GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

X

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    BCR-ABL P-Loop Deletion Detected in Imatinib-Resistant CML Patients Corresponds to Splice Variant Associated with L248V Point Mutation, Retains BCR-ABL Kinase Activity, and Responds to Dasatinib Treatment.
    American Society of Hematology ; 2006
    In:  Blood Vol. 108, No. 11 ( 2006-11-01), p. 2168-2168
    Details
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 108, No. 11 ( 2006-11-01), p. 2168-2168
    Abstract: Clonal selection of cells harboring point mutations of the BCR-ABL kinase domain are considered a major cause of resistance to imatinib. More than 40 different point mutations have been described that cause a variable degree of imatinib resistance, and display a differential response to alternative kinase inhibitors, like dasatinib or nilotinib. Here, we describe three cases (2 m, 1 f) with imatinib resistant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) associated with a specific deletion of 81 bp of ABL exon 4. Patients were diagnosed with chronic phase (CP) CML at the age of 52, 54, and 68 years. After initial interferon alpha based therapies for 32, 60, and 71 mo, imatinib therapy was initiated at dosages between 400–800 mg per day. After 18, 24, and 29 mo patients lost hematologic response in CP CML (n=2) or progressed to lymphoid blast crisis (BC, n=1). Molecular analysis of the ABL kinase domain revealed a deletion of a 81 bp fragment associated with a loss of amino acids 248–274 in all cases. In one patient, an additional M351T mutation was found. In the two cases with CP CML, dasatinib was commenced for imatinib resistance, resulting in a partial hematologic and minor cytogenetic response (60 and 70% Ph+ metaphases, respectively) after 14 mo of therapy. The patient with lymphoid BC was treated with vincristine and prednisone and died 24 mo after appearance of imatinib resistance. In two cases, sequencing of genomic DNA revealed an underlying CTG/GTG mutation associated with a L248V amino acid switch. The point mutation activated a cryptic splice site within ABL exon 4 leading to an in-frame splice variant characterized by the loss of a 81 bp 3′ portion of exon 4. We sought to evaluate the BCR-ABL kinase activity of the splice variant and the response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in vitro. The 81 bp deletion of p210 BCR-ABL was cloned using cDNA from one of the patients. Using this construct, retrovirally transduced Ba/F3 cells were transformed upon growth factor withdrawal. These cells expressed BCR-ABL at the transcript and protein levels. Presence of the 81 bp deletion was confirmed by sequencing. Despite the presence of the corresponding 27 amino acid P-loop deletion (Δ248–274), Western blot indicated strong autophosphorylation of BCR-ABL, which decreased in the presence of imatinib to non-detectable levels at concentrations of 1.25μM and above. In the presence of imatinib/nilotinib/dasatinib, the growth of BCR-ABL expressing Ba/F3 cells was shifted from an IC50 of 125/30/0.5nM for wild-type BCR-ABL to 470/185/1.9nM for Δ248–274 cells. Thus, in vitro data demonstrate that deletion of almost the entire P-loop does not abrogate BCR-ABL kinase activity and results in only marginal resistance towards ABL kinase inhibitors. We conclude that deletions of BCR-ABL may be the result of alternative splicing generated by point mutations associated with resistance to imatinib. The Δ248–274 splice variant retains BCR-ABL kinase activity and sensitivity to imatinib, nilotinib, and dasatinib.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1182/blood.V108.11.2168.2168
    RVK:
    XA 33000
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2006
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Absolute BCR-ABL Transcript Levels At 3 Months but Not At Diagnosis Predict Survival of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) Patients On Imatinib Therapy
    American Society of Hematology ; 2012
    In:  Blood Vol. 120, No. 21 ( 2012-11-16), p. 3761-3761
    Details
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 120, No. 21 ( 2012-11-16), p. 3761-3761
    Abstract: Abstract 3761 Introduction: Early assessment of molecular and cytogenetic response at 3 months of imatinib treatment has been shown to predict survival and might trigger treatment intensification in slow responders who are supposed to harbor a BCR-ABL positive clone with inferior susceptibility to tyrosine kinase inhibition (Hanfstein et al., Leukemia 2012). BCR-ABL transcript levels at 3 months depend on levels at diagnosis and the subsequent decline under treatment. Which of both parameters determines the clinical course and allows for prediction of survival is unclear. The BCR-ABL/ABL ratio is supposed to be skewed for high values, e.g. 〉 10%, due to the fact that ABL transcripts are also amplified from the fusion gene and in fact BCR-ABL/(ABL + BCR-ABL) is determined. Therefore, Beta-glucuronidase (GUS) was used as reference gene to determine high transcript levels at diagnosis. In addition, the linearity of the BCR-ABL/GUS scale allowed for an optimization of prognostic cut-off levels. We compared the significance of 1) BCR-ABL/GUS at diagnosis, 2) BCR-ABL/GUS at 3 months, 3) the individual reduction of transcripts given by (BCR-ABL/GUS at 3 months)/(BCR-ABL/GUS at diagnosis), and 4) the established 10% BCR-ABL/ABL landmark expressed on the international scale (BCR-ABLIS). Patients and methods: A total of 337 patients (pts) were investigated. According to the protocol of the German CML study IV pts could have been pre-treated with imatinib up to 6 weeks before randomization. 