In:
Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, Wiley, Vol. 42, No. 6 ( 2019-06), p. 603-609
Abstract:
The implantation of leads in the right atrial septum (RAS) or the right ventricular septum (RVS) is technically challenging, and dislodgement occurs occasionally. This study aims to determine a predictor for the dislodgement of leads implanted in the RAS or RVS. Methods This retrospective cohort study enrolled 137 consecutive patients who underwent the cardiac implantable electronic devices implantation, using active fixation leads in the RAS and RVS. We compared the pacing threshold, R‐ or P‐wave amplitude, slew rate, and presence of the current of injury (COI) between dislodged and nondislodged leads. Results We performed lead fixation for 74 and 125 times in the RAS and RVS, respectively. Atrial lead dislodgement occurred five times (6.8%) intraoperatively and five times (6.8%) postoperatively, whereas ventricular lead dislodgement occurred eight times (6.4%) intraoperatively and three times (2.4%) postoperatively. Although there were no lead parameters that showed a significant difference common to RAS lead and RVS lead, the presence of the COI was significantly different between nondislodged and dislodged leads in both the RAS and RVS (atrial leads: 57.8% vs 0%, P 〈 0.001; ventricular leads: 67.5% vs 9.1%, P 〈 0.001). The positive predictive value of COI presence for predicting no lead dislodgement was 100% and 98.7% in the RAS and RVS, respectively. Conclusion Lead dislodgement is more likely when the COI is absent; documentation of COI should be pursued during lead implantation in challenging sites as the RAS and RVS.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
0147-8389
,
1540-8159
DOI:
10.1111/pace.2019.42.issue-6
Language:
English
Publisher:
Wiley
Publication Date:
2019
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2037547-5
