-2012_5; Arctic_SEB_2009-2014_1; Arctic_SEB_2009-2014_2; Arctic_SEB_2010-2014_1; Arctic_SEB_2010-2014_2; Arctic_SEB_2010-2014_3; Arctic_SEB_2010-2014_4; Arctic_SEB_2010-2014_5; Arctic_SEB_2011-2011_1; Arctic_SEB_2011-2013_1; Arctic_SEB_2011-2014_1; Arctic_SEB_2012-2012_1; Arctic_SEB_2012-2013_1; Arctic_SEB_2012-2013_2; Arctic_SEB_2012-2013_3; Arctic_SEB_2012-2013_4; Arctic_SEB_2012-2014_1; Arctic_SEB_2012-2015_1; Arctic_SEB_2012-2015_2; Arctic_SEB_2012-2015_3; Arctic_SEB_2012-2015_4; Arctic_SEB_2012-2015_5; Arctic_SEB_2013-2013_1; Arctic_SEB_2013-2014_1; Arctic_SEB_2013-2015_1; Arctic_SEB_2013-2015_2; Arctic_SEB_2013-2015_3; Arctic_SEB_2014-2014_1; Arctic_SEB_2014-2015_1; Arctic_SEB_2014-2016_1; Arctic_SEB_2015-2015_1; Arctic_SEB_2015-2015_2; Arctic_SEB_2015-2015_3; ArcticTundraSEB; Arctic Tundra Surface Energy Budget; Author(s); Classification; Comment; Data collection methodology; Data type; Date/Time of event; dry tundra; Eddy covariance; eddy heat flux; ELEVATION; Energy budget, description; Event label; Field observation; First year of observation; glacier; glaciers; graminoids; ground heat flux and net radiation; harmonized data; high latitude; Identification; Journal/report title; Land-Atmosphere; Land-cover; Last year of observation; latent and sensible heat; latent heat flux; LATITUDE; Location; LONGITUDE; longwave radiation; meteorological data; observatory data; Peat bog; Persistent Identifier; Publication type; Radiation fluxes; Radiative energy budget; Resolution; Season; sensible heat flux; shortwave radiation; shrub tundra; Spatial coverage; surface energy balance; synthetic data; Title; tundra vegetation; Type of study; Variable; Vegetation type; wetland; wetlands; Year of publication
    Type: Dataset
    Format: text/tab-separated-values, 8650 data points
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    DATA PANGAEA
  • 5
    facet.materialart.
    Unknown
    Harmonized in-situ observations of surface energy fluxes and environmental drivers at 64 Arctic vegetation and glacier sites - Surface energy budget componenent data (2022)
    PANGAEA
    Details
    Publication Date: 2024-04-12
    Description: Despite the importance of surface energy budgets (SEBs) for land-climate interactions in the Arctic, uncertainties in their prediction persist. In situ observational data of SEB components - useful for research and model validation - are collected at relatively few sites across the terrestrial Arctic, and not all available datasets are readily interoperable. Furthermore, the terrestrial Arctic consists of a diversity of vegetation types, which are generally not well represented in land surface schemes of current Earth system models. This dataset comprises harmonized, standardized and aggregated in-situ observations of surface energy budget components measured at 64 sites on vegetated and glaciated sites north of 60° latitude, in the time period from 1994 till 2021. The surface energy budget components include net radiation, sensible heat flux, latent heat flux, ground heat flux, net shortwave radiation, net longwave radiation, surface temperature and albedo, which were aggregated to daily mean, minimum and maximum values from hourly and half-hourly measurements. Data were retrieved from the monitoring networks FLUXNET, AmeriFlux, AON, GC-Net and PROMICE.