56 pts with imatinib onset before initial blood sampling within the study were excluded from the analysis. A total of 281 evaluable patients (median age 51 years, range 17–85, 42% female) were treated with an imatinib-based therapy consisting of imatinib 400 mg/d (n=76), imatinib 800 mg/d (n=110) and combinations of standard dose imatinib with interferon alpha (n=84) and low-dose cytarabine (n=11). Median follow-up was 4.8 years (range 1–10). Transcript levels of BCR-ABL, ABL, and GUS were determined by quantitative RT-PCR from samples taken before imatinib onset (“at diagnosis”) and 3 month samples. Only patients expressing typical BCR-ABL transcripts (b2a2 and/or b3a2) were considered. Disease progression was defined by the incidence of accelerated phase, blastic phase or death from any reason. A landmark analysis was performed for progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after dichotomizing patients by a cut-off optimized by the cumulative martingale residuals method. Results: The median BCR-ABL/GUS ratio was 15.5% at diagnosis (0.07–271) and 0.62% at 3 months (0–34.7) reflecting a decline by 1.4 log. Disease progression was observed in 17 patients (6.0%), 14 of them died (5.0%). With regard to the above described parameters the following findings were observed: 1) at diagnosis no cut-off level could be identified for BCR-ABL/GUS ratios to separate two prognostic groups according to long-term PFS or OS. 2) At 3 months an optimized 2.8% BCR-ABL/GUS cut-off separated a high-risk group of 61 pts (22% of pts, 8-year PFS 78%, 8-year OS 81%) from a good-risk group of 220 pts (78% of pts, 8-year PFS 94%, 8-year OS 94%, p 〈 0.001, respectively). 3) At 3 months an individual reduction of BCR-ABL transcripts to at least 40% (0.4 log) of the initial level separated best and divided a high-risk group of 33 pts (12% of pts, 8-year PFS 74%, 8-year OS 80%) from a good-risk group of 248 pts (88% of pts, 8-year PFS 93%, 8-year OS 93%, p 〈 0.001, respectively). 4) When the established 10% BCR-ABLIS at 3 months was investigated, 63 pts were high-risk (22% of pts, 8-year PFS 82%, 8-year OS 85%) and 218 good-risk (78% of pts, 8-year PFS 91%, 8-year OS 93%, p=0.002 for PFS, p=0.011 for OS). Conclusions: Initial BCR-ABL transcript levels at diagnosis did not show prognostic significance. To predict survival at 3 months of treatment the absolute transcript level normalized by ABL or GUS can be used. Disclosures: Schnittger: MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Equity Ownership. Hochhaus:Novartis, BMS, MSD, Ariad, Pfizer: Consultancy Other, Honoraria, Research Funding. Müller:Novartis, BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1182/blood.V120.21.3761.3761
    RVK:
    XA 33000
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Randomized Comparison of Imatinib 800 Mg Vs. Imatinib 400 Mg +/- IFN in Newly Diagnosed BCR/ABL Positive Chronic Phase CML: Analysis of Molecular Remission at 12 Months; The German CML-Study IV.
    American Society of Hematology ; 2009
    In:  Blood Vol. 114, No. 22 ( 2009-11-20), p. 339-339
    Details
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 114, No. 22 ( 2009-11-20), p. 339-339
    Abstract: Abstract 339 Initial reports that high dose imatinib results in better responses more rapidly than standard dose imatinib remain controversial. The German CML Study Group therefore compared imatinib 800 mg (IM 800) with standard dose imatinib +/- IFN (IM 400, IM 400 + IFN) in newly diagnosed, not pretreated CML with regard to molecular response at 12 months and survival in a randomized clinical trial. By April 30, 2009, 1026 chronic phase CML patients have been randomized (326 for IM 400, 338 for IM 800, 351 for imatinib + IFN). Comparison was for molecular and cytogenetic remissions, overall (OS) and progression free (PFS) survival and toxicity. 1015 patients were evaluable at baseline, 904 for survival analysis (294 for IM 400, 286 for IM 800, 324 for IM 400+IFN), 790 for cytogenetic (analysis of at least 20 metaphases required) and 823 for molecular response. The three treatment groups were similar regarding median age, sex, median values of Hb, WBC, platelets and distribution according to the EURO score. Median follow-up was 25 months in the imatinib 800 mg arm and 42 months in the imatinib 400 mg +/-IFN arms. The difference is due to the fact that at first the IM 800 arm was designed for high risk patients only and opened up to all risk groups in July 2005. The median daily doses of imatinib were 626 mg (209- 800 mg) in the IM 800 arm and 400 mg (184- 720 mg) in the IM 400 +/- IFN arms. Of 218 patients receiving imatinib 800 mg and evaluable for dosage at 12 months, 100 (45.9%) received more than 700 mg/day, 27 (12.4%) 601-700 mg, 37 (17.0%) 501-600 mg, 48 (22.0%) 401-500 mg and only 6 (2.8%) 400 mg/day or less. The cumulative incidences at 12 months of complete cytogenetic remission (CCR) were 52.3%, 64.9% and 50.6%, and of major molecular remission (MMR) 30.2%, 54.3% and 34.6% with IM 400, IM 800 and IM 400 +IFN, respectively. The cumulative incidences of achieving CCR and MMR with IM 400, IM 800 and IM 400+IFN at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after start of treatment are summarized in the table. MMR at 12 months was reached faster with IM 800 than with IM 400 (p=0.0003) or