In:
ECS Meeting Abstracts, The Electrochemical Society, Vol. MA2014-01, No. 1 ( 2014-04-01), p. 72-72
Abstract:
Recently, energy storage systems based on bivalent Mg 2+ ions spurred considerable interest as a promising high energy density alternative battery system among others [1, 2]. Magnesium (Mg) has several positive attributes which set it apart from Li-ion battery system. It is environmental friendly, cost effective (~$ 2700/ton for Mg compared to $64,000/ton for Li) and is relatively more abundant in the earth’s crust (~13.9% Mg compared to ~0.0007% of Li) compared to hitherto used popular systems. Additionally, magnesium is more stable in air compared to lithium, and is theoretically capable of rendering higher volumetric capacity (3832 mAh/cc for Mg vs. 2062 mAh/cc for Li). In the year 2000, Aurbach and coworkers successfully demonstrated a prototype Mg cell using the Mo 6 S 8 Chevrel Phase a new class of cathodes, Mg anode, and the 0.25 molar Mg(AlCl 2 EtBu) 2 /tetrahydrofuran electrolyte where Mg 2+ can be (de)intercalated reversibly ~ 1-1.2V offering an energy density ~ 60 Whkg -1 up to 2000 cycles with little fade in capacity [3]. Relatively fast and easy intercalation of Mg 2+ ions at room temperature makes Mo 6 S 8 a model cathode for magnesium battery. However, Mo 6 S 8 is a metastable phase at room temperature, and is therefore indirectly stabilized when generated via leaching of the metal from the thermodynamically stable ternary Chevrel phase compounds, M x Mo 6 T 8 (M = metal, T = S, Se, Te) [4]. Typical synthesis approach of Cu x Mo 6 S 8 (Cu x CP) requires high temperature reactions of elemental blends in an evacuated quartz ampoules (EQA) at ~1150 ○ C for 7 days [3] or by a molten salt (MS) route using Mo-MoS 2 -CuS reactants in a KCl salt, and heat treating the reaction mixtures at ~850 ○ C for 60h in an Ar atmosphere [5]. Both approaches are extremely tedious and require chemical leaching either in 6 molar HCl/H 2 O or 0.2 molar I 2 /acetonitrile solutions for several days at room temperature for complete removal of copper [5]. Herein, we report a rapid solution chemistry route (total manufacturing time required for the synthesis of CP is only ~12h) for the synthesis of Mo 6 S 8 following modification of a previous report [6] which only reported the synthesis of the Cu analog of the Mo 6 S 8 phase. The structural analysis (XRD and SEM) shows the formation of phase-pure micrometer (~1-1.5 mm) size cuboidal shaped Cu 2 Mo 6 S 8 and Mo 6 S 8 crystals [See Fig. 1(a-d )]. Electrochemical performance of the resultant Mo 6 S 8 cathode exhibits a discharge capacity ~ 76 mAhg -1 with excellent capacity retention up to ~100 cycles, when cycled at a current rate of 20mA/g (~C/6). The excellent cyclability, rate capability and high Coulombic efficiency (~99.3% at ~1.C rate) of the Mo 6 S 8 cathode, renders the solution chemistry route a convenient approach for synthesizing the electrochemically active model Chevrel phase Mo 6 S 8 . Results of these studies will be presented and discussed. References [1] Aurbach D, Suresh G, Levi E, Mitelman A, Mizrahi O, Chusid O, et al. Progress in Rechargeable Magnesium Battery Technology. Advanced Materials. 2007;19:4260-7. [2] Kim HS, Arthur TS, Allred GD, Zajicek J, Newman JG, Rodnyansky AE, et al. Structure and compatibility of a magnesium electrolyte with a sulphur cathode. Nat Commun. 2011;2:427. [3] Aurbach D, Lu Z, Schechter A, Gofer Y, Gizbar H, Turgeman R, et al. Prototype systems for rechargeable magnesium batteries. Nature. 2000;407:724-7. [4] Rabiller P, Rabiller-Baudry M, Even-Boudjada S, Burel L, Chevrel R, Sergent M, et al. Recent progress in chevrel phase syntheses: A new low temperature synthesis of the superconducting lead compound. Materials Research Bulletin. 1994;29:567-74. [5] Lancry E, Levi E, Mitelman A, Malovany S, Aurbach D. Molten salt synthesis (MSS) Of Cu 2 Mo 6 S 8 - New way for large-scale production of Chevrel phases. Journal of Solid State Chemistry. 2006;179:1879-82. [6] Nanjundaswamy KS, Vasanthacharya NY, Gopalakrishnan J, Rao CNR. Convenient synthesis of the Chevrel phases metal molybdenum sulfide, M x Mo 6 S 8 (M = copper, lead, lanthanum or gadolinium). Inorganic Chemistry. 1987;26:4286-8. Acknowledgements: The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support as part of the Department of Energy’s National Energy Technology Laboratory’s program DOE-NETL) (contract number DE-FE0004000). PNK also acknowledge the Edward R. Weidlein Chair Professorship funds and the Center for Complex Engineered Multifunctional Materials (CCEMM) for partial support of this research.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
2151-2043
DOI:
10.1149/MA2014-01/1/72
Language:
Unknown
Publisher:
The Electrochemical Society
Publication Date:
2014
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2438749-6
