GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Newark :John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated,
    Keywords: Drugs -- Structure-activity relationships. ; Electronic books.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    Pages: 1 online resource (361 pages)
    Edition: 1st ed.
    ISBN: 9783527645978
    Series Statement: Methods and Principles in Medicinal Chemistry Series ; v.53
    DDC: 615.19
    Language: English
    Note: Protein-Ligand Interactions -- Contents -- List of Contributors -- Preface -- A Personal Foreword -- Part I: Binding Thermodynamics -- 1 Statistical Thermodynamics of Binding and Molecular Recognition Models -- 1.1 Introductory Remarks -- 1.2 The Binding Constant and Free Energy -- 1.3 A Statistical Mechanical Treatment of Binding -- 1.3.1 Binding in a Square Well Potential -- 1.3.2 Binding in a Harmonic Potential -- 1.4 Strategies for Calculating Binding Free Energies -- 1.4.1 Direct Association Simulations -- 1.4.2 The Quasi-Harmonic Approximation -- 1.4.3 Estimation of Entropy Contributions to Binding -- 1.4.4 The MoleculeMechanics Poisson-Boltzmann Surface AreaMethod -- 1.4.5 Thermodynamic Work Methods -- 1.4.6 Ligand Decoupling -- 1.4.7 Linear Interaction Methods -- 1.4.8 Salt Effects on Binding -- 1.4.9 Statistical Potentials -- 1.4.10 Empirical Potentials -- References -- 2 Some Practical Rules for the Thermodynamic Optimization of Drug Candidates -- 2.1 Engineering Binding Contributions -- 2.2 Eliminating Unfavorable Enthalpy -- 2.3 Improving Binding Enthalpy -- 2.4 Improving Binding Affinity -- 2.5 Improving Selectivity -- 2.6 Thermodynamic Optimization Plot -- Acknowledgments -- References -- 3 Enthalpy-Entropy Compensation as Deduced from Measurements of Temperature Dependence -- 3.1 Introduction -- 3.2 The Current Status of Enthalpy-Entropy Compensation -- 3.3 Measurement of the Entropy and Enthalpy of Activation -- 3.4 An Example -- 3.5 The Compensation Temperature -- 3.6 Effect of High Correlation on Estimates of Entropy and Enthalpy -- 3.7 Evolutionary Considerations -- 3.8 Textbooks -- References -- Part II: Learning from Biophysical Experiments -- 4 Interaction Kinetic Data Generated by Surface Plasmon Resonance Biosensors and the Use of Kinetic Rate Constants in Lead Generation and Optimization -- 4.1 Background. , 4.2 SPR Biosensor Technology -- 4.2.1 Principles -- 4.2.2 Sensitivity -- 4.2.3 Kinetic Resolution -- 4.2.4 Performance for Drug Discovery -- 4.3 From Interaction Models to Kinetic Rate Constants and Affinity -- 4.3.1 Determination of Interaction Kinetic Rate Constants -- 4.3.2 Determination of Affinities -- 4.3.3 Steady-State Analysis versus Analysis of Complete Sensorgrams -- 4.4 Affinity versus Kinetic Rate Constants for Evaluation of Interactions -- 4.5 From Models to Mechanisms -- 4.5.1 Irreversible Interactions -- 4.5.2 Induced Fit -- 4.5.3 Conformational Selection -- 4.5.4 Unified Model for Dynamic Targets -- 4.5.5 Heterogeneous Systems/Parallel Reactions -- 4.5.6 Mechanism-Based Inhibitors -- 4.5.7 Multiple Binding Sites and Influence of Cofactors -- 4.6 Structural Information -- 4.7 The Use of Kinetic Rate Constants in Lead Generation and Optimization -- 4.7.1 Structure-Kinetic Relationships -- 4.7.2 Selectivity/Specificity and Resistance -- 4.7.3 Chemodynamics -- 4.7.4 Thermodynamics -- 4.8 Designing Compounds with Optimal Properties -- 4.8.1 Correlation between Kinetic and Thermodynamic Parameters and Pharmacological Efficacy -- 4.8.2 Structural Modeling -- 4.9 Conclusions -- Acknowledgments -- References -- 5 NMR Methods for the Determination of Protein-Ligand Interactions -- 5.1 Experimental Parameters from NMR -- 5.2 Aspects of Protein-Ligand Interactions That Can Be Addressed by NMR -- 5.2.1 Detection and Verification of Ligand Binding -- 5.2.2 Interaction Site Mapping -- 5.2.3 Interaction Models and Binding Affinity -- 5.2.4 Molecular Recognition -- 5.2.5 Structure of Protein-Ligand Complexes -- 5.3 Ligand-Induced Conformational Changes of a Cyclic Nucleotide Binding Domain -- 5.4 Ligand Binding to GABARAP Binding Site and Affinity Mapping -- 5.5 Transient Binding of Peptide Ligands to Membrane Proteins -- References. , Part III: Modeling Protein-Ligand Interactions -- 6 Polarizable Force Fields for Scoring Protein-Ligand Interactions -- 6.1 Introduction and Overview -- 6.2 AMOEBA Polarizable Potential Energy Model -- 6.2.1 Bond, Angle, and Cross-Energy Terms -- 6.2.2 Torsional Energy Term -- 