IM400+IFN (p=0.0131). Optimal molecular response (OMR= 〈 0.01% BCR-ABL according to the international scale) was reached with IM 800 after a median of 31.3 months vs. 47.5 and 42.5 months with IM 400 +/- IFN. Also CCR was reached faster with IM 800 (p 〈 0.01). The more rapid achievement of MMR with IM 800 was observed in low and intermediate risk patients with little or no difference in high risk patients. In an analysis “as treated” patients receiving more than 600 mg/day reached remissions faster than those receiving lower dosages (CCR after a median of 7.8 vs. 8.9 months, MMR after a median of 10.4 vs. 12.9 months). At the time of this evaluation, OS (92% at 5 years) and PFS (88% at 5 years) showed no difference. Type and severity of adverse events (AE) at 12 months did not differ from those expected (all grades and grades III/IV). Hematologic (thrombocytopenia 7% vs. 4%) and non-hematologic AEs (gastrointestinal 35% vs. 15-24% and edema 29% vs. 16-19%) were more frequent with IM 800, fatigue (14% vs. 7-13%) and neurological problems (15% vs. 6-7%) more frequent with IM 400 + IFN (all grades). These data show a significantly faster achievement of MMR at 12 months with IM 800 as compared to IM 400 +/-IFN. So far, this faster response rate did not translate into better OS or PFS. Hence IM 400 should still be considered as standard of care. With some individual dose adjustments tolerability of IM 800 was good. Longer observation is required to determine whether this more rapid achievement of MMR and CCR will have a long term impact or not. Disclosures: German CML Study Group: Deutsche Krebshilfe: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; European LeukemiaNet: Research Funding; Kompetenznetz Leukämie: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Essex: Research Funding.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1182/blood.V114.22.339.339
    RVK:
    XA 33000
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2009
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 4
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Superior CMR-Rates with Tolerability-Adapted Imatinib 800 Mg Vs. 400 Mg Vs. 400 Mg + IFN In CML: The Randomized German CML-Study IV
    American Society of Hematology ; 2010
    In:  Blood Vol. 116, No. 21 ( 2010-11-19), p. 357-357
    Details
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 116, No. 21 ( 2010-11-19), p. 357-357
    Abstract: Abstract 357 Treatment of CML with imatinib of 400 mg can be unsatisfactory. Treatment optimization is warranted. The German CML-Study group has therefore conducted a randomized study comparing imatinib 800 mg vs 400 mg vs 400 mg + IFN. A significantly faster achievement of MMR at 12 months has been observed with imatinib 800 mg in a tolerability adapted manner and MMR by 12 months has been found to translate into better overall survival. Since stable CMR has been associated with durable off-treatment remissions we sought to analyse the impact of tolerability-adapted imatinib 800 mg on CMR and survival. Standardized determinations of molecular response and evaluation of its impact on outcome are goals of CML-Study IV. CMR4 is defined as a BCR-ABL/ABL ratio of 〈 0,01 on the International Scale. From July 2002 – April 30, 2009 1022 newly diagnosed patients with CML in chronic phase were randomized, 1012 were evaluable (338 with imatinib 800 mg, 324 with imatinib 400 mg, 350 with imatinib plus IFN). Median observation time was 40 months. The median average daily imatinib doses were 628 mg in the 800 mg arm and 400 mg in the 400 mg based arms. The actual median daily doses in the 800 mg arm per 3-months periods were: 555 mg, 737 mg, 613 mg, 600 mg, and 600 mg thereafter, reflecting the run–in period with imatinib 400 mg for 6 weeks in the first period and the adaptation to tolerability from the third 3-months period onwards. Median daily imatinib doses in the 400 mg arms were 400 mg throughout. Adaptation of imatinib dose in the 800 mg arm according to tolerability is reflected by similar higher-grade adverse events rates (WHO grades 3 and 4) with all treatments. Significantly higher remission rates were achieved with imatinib 800 mg by 12 months. The cumulative incidences of CCR by 12 months were 63% [95%CI:56.4-67.9] with imatinib 800 mg vs 50% [95%CI:43.0-54.5] with the two 400 mg arms. The cumulative incidences of MMR by 12 months were 54.8% [95%CI:48.7-59.7] with imatinib 800 mg vs 30.8% [95%CI:26.6-36.1] with imatinib 400 mg vs 34.7% [95%CI:29.0-39.2] with imatinib + IFN. The cumulative incidences of CMR4 compared with the MMR incidences over the first 36 months are shown in Table 1. Imatinib 800 mg shows superior CMR4 rates over the entire 36 months period, CMR4 is reached significantly faster with imatinib 800 mg as compared to the 400 mg arms. The CMR4 rates reach 56.8% by 36 months [95%CI:49.4-63.5] as compared to 45.5% with imatinib 400 mg [95%CI:38.7-51.0] and 40.5% with imatinib plus IFN [95%CI:34.6-46.3] . Most patients have stable CMR4 over the entire period. Time after start of treat-ment (months) Cumulative incidences MMR(%) CMR4 (%) IM400 n=306 D IM800 n=328 D IM400 +IFN n=336 IM400 n=306 D IM800 n=328 D IM400 +IFN n=336 6 8.6 9.5 18.1 9.7 8.4 3 0.7 3.7 1.3 2.4 12 30.8 24.0 54.8 20.1 34.7 7.5 12.3 19.8 7.4 12.4 18 50.3 18.1 68.4 14.3 54.1 21.2 12.2 33.4 9.8 23.6 24 63 13.0 76.0 13.2 62.8 30.7 12.3 43 13 30.0 36 79.3 2.3 81.6 10.9 70.7 45.5 11.3 56.8 16.3 40.5 In summary, superior CMR4 rates are achieved with high-dose imatinib adapted to good tolerability, and more patients in the tolerability-adapted 800 mg arm have stable CMR4 qualifying for treatment discontinuation as compared to the 400 mg based arms. With improved application imatinib remains first choice for early CML. Disclosures: Koschmieder: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Schnittger:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment, Equity Ownership. German CML-Study Group:Deutsche Krebshilfe: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; BMBF: Research Funding; Essex: Research Funding.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1182/blood.V116.21.357.357
