GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Ihre E-Mail wurde erfolgreich gesendet. Bitte prüfen Sie Ihren Maileingang.

Leider ist ein Fehler beim E-Mail-Versand aufgetreten. Bitte versuchen Sie es erneut.

Vorgang fortführen?

Exportieren
  • 1
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 21, No. 24 ( 2003-12-15), p. 4496-4504
    Kurzfassung: Purpose: To examine the efficacy of prolonged maintenance chemotherapy versus intensified consolidation therapy for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Materials and Methods: Eight hundred thirty-two patients (median age, 54 years; range, 16 to 82 years) with de novo AML were randomly assigned to receive 6-thioguanine, cytarabine, and daunorubicin (TAD) plus cytarabine and mitoxantrone (HAM; cytarabine 3 g/m 2 [age 〈 60 years] or 1 g/m 2 [age ≥ 60 years] × 6) induction, TAD consolidation, and monthly modified TAD maintenance for 3 years, or TAD-HAM-TAD and one course of intensive consolidation with sequential HAM (S-HAM) with cytarabine 1 g/m 2 (age 〈 60 years) or 0.5 g/m 2 (age ≥ 60 years) × 8 instead of maintenance. Results: A total of 69.2% patients went into complete remission (CR). Median relapse-free survival (RFS) was 19 months for patients on the maintenance arm, with 31.4% of patients relapse-free at 5 years, versus 12 months for patients on the S-HAM arm, with 24.7% of patients relapse-free at 5 years (P = .0118). RFS from maintenance was superior in patients with poor risk by unfavorable karyotype, age ≥ 60 years, lactate dehydrogenase level greater than 700 U/L, or day 16 bone marrow blasts greater than 40% (P = .0061) but not in patients with good risk by complete absence of any poor risk factors. Although a survival benefit in the CR patients is not significant (P = .085), more surviving patients in the maintenance than in the S-HAM arm remain in first CR (P = .026). Conclusion: We conclude that TAD-HAM-TAD-maintenance first-line treatment has a higher curative potential than TAD-HAM-TAD-S-HAM and improves prognosis even among patients with poor prognosis.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publikationsdatum: 2003
    ZDB Id: 2005181-5
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 2
    In: Leukemia & Lymphoma, Informa UK Limited, Vol. 23, No. 3-4 ( 1996-01), p. 227-234
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 1042-8194 , 1029-2403
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: Informa UK Limited
    Publikationsdatum: 1996
    ZDB Id: 2030637-4
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 3
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 116, No. 21 ( 2010-11-19), p. 2696-2696
    Kurzfassung: Abstract 2696 Introduction: The prognosis of older patients (≥ 60 years) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is generally poor. The decision whether or not to use intensive chemotherapy in this patient cohort is challenging since only half of all older AML patients will eventually achieve a complete remission (CR) with an intensive approach. We therefore sought to develop a clinically relevant risk score for estimating the chance to obtain a CR compared to the risk of early death (ED). Patients and Methods: 1406 patients ≥ 60 years of age with AML and evaluable for an induction result after treatment with an intensive induction regimen (1-2 courses of either standard-dose araC containing TAD - high-dose araC containing HAM or HAM - HAM) within the AMLCG1999 study of the German AML Cooperative Group (AMLCG) were analyzed. External validation was performed on 801 patients ≥ 61 years of age treated in the AML96 study of the Study Alliance Leukemia (SAL) treated with 1–2 courses of a ‘7+3’ induction. 16 clinical parameters as well as cytogenetic and molecular risk factors were evaluated for risk prediction in an exploratory analysis. Results: Among the analyzed parameters, age, de novo versus secondary leukemia, body temperature, hemoglobin, thrombocyte count, LDH, fibrinogen and the cytogenetic and molecular risk were significantly associated with a CR and/or with an ED within 60 days (p 〈 0.05) in a multivariate logistic regression analysis. For comparison, patients were grouped into quarters by their predicted CR and ED score. The comparison of the predicted with the observed CR and ED rates within these quarters and additionally within the highest and lowest 5% showed a valid prediction of the CR and ED rates by the individual risk prediction (figure 1A & B). This could also be demonstrated when applying these CR and ED scores on an independent patient population (figure 1C & D). Conclusions: These scores based on pretreatment clinical, cytogenetic and molecular variables provide a reasonable estimate for CR and the ED rate of elderly AML