In:
Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, Wiley, Vol. 45, No. 11 ( 2022-11), p. 1323-1329
Abstract:
Although much has been discussed about the early recurrence of atrial fibrillation (ERAF) after cryoballoon ablation (CBA), the clinical impact of very early recurrence of atrial fibrillation (VERAF) after CBA remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the impact of VERAF after CBA. Methods We enrolled 236 consecutive patients who underwent an initial CBA for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation between February 2017 and December 2020 in our hospital. These patients were categorized into three groups: VERAF group who experienced an initial recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia within 48 h after CBA, late‐ERAF (LERAF) group who experienced an initial recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia between 48 h and 3 months after CBA, and non‐ERAF (NERAF) group who did not experience a recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia within 3 months after CBA. We investigated the late recurrence of AF (LRAF, defined as recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia more than 3 months after CBA), and the incidence of non‐pulmonary vein (PV) triggers in the patients who experienced a repeat ablation procedure due to LRAF. Results VERAF group had a higher incidence of freedom from LRAF than LERAF group ( p = 0.032) and a lower incidence of freedom from LRAF than NERAF group ( p = 0.002). Moreover, VERAF group had the highest incidence of non‐PV triggers at repeat ablation procedure among the three groups ( p = 0.003). Conclusions While ERAF was a predictor of LRAF, VERAF was less related to LRAF among the patients with ERAF after CBA. Furthermore, VERAF might be associated with non‐PV triggers.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
0147-8389
,
1540-8159
Language:
English
Publisher:
Wiley
Publication Date:
2022
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2037547-5