    RVK:
    XA 33000
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2010
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 5
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Molecular Response After 3 Months of 1st Line Imatinib Therapy Is Predictive for Treatment Failure and Disease Progression In Patients with Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia - a Follow-up Analysis of the German CML Study IV
    American Society of Hematology ; 2010
    In:  Blood Vol. 116, No. 21 ( 2010-11-19), p. 360-360
    Details
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 116, No. 21 ( 2010-11-19), p. 360-360
    Abstract: Abstract 360 Introduction: The lack of a sufficient response to first line imatinib treatment has been observed in a substantial proportion of CML patients and has been associated with an inferior survival. Therefore, response criteria have been defined to identify patients with treatment failure. A change of drug therapy to 2nd generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors or allogeneic stem cell transplantation is recommended for this group of patients (European LeukemiaNet, ELN, Baccarani et al., JCO 2009). We sought to evaluate the predictive value of early molecular response landmarks for treatment failure and disease progression to identify patients at risk and to provide a guidance for the interpretation of BCR-ABL levels. Patients and methods: 949 patients included into the randomized German CML Study IV and treated with an imatinib based therapy consisting of standard dose imatinib (400 mg/d), high dose imatinib (800 mg/d) and combinations of standard dose imatinib with low dose cytarabine or interferon alpha were evaluable for molecular and cytogenetic analysis. BCR-ABL (IS) was determined by quantitative RT-PCR. The type of BCR-ABL transcript (b2a2, n=424; b3a2, n=464; b2a2 and b3a2, n=148) was defined by multiplex PCR. Patients with atypical BCR-ABL transcripts were excluded from the analysis. Cytogenetic response (CyR) was determined by G-banding metaphase analyses. Treatment failure has been defined according to ELN criteria as a lack of major CyR after 12 months and a lack of complete CyR after 18 months of imatinib treatment, respectively. CyR data were available for 479 pts between 12 and 18 months with a subset of 289 pts evaluable for 3 month molecular response (CyR data after 18 months, n=532; 3 month molecular subset, n=289). Disease progression comprises the incidence of accelerated phase, blast phase and death. Median follow-up for disease progression was 35 months (range 2–85). Fisher's exact test has been performed to evaluate the prognostic significance of 3 month BCR-ABL landmarks for 12 month and 18 month treatment failure. A landmark analysis has been performed for disease progression (logrank test). Results: In 20 of 289 evaluable pts treatment failure has been observed after 12 months, and in 29 of 289 pts after 18 months. 24 of 570 evaluable pts showed a disease progression after a median of 18 months (range 5–71). A stratification into three groups at 3 months reveals a significant difference concerning treatment failure between pts with BCR-ABL levels between 1% and 10% and those with BCR-ABL levels 〉 10%. With regard to disease progression there is a statistical trend. Comparing two groups the 10% BCR-ABL cut-off is highly significant for both, treatment failure and disease progression. Missing the 10% BCR-ABL landmark after 3 months of imatinib treatment defines a poor risk group with a 20.7% risk of treatment failure after 18 months and a 8.1% risk of disease progression (Table). Conclusion: Early assessment of molecular response after 3 months of imatinib therapy allows the identification of a patient cohort with an increased risk of treatment failure and disease progression. Disclosure: Müller: Novartis Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding. Schnittger:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hochhaus:Novartis Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1182/blood.V116.21.360.360
    RVK:
    XA 33000
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2010
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 6
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Molecular Response 〈1% BCR-ABL IS at 12 Months Is Associated with Improved Overall and Progression-Free Survival. the Randomized German CML-Study IV
    American Society of Hematology ; 2010
    In:  Blood Vol. 116, No. 21 ( 2010-11-19), p. 669-669
    Details
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 116, No. 21 ( 2010-11-19), p. 669-669