patients. An online calculation tool for the prediction of the CR and the ED rate has been implemented (www.aml-score.org). This tool might be helpful to determine the treatment strategy for older patients with AML. Comparison of the predicted CR and ED rate with the corresponding observed CR and ED rates. Patients were grouped into quarters by their predicted CR or ED rates and the boxplot of the predicted rate of each quarter is plotted against the observed rate of this quarter. In addition, the predicted versus the observed rates of the extreme 5% by predicted rates are shown. A: AMLCG population, CR rates; B: AMLCG population, ED rates; C: SAL population, CR rates; D: SAL population, ED rates. Disclosure: Haferlach: MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment, Equity Ownership. Haferlach:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment, Equity Ownership, Research Funding.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: American Society of Hematology
    Publikationsdatum: 2010
    ZDB Id: 1468538-3
    ZDB Id: 80069-7
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 4
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 122, No. 21 ( 2013-11-15), p. 1447-1447
    Kurzfassung: Data on benefit and toxicity by treatment intensification for AML are now available and allow rediscussing current dosing. Methods In a multicenter trial involving patients between 16 and 86 years of age, patients below 60 years received uniform double induction by the 1st course with standard dose araC/ daunorubicin (60mg/m²x3)/ thioguanine followed by the 2nd course with high-dose araC (3g/m²x6)/ mitoxantrone (10mg/m²x3), or randomly two high-dose courses. As age adaption patients of 60y or older received the 2nd course only in case of persistent blasts, and high-dose araC at 1 instead of 3g/m². Post remission treatment was consolidation and maintenance or randomly autologous stem cell transplantation in younger patients. Results 3369 patients entered the trial with 1843 patients 60y or older. A multivariate analysis identified age as continuous variable, favorable cytogenetics/ molecular genetics, unfavorable cytogenetics, white blood cell count and lactate dehydrogenase as categorical variables to be risk factors predicting complete remission, overall survival as well as relapse free survival. To separate the age effect from the treatment effect, two subgroups of similar age and baseline characteristics but different treatment were compared. Thus, the 239 patients aged 57-59 and the 336 patients aged 60-62 years shared not only similar age but also similar baseline characteristics, while their treatment by protocol and age adaption differed substantially. The difference as expressed by the cumulative araC dosis amounted to a factor of 3.6, which however did not translate into a different overall survival (equally 28%) or relapse rate (equally 70%) at 5 years. In contrast to different treatment, different age had a strong effect on outcome. Thus, the survival in patients aged 16-46y was 65% at 5 years versus 40% in those of 47-59y receiving the same treatment (p 〈 0.001). A corresponding age related difference was also found between the patients of 60-66y and those of 67-86y (p 〈 0.001) receiving the same age adapted treatment. As shown by others in patients of 18-60y doubling an intermediate cumulative dose of araC produced excessive toxicity without therapeutic benefit (Löwenberg B et al. NEJM 2011; 364: 1027-36), while high dose daunorubicin (90mg/m²) instead of standard dose (45mg/m²) improved the remission rate and survival in younger patients (Fernandez H et al. NEJM 2009; 361: 1249-59) and older patients of 60-65y (Löwenberg B et al. NEJM 2009; 361: 1235-48). No comparable data are available about daunorubicin 60mg/m² the standard in present study. Conclusion Age and disease biology rather than chemotherapy intensity are the main determinants of outcome in AML. Once a certain intensity and antileukemic effect has been achieved, a further escalation does not seem to overcome the age factor in AML. Present data require rediscussing current chemotherapy dosing and treatment alternatives. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: American Society of Hematology
    Publikationsdatum: 2013
    ZDB Id: 1468538-3
    ZDB Id: 80069-7
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 5
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 114, No. 22 ( 2009-11-20), p. 2635-2635
