In:
Neurourology and Urodynamics, Wiley, Vol. 39, No. 5 ( 2020-06), p. 1576-1583
Abstract:
In sacral neuromodulation (SNM) patients, it is thought the bellows response elicited upon sacral spinal nerve stimulation is reflex‐mediated. Therefore the mechanism of action of SNM is considered to be at the spinal or supraspinal level. These ideas need to be challenged. Objective To identify the neural pathway of the bellows response upon sacral spinal nerve stimulation. Design, Setting, and Participants Single tertiary center, prospective study (December 2017‐June 2019) including 29 patients with overactive bladder refractory to first‐line treatment. Intervention Recording of the pelvic floor muscle response (PFMR) using a camcorder and electromyography (EMG) (intravaginal probe and concentric needles) upon increasing stimulation during lead or implantable pulse generator placement. Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis The lowest stimulation intensity needed to elicit a visual PFMR and electrical PFMR was determined. Electrical PFMRs were subdivided according to their latency. Outcome: the association between visual and electrical PFMRs. Statistical analyses were performed using the weighted kappa coefficient. Results Three different electrical PFMRs could be identified by surface and needle EMG, corresponding with a direct efferent motor response (R1), oligosynaptic (R2), and polysynaptic (R3) afferent reflex response. Only the R1 electrical PFMR was perfectly associated with the visual PFMR ( κ = 0.900). Conclusions The visual PFMRs upon sacral spinal nerve stimulation are direct efferent motor responses. A reopening of the discussion on the mechanism of action of SNM is possibly justified.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
0733-2467
,
1520-6777
Language:
English
Publisher:
Wiley
Publication Date:
2020
detail.hit.zdb_id:
1500793-5
