GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Dordrecht :Springer Netherlands,
    Keywords: Crustacea. ; Introduced organisms. ; Electronic books.
    Description / Table of Contents: This book provides a unique view into the story of how shrimps, crabs, and lobsters have been distributed around the world by human activity, and the profound implications of this global reorganization of biodiversity for marine conservation biology.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    Pages: 1 online resource (713 pages)
    Edition: 1st ed.
    ISBN: 9789400705913
    Series Statement: Invading Nature - Springer Series in Invasion Ecology Series ; v.6
    Language: English
    Note: Intro -- In the Wrong Place - Alien Marine Crustaceans: Distribution, Biology and Impacts -- Preface -- Contents -- Contributors -- Part I: In the Beginning -- The Global Dispersal of Marine and Estuarine Crustaceans -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Vectors -- 3 History of Recognition of Human-Altered Biogeography of Marine Crustaceans -- 4 The Scale of Modern-Day Recognition of Crustacean Invasions -- 5 Discussion -- References -- Part II: Global Dispersal -- Human-Mediated Spread of Alien Crabs -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Alien Marine Crabs -- 3 Regional Invasions (See Table 3, Fig. 6) -- 3.1 The North Sea -- 3.2 North Atlantic -- 3.3 Mediterranean and Black Sea -- 3.4 South Atlantic -- 3.5 Indian Ocean -- 3.6 North West Pacific -- 3.7 South West Pacific -- 3.8 North East Pacific -- 3.9 Hawaiian Islands -- 3.10 South East Pacific -- 3.11 Southern Ocean -- 4 Vectors and Routes (Fig. 7) -- 5 Most Significant Alien Crab Species Worldwide -- 5.1 Callinectes sapidus Rathbun, 1896, Blue Crab -- 5.1.1 Distribution -- 5.1.2 Habitat -- 5.1.3 Biology -- 5.1.4 Impact -- 5.2 Carcinus aestuarii Nardo, 1847, Mediterranean Green Crab -- 5.2.1 Distribution -- 5.2.2 Habitat -- 5.2.3 Biology -- 5.2.4 Impact -- 5.3 Carcinus maenas (Linnaeus, 1758), European Shore Crab, Green Crab -- 5.3.1 Distribution -- 5.3.2 Habitat -- 5.3.3 Biology -- 5.3.4 Impact -- 5.3.5 Management -- 5.4 Charybdis (Charybdis) hellerii (A. Milne Edwards, 1867) -- 5.4.1 Distribution -- 5.4.2 Habitat -- 5.4.3 Biology -- 5.4.4 Impact -- 5.5 Charybdis (Charybdis) japonica (A. Milne Edwards, 1861), Asian Paddle Crab, Lady Crab -- 5.5.1 Distribution -- 5.5.2 Habitat -- 5.5.3 Biology -- 5.5.4 Uses -- 5.5.5 Impact -- 5.6 Chionoecetes opilio (Fabricius, 1788), Snow Crab -- 5.6.1 Distribution -- 5.6.2 Habitat -- 5.6.3 Biology -- 5.6.4 Impact -- 5.7 Eriocheir sinensis H. Milne Edwards, 1853, Chinese mitten crab. , 5.7.1 Distribution -- 5.7.2 Habitat -- 5.7.3 Biology -- 5.7.4 Impact -- 5.7.5 Management -- 5.8 Hemigrapsus sanguineus (de Haan, 1853), Japanese, Asian Shore Crab -- 5.8.1 Distribution -- 5.8.2 Habitat -- 5.8.3 Biology -- 5.8.4 Impact -- 5.8.5 Management -- 5.9 Hemigrapsus takanoi Asakura and Watanabe, 2005 -- 5.9.1 Distribution -- 5.9.2 Habitat -- 5.9.3 Biology -- 5.9.4 Impact -- 5.10 Metacarcinus novaezelandiae (Hombron and Jacquinot, 1846), Pie-Crust Crab -- 5.10.1 Distribution -- 5.10.2 Habitat -- 5.10.3 Biology -- 5.10.4 Impact -- 5.11 Pachygrapsus marmoratus (Fabricius, 1787), Marbled Crab -- 5.11.1 Distribution -- 5.11.2 Habitat -- 5.11.3 Biology -- 5.11.4 Impact -- 5.12 Paralithodes camtschaticus (Tilesius, 1815), Red King Crab -- 5.12.1 Distribution -- 5.12.2 Habitat -- 5.12.3 Biology -- 5.12.4 Impact -- 5.13 Percnon gibbesi (H. Milne Edwards, 1853), Sally Lightfoot -- 5.13.1 Distribution -- 5.13.2 Habitat -- 5.13.3 Biology -- 5.13.4 Impact -- 5.14 Petrolisthes armatus (Gibbes, 1850), Green Porcelain Crab -- 5.14.1 Distribution -- 