    Abstract: Abstract 669 Introduction: The prognostic relevance of major molecular remission (MMR, 〈 0.1% BCR-ABL according International Scale, IS) for survival has remained uncertain. Gold standard for the evaluation of treatment response is the achievement of complete cytogenetic remission in spite of its limited sensitivity and the requirement of bone marrow puncture. The standardization of PCR methods and the introduction of conversion factors to account for differences among European laboratories, has resulted in a uniform reporting system allowing comparable BCR-ABL expression levels derived from peripheral blood samples. We sought to evaluate an association of the degree of molecular response and survival. Patients and Methods: We have analyzed 848 patients within the CML-Study IV (randomized comparison of imatinib 800 mg vs 400 mg vs 400 mg + IFN). BCR-ABL (IS) was determined by quantitative RT-PCR. Patients with atypical BCR-ABL transcripts were excluded from the analysis. Median observation time was 40 months (minimum 12). Landmark analyses have been performed at 12 months for overall and progression-free survival using 3 groups of response ( 〈 0.1%, 0.1%-1%, 〉 1% BCR-ABL IS). Results: 341 patients achieved a BCR-ABL expression 〈 0.1% (MMR), 240 patients between 0.1% and 1% and 267 patients 〉 1% by 12 months. Independent of treatment approach, the groups of patients achieving MMR and 0.1%- 〈 1% at 12 months showed significantly higher progression free survival (PFS) (p=0.0023; 99% [95% CI: 97–100%] vs 97% [95% CI: 94–99%] vs 94% [95% CI: 90–97%] at 3 years) and better overall survival (p=0.0011; 99% [95% CI: 97–100%] vs 98% [95% CI: 95–100%] vs 93% [95% CI: 90–96%] at 3 years) compared to the group with 〉 1% BCR-ABL by 12 months (Figure). Conclusion: Faster and deeper response to imatinib-based treatment by 12 months revealed to be associated with improved PFS and overall survival. The critical cutoff level seems to be 1% BCR-ABL IS which has been shown to closely correlate with complete cytogenetic remission. Disclosures: Müller: Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Schnittger:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment, Equity Ownership. German CML-Study Group:Deutsche Krebshilfe: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; BMBF: Research Funding; Essex: Research Funding.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1182/blood.V116.21.669.669
    RVK:
    XA 33000
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2010
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 7
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Long-Term Results in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML): The Influence of High-Dose AraC, G-CSF Priming, Autologous Transplantation, Prolonged Maintenance, Age, History, Cytogenetics, and Mutation Status. Data of the AMLCG 1999 Trial.
    American Society of Hematology ; 2009
    In:  Blood Vol. 114, No. 22 ( 2009-11-20), p. 485-485
    Details
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 114, No. 22 ( 2009-11-20), p. 485-485
    Abstract: Abstract 485 In order to assess the relative value of major treatment variables for AML and subgroups in a representative setting 2693 patients were treated in a multicenter trial. To avoid a selection during treatment and to provide intention-to-treat conditions in a factorial design patients were randomized up-front in one step to receive TAD-HAM versus HAM-HAM induction, G-CSF priming with all chemotherapy courses during the 1st year versus no G-CSF, and for postremission therapy TAD consolidation followed by monthly myelosuppressive maintenance versus autologous stem cell transplantation instead of maintenance (TAD, thioguanine, araC standard dose and daunorubicin; HAM, araC 3 (age 〈 60) or 1 (age 60+) g/m2 × 6 with mitoxantrone; G-CSF 150μg/m2/day from 48h before until the end of the chemotherapy course; maintenance, 5-day standard dose araC with daunorubicin or with thioguanine or with cyclophosphamide alternatingly). The median age was 61 (range 16-85) years with 55% of patients 60 years or older, 27% patients had AML secondary to cytotoxic treatment or myelodysplasia. Favorable, intermediate, and unfavorable cytogenetics were found in 7.5%, 67% and 25.5% of patients, respectively. Among 956 patients with normal cytogenetics the mutation status was availabel with NPM1 mut/ FLT3-ITD neg in 33% and other combinations in 67%. The median observation time for the entire patients was 4.4 years . In the patients 〈 60 years the overall survival (OS) at 5 years is 40%. 65% went into complete remission (CR). Their relapse rate (RR) at 5 years is 52%. Patients of 60+years show an OS of 13% at 5 years, a CR rate of 54%, and a RR of 81% at 5 years. There were no significant differences in these parameters with respect to randomizations between TAD-HAM versus HAM-HAM, G-CSF priming versus no G-CSF, maintenance versus autologous stem cell transplantation. In a multivariate analysis including all patients and ages the main determinants of OS were age 60+y (HR 2.00; 95% CI 1.82-2.21), de-novo AML (0.79; 0.71-0.88), unfavorable karyotype (2.05; 1.84-2.28), favorable karyotype (0.47; 0.37-0.60), day 16 b.m. blast clearance (0.66; 0.61-0.74), and LDH (1.36; 1.19-1.54). Corresponding factors for the RR were age 60+ (1.90; 1.65-2.18), unfavorable karyotype (1.83; 1.54-2.17), favorable karyotype (0.41; 0.30-0.55), LDH (1.33; 1.11-1.59), and day 16 b.m. blast clearance (0.79; 0.68-0.93). In patients with normal karyotype the main determinants of OS were age 60+ (2.12; 1.77-2.54), NPM1mut/ FLT3-ITD neg (0.45; 0.36-0.56), and for the RR age 60+ (1.87; 1.49-2.35), and NPM1mut/ FLT3-ITD neg (0.37; 0.29-0.48). Even in patients 〈 60 years age older than the median (47y) is a major risk factor for OS (1.56; 1.33-1.82) and RR (1.35; 1.10-1.66). Conclusion: In a prospective analysis of representative and unselected patients with AML the outcome of therapy is mainly determined by chromosomal and molecular abnormalities and by older age as an own risk factor. The influence of treatment variables such as substantial increase in high-dose araC, G-CSF priming, or autologous SCT is neglectable. Present data may contribute a basis for novel molecular and immunologic approaches. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1182/blood.V114.22.485.485