    Kurzfassung: Abstract 2635 Poster Board II-611 Background: Cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia (CN-AML) is associated with an intermediate outcome. A number of clinical and molecular risk factors have been characterized pointing to the heterogeneity of this group. The purpose of the study was to define a prognostic model based on pre-treatment patient characteristics to facilitate choice of therapy by definition of patient groups with different prognoses. Patients and methods: We evaluated four molecular markers (mutations of NPM1, CEBPA, MLL-PTD; FLT3-ITD mutant level; interaction term NPM1 and FLT3-ITD mutant level) and nine clinical parameters (white blood count (WBC), platelet count, hemoglobin level, lactase dehydrogenase (LDH) level, bone marrow blasts, de novo AML vs. non de novo AML, performance status, sex and age) at initial diagnosis in 648 patients with CN-AML treated in the AMLCG (German AML Cooperative Group) 1999 trial. The outcome parameter overall survival (OS) was calculated from randomization to death from any cause or to the latest follow-up date. Event-free survival (EFS) was defined as the period from the start of therapy until lack of a complete remission (CR), relapse of AML after CR or death without relapse. Relapse-free survival (RFS) was determined for responders from the first day of a CR until relapse or death without relapse. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses for OS were performed. All parameters with p'0.05 in multivariate analyses after backward elimination and their regression coefficients were applied in the prognostic score. The minimal p-value approach was used to identify the risk groups with the greatest differences in OS. Results: In our patient cohort 84% had de novo AML. Median age was 60 years (17–85 years) and 70% had an ECOG score ≤1. Median platelet count was 57 G/l (5–643 G/l), median WBC was 18 G/l (0.1–798 G/l) and median hemoglobin level was 9.2 g/dl (4.2–16.4 g/dl). Mutations of NPM1, FLT3-ITD, MLL-PTD and CEBPA were present in 51%, 27%, 8% and 10% of patients, respectively. Median FLT3-ITD mutant level in FLT3-ITD mutated patients was 0.42 (0.02–1.00). Of 648 patients 377 had died. Median OS was 20 months with a median follow-up of 45 months. In the multivariate analyses for OS, the following parameters were significant: age (+10, years, HR: 1.3, p 〈 0.001), WBC (10 fold, ×109/l, HR: 1.4, p 〈 0.001), NPM1 (mutation vs. wild-type, HR: 0.35, p 〈 0.001), CEBPA (mutation vs. wild-type, HR: 0.47, p=0.001), interaction term NPM1/FLT3-ITD mutant level (+1, HR: 4.5, p=0.006), performance status (ECOG 0,1 vs. ECOG 2-4, HR: 1.4, p=0.006) and platelet count (10 fold, ×109/l, HR: 0.70, p=0.016). After calculation of the prognostic score for each patient and definition of two cutpoints, we could identify three risk groups (median OS (N=590): not reached (n=169) vs. 22.7 months (n=220) vs. 8.4 months (n=201), p 〈 0.001; median EFS (N=583): 42.3 months (n=168) vs. 7.6 months (n=216) vs. 3.2 months (n=199), p 〈 0.001; median RFS (N=383): not reached (n=136) vs. 15.3 months (n=143) vs. 7.6 months (n=104), p 〈 0.001). Furthermore this model was valid in both age subgroups ( 〈 60 years / ≥60 years). Interestingly, a subset of 31% of patients within the molecular favorable NPM1+/FLT3-ITD- risk group were assigned to the intermediate group according to our prognostic score and 31% of the low risk group were not NPM1+/FLT3-ITD-. Conclusions: We propose a new prognostic score based on pre-therapeutic clinical and well-established molecular markers that could be easily applied in the routine patient care setting for risk stratification and risk-adapted therapy. Further prospective validation is required to confirm the clinical relevance of this score. Disclosures: Unterhalt: Roche: travel support. Hoster:Roche: travel support.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: American Society of Hematology
    Publikationsdatum: 2009
    ZDB Id: 1468538-3
    ZDB Id: 80069-7
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 6
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 110, No. 11 ( 2007-11-16), p. 593-593
    Kurzfassung: In order to test current risk factors in a prospective multicenter setting we evaluated the AMLCG 99 trial. Patients were randomly assigned to induction by TAD-HAM (HAM with araC 3 for age 〈 60y and 1 for age ≥60y g/m2 × 6), or HAM-HAM, and also to TAD consolidation and maintenance or (age 〈 60y) myeloablative chemotherapy and autologous SCT. Patients with histocompatible family donors preferentially underwent allogeneic SCT. Since any randomization was done up-front, informations from completely unselected patients were available. 2547 patients of 16–85 (median 61) y entered the trial. 