5.14.2 Habitat -- 5.14.3 Biology -- 5.14.4 Impact -- 5.15 Portunus (Portunus) pelagicus (Linnaeus, 1758), Blue Swimming Crab -- 5.15.1 Distribution -- 5.15.2 Habitat -- 5.15.3 Biology -- 5.15.4 Impact -- 5.16 Pyromaia tuberculata (Lockington, 1877), Spider Crab -- 5.16.1 Distribution -- 5.16.2 Habitat -- 5.16.3 Biology -- 5.16.4 Impact -- 5.17 Rhithropanopeus harrisii (Gould, 1841), Dwarf Crab, Harris Mud Crab -- 5.17.1 Distribution -- 5.17.2 Habitat -- 5.17.3 Biology -- 5.17.4 Impact -- 5.17.5 Management -- 5.18 Scylla serrata (Forskål, 1775), Mangrove Crab -- 5.18.1 Distribution -- 5.18.2 Invasion History -- 5.18.3 Habitat -- 5.18.4 Biology -- 5.18.5 Impact -- 6 Life History Trends and Body Size of Alien Crabs -- 7 Discussion -- 7.1 Regional Observations -- 7.2 Dominant Alien Brachyuran Groups (Fig. 10). , 7.3 Invasion Dynamics of Alien Brachyurans -- 7.4 Alien Crab Fisheries -- 7.4.1 Cancer pagurus -- 7.4.2 Chionoecetes opilio -- 7.4.3 Eriocheir sinensis -- 7.4.4 Paralithodes camtschaticus -- 7.4.5 Portunus pelagicus -- 7.4.6 Scylla serrata -- 7.5 Role of Live Exports and the Aquarium Trade in the Spread of Alien Crabs -- 7.6 Pest Management Options for Alien Brachyuran Crabs -- 8 Summary -- References -- The Global Spread of the Chinese Mitten Crab Eriocheir sinensis -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Life History and Physiology -- 3 Routes of Introduction and Capacity to Spread -- 4 The Chinese Mitten Crab in Continental Europe -- 5 Introduction to the UK -- 6 Introduction to West Coast USA -- 7 Recent Introductions and Rate of Spread -- 8 Economic Importance and Transmission of Human Pathogens -- 9 Riparian Degradation -- 10 The Future -- References -- The Japanese Skeleton Shrimp Caprella mutica (Crustacea, Amphipoda): A Global Invader of Coastal Waters -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Biology and Ecology of Caprella mutica -- 2.1 Morphology -- 2.2 Life History and Seasonal Population Dynamics -- 2.3 Habitat Preference -- 2.4 Environmental Tolerance Limits -- 2.5 Feeding -- 2.6 Intraspecific Behaviour and Aggression -- 2.7 Interspecific Interactions -- 3 Distribution and Dispersal -- 3.1 Current Distribution -- 3.2 Dispersal Vectors -- 3.3 Future Spread -- 4 Risk Assessment and Potential Management Options -- 5 Conclusions -- References -- Part III: Alien Faunas by Region -- Barnacle Invasions: Introduced, Cryptogenic, and Range Expanding Cirripedia of North and South America -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Vectors That Transport Barnacles Across and Between Oceans -- 3 Introduced and Cryptogenic Cirripedia of the Americas -- 4 Balanomorpha: Balanidae: Amphibalaninae -- 4.1 Status of Amphibalanus eburneus and Amphibalanus improvisus on the Atlantic Coast of South America. , 4.2 Amphibalanus amphitrite (Darwin, 1854) -- 4.3 Amphibalanus eburneus (Gould, 1841) -- 4.4 Amphibalanus improvisus (Darwin, 1854) -- 4.5 Amphibalanus reticulatus (Utinomi, 1967) -- 4.6 Amphibalanus subalbidus (Henry, 1974) -- 4.7 Fistulobalanus pallidus (Darwin, 1854) -- 5 Balanomorpha: Balanidae: Balaninae -- 5.1 Balanus glandula Darwin, 1854 -- 5.2 Balanus trigonus (Darwin, 1854) -- 5.3 Balanus calidus Pilsbry, 1916 and Balanus spongicola Brown, 1844 -- 6 Balanomorpha: Balanidae: Megabalaninae -- 6.1 Megabalanus coccopoma (Darwin, 1854) -- 6.2 Megabalanus tintinnabulum (Linnaeus, 1758) -- 7 Balanomorpha: Balanidae: Archaeobalanidae -- 7.1 Striatobalanus amaryllis (Darwin, 1854) -- 8 Rhizocephala: Sacculinidae -- 8.1 Loxothylacus panopaei (Gissler, 1884) -- 9 Intracontinental Range Expansions -- 9.1 Balanidae: Amphibalanus subalbidus (Henry, 1974) -- 9.2 Chthamalidae: Chthamalus fragilis