    RVK:
    XA 33000
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2009
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 8
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Front Line Treatment of Elderly Patients with Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia: Long-Term Results of the German AML Cooperative Group
    American Society of Hematology ; 2011
    In:  Blood Vol. 118, No. 21 ( 2011-11-18), p. 425-425
    Details
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 118, No. 21 ( 2011-11-18), p. 425-425
    Abstract: Abstract 425 The introduction of all-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA) in front line therapy of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) has improved the outcome of all age groups. In the elderly patients (pts), multi-morbidity and higher vulnerability to chemotherapy-related toxicity are the main problems reducing the chance of cure. This has led to recommendations to reduce the intensity of therapy in elderly APL pts. We report on the long-term outcome of pts with newly diagnosed APL registered in two prospective studies of the German AML Cooperative Group (AMLCG) from December 1994 until June 2011. The therapy consisted of ATRA and anthracycline/ara-C-based induction and consolidation therapy (TAD/HAM–TAD) followed by maintenance therapy as reported previously in younger APL pts (Lengfelder et al. Leukemia 2009;23:2248–2258). In pts ≥60 years (y), the administration of the second induction cycle (HAM with an age adapted cumulative ara-C dose of 6g/sqm) was at the discretion of the treating physician. After December 2005, the pts were included in the ongoing APL protocol and randomized between the AMLCG strategy and the protocols of the Spanish PETHEMA. Among 295 adult pts with newly diagnosed APL, 83 pts (28%) were ≥60y of age. Seventeen elderly pts (20%) were not enrolled in the study, due to death before start of therapy, contraindications against chemotherapy or concomitant other malignancy. Eleven pts randomized in the PETHEMA arm were excluded from the present analysis to cover homogeneity of therapy. In 53 of 55 pts treated according to the AMLCG protocol, results are available. Median age was 67 y (range 60 to 83); 58% were male, 42% female; 68% had low/intermediate and 32% high risk according to Sanz score. Morphology was FAB M3 in 62%, M3v in 38%. Cytogenetics showed t(15;17) alone in 52%, and combination with other abnormalities in 48% of pts. The bcr1/bcr2 transcript of PML/RARA was found in 41% and the bcr3 transcript in 59% of pts. Forty-four pts (83%) achieved complete remission (CR). Early death (ED) occurred in 9 pts (17%). Median time to ED was 12 days (range 2 to 19) after start of therapy. Causes of ED were bleeding, multi-organ failure and sepsis. Manifest APL differentiation syndrome occurred in 25% of pts and WHO grade '3 bleeding, fever/infection or cardiac failure in 8%, 43% and 17% of pts, respectively. After consolidation therapy, 96% of pts were in molecular remission. After a median follow up of 5.3 y (1 day to 12.8 y), the 6-year overall (OS), event free (EFS) and relapse free survival (RFS) and the cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) were 45%, 41%, 50% and 26%, respectively. The outcome was further analyzed according to risk group, number of induction cycles, and age ≥60y to 69y and ≥70y. Pts with pretreatment white blood cell (WBC) count 〈 10 × 109/L (low/intermediate risk; n=36) had a significantly superior outcome compared to pts with high WBC counts (high risk; n=17) resulting in a CR rate of 92% vs. 65% and ED rate of 8% vs. 35%, respectively (p=0.02). The 6-year OS, EFS, RFS and CIR of the low/intermediate risk pts was 56%, 53%, 60% and 14%, respectively, compared to 25%, 15%, 23% and 58% in high risk pts (p=0.006, p=0.0004; p=0.008; p 〈 0.01). All 12 pts, who had received two induction cycles achieved CR, and no relapse occurred so far resulting in a significantly superior outcome compared to patients, who had received only one induction cycle (OS: p=0.007; EFS: p=0.0002; RFS: p=0.01). In the pts '70y (n=17), 71% entered CR and 29% died from ED. Separated according to low and high WBC counts, the CR rate of this group was 83% vs. 40% and the ED rate 17% vs. 60% (p=0.07), respectively, resulting in an inferior OS (p=0.08) of the pts with high WBC count. Conclusions: Among our elderly pts, we found a high proportion of pts with high risk profile and a high rate of exclusion from the study due to death before the start of therapy or poor condition. In patients included in our study, high WBC count and advanced age are associated with a high risk of ED. The inferior outcome in pts, who received only one induction cycle, suggests that intensification of chemotherapy should be considered in elderly APL pts, if possible. The incorporation of arsenic trioxide might be an alternative, which could be investigated in future trials. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1182/blood.V118.21.425.425