    Keywords: Albedo; Albedo, maximum; Albedo, minimum; Arctic; Arctic_SEB_CA-SCB; Arctic_SEB_CP1; Arctic_SEB_Dye-2; Arctic_SEB_EGP; Arctic_SEB_FI-Lom; Arctic_SEB_GL-NuF; Arctic_SEB_GL-ZaF; Arctic_SEB_GL-ZaH; Arctic_SEB_KAN_B; Arctic_SEB_KAN_L; Arctic_SEB_KAN_M; Arctic_SEB_KAN_U; Arctic_SEB_KPC_L; Arctic_SEB_KPC_U; Arctic_SEB_MIT; Arctic_SEB_NASA-E; Arctic_SEB_NASA-SE; Arctic_SEB_NASA-U; Arctic_SEB_NUK_K; Arctic_SEB_NUK_L; Arctic_SEB_NUK_N; Arctic_SEB_NUK_U; Arctic_SEB_QAS_A; Arctic_SEB_QAS_L; Arctic_SEB_QAS_M; Arctic_SEB_QAS_U; Arctic_SEB_RU-Che; Arctic_SEB_RU-Cok; Arctic_SEB_RU-Sam; Arctic_SEB_RU-Tks; Arctic_SEB_RU-Vrk; Arctic_SEB_Saddle; Arctic_SEB_SCO_L; Arctic_SEB_SCO_U; Arctic_SEB_SE-St1; Arctic_SEB_SJ-Adv; Arctic_SEB_SJ-Blv; Arctic_SEB_SouthDome; Arctic_SEB_Summit; Arctic_SEB_TAS_A; Arctic_SEB_TAS_L; Arctic_SEB_TAS_U; Arctic_SEB_THU_L; Arctic_SEB_THU_U; Arctic_SEB_Tunu-N; Arctic_SEB_UPE_L; Arctic_SEB_UPE_U; Arctic_SEB_US-A03; Arctic_SEB_US-A10; Arctic_SEB_US-An1; Arctic_SEB_US-An2; Arctic_SEB_US-An3; Arctic_SEB_US-Atq; Arctic_SEB_US-Brw; Arctic_SEB_US-EML; Arctic_SEB_US-HVa; Arctic_SEB_US-ICh; Arctic_SEB_US-ICs; Arctic_SEB_US-ICt; Arctic_SEB_US-Ivo; Arctic_SEB_US-NGB; Arctic_SEB_US-Upa; Arctic_SEB_US-xHE; Arctic_SEB_US-xTL; ArcticTundraSEB; Arctic Tundra Surface Energy Budget; Bowen ratio; Calculated from Ground heat, flux / Net radiation; Calculated from Heat, flux, latent / Net radiation; Calculated from Heat, flux, sensible / Heat, flux, latent; Calculated from Heat, flux, sensible / Net radiation; Calculated from Heat, flux, sensible + Heat, flux, latent + Ground heat, flux; Calculated from Long-wave downward radiation, maximum - Long-wave upward radiation, maximum; Calculated from Long-wave downward radiation, minimum - Long-wave upward radiation, minimum; Calculated from Long-wave downward radiation - Long-wave upward radiation; Calculated from Long-wave net radiation / Net radiation; Calculated from Short-wave downward (GLOBAL) radiation, maximum - Short-wave upward (REFLEX) radiation, maximum; Calculated from Short-wave downward (GLOBAL) radiation, minimum - Short-wave upward (REFLEX) radiation, minimum; Calculated from Short-wave downward (GLOBAL) radiation - Short-wave upward (REFLEX) radiation; Calculated from Short-wave net radiation, maximum + Long-wave net radiation, maximum; Calculated from Short-wave net radiation, minimum + Long-wave net radiation, minimum; Calculated from Short-wave net radiation / Net radiation; Calculated from Short-wave net radiation + Long-wave net radiation; Calculated from Short-wave upward (REFLEX) radiation / Short-wave downward (GLOBAL) radiation; Calculated from Surface temperature, maximum - Temperature, air, maximum; Calculated from Surface temperature, minimum - Temperature, air, minimum; Calculated from Surface temperature - Temperature, air; Cloud coverage; Cloud coverage, maximum; Cloud coverage, minimum; Daily maximum; Daily mean; Daily minimum; Data source; DATE/TIME; Day of the year; dry tundra; Eddy covariance; eddy heat flux; ELEVATION; Event label; Field observation; glacier; graminoids; Ground heat, flux; Ground heat, flux, maximum; Ground heat, flux, minimum; Ground heat, flux/Net radiation ratio; ground heat flux and net radiation; harmonized data; Heat, flux, latent; Heat, flux, latent, maximum; Heat, flux, latent, minimum; Heat, flux, latent/Net radiation ratio; Heat, flux, sensible; Heat, flux, sensible, maximum; Heat, flux, sensible, minimum; Heat flux, sensible/Net radiation ratio; high latitude; Humidity, relative; Humidity, relative, maximum; Humidity, relative, minimum; Land-Atmosphere; Land-cover; latent and sensible heat; latent heat flux; LATITUDE; Location ID; LONGITUDE; Long-wave downward radiation; Long-wave downward radiation, maximum; Long-wave downward radiation, minimum; Long-wave net radiation; Long-wave net radiation, maximum; Long-wave