Darwin, 1854 -- 9.3 Archaeobalanidae: Semibalanus balanoides (Linnaeus, 1758) -- 9.4 Tetraclitidae: Tetraclita rubescens (Darwin, 1854) -- 10 Balanidae Species Removed from Further Consideration -- 10.1 Paraconcavus pacificus (Pilsbry, 1916) -- 10.2 Balanus crenatus Bruguière, 1789 -- 11 Discussion -- 11.1 Temporal Patterns -- 11.2 Temporal Patterns: Post-Discovery Spreading -- 11.3 Temporal-Geographic Patterns -- 11.4 Geographic Patterns: Diversity and Origins -- 11.5 Geographic Patterns: Regional Diversity of Invaders -- 11.6 Galapagos Islands -- 11.7 The Panama Canal -- 11.8 Future Invasions -- References -- Marine Crustacean Invasions in North America: A Synthesis of Historical Records and Documented Impacts -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Taxonomic and Geographic Distribution of Non-native Crustaceans -- 2.1 Number of Species by Coast -- 2.2 Salinity Distribution of Species by Coast -- 2.3 Taxonomic Distribution by Coast -- 2.4 Native Region by Coast. , 3 Impacts of Non-native Crustaceans -- 3.1 Impact Type -- 3.2 Information Type and Effect Magnitude -- 3.3 Certainty -- 4 Conclusions -- Appendix 1 -- Appendix 2 -- Appendix 3 -- References -- Alien Decapod Crustaceans in the Southwestern Atlantic Ocean -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Established Alien Decapods -- 2.1 Charybdis hellerii (A. Milne-Edwards, 1867) (Fig. 1b) -- 2.2 Eurypanopeus depressus (Smith, 1869) -- 2.3 Palaemon macrodactylus Rathbun, 1902 -- 2.4 Pyromaia tuberculata (Lockington, 1877) (Fig. 2a) -- 2.5 Rhithropanopeus harrisii (Gould, 1841) (Fig. 2b) -- 3 Penaeid Shrimp Farming -- 3.1 Marsupenaeus japonicus (Bate, 1888) -- 3.2 Penaeus monodon (Fabricius, 1798) -- 3.3 Fenneropenaeus penicillatus (Alcock, 1905) -- 3.4 Litopenaeus stylirostris (Stimpson, 1874) -- 3.5 Litopenaeus vannamei (Boone, 1931) -- 4 Discussion -- 4.1 Taxonomic Resolution and Patterns of Diversity and Geographic Distribution -- 4.2 Detection, Regulations and Management -- References -- The Alien and Cryptogenic Marine Crustaceans of South Africa -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Inventory -- 3 Temporal Trends -- 4 Biogeographic Patterns -- 5 Main Pathways -- 5.1 Wood Boring -- 5.2 Dry Ballast -- 5.3 Fouling -- 5.4 Ballast Water -- 5.5 Aquaculture -- 6 Economic and Ecological Impacts -- 7 Future Trends -- References -- The Snow Crab, Chionoecetes opilio (Decapoda, Majoidea, Oregoniidae) in the Barents Sea -- 1 Introduction -- 2 The Barents Sea: Short Description -- 3 Distribution of Snow Crab in the Barents Sea -- 4 Size Distribution -- 5 Reproductive Characteristics -- 6 Predators -- 7 Diet -- 8 Genetics -- 9 Discussion -- References -- Alien Malacostracan Crustaceans in the Eastern Baltic Sea: Pathways and Consequences -- 1 Introduction -- 2 The Study Area -- 3 Invasion History of Crustaceans in the Gulf of Finland, Curonian and Vistula Lagoons -- 4 Amphipods -- 5 Mysids. , 6 Isopods.
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Dordrecht :Springer Netherlands,
    Keywords: Biological invasions. ; Electronic books.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    Pages: 1 online resource (328 pages)
    Edition: 1st ed.
    ISBN: 9781402050473
    Series Statement: Monographiae Biologicae Series ; v.83
    Language: English
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Keywords: Aquatic biology ; Biodiversity ; Ecology ; Environmental sciences ; Marine Sciences ; Aufsatzsammlung ; Krebstiere ; Invasion
    Type of Medium: Book
    Pages: XV, 716 S. , Ill., graph. Darst., Kt , 235 mm x 155 mm
    ISBN: 9400705905 , 9789400705906
    Series Statement: Invading nature - Springer series in invasion ecology 6