    RVK:
    XA 33000
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2011
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 9
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Optimaization of Imatinib Therapy by Combination. 5 Year Survival and Response Results of the Pilot Phase of the Randomized German CML STUDY IV.
    American Society of Hematology ; 2009
    In:  Blood Vol. 114, No. 22 ( 2009-11-20), p. 862-862
    Details
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 114, No. 22 ( 2009-11-20), p. 862-862
    Abstract: Abstract 862 Rapid relapse after discontinuation of imatinib, the need for indefinite therapy and residual disease in most patients are the major challenges in management of CML. Combinations of imatinib with IFN simultaneously, or consecutively preceding imatinib, or with araC may improve treatment outcome. The German CML Study Group therefore designed a randomized trial to compare standard imatinib vs. imatinib + interferon alpha (IFN) vs. imatinib + low dose araC vs. imatinib after IFN failure (for low- and intermediate-risk patients, high risk patients received imatinib 800 mg instead). The current evaluation represents the prefinal results of the pilot phase of the trial. Inclusion criteria were newly diagnosed BCR/ABL positive CML in chronic phase (CP). Primary aims are: prolongation of survival (overall, OS, and progression free, PFS), determination of rates of hematologic, cytogenetic and molecular remissions, adverse events (AE) and role of allografting. By the end of 2005, 670 patients were randomized, 13 had to be excluded (no CML (n=3), pregnancy, no CP (n=1 each), imatinib 800 mg (n=8)). Analysis was according to intention to treat. 657 patients were evaluable (174 with imatinib 400 mg, 196 with imatinib+IFN, 158 with imatinib+araC and 129 with imatinib after IFN-failure). 656 patients were evaluable for hematologic, 611 for cytogenetic, and 618 for molecular responses. Patient characteristics of treatment arms were similar for age (median 53 years), sex (40% female), median values for Hb (12.6 g/dl), WBC (66.2/μl), platelets (383/μl) and for Euro risk score (low 35%, intermediate 54%, high 10%). The median dose of imatinib was 400mg/die in all arms, of araC 10 mg per treatment day and of IFN 4.2 Mio I.U./die in the imatinib after IFN arm and 1.8 Mio I.U./die in the imatinib+IFN arm. Median observation time was 57.3 months. 55 patients died, 73 patients were transplanted in 1st CP, 81 patients progressed, 59 patients were switched to second generation TKIs. After 3 years 126 patients (72%) of the imatinib 400mg arm still received the initial therapy as well as 60 patients (30%) of the imatinib+IFN arm and 53 patients (34%) of the imatinib+araC arm. 9 patients (7%) of the imatinib after IFN arm are still on IFN. 5-year OS of all patients is 91%. 5-year PFS of all patients (no death, patient still in first chronic phase) is 87%. 5-year-OS and PFS according to treatment arm are shown in the Table. At 5 years, the cumulative incidences of achieving complete cytogenetic remission or major molecular remission (MMR) as determined by competing risks (death, progression) are not different (Table). Type and severity of adverse events (AE) over a 5-years period did not differ from those reported previously (Table). Hematologic AEs grade III/IV were similar in all therapy arms except leukopenia grade III/IV, which was more frequently observed in the imatinib after IFN arm (14%). Non hematologic AEs were mainly fluid retention, neurological and gastrointestinal symptoms and fatigue. Neurologic symptoms and fatigue were more often reported for the therapy arms with IFN. Imatinib 400mgImatinib+IFNImatinib+AraCImatinib after IFN5-Year Survival and Response RatesOS87%93%92%92% PFS84%91%88%84% CCR92%92 %89%83% MMR83%78%80%70% Adverse Events, WHO Grade III/IVAnemia7%1%3%3% Leukopenia4%5%2%14% Thrombocytopenia5%6%6%6% WHO Grade I-IVEdema15%13%5%0% Neurological5%15%5%22% Gastrointestinal17%27%21%15% Fatigue8%13%9%23% This analysis shows excellent survival and durable response rates in all arms. Currently, survival in all treatment arms is equal to, or better than in IRIS. To verify possible differences in survival, e.g. imatinib 400 mg vs. imatinib + IFN, longer observation is planned. Although cytogenetic and molecular responses in the imatinib after IFN failure arm at 5 years are inferior to that in the other treatment arms, the question of whether the consecutive therapy with IFN first and imatinib after IFN-failure provides a survival advantage requires long term follow-up. Imatinib in combination with, or after IFN, or with low dose araC are feasible and safe treatment modalities. We expect that the study will optimize and improve therapy outcome in CML. Disclosures: German CML Study Group: Deutsche Krebshilfe: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; German Competence Net : Research Funding; European LeukemiaNet: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Essex: Research Funding.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1182/blood.V114.22.862.862
    RVK:
    XA 33000
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2009
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 10
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Analysis of Philadelphia Negative Clones Detected during Treatment with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: A Study on 63 CML Cases.