net radiation, minimum; Long-wave net radiation/Net radiation ratio; longwave radiation; Long-wave upward radiation; Long-wave upward radiation, maximum; Long-wave upward radiation, minimum; meteorological data; Month; Net radiation; Net radiation, maximum; Net radiation, minimum; Normalized by X / Potential incoming solar radiation, maximum * 100; observatory data; Original variable; Peat bog; Potential incoming solar radiation; Potential incoming solar radiation, maximum; Potential incoming solar radiation, minimum; Precipitation; Precipitation, daily, maximum; Precipitation, daily, minimum; Pressure, atmospheric; Pressure, atmospheric, maximum; Pressure, atmospheric, minimum; Radiation fluxes; Radiative energy budget; sensible heat flux; Short-wave downward (GLOBAL) radiation; Short-wave downward (GLOBAL) radiation, maximum; Short-wave downward (GLOBAL) radiation, minimum; Short-wave net radiation; Short-wave net radiation, maximum; Short-wave net radiation, minimum; Short-wave net radiation/Net radiation ratio; shortwave radiation; Short-wave upward (REFLEX) radiation; Short-wave upward (REFLEX) radiation, maximum; Short-wave upward (REFLEX) radiation, minimum; shrub tundra; Soil water content, volumetric; Soil water content, volumetric, maximum; Soil water content, volumetric, minimum; surface energy balance; Surface temperature; Surface temperature, maximum; Surface temperature, minimum; synthetic data; Temperature, air; Temperature, air, maximum; Temperature, air, minimum; Temperature, soil; Temperature, soil, maximum; Temperature, soil, minimum; Temperature gradient, 0-2m above surface; Temperature gradient, 0-2m above surface, maximum; Temperature gradient, 0-2m above surface, minimum; tundra vegetation; Type of study; Vapour pressure deficit; Vapour pressure deficit, maximum; Vapour pressure deficit, minimum; wetland; Wind direction; Wind speed; Wind speed, maximum; Wind speed, minimum; Year of observation
    Type: Dataset
    Format: text/tab-separated-values, 17112737 data points
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    DATA PANGAEA
  • 6
    facet.materialart.
    Unknown
    Harmonized in-situ observations of surface energy fluxes and environmental drivers at 64 Arctic vegetation and glacier sites - Environmental conditions (2022)
    PANGAEA
    Details
    Publication Date: 2024-05-05
    Description: Despite the importance of surface energy budgets (SEBs) for land-climate interactions in the Arctic, uncertainties in their prediction persist. In situ observational data of SEB components - useful for research and model validation - are collected at relatively few sites across the terrestrial Arctic, and not all available datasets are readily interoperable. Furthermore, the terrestrial Arctic consists of a diversity of vegetation types, which are generally not well represented in land surface schemes of current Earth system models. This dataset describes the environmental conditions for 64 tundra and glacier sites (〉=60°N latitude) across the Arctic, for which in situ measurements of surface energy budget components were harmonized (see Oehri et al. 2022). These environmental conditions are (proxies of) potential drivers of SEB-components and could therefore be called SEB-drivers. The associated environmental conditions, include the vegetation types graminoid tundra, prostrate dwarf-shrub tundra, erect-shrub tundra, wetland complexes, barren complexes (≤ 40% horizontal plant cover), boreal peat bogs and glacier. These land surface types (apart from boreal peat bogs) correspond to the main classification units of the Circumpolar Arctic Vegetation Map (CAVM, Raynolds et al. 2019). For each site, additional climatic and biophysical variables are available, including cloud cover, snow cover duration, permafrost characteristics, climatic conditions and topographic conditions.