    DDC: 570
    Language: English
    Note: Enth. Literaturangaben und Index
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Book
    Book
    Funchal : Museu Municipal
    Type of Medium: Book
    Pages: 9 S , Ill
    Series Statement: Bocagiana / Museu Municipal do Funchal 71
    Language: English
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Publication Date: 2024-03-05
    Description: A comprehensive dataset of non-native species (NNS) was assembled by combining the SInAS database of alien species occurrences (Seebens, 2021) with several other publicly available databases and NNS lists to examine NNS diversity globally (Bailey et al., 2020; Campbell et al., 2016; Carlton & Eldredge, 2009; Casties et al., 2016; Eldredge & Carlton, 2015; Hewitt et al., 2002, 2004; Lambert, 2002; Meyer, 2000; NEMESIS, 2017, 2020; Paulay et al., 2002; Richardson et al., 2020; Schwindt et al., 2020; Sturtevant et al., 2019; U.S. Geological Survey, 2017; Wonham & Carlton, 2005) to examine NNS diversity globally. The SInAS_AlienSpeciesDB_2.4.1 file was used as the base file for our dataset. Species without assignment of invaded country/region were removed from the dataset. Then, species assigned only as CASUAL and ABSENT in the columns degreeOfEstablishment (N) and occurrenceStatus (L), respectively, were also removed due to their undetermined non-native establishment status in those particular regions (Groom et al., 2019). Following, species from other publicly available databases and NNS lists that had not been listed for particular region/s in the SInAS database were added to the file. The species that were both native and NNS within a continent were retained in the dataset. Accordingly, the dataset consisted 36 822 species established outside of their native regions, out of which 36 326 came from Seebens (2021) and 496 species from other databases and NNS lists. Binominal scientific names, phylum, class, and family levels were assigned to each species based on the SInAS_AlienSpeciesDB_2.4.1_FullTaxaList file that was originally determined following Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF). When a species was not automatically assigned to binominal scientific name and/or taxonomic level, an additional manual search of GBIF, World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) and a general internet search engine was conducted in June and July 2022, and September 2023. Also, to examine NNS diversity among different habitats (i.e., terrestrial, freshwater, and marine), we assigned one or more habitats for each species based on the Step2_StandardTerms_GRIIS file; habitat data in the Step2_StandardTerms_GRIIS file originated from the Global Register of Introduced and Invasive Species (GRIIS). Again, if habitat(s) was(were) not automatically assigned to a species, an additional manual search of WoRMS and a general internet search engine was conducted from July to September 2022. We emphasize that due to the great number of species in our dataset and changing information availability over time, there is a possibility that we did not list all potential habitats for all species. Brackish habitats were defined as marine based on the Venice System (1958). Regions were assigned based on the geographic continental definitions (i.e., North America, South America, Europe, Africa, Asia, and Australia), with Pacific islands as a separate region due to their unclear/undefined continental affiliations (National Geographic Society, 2022). Finally, global estimated biodiversity (i.e., numbers of species per taxonomic group) of each particular phylum, class, and family was obtained from the GBIF in October 2022 (GBIF, 2022).