1858 pts had de-novo and 689 pts secondary AML. The CR rate was 61%, 54% in older (60) and 69% in younger patients. The overall survival (OS) at 4 years was 27%, 15% in older and 41% in younger patients. The relapse risk (RR) was 65%, 80% in older and 50% in younger patients and the relapse-free survival (RFS) was 30%, 14% and 44%, respectively. In the entire patients complete outcome (CR, OS, RR, RFS) was predicted by favorable and unfavorable karyotype. Among patients with any abnormal karyotype complete outcome was predicted by unfavorable karyotype in the older and favorable karyotype in the younger age group. In both age groups with normal karyotype outcome for the complete parameters was predicted by the NPM1+/FLT3- ITD- mutation status. As a new finding in patients of 〈 60 years with normal karyotype female sex turned out being an independent predictive factor for longer OS (HR 1.45;95%CI 1.04–2.03), longer RFS (HR1.64;95%CI 1.10–2.44), and lower RR (HR 0.59;95%CI 0.38–0.92). Female sex was the only predictive factor besides the NPM1/FLT3 mutation status in this group. The OS at 4 years in patients of 〈 60y with normal karyotype is 52% in women and 40% in men (log-rank P=0.047), the RR is 37% and 52% (P=0.016), and the RFS is 55% in women and 42% in men (P=0.025). Furthermore, the favorable NPM1+/FLT3- mutation status was more frequent in women than in men (35% vs 26%; P=0.0075). Remarkably, the NPM1+/FLT3- mutation status was equally predictive in patients of ≥60y as in those of 〈 60y with HR for OS of 2.51 (95% CI 1.75–3.61) and 3.27 (95%CI 2.11–5.05) and HR for RR of 0.33 (95% C 0.21–0.51) and 0.29 (95%CI 0.17–0.49). The difference in the OS at 4 years between patients with NPM1+/FLT3- mutation and those with other NPM1/FLT3 combinations was 42% vs 18% (P= 〈 0.001) in the older, and 69% vs 34% (P 〈 0.001) in the younger patients. The related differences in RR were 58% vs 84% (P 〈 0.001) in the older, and 22% vs 59% (P 〈 0.001) in the younger patients. Among the NPM1/FLT3 mutations the favorable +/− constellation accounted for 27% of older, and 35% of younger patients (P=0.0197). Besides karyotypes and mutations, also age, de-novo AML, blast clearance, LDH and WBC partly predicted outcomes. In contrast no prognostic impact was found by multi-and univariate analyses of treatment alternatives. Conclusion: As from a large multicenter prospective trial the outcome in AML is mainly determined by cytogenetics, NPM1/FLT3 mutation, age and sex, but not by the assigned treatment variables.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: American Society of Hematology
    Publikationsdatum: 2007
    ZDB Id: 1468538-3
    ZDB Id: 80069-7
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 7
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 118, No. 21 ( 2011-11-18), p. 2773-2773
    Kurzfassung: Abstract 2773 Introduction: For patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes an epigenetic therapy with hypomethylating agents is considered standard of care. Intensive chemotherapy can be offered to a subset of patients; however, data about the long-term outcome of MDS patients receiving intensive chemotherapy are scarce. Methods: For this evaluation, 104 adult patients with IPSS intermediate-2 or high-risk MDS with at least 10% bone marrow blasts of all age groups treated within the AMLCG1999 trial were included. Patients were randomized upfront to receive 1. double induction therapy with either standard-dose containing TAD - versus high-dose containing HAM–HAM, 2. TAD consolidation therapy followed by either a monthly maintenance therapy for 3 years after achievement of CR or an autologous stem cell transplantation (patients aged ≥ 60 years were all assigned to maintenance therapy), and 3. blast priming with filgastrim starting on day -1 of chemotherapy in selected centers. Results: Fifty-four patients had IPSS Score intermediate-2 and 50 patients were IPSS high risk. Median bone marrow blast count at diagnosis was 15%. The median age was 63.5 years (range: 27–76 years), 39 patients (37.5 %) were female. Median lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) serum level was 296 U/l, median leukocyte count at diagnosis was 5,950 per μl. The cytogenetic risk groups were as follows: favorable 3, intermediate 57, unfavourable 37, missing 7. Among 38 patients with normal karyotype, NPM1/FLT3 mutational status was available for 22 with 5 patients having the combination NPM1 mutated/FLT3 wildtype. Comparison with 2051 patients with de novo AML within the same trial revealed the following significant differences: patients with MDS were older, had a higher male to female ratio, a lower LDH serum level at diagnosis, a lower leukocyte count at diagnosis and were more likely to have adverse cytogenetic risk. Compared to 636 patients with secondary AML after MDS, cytotoxic therapy or irradiation, the cohort of patients with MDS did not display any significant differences except the sex distribution. Patients with MDS displayed a CR rate of 48% (50/104 patients), which