    Keywords: Arctic; Arctic_SEB_CA-SCB; Arctic_SEB_CP1; Arctic_SEB_Dye-2; Arctic_SEB_EGP; Arctic_SEB_FI-Lom; Arctic_SEB_GL-NuF; Arctic_SEB_GL-ZaF; Arctic_SEB_GL-ZaH; Arctic_SEB_KAN_B; Arctic_SEB_KAN_L; Arctic_SEB_KAN_M; Arctic_SEB_KAN_U; Arctic_SEB_KPC_L; Arctic_SEB_KPC_U; Arctic_SEB_MIT; Arctic_SEB_NASA-E; Arctic_SEB_NASA-SE; Arctic_SEB_NASA-U; Arctic_SEB_NUK_K; Arctic_SEB_NUK_L; Arctic_SEB_NUK_N; Arctic_SEB_NUK_U; Arctic_SEB_QAS_A; Arctic_SEB_QAS_L; Arctic_SEB_QAS_M; Arctic_SEB_QAS_U; Arctic_SEB_RU-Che; Arctic_SEB_RU-Cok; Arctic_SEB_RU-Sam; Arctic_SEB_RU-Tks; Arctic_SEB_RU-Vrk; Arctic_SEB_Saddle; Arctic_SEB_SCO_L; Arctic_SEB_SCO_U; Arctic_SEB_SE-St1; Arctic_SEB_SJ-Adv; Arctic_SEB_SJ-Blv; Arctic_SEB_SouthDome; Arctic_SEB_Summit; Arctic_SEB_TAS_A; Arctic_SEB_TAS_L; Arctic_SEB_TAS_U; Arctic_SEB_THU_L; Arctic_SEB_THU_U; Arctic_SEB_Tunu-N; Arctic_SEB_UPE_L; Arctic_SEB_UPE_U; Arctic_SEB_US-A03; Arctic_SEB_US-A10; Arctic_SEB_US-An1; Arctic_SEB_US-An2; Arctic_SEB_US-An3; Arctic_SEB_US-Atq; Arctic_SEB_US-Brw; Arctic_SEB_US-EML; Arctic_SEB_US-HVa; Arctic_SEB_US-ICh; Arctic_SEB_US-ICs; Arctic_SEB_US-ICt; Arctic_SEB_US-Ivo; Arctic_SEB_US-NGB; Arctic_SEB_US-Upa; Arctic_SEB_US-xHE; Arctic_SEB_US-xTL; ArcticTundraSEB; Arctic Tundra Surface Energy Budget; Aspect; Aspect, coefficient of variation; Calculated average/mean values; Cloud cover; Cloud cover, standard deviation; Cloud top pressure; Cloud top pressure, standard deviation; Cloud top temperature; Cloud top temperature, standard deviation; Conrad's continentality index; Daily maximum; Daily mean; Data source; Date/Time of event; dry tundra; Eddy covariance; eddy heat flux; ELEVATION; Elevation, standard deviation; Event label; Field observation; glacier; graminoids; ground heat flux and net radiation; harmonized data; high latitude; Humidity, relative; Land-Atmosphere; Land-cover; Land cover classes; Land cover type; latent and sensible heat; latent heat flux; LATITUDE; Location ID; LONGITUDE; longwave radiation; Mean values; Median values; meteorological data; Number of vegetation types; observatory data; Peat bog; Permafrost, type; Permafrost extent; Permafrost ice content, description; Precipitation; Precipitation, coefficient of variation; Precipitation, daily, maximum; Precipitation, snow; Precipitation, sum; Pressure, atmospheric; p-value; Radiation fluxes; Radiative energy budget; Reference/source; sensible heat flux; Shannon Diversity Index; Shannon Diversity Index, maximum; shortwave radiation; shrub tundra; Site; Slope; Slope, coefficient of variation; Slope, mathematical; Snow, onset, day of the year; Snow cover, number of days; Snowfall, coefficient of variation; Snow-free days; Snow type; Soil water content, volumetric; Species present; Summer warmth index; surface energy balance; synthetic data; Temperature, air, annual mean; Temperature, air, coefficient of variation; Temperature, annual mean range; tundra vegetation; Type of study; Uniform resource locator/link to reference; Vapour pressure deficit; Vegetation type; wetland; Wind speed; Zone
    Type: Dataset
    Format: text/tab-separated-values, 4705 data points
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    DATA PANGAEA
  • 7
    facet.materialart.
