In:
Colorectal Disease, Wiley, Vol. 25, No. 4 ( 2023-04), p. 669-678
Abstract:
Bridge to surgery (BtS) aims to decrease perioperative morbidity and mortality in emergency resection (ER) of the colon. Previous results are inconsistent, and long‐term comparisons are scarce. The aim of this study was to compare the short‐ and long‐term outcomes of BtS and ER. Method This retrospective study examined data from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry for patients treated for acute malignant large bowel obstruction from 2007 to 2009. Patients were grouped by treatment strategy: BtS (using a self‐expanding metallic stent or diverting stoma) or ER. Medical records were scrutinized for all patients in the BtS group. The primary endpoints were 5‐year overall survival (OS) and 3‐year recurrence‐free survival (RFS). The secondary endpoints were postoperative mortality and morbidity rates and stoma permanence. Results Overall, 143 patients were treated using BtS versus 1302 patients treated with ER. The 5‐year OS was higher in the BtS group than in the ER group (53.8% vs. 37.4%; p 〈 0.05). No difference was noted in the 3‐year RFS (75.7% vs. 75.0%; p = 0.38). The postoperative mortality rate was lower in the BtS group than in the ER group (0.7% vs. 7.3%; p 〈 0.05). Complications occurred in 46.9% of patients in the BtS group (both procedures) versus 35.9% of patients in the ER group ( p 〈 0.05); the rate of severe complications was 23.1% and 16.9%, respectively ( p = 0.07). Conclusion This retrospective population‐based registry study showed higher long‐term survival and lower postoperative mortality rates among patients treated with BtS versus ER for acute malignant large bowel obstruction.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
1462-8910
,
1463-1318
Language:
English
Publisher:
Wiley
Publication Date:
2023
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2004820-8