was significantly lower than de novo AML patients (67%) and not different to secondary AML patients (47%). Median overall survival in MDS patients was 320 (95% CI: 236 to 505) days with a 2-year and 5-year survival of 33.4% (95% CI: 23.6% to 43.2%) and 22.7% (95% CI: 13.5% to 31.9%), respective, which was significantly (p=0.03) lower than in patients with de novo AML (median 484, 95% CI 435 to 541 days) and comparable to patients with secondary AML (median 282, 95% CI 224 to 311 days, p=0.13). Median relapse-free survival in responding MDS patients was 536 (95% CI: 264 to 1299) days with no significant differences of RFS compared to de novo or secondary AML patients. In multivariate analyses, the diagnosis of MDS remained an independent prognostic factor for CR probability but had no independent influence on survival compared with de novo AML patients. Nine patients proceeded to allogeneic stem cell transplantation in first complete remission of whom six remain in first complete remission between 1354 and 1911 days after achievement of CR. In addition, 16 patients remained in CR for more than one year without allogeneic transplantation. Discussion: Taken together, outcome of patients with intermediate-2 or high-risk MDS after intensive chemotherapy is comparable to the outcome of patients with secondary AML. Adjustment for known risk factors such as age, cytogenetic risk and LDH revealed that inferior outcome of MDS patients compared to patients with de novo AML is attributable to the higher incidence of adverse risk factors. CR-rates appear to be higher compared to hypomethylating therapy and a fraction of MDS patients experiences long-term survival by intensive chemotherapy. Allogeneic transplantation can improve long-term survival for patients achieving remission. Disclosures: Krug: MedA Pharma: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Alexion: Honoraria; Boehringer Ingelheim: Research Funding; Sunesis: Honoraria. Haferlach:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment, Equity Ownership. Schnittger:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment, Equity Ownership. Haferlach:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment, Equity Ownership.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: American Society of Hematology
    Publikationsdatum: 2011
    ZDB Id: 1468538-3
    ZDB Id: 80069-7
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 8
    In: The Lancet, Elsevier BV, Vol. 376, No. 9757 ( 2010-12), p. 2000-2008
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0140-6736
    RVK:
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: Elsevier BV
    Publikationsdatum: 2010
    ZDB Id: 2067452-1
    ZDB Id: 3306-6
    ZDB Id: 1476593-7
    SSG: 5,21
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 9
    Online-Ressource
    Online-Ressource
    American Society of Hematology ; 2014
    In:  Blood Vol. 124, No. 21 ( 2014-12-06), p. 2267-2267
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 124, No. 21 ( 2014-12-06), p. 2267-2267
    Kurzfassung: As a global approach to acute myeloid leukemia the AMLCG started a clinical trial in 1999 with the intention to clarify the influence of baseline characteristics as well as treatment variables on patients’ outcome. The heterogeneity of this disease in mind, all randomization was done stratified for potential risk factors. Furthermore, all randomization was restricted to the single time point up-front of any treatment. Thus, an unbiased intention-to-treat analysis could be provided. Between June 1999 and January 2012, 3370 consecutive patients 16 - 86 (median 61) years of age entered the trial at 57 participating centers. The general up-front randomization comprised (A) repeated G-CSF priming versus no G-CSF, (B) double induction by TAD (thioguanine-araC-daunorubicin) all at standard dose plus HAM (high-dose araC- standard dose mitoxantrone) versus HAM plus HAM, (C) postremission TAD and maintenance versus TAD and autologous stem cell transplantation. For age adaption patients of 60 years and older received reduced intensity double induction (B) and maintenance instead of autologous transplantation (C). The complete remission rate was 57% (65% 〈 60 and 51% 60+ years, p= 〈 .0001). With a median observation time of 7.1 years the overall survival at 5 years is 26% (40% 〈 60 years and 14% 60+ years, p 〈 .0001) and the rate of patients in complete remission at 5 years is 29% (41% 〈 60 years and 15% 60+ years, p 〈 .0001). There were no significant differences in the CR rates, the 5 years survival and continuous complete remission rates according to randomizations for treatment variables. In contrast, the CR rates and the therapeutic endpoints projected to 5 years were found significantly