GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Wiley ; 2022
    In:  CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics Vol. 28, No. 2 ( 2022-02), p. 279-288
    In: CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics, Wiley, Vol. 28, No. 2 ( 2022-02), p. 279-288
    Abstract: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) in the ventral intermediate nucleus (Vim‐DBS) is the preferred surgical therapy for essential tremor (ET). Tolerance and disease progression are considered to be the two main reasons underlying the loss of long‐term efficacy of Vim‐DBS. This study aimed to explore whether Vim‐DBS shows long‐term loss of efficacy and to evaluate the reasons for this diminished efficacy from different aspects. Methods In a repeated‐measures meta‐analysis of 533 patients from 18 studies, Vim‐DBS efficacy was evaluated at ≤6 months, 7–12 months, 1–3 years, and ≥4 years. The primary outcomes were the score changes in different components of the Fahn‐Tolosa‐Marin Tremor Rating Scale (TRS; total score, motor score, hand‐function score, and activities of daily living [ADL] score). Secondary outcomes were the long‐term predictive factors. Results The TRS total, motor, and ADL scores showed significant deterioration with disease progression ( p  = 0.002, p  = 0.047, and p   〈  0.001, respectively), while the TRS total ( p   〈  0.001), hand‐function ( p  = 0.036), and ADL ( p  = 0.004) scores indicated a significant long‐term reduction in DBS efficacy, although the motor subscore indicated no loss of efficacy. Hand‐function ( p   〈  0.001) and ADL ( p  = 0.028) scores indicated DBS tolerance, while the TRS total and motor scores did not. Stimulation frequency and preoperative score were predictive factors for long‐term results. Conclusion This study provides level 3a evidence that long‐term Vim‐DBS is effective in controlling motor symptoms without waning benefits. The efficacy reduction for hand function was caused by DBS tolerance, while that for ADL was caused by DBS tolerance and disease progression. More attention should be given to actual functional recovery rather than changes in motor scores in patients with ET.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1755-5930 , 1755-5949
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2423467-9
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2423461-8
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...