GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Earth sciences of Asia  (1)
  • Earthquakes of 1003, 1114/1115, 1269, 1344, 1513/1514 and 1544  (1)
  • Europe  (1)
  • 1
    Publication Date: 2024-01-09
    Description: Executive Summary The 2020 European Seismic Hazard Model (ESHM20) provides an update of the earthquake hazard assessment of the Euro-Mediterranean region. ESHM20 has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No.s 730900 of the SERAProject (www.sera-eu.org) The ESHM20 follows the same principles as the ESHM13, with state-of-the art procedures homogeneously applied for the entire pan-European region, without the country-borders issues. The model was built upon recently compiled datasets (i.e. earthquake catalogues, active faults, ground shaking recordings), information (tectonic and geological) and models (seismogenic sources, ground shaking). A fully probabilistic framework was adopted in the hazard model implementation and all datasets and inputs are fully cross-border harmonized. The newly developed seismogenic source model encompass fully harmonized and cross borders seismogenic sources following the recent national earthquake hazard models. The inherent uncertainties in characterizing the earthquake rupture forecast are handled by a complex logic tree, consisting of two main models (branches): an area source-based model and a hybrid fault-smoothed seismicity model. The ground motion characteristic model is built upon the most complete ground shaking recordings in Europe and aims at capturing the effects of source and attenuation path of the expected ground shaking at a site. The regional variability of the ground shaking as constrain by observations is captured by a novel approach of spatial clustering and the overall uncertainties are handled in a backbone logic tree. The master logic tree combines the earthquake rate forecast with the backbone ground motion models into a computational model for assessing the earthquake ground shaking at across the entire Euro- Mediterranean region. Full sets of hazard results (i.e. hazard curves and maps, uniform hazard spectra) for various combinations of return periods and descriptive statistics (mean, median and quantiles) are available. The ESHM20 development process involved several regional workshops where the scientists and experts were consulted and their feedback was acknowledged and considered on the model outcome. Finally, ESHM20 provides the basis to derive informative hazard maps for two key engineering parameters defining the anchoring points of the seismic design spectra for the next version of the European Seismic Design Code (CEN-EC8). The European Facilities for Earthquake Hazard and Risk (EFEHR) will maintain and further develop this model in collaboration with the GEM Foundation and the European Plate Observing System (EPOS). The source data, input models, software and outputs of ESRM20 are thus being openly released with a Creative Commons CC-BY International 4.0 license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This license allows re-users to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use. Each product is released with a clear notice on how it should be cited in order to abide by the license. ESHM20 is online available at the www.hazard.EFEHR.org.
    Description: 1. Swiss Seismological Service, ETH Zurich, Sonneggstrasse 5, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland, 2. Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), 00143 Rome, Italy, 3. German Research Centre for Geociences (GFZ), Section 2.6 Seismic Hazard & Risk Dynamics, 14473 Potsdam, Germany, 4. Institut des Sciences de la Terre (ISTerre), IRD, 38058 Grenoble, France, 5. Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), 20133 Milan, Italy, 6. Instituto Superior Tecnico (IST), 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal, 7. Bogazici University, Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Institute, Department of Earthquake Engineering, 34684, Cengelkoy, Istanbul, Turkey, 8. Institute of Geophysics , ETH Zurich, Sonneggstrasse 5, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
    Description: Published
    Description: OST5 Verso un nuovo Monitoraggio
    Keywords: seismic hazard ; Europe ; 05.08. Risk
    Repository Name: Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV)
    Type: report
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Publication Date: 2022-11-18
    Description: Seismology and Earthquake Engineering Research Infrastructure Alliance for Europe (SERA), H2020, grant agreements 730900.
