In:
Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 36, No. 6_suppl ( 2018-02-20), p. 408-408
Kurzfassung:
408 Background: To assess GD or FCT as the chemoradiation (CRT) component of a bladder sparing regimen. Methods: Patients with T2-4a bladder cancer were randomized. Patients had a maximal transurethral resection and induction CRT to 40 Gy followed by cystoscopic assessment. Patients with a complete response (CR) received consolidation CRT to 64 Gy. Others were offered cystectomy and no further CRT. Adjuvant gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy was subsequently administered. The primary endpoint was the rate of distant metastasis at 3 years (DM3). Toxicity and other efficacy related endpoints including CR and bladder intact distant metastasis free survival at 3 years (BI-DMFS3) were also assessed. Using the Clopper-Pearson method, the study required 32 patients per arm, with a benchmark DM3 of 25% and a 1-sided significance level of 0.1. If both arms meet this benchmark, toxicity will be used to select a regimen for future study. This study was not designed to compare arms. Results: From 12/2008 to 4/2014, 70 patients were enrolled; 66 were eligible for analysis (33 per arm). Median follow-up was 4.3 years. DM3 was 22% and 16% for FCT and GD, respectively. BI-DMFS3 was 67% and 72%, respectively. CR rates were 88% and 78%, respectively. Of 33 patients in the FCT group, 32 (97%) completed induction, 27 (93%) completed induction and consolidation, and 18 (55%) completed the entire protocol. Of 33 patients in the GD group, these figures were 31 (94%), 23 (92%), and 16 (49%), respectively. Of 33 patients in the FCT group, 21 (64%) had grade 3-4 toxicity during protocol treatment with 18 (55%), 2 (6%) and 2 (6%) experiencing hematologic, GI and GU toxicity, respectively. For 33 patients in the GD group, these figures were 18 (55%) overall and 14 (43%), 3 (9%) and 2 (6%), respectively. Conclusions: Both regimens are promising, given DM3 rates 〈 25%. As there was less toxicity in the GD arm, it would be reasonable to consider a gemcitabine based option as well as a cisplatin based regimen for future trials. Daily radiation may be as effective as twice-daily radiation, which may broaden appeal. Clinical trial information: NCT00777491.
Materialart:
Online-Ressource
ISSN:
0732-183X
,
1527-7755
DOI:
10.1200/JCO.2018.36.6_suppl.408
Sprache:
Englisch
Verlag:
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
Publikationsdatum:
2018
ZDB Id:
2005181-5
