In:
Acta Paediatrica, Wiley, Vol. 109, No. 7 ( 2020-07), p. 1338-1345
Abstract:
We surveyed care practices for critically ill very preterm infants admitted to neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in the International Network for Evaluating Outcomes in Neonates (iNeo) to identify differences relevant to outcome comparisons. Methods We conducted an online survey on care practices for critically ill very preterm infants and infants with severe intracranial haemorrhage (ICH). The survey was distributed in 2015 to representatives of 390 NICUs in 11 countries. Survey replies were compared with network incidence of death and severe ICH for infants born between 23 0/7 and 28 6/7 weeks of gestation from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2015. Results Most units in Israel, Japan and Tuscany, Italy, favoured withholding care when care was considered futile, whereas most units in other networks favoured redirection of care. For infants with bilateral grade 4 ICH, redirection of care was very frequently (≥90% of cases) offered in the majority of units in Australia and New Zealand and Switzerland, but rarely in other networks. Networks where redirection of care was frequently offered for severe ICH had lower rates of survivors with severe ICH. Conclusion We identified marked inter‐network differences in care approaches that need to be considered when comparing outcomes.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
0803-5253
,
1651-2227
Language:
English
Publisher:
Wiley
Publication Date:
2020
detail.hit.zdb_id:
203487-6
detail.hit.zdb_id:
1492629-5