    Unknown
    The energy balance over land and oceans: an assessment based on direct observations and CMIP5 climate models (2014)
    SPRINGER
    In:  EPIC3Climate Dynamics, SPRINGER, 44(Issue), pp. 3393-3429, ISSN: 0930-7575
    Details
    Publication Date: 2019-12-03
    Description: The energy budgets over land and oceans are still afflicted with considerable uncertainties, despite their key importance for terrestrial and maritime climates. We evaluate these budgets as represented in 43 CMIP5 climate models with direct observations from both surface and space and identify substantial biases, particularly in the surface fluxes of downward solar and thermal radiation. These flux biases in the various models are then linearly related to their respective land and ocean means to infer best estimates for present day downward solar and thermal radiation over land and oceans. Over land, where most direct observations are available to constrain the surface fluxes, we obtain 184 and 306 Wm−2 for solar and thermal downward radiation, respectively. Over oceans, with weaker observational constraints, corresponding estimates are around 185 and 356 Wm−2. Considering additionally surface albedo and emissivity, we infer a surface absorbed solar and net thermal radiation of 136 and −66 Wm−2 over land, and 170 and −53 Wm−2 over oceans, respectively. The surface net radiation is thus estimated at 70 Wm−2 over land and 117 Wm−2 over oceans, which may impose additional constraints on the poorly known sensible/latent heat flux magnitudes, estimated here near 32/38 Wm−2 over land, and 16/100 Wm−2 over oceans. Estimated uncertainties are on the order of 10 and 5 Wm−2 for most surface and TOA fluxes, respectively. By combining these surface budgets with satellite-determined TOA budgets we quantify the atmospheric energy budgets as residuals (including ocean to land transports), and revisit the global mean energy balance.
    Repository Name: EPIC Alfred Wegener Institut
    Type: Article , isiRev
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    PAPER (OA)
  • 8
    facet.materialart.
    Unknown
    The energy balance over land and oceans: An assessment based on direct observations and CMIP5 climate models (2015)
    Geophysical Research Abstracts
    In:  EPIC3EGU General Assembly 2015, Wien, 2015-04-12-2015-04-17Vol. 17, EGU2015-6172, 2015, Geophysical Research Abstracts
    Details
    Publication Date: 2020-03-05
    Description: The energy budgets over land and oceans are still afflicted with considerable uncertainties, despite their key importance for terrestrial and maritime climates. We evaluate these budgets as represented in 43 CMIP5 climate models with direct observations from both surface and space and identify substantial biases, particularly in the surface fluxes of downward solar and thermal radiation. These flux biases in the various models are then linearly related to their respective land and ocean means to infer best estimates for present day downward solar and thermal radiation over land and oceans. Over land, where most direct observations are available to constrain the surface fluxes, we obtain 184 and 306 Wm-2 for solar and thermal downward radiation, respectively. Over oceans, with weaker observational constraints, corresponding estimates are around 185 and 356 Wm-2. Considering additionally surface albedo and emissivity, we infer a surface absorbed solar and net thermal radiation of 136 and -66 Wm-2 over land, and 170 and -53 Wm-2 over oceans, respectively. The surface net radiation is thus estimated at 70 Wm-2 over land and 117 Wm-2 over oceans, which may impose additional constraints on the poorly known sensible/latent heat flux magnitudes, estimated here near 32/38 Wm-2 over land, and 16/100 Wm-2 over oceans. Estimated uncertainties are on the order of 10 and 5 Wm-2 for most surface and TOA fluxes, respectively. By combining these surface budgets with satellite-determined TOA budgets we quantify the atmospheric energy budgets as residuals (including ocean to land transports), and revisit the global mean energy balance. This study has recently been published online in Climate Dynamics.
    Repository Name: EPIC Alfred Wegener Institut
    Type: Conference , notRev
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    PAPER (OA)
  • 9
    facet.materialart.
    Unknown
    The energy balance over land and sea: An assessment based on direct observations and CMIP5 models (2014)
    Geophysical Research Abstracts
    In:  EPIC3European Geosciences Union General Assembly 2014, Vienna, Austria, 2014-04-27-2014-05-02Vol. 16, EGU2014-7494, 2014, Geophysical Research Abstracts
    Details
    Publication Date: 2020-03-05
    Description: The energy budgets over land and oceans are key determinants of terrestrial and maritime climates. Traditionally, however, large uncertainties have been inherent in the estimates of these budgets, which is still reflected in largely differing energy budgets in the latest generation of global climate models (CMIP5). We combine a comprehensive set of radiation observations with 43 state-of-the-art global climate models from CMIP5 to infer best estimates for downward solar and thermal radiation averaged over land and ocean surfaces. Over land, where most direct observations are available to constrain the surface fluxes, we obtain 185 and 305 Wm-2 for the solar and thermal downward radiation, respectively. Over oceans, with weaker observational constraints, our best estimates are around 186 and 356 Wm-2 for the solar and thermal downward radiation. These values closely agree, mostly within 3 Wm-2, with the respective quantities independently derived by recent state-of-the-art reanalyses (ERA-Interim) and satellite-derived products (surface CERES EBAF). This remarkable consistency enhances confidence in the determined flux magnitudes, which so far caused large uncertainties in the energy budgets and often hampered an accurate simulation of surface climates in models. Considering additionally surface albedo and emission, we infer an absorbed solar and net thermal radiation over land of 138 and -67 Wm-2, and over ocean of 170 and -53 Wm-2, respectively. Best estimates for the surface net radiation thus amount to 71 Wm-2 over land and 117 Wm-2 over oceans, which may provide better constraints for the respective sensible and latent heat fluxes. Combining these surface budgets with satellite-determined TOA budgets (CERES-EBAF) results in an atmospheric solar absorption of 75 and 82 Wm-2 and a net atmospheric thermal emission of -165 and -190 Wm-2 over land and oceans, respectively.