influenced by risk factors as identified within both age groups and including favorable cytogenetics/ molecular genetics (Döhner H et al. Blood 115: 453-74; 2010), adverse genetics, AML secondary to cytotoxic treatment or to previous myelodysplastic syndrome, LDH in serum, and in particular increasing age itself. In patients between 16 and 59 years of age receiving equal intensity treatment those below versus above the median age of 48 years showed a CR rate of 69% versus 57% (p 〈 .0001), a 5 years survival of 48% versus 33% (p 〈 .0001), and a 5 years proportion in CR of 46% versus 35% (p 〈 .0001). In patients between 60 and 86 years who received reduced intensity treatment the median age was 67 years, and those below versus above this median showed 51% versus 47% CR (p=.1), 5 years survival of 19% versus 9% (p 〈 .001) and 19% versus 12% 5 years proportion in CR (p=.01). Thus, up-front randomization proved to provide unbiased informations about the impact of various risk factors and treatment variables. While age was found to dominate other risk groups (Büchner T et al. J Clin Oncol: 27: 61-69; 2009), a difference in treatment intensity by factor 3.7 had no influence of outcome in a sample of equal baseline characteristics (Büchner T et al. Blood 122: 1447; 2013). As an alternative to antileukemic cytotoxicity, allogeneic stem cell transplantation in first remission was found to prolong even the overall survival in a matched pair analysis again done prospectively within present AMLCG99 trial (Stelljes M et al. J Clin Oncol 32: 288-96; 2013). Up-front randomization and a common standard arm also qualified as a model to compare treatment strategies between different studies (Büchner T et al. Leukemia Research 26: 1073-75; 2002, J Clin Oncol 30:3604-10; 2012). In older patients a web-based prediction of complete remission and early death could be established based upon the AMLCG99 trial (Krug U et al. Lancet 376: 2000-08; 2010). In summary, present long-term results from up-front randomization strongly support a strict prospective strategy for cooperative clinical research on acute myeloid leukemia. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: American Society of Hematology
    Publikationsdatum: 2014
    ZDB Id: 1468538-3
    ZDB Id: 80069-7
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 10
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 108, No. 11 ( 2006-11-16), p. 1978-1978
    Kurzfassung: As recently reported modifications, dose or duration of treatment had no impact on outcome of AML in older patients (Burnett et al. Blood 106: 162a, 2005). We therefore evaluated 764 patients 60 years of age or older and their various prognostic subgroups in the 1992 and 1999 mulitcenter randomized trials by the German AMLCG where patients received uniform postremission consolidation by one course of TAD (standard dose thioguanine, araC, daunorubicin) and maintenance by monthly 5 day courses of reduced TAD. For maximum homogeneity this analysis was restricted to de-novo AML and to patients with known karyotype. Before treatment started, patients were assigned to induction treatment by either TAD followed by HAM (HAM, high-dose araC 1g/m2x6 / mitoxantrone 10mg/m2x3), or to induction by two courses of HAM. The second induction course (HAM) was given to only patients with 5% or more residual bone marrow blasts. Therapy administered to the two randomized groups differed by a factor 2 in their araC dose. Despite this difference in treatment intensity patients in the two arms show similar response rate, overall survival (OS), ongoing CR, and relapse-free survival (see table). The same similarity in outcome as for de-novo AML overall is true for established prognostic subgroups as listed below. Conclusion: Intensification of induction therapy by high-dose araC has no effect on outcome in older age de-novo AML. Since potential influences other than the randomized treatment were minimized, present results do not support a risk adapted intensification strategy. TAD-HAM HAM-HAM P TAD-HAM HAM-HAM P OS 4y % OS 4y % CR 4y % CR 4y % Total 18 13 .28 22 22 .53 Favorable Karyotype 17 16 .48 41 33 .82 Intermediate Karyotype 24 18 .31 24 26 .38 Unfavorable Karyotype 4 - .81 - - .37 LDH ≤ 700U/L 21 13 .86 23 24 .47 LDH 〉 700U/L 12 10 .07 - 16 .27 WBC ≤ 20x103/ccm 21 11 .91 22 21 .81 WBC 〉 20x103/ccm 15 16 .08 22 26 .19 Day 16 Blasts 〈 10% 26 16 .87 23 22 .81 Day 16 Blasts ≥ 10% 14 8 .28 18 19 .26
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: American Society of Hematology
    Publikationsdatum: 2006
    ZDB Id: 1468538-3
    ZDB Id: 80069-7
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
Schließen ⊗
Diese Webseite nutzt Cookies und das Analyse-Tool Matomo. Weitere Informationen finden Sie hier...