6.2.3 Van der Waals Interactions -- 6.2.4 Permanent Electrostatic Interactions -- 6.2.5 Electronic Polarization -- 6.2.6 Polarization Energy -- 6.3 AMOEBA Explicit Water Simulation Applications -- 6.3.1 Small-Molecule Hydration Free Energy Calculations -- 6.3.2 Ion Solvation Thermodynamics -- 6.3.3 Binding Free Energy of Trypsin and Benzamidine Analogs -- 6.4 Implicit Solvent Calculation Using AMOEBA Polarizable Force Field -- 6.5 Conclusions and Future Directions -- References -- 7 Quantum Mechanics in Structure-Based Ligand Design -- 7.1 Introduction -- 7.2 Three MM-Based Methods -- 7.3 QM-Based Force Fields -- 7.4 QM Calculations of Ligand Binding Sites -- 7.5 QM/MM Calculations -- 7.6 QM Calculations of Entire Proteins -- 7.6.1 Linear Scaling Methods -- 7.6.2 Fragmentation Methods -- 7.7 Concluding Remarks -- Acknowledgments -- References -- 8 Hydrophobic Association and Volume-Confined Water Molecules -- 8.1 Introduction -- 8.2 Water as a Whole in Hydrophobic Association -- 8.2.1 Background -- 8.2.2 Computational Modeling of Hydrophobic Association -- 8.2.2.1 Explicit versus Implicit Solvent: Is the Computational Cost Motivated? -- 8.3 Confined Water Molecules in Protein-Ligand Binding -- 8.3.1 Protein Hydration Sites -- 8.3.2 Thermodynamics of Volume-Confined Water Localization -- 8.3.3 Computational Modeling of Volume-Confined Water Molecules -- 8.3.4 Identifying Hydration Sites -- 8.3.5 Water in Protein-Ligand Docking -- Acknowledgments -- References -- 9 Implicit Solvent Models and Electrostatics in Molecular Recognition -- 9.1 Introduction. , 9.2 Poisson-Boltzmann Methods -- 9.3 The Generalized Born Model -- 9.4 Reference Interaction Site Model of Molecular Solvation -- 9.5 Applications -- 9.5.1 The ''MM-PBSA'' Model -- 9.5.2 Rescoring Docking Poses -- 9.5.3 MM/3D-RISM -- Acknowledgments -- References -- 10 Ligand and Receptor Conformational Energies -- 10.1 The Treatment of Ligand and Receptor Conformational Energy in Various Theoretical Formulations of Binding -- 10.1.1 Double Decoupling Free Energy Calculations -- 10.1.2 MM-PB(GB)SA -- 10.1.3 Mining Minima -- 10.1.4 Free Energy Functional Approach -- 10.1.5 Linear Interaction Energy Methods -- 10.1.6 Scoring Functions -- 10.2 Computational Results on Ligand Conformational Energy -- 10.3 Computational Results on Receptor Conformational Energy -- 10.4 Concluding Remarks -- Acknowledgments -- References -- 11 Free Energy Calculations in Drug Lead Optimization -- 11.1 Modern Drug Design -- 11.1.1 In Silico Drug Design -- 11.2 Free Energy Calculations -- 11.2.1 Considerations for Accurate and Precise Results -- 11.3 Example Protocols and Applications -- 11.3.1 Example 1: Disappearing an Ion -- 11.3.2 Example 2: Relative Ligand Binding Strengths -- 11.3.3 Applications -- 11.4 Discussion -- References -- 12 Scoring Functions for Protein-Ligand Interactions -- 12.1 Introduction -- 12.2 Scoring Protein-Ligand Interactions: What for and How to? -- 12.2.1 Knowledge-Based Scoring Functions -- 12.2.2 Force Field-Based Methods -- 12.2.3 Empirical Scoring Functions -- 12.2.4 Further Approaches -- 12.3 Application of Scoring Functions: What Is Possible and What Is Not? -- 12.4 Thermodynamic Contributions and Intermolecular Interactions: Which Are Accounted for and Which Are Not? -- 12.5 Conclusions or What Remains to be Done and What Can be Expected? -- Acknowledgments -- References -- Part IV: Challenges in Molecular Recognition. , 13 Druggability Prediction -- 13.1 Introduction -- 13.2 Druggability: Ligand Properties -- 13.3 Druggability: Ligand Binding -- 13.4 Druggability Prediction by Protein Class -- 13.5 Druggability Predictions: Experimental Methods -- 13.5.1 High-Throughput Screening -- 13.5.2 Fragment Screening -- 13.5.3 Multiple Solvent Crystallographic Screening -- 13.6 Druggability Predictions: Computational Methods -- 13.6.1 Cavity Detection Algorithms -- 13.6.2 Empirical Models -- 13.6.2.1 Training Sets -- 13.6.2.2 Applicability and Prediction Performance -- 13.6.3 Physical Chemistry Predictions -- 13.7 A Test Case: PTP1B -- 13.8 Outlook and Concluding Remarks -- References -- 14 Embracing Protein Plasticity in Ligand Docking -- 14.1 Introduction -- 14.2 Docking by Sampling Internal Coordinates -- 14.3 Fast Docking to Multiple Receptor Conformations -- 14.4 Single Receptor Conformation -- 14.5 Multiple Receptor Conformations -- 14.5.1 Exploiting Existing Experimental Conformational Diversity -- 14.5.2 Selecting ''Important'' Conformations -- 14.5.3 Generating In Silico Models -- 14.6 Improving Poor Homology Models of the Binding Pocket -- 14.7 State of the Art: GPCR Dock 2010 Modeling and Docking Assessment -- 14.8 Conclusions and Outlook -- Acknowledgments -- References -- 15 Prospects of Modulating Protein-Protein Interactions -- 15.1 Introduction -- 15.2 Thermodynamics of Protein-Protein Interactions -- 15.3 CADD Methods for the Identi.cation and Optimization of Small-Molecule Inhibitors of PPIs -- 15.3.1 Identifying Inhibitors of PPIs Using SBDD -- 15.3.1.1 Protein Structure Preparation -- 15.3.1.2 Binding Site Identification -- 15.3.1.3 Virtual Chemical Database -- 15.3.1.4 Virtual Screening of Compound Database -- 15.3.1.5 Rescoring -- 15.3.1.6 Final Selection of Ligands for Experimental Assay -- 15.3.2 Lead Optimization -- 15.3.2.1 Ligand-Based Optimization. , 15.3.2.2 Computation of Binding Free Energy.
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Keywords: Forschungsbericht ; Metabolit ; Pharmakodynamik ; Toxikologische Bewertung
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    Pages: 1 Online-Ressource (15 Seiten, 677,4 KB) , Diagramme
    Language: German
    Note: Förderkennzeichen BMBF 01DQ19002 , Verbundnummer 01185381 , Unterschiede zwischen dem gedruckten Dokument und der elektronischen Ressource können nicht ausgeschlossen werden
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Perspectives in drug discovery and design 20 (2000), S. 115-144 
    ISSN: 1573-9023
    Keywords: binding affinity ; docking ; knowledge-based ; protein-ligand interactions ; scoring function ; virtual screening
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Chemistry and Pharmacology
    Notes: Abstract The development of a new knowledge-based scoring function (DrugScore) and its power to recognize binding modes close to experiment, to predict binding affinities, and to identify ‘hot spots’ in binding pockets is presented. Structural information is extracted from crystallographically determined protein-ligand complexes using ReLiBase and converted into distance-dependent pair-preferences and solvent-accessible surface (SAS) dependent singlet preferences of protein and ligand atoms. The sum of the pair preferences and the singlet preferences is calculated using the 3D structure of protein-ligand complexes either taken directly from the X-raystructure or generated by the docking tool FlexX. DrugScore discriminates efficiently between well-docked ligand binding modes (root-mean-squaredeviation 〈2.0 Å with respect to a crystallographically determined reference complex) and computer-generated ones largely deviating from the native structure. For two test sets (91 and 68 protein-ligand complexes, taken from the PDB) the calculated score recognizes poses deviating 〈2 Å from the crystal structure on rank 1 in three quarters of all possible cases. Compared to the scoring function in FlexX, this is a substantial improvement. For five test sets ofcrystallographically determined protein-ligand complexes as well as for two sets of ligand geometries generated by FlexX, the calculated score is correlated with experimentally determined binding affinities. For a set of 16 crystallographically determined serine protease inhibitor complexes, a R2 value of 0.86 and a standard deviation of 0.95 log units is achievedas best result; for a set of 64 thrombin and trypsin inhibitors docked into their target proteins, aR2 value of 0.48 and a standard deviation of 0.7 log units is calculated. DrugScore performs better than other state-of-the-art scoring functions. To assess DrugScore's capability to reproduce the geometry of directional interactions correctly, ‘hotspots’ are identified and visualized in terms of isocontour surfaces inside the binding pocket. A dataset of 159 X-ray protein-ligand complexes is used to reproduce and highlight the actually observed ligand atom positions. In 74% of all cases, the actually observed atom type corresponds to an atom type predicted by the most favorable score at the nearest grid point. The prediction rate increases to 85% ifat least an atom type of the same class of interaction is suggested. DrugScore is fast to compute and includes implicitly solvation and entropy contributions. Small deviations in the 3D structureare tolerated and, since only contacts to non-hydrogenatoms are regarded, it does not require any assumptions on protonation states.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...