In:
Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Vol. 231, No. 5-6 ( 2011-10-1), p. 749-760
Abstract:
This article evaluates three different questioning techniques for measuring the prevalence of plagiarism in student papers: the randomized response technique (RRT), the item count technique (ICT), and the crosswise model (CM). In three independent experimental surveys with Swiss and German university students as subjects (two web surveys and a survey using paper and- pencil questionnaires in a classroom setting), each of the three techniques is compared to direct questioning and evaluated based on the “more-is-better” assumption. According to our results the RRT and the ICT failed to reduce social desirability bias in self-reports of plagiarism. In contrast, the CM was more successful in eliciting a significantly higher rate of reported sensitive behavior than direct questioning. One reason for the success of the CM, we believe, is that it overcomes the “self-protective no” bias known from the RRT (and which may also be a potential problem in the ICT).We find rates of up to 22 percent of students who declared that they ever intentionally adopted a passage from someone else’s work without citing it. Severe plagiarism such as handing in someone else’s paper as one’s own, however, seems to be less frequent with rates of about 1 to 2 percent.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
2366-049X
,
0021-4027
DOI:
10.1515/jbnst-2011-5-612
Language:
English
Publisher:
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Publication Date:
2011
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2416178-0
detail.hit.zdb_id:
215643-X
