In:
Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Wiley, Vol. 40, No. 5 ( 2010-05), p. 1054-1084
Abstract:
Undergraduates ( N = 339) listened to a simulated police interview with a defendant concerning his alibi. We studied the impact of (a) the strength of the alibi evidence; (b) defendant's prior convictions; (c) judge's instructions on prior conviction evidence; and (d) perceivers' need for cognition (NFC) on alibi believability and defendant guilt ratings. Defendants previously convicted of the same crime as the current charge were seen as more likely to be guilty than defendants previously convicted of a different crime. Judge's instructions did not affect guilt ratings. NFC was less influential than anticipated, but did affect participants' understanding and recall of judicial instructions. Strong alibis were seen as more believable and led to lower guilt ratings than weak alibis.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
0021-9029
,
1559-1816
DOI:
10.1111/jasp.2010.40.issue-5
DOI:
10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00610.x
Language:
English
Publisher:
Wiley
Publication Date:
2010
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2066531-3
detail.hit.zdb_id:
120134-7
SSG:
5,2
