In:
British Journal of Haematology, Wiley, Vol. 97, No. 2 ( 1997-05), p. 372-382
Abstract:
We evaluated the morphological findings in 150 consecutive cases of T‐lineage acute lymphocytic leukaemia (T‐ALL). Cytochemistry including PAS staining and acid phosphatase reaction proved of limited value for the diagnosis of ALL. The diagnosis of acute leukaemia was easy to establish in most instances. However, in a few cases the leukaemic cells were difficult to recognize as blasts. The nuclei of such cells showed condensed chromatin and nucleoli were lacking, and was encountered particularly in thymic ALL. Basophilic cytoplasm combined with prominent vacuolization suggestive of mature B‐ALL (ALL‐L3 type), was observed in 16 cases. Other features, however, such as cell size, polymorphism, chromatin structure, sparse cytoplasm or focal positivity for acid phosphatase, excluded a diagnosis of ALL‐L3 in those cases. Distinction from hybrid leukaemia was difficult in 20 cases, because of a low percentage of peroxidase‐positive blasts or other features which suggested a separate myeloid leukaemia component. In nine of these the hybrid nature of the leukaemia was considered as certain on the basis of morphology. Seven cases had been diagnosed as biphenotypic with coexpression of myeloid and lymphoid markers by immunological techniques. In conclusion, our analysis showed some serious pitfalls of the morphology in T‐ALL, clearly indicating the need for immunological analysis of the leukaemic cells. However, morphology remains an essential component of the diagnostic repertoire, especially when the marrow is difficult to aspirate and in cases with equivocal immunological findings. Furthermore, recognition of a separate myeloid leukaemic component in addition to the lymphatic one requires a morphological analysis.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
0007-1048
,
1365-2141
DOI:
10.1046/j.1365-2141.1997.d01-2171.x
Language:
English
Publisher:
Wiley
Publication Date:
1997
detail.hit.zdb_id:
1475751-5