    American Society of Hematology ; 2007
    In:  Blood Vol. 110, No. 11 ( 2007-11-16), p. 4541-4541
    Details
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 110, No. 11 ( 2007-11-16), p. 4541-4541
    Abstract: The occurrence of Philadelphia chromosome negative (Ph−) clones in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been reported in approximately 5% of cases. The pathogenesis of this phenomenon still remains unclear. The clinical relevance of these new clones remains to be clarified, as only occasional reports describe the presence of hematological dysplastic features or development of overt disease such as MDS or AML. We found 63 patients with CML that developed Ph− clones and performed in total 281 chromosome analyses (median: 4 analyses per case; range, 1–18). In total, 66 clonal abnormalities were detected. 60 cases showed only one aberration, in the remaining 3 cases 2 abnormalities were detected. Remarkably, no complex aberrant karyotypes were observed. Most frequent aberrations were gains and losses of whole chromosomes: +8 (n=35, 55.6%), +Y (n=3, 4.8%), +11 (n=2, 3.2%), +X (n=1, 1.6%), −Y (n=9, 14.3%), −7 (n=6, 9.5%). The following abnormalities were only observed in a single case: inv(Y)(p11.1q11.2); +1,der(1;7)(q10;p10); del(5)(q13q33); der(7)del(7)(p13)del(7)(q11.2); del(7)(q11q22); der(7;15)(q10;q10); t(8;11)(q22;q23); del(12)(p11p13); del(20)(q11q13). The majority of aberrations were unbalanced, only 2 balanced rearrangements were observed. No clonal evolution was found. Although this pattern of abnormalities resembles closest the pattern observed in MDS or Ph− chronic myeloproliferative disorder, only 1 case with −7 developed a MDS and subsequently an AML. Most frequently in addition to the Ph− clone a Ph+ clone and a normal clone was observed (n=86). In 8 analyses the Ph− clone was the only clone detected and in 60 analyses the Ph− clone was accompanied by a normal clone, in 10 by a Ph+ clone. In one case two different Ph− clones were observed during the course of the disease. For 34 patients detailed clinical data are available. All these patients were treated with imatinib, 7 patients subsequently received dasatinib and 3 nilotinib after imatinib treatment. The Ph− clone was observed after a median of 43 months (mo) after diagnosis and 20.5 mo after start of imatinib treatment, respectively. Dasatinib treatment was started 2, 3, 6, 10 and 12 mo prior to the first detection of the Ph− clone and in 1 case 5 mo after occurrence of the Ph− clone. Nilotinib treatment was started 6, 7 and 11 mo prior to the first detection of the Ph− clone. In 15 cases imatinib treatment was started within the first 4 mo after diagnosis. In these cases the Ph− clone was observed in median 13 mo after start of imatinib treatment (range: 4–64). Overall the 34 cases were monitored for 428 mo after occurrence of the Ph− clone (median=11.5 mo). In 6 cases the Ph− clone was lost during follow-up (in one case after allogeneic SCT). In conclusion: Ph− clones are stable over time in most cases. In the majority of cases only single, usually unbalanced abnormalities are observed. The size of the Ph− clone fluctuates and can also disappear. In most cases the Ph− clones seem to have no clinical impact. Longer follow-up is necessary to clarifiy the prognostic impact. So far the available data do not imply that the occurrence of Ph− clones per se should lead to changes in treatment strategy. However, close cytogenetic monitoring is recommended.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1182/blood.V110.11.4541.4541
    RVK:
    XA 33000
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2007
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...