GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Keywords: Fadenwürmer
    Type of Medium: Book
    Series Statement: Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für Meeresforschung in Bremerhaven 4
    Language: English
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Keywords: Marine pollution ; Meeresverschmutzung
    Type of Medium: Book
    Pages: VIII, 145 S , graph. Darst., Kt
    ISBN: 3540079211 , 0387079211
    Series Statement: Hochschultext
    DDC: 628.1/68/09162
    RVK:
    RVK:
    RVK:
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: German
    Note: Literaturverz. S. [127] - 139 , Literaturverz. S. [127] - 139
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Marine biology 33 (1975), S. 279-280 
    ISSN: 1432-1793
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Biology
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    ISSN: 1432-1939
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Biology
    Notes: Summary From bibliographic data the biomass correlations (organic dry weight) are constructed for the subsurface layer of a hypothetical 30 m deep silty sand station: 200 μg/ml macrofauna (including 120 μg/ml subsurface deposit feeders), 50 μg/ml meiofauna, 20 μg/ml Foraminifera, 1 μg/ml Ciliata and Flagellata, and 100 μg/ml bacteria. ATP-biomass is discussed. Meiofauna and Foraminifera contribute with 30 and 12% to the living biomass in the sediment, and it is assumed that their contribution to the food of deposit-feeding macrofauna is of a similar percentage. This is corroborated by productivity estimations. Bacteria are the main food of deposit feeding macrofauna, meiofauna, and microfauna. From different calculations it becomes evident that the productivity of bacteria in the sediment is far below figures achieved in experimental cultures: the conclusion is that sediment bacteria, in general, do not live under good environmental conditions. A rather large part of the bacterial population in the sediment seems to be in the stationary phase of life, and only a fraction of the total population exhibits high metabolic rates and rapid duplications. Only these active bacteria are of importance for the breakdown of relatively refractive organic matter in the sediment. In soft bottom marine sediments where the input of organic matter is higher than the remineralization rate, benthic animals stimulate by their activities and by nutrient cycling the decomposition of detritus via bacteria. Though meiofauna, in principle, feeds upon the same food resource as macrofauna, there is no real competition for food, because meiofaunal animals by their activities and by excreting metabolic end products induce a bacterial productivity which would not be there without them, and feed on it. There are a few examples where more specialized interactions exist between benthic animals and bacteria; these interactions have been termed “gardening”. They could be highly important in the benthic ecosystem.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Publication Date: 2022-05-05
    Type: Article , NonPeerReviewed
    Format: text
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    Publication Date: 2022-05-05
    Type: Book chapter , NonPeerReviewed
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    facet.materialart.
    Unknown
    Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Klasse
    Publication Date: 2023-11-15
    Description: Meiofauna dispersal is possible by waterfowl, by floating substrates including sea ice, and by turbulent water, either in suspension or adhering to sediment particles. During severe storms sea water turbulence erodes sediments not only in shallow water, but also in the sublittoral region. In the past centuries meiofauna had a chance of dispersal in sand that served as ballast for sailing vessels. Direct evidence for mciofauna dispersal is scarce. In an appendix to the paper several authors report on meiofauna found on drifting coconuts and in plankton samples, and on other observations bearing on meiofauna dispersal.
    Type: Article , PeerReviewed
    Format: text
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...