    Keywords: Area/locality; Class; Code; Family; Habitat; Identification; Phylum; Reference/source; Scientific name; Taxon/taxa
    Type: Dataset
    Format: text/tab-separated-values, 664480 data points
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Naturwissenschaften 87 (2000), S. 363-365 
    ISSN: 1432-1904
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Biology , Chemistry and Pharmacology , Natural Sciences in General
    Notes: Abstract  Micrographs of retinas from the deep-sea fish Cataetyx laticeps revealed visual cells containing membranous whorls in the ellipsoids of the inner segments resulting from stretching and modifications of the mitochondria membranes and their cristae. These pathological structures seem to be homologous to the whorls observed in retinas of human carriers of Tay-Sachs disease. This disease, a genetic disorder, is found in humans and some mammals. Our findings in fish suggest that the gene responsible can be found throughout the vertebrate evolutionary tree, possibly dormant in most taxa.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Biological invasions 2 (2000), S. 177-186 
    ISSN: 1573-1464
    Keywords: Alien species ; anthropogenic dispersal ; Erythrean invadess ; exotic shellfish fouling- and ballant-transport ; mariculture ; Mediterranean
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Biology
    Notes: Abstract Exotic macrophytes, invertebrates and fish are found in most coastal habitats in the Mediterranean Sea. The Mediterranean Sea has been subjected to introductions of non-indigenous species by ship traffic since the opening of interoceanic maritime routes five centuries ago. The Sea, a hub of shipping, is exceptionally susceptible to invaders that arrive in fouling communities or ballast. The Suez Canal has been the largest pathway for the entry of these species: more than 300 Erythrean species – principally molluscs, fish, decapod crustaceans, polychaetes and algae – have become established in the eastern Mediterranean, primarily along the Levantine coasts. Mariculture of nonindigenous shellfish predominates in the northern Mediterranean lagoonar environments. Unrestricted transport of commercially important exotic shellfish has resulted in numerous unintentional introductions of pathogens, parasites and pest species. Some invaders have outcompeted or replaced native species locally, severely reducing biodiversity; some other invaders are so abundant they are exploited commercially. The rate of these biotic invasions has increased in recent decades, and they collectively have significant ecological and economic impacts in the Mediterranean Sea.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    Publication Date: 2015-12-16
    Description: The round goby, Neogobius melanostomus (Pallas, 1814), is one of the most invasive non-indigenous species in the Baltic Sea. It dominates coastal fisheries in some localities and is frequently found in offshore pelagic catches. This paper identifies management issues and suggests actions to be considered for post-invasion management. Priority should be given to the establishment of a coordinated pan-Baltic monitoring programme and associated data storage and exchange, as well as the compilation of landing statistics of the round goby in commercial and recreational fisheries. While eradication is unrealistic, population control that leads to minimising the risk of transfer to yet uncolonised areas in the Baltic Sea and adjacent waterbodies is feasible. This should comprise the requirement that the species be landed in commercial fishery bycatch, the management of ships’ ballast water and sediments, and hull fouling of inland and sea-going vessels, including recreational boats. Extensive involvement of stakeholders is crucial at all phases of the management process.