    Description: Published
    Description: 2T. Deformazione crostale attiva
    Description: 6T. Studi di pericolosità sismica e da maremoto
    Description: 4IT. Banche dati
    Keywords: Geology ; Earth sciences of Europe ; Earth sciences of Africa ; Earth sciences of Asia ; Earth Sciences and Geology ; earthquakes ; hazard model ; seismogenic faults ; slip rate ; crustal fault sources ; subduction fault sources ; Seismology ; 04.04. Geology ; 04.06. Seismology ; 04.07. Tectonophysics
    Repository Name: Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV)
    Type: web product
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Publication Date: 2024-04-05
    Description: When large earthquakes occur, it is natural enough to wonder about their likely predecessors (if any). This is why, after the earthquakes of February 2023, we began a review of the historical seismic record of Eastern Anatolia Our investigation concentrated on six major earthquakes/sequences occurred after 1000 AD (1003, 1114/1115, 1269, 1344, 1513/1514 and 1544). The earthquakes of 1822, 1872 and 1893 are better known and do not require priority investigation. The geopolitical history of this region is very complex, with many changes of rulers along the centuries, but its long-term seismic history is rather well known. Many earthquakes are on record both before and since the date - some 2100 years ago - when the region became a Roman province. Many of its main towns (Aleppo and Antakya for instance) have a long-term history that includes eyewitness observations of many strong earthquakes. Historical earthquake records for this area were collected and studied several times. The latest studies are Soysal et al. (1981), Ambraseys and Finkel (1995), Guidoboni & Comastri (2005), Sbeinati et al. (2005), Tan et al. (2008). N.N. Ambraseys wrote many papers on this subject and compendiated his work in Ambraseys (2009). However, time, epicentral location and size of many earthquakes are debatable and earthquake catalogues propose contrasting values for the same events. Our work consisted of: a) retrieving and analyzing the main historical sources for each earthquake; b) identifying the localities mentioned in the sources and assessing macroseismic intensities from the original information; c) determining earthquake parameters (Io, Mw and - whenever possible - source azimuth) with the “Boxer” method (Gasperini et al., 1999), after properly calibrating the relevant coefficient by using recent earthquakes of the Anatolian region. Fig. 3 presents the seismological results of this work: Mw (with uncertainty equal to 0.3) and the “boxes” obtained with the Gasperini et al. (1999) procedure and representing the surface projection of the possible earthquake sources: the epicentre is in the middle of the “box”. The epicentral location and Mw calculated for the main earthquake of 1114 are close to those of the first event of 6 February, 2023. The “box” seems to match the Pazarcik segment of the EAFZ (we refer hereafter to the fault definitions used by Duman and Emre, 2013 and by Duman et al., 2018). The 1269 earthquake was less energetic than the 1114 one, and its parameters are less well constrained. Its “box” suggests the Amanos segment as the likeliest source, with the Toprakkale segment as an alternative candidate. The 1344 earthquake is rather well known and was indeed a very large one. On account of its location it was not considered in the debate on the 2023 earthquake source. However, the identification of its source would be helpful for the understanding of seismicity in this region. As for the 1513/1514 earthquake, the first interpretation by Ambraseys (1988) was -and still is – considered as the absolute truth by literature, leading to a strong connection with the Pazarcık segment. Unfortunately, this interpretation is founded on poor information, as later stated by Ambraseys (2009) and confirmed by us. Though we cannot provide reliable epicentral location and magnitude estimates, we believe that the Toprakkale or Karataş segments could represent a more appropriate option for the source. Similar considerations can be proposed for the 1544 earthquake, whose informative background is also very weak. It could be located in the area where the recent M7.6 took place (Çardak fault), with Mw around 6.9.
    Description: Unpublished
    Description: Ferrara
    Description: OST1 Alla ricerca dei Motori Geodinamici
    Keywords: Eastern Anatolian Fault ; February 2023 earthquakes ; Predecessors ; historical seismology ; Earthquakes of 1003, 1114/1115, 1269, 1344, 1513/1514 and 1544 ; Historical seismology
    Repository Name: Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV)
    Type: Conference paper
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...