    Repository Name: EPIC Alfred Wegener Institut
    Type: Conference , notRev
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    PAPER (OA)
  • 10
    facet.materialart.
    Unknown
    The global land surface energy balance and its representation in CMIP5 models (2015)
    Geophysical Research Abstracts
    In:  EPIC3EGU General Assembly 2015, Wien, 2015-04-12-2015-04-17Vol. 17, EGU2015-9214, 2015, Geophysical Research Abstracts
    Details
    Publication Date: 2020-03-05
    Description: The energy budget over terrestrial surfaces is a key determinant of the land surface climate and governs a variety of physical, chemical and biological surface processes. The purpose of the present study is to establish new reference estimates for the different components of the energy balance over global land surfaces. Thanks to the impressive progress in space-based observation systems in the past decade, we now know the energy exchanges between our planet and the surrounding space with unprecedented accuracy. However, the energy flows at the Earth’s surface have not been established with the same accuracy, since they cannot be directly measured from satellites. Accordingly, estimates on the magnitude of the fluxes at terrestrial surfaces largely vary, and latest climate models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) still show significant differences in their simulated energy budgets on a land mean basis, which prevents a consistent simulation of the land surface processes in these models. In the present study we use to the extent possible direct observations of surface radiative fluxes from the Global Energy Balance Archive (GEBA) and the Baseline Surface Radiation Network (BSRN) to better constrain the simulated fluxes over global land surfaces. These model-calculated fluxes stem from the comprehensive set of more than 40 global climate from CMIP5 used in the latest IPCC report AR5. The CMIP5 models overall still show a tendency to overestimate the downward solar and underestimate the downward thermal radiation at terrestrial surfaces, a long standing problem in climate modelling. Based on the direct radiation observations and the bias structure of the CMIP5 models we infer best estimates for the downward solar and thermal radiation averaged over global land surfaces. They amount to 184 Wm-2 and 306 Wm-2, respectively. These values closely agree with the respective quantities independently derived by recent state-of-the-art reanalyses (ERA-Interim) and satellite-derived products (surface CERES EBAF). This remarkable consistency enhances confidence in the determined flux magnitudes, which so far caused large uncertainties in the energy budgets and often hampered an accurate simulation of surface climates in models. Using in addition a land mean surface albedo estimate of 0.26, we determine an average absorbed solar radiation at land surfaces of 136 Wm-2. Our best estimate for the upward thermal radiation at land surfaces (essentially based on the Stefan Boltzmann law) is 372 Wm-2, and combined with the above best estimate of 306 Wm-2 for the downward thermal radiation, this results in a net thermal radiation of -66 Wm-2 averaged over global land surfaces. Adding the absorbed solar and net thermal radiation, our best estimate of the land mean surface net radiation amounts to 70 Wm-2, which is the energy available for the sensible and latent heat fluxes. Latest estimates of terrestrial latent heat fluxes indicate a land mean value slightly below 40 Wm-2. In our best estimate of the global land mean energy balance we thus adopt a land mean latent heat flux of 38 Wm-2, leaving a land mean sensible heat flux of 32 Wm-2 as residual to close the energy balance over terrestrial surfaces. A diagram of the global land mean energy balance including these new estimates and the related discussion has recently been published in Climate Dynamics (Wild et al. 2015).
    Repository Name: EPIC Alfred Wegener Institut
    Type: Conference , notRev
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    PAPER (OA)
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...