    Type: Article , PeerReviewed
    Format: text
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    Publication Date: 2024-01-14
    Description: Aim: Human activities have introduced numerous non-native species (NNS) worldwide. Understanding and predicting large-scale NNS establishment patterns remain fundamental scientific challenges. Here, we evaluate if NNS composition represents a proportional subset of the total species pool available to invade (i.e. total global biodiversity), or, conversely, certain taxa are disproportionately pre-disposed to establish in non-native areas. Location: Global. Time period: Present day. Major taxa studied: Global diversity. Methods: We compiled one of the most comprehensive global databases of NNS (36,822 established species) to determine if NNS diversity is a representative proportional subset of global biodiversity. Results: Our study revealed that, while NNS diversity mirrors global biodiversity to a certain extent, due to significant deviance from the null model it is not always a representative proportional subset of global biodiversity. The strength of global biodiversity as a predictor depended on the taxonomic scale, with successive lower taxonomic levels less predictive than the one above it. Consequently, on average, 58%, 42% and 28% of variability in NNS numbers were explained by global biodiversity for phylum, class and family respectively. Moreover, global biodiversity was a similarly strong explanatory variable for NNS diversity among regions, but not habitats (i.e. terrestrial, freshwater and marine), where it better predicted NNS diversity for terrestrial than for freshwater and marine habitats. Freshwater and marine habitats were also greatly understudied relative to invasions in the terrestrial habitats. Over-represented NNS relative to global biodiversity tended to be those intentionally introduced and/or ‘hitchhikers’ associated with deliberate introductions. Finally, randomness is likely an important factor in the establishment success of NNS. Main conclusions: Besides global biodiversity, other important explanatory variables for large-scale patterns of NNS diversity likely include propagule and colonization pressures, environmental similarity between native and non-native regions, biased selection of intentionally introduced species and disparate research efforts of habitats and taxa.
    Type: Article , PeerReviewed
    Format: text
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    Publication Date: 2024-04-10
    Description: Standardised terminology in science is important for clarity of interpretation and communication. In invasion science - a dynamic and rapidly evolving discipline - the proliferation of technical terminology has lacked a standardised framework for its development. The result is a convoluted and inconsistent usage of terminology, with various discrepancies in descriptions of damage and interventions. A standardised framework is therefore needed for a clear, universally applicable, and consistent terminology to promote more effective communication across researchers, stakeholders, and policymakers. Inconsistencies in terminology stem from the exponential increase in scientific publications on the patterns and processes of biological invasions authored by experts from various disciplines and countries since the 1990s, as well as publications by legislators and policymakers focusing on practical applications, regulations, and management of resources. Aligning and standardising terminology across stakeholders remains a challenge in invasion science. Here, we review and evaluate the multiple terms used in invasion science (e.g. 'non-native', 'alien', 'invasive' or 'invader', 'exotic', 'non-indigenous', 'naturalised', 'pest') to propose a more simplified and standardised terminology. The streamlined framework we propose and translate into 28 other languages is based on the terms (i) 'non-native', denoting species transported beyond their natural biogeographic range, (ii) 'established non-native', i.e. those non-native species that have established self-sustaining populations in their new location(s) in the wild, and (iii) 'invasive non-native' - populations of established non-native species that have recently spread or are spreading rapidly in their invaded range actively or passively with or without human mediation. We also highlight the importance of conceptualising 'spread' for classifying invasiveness and 'impact' for management. Finally, we propose a protocol for classifying populations based on (i) dispersal mechanism, (ii) species origin, (iii) population status, and (iv) impact. Collectively and without introducing new terminology, the framework that we present aims to facilitate effective communication and collaboration in invasion science and management of non-native species.
    Type: Article , PeerReviewed
    Format: text
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...