In:
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Wiley, Vol. 92, No. 3 ( 2024-09), p. 1115-1127
Abstract:
T 1 mapping is a widely used quantitative MRI technique, but its tissue‐specific values remain inconsistent across protocols, sites, and vendors. The ISMRM Reproducible Research and Quantitative MR study groups jointly launched a challenge to assess the reproducibility of a well‐established inversion‐recovery T 1 mapping technique, using acquisition details from a seminal T 1 mapping paper on a standardized phantom and in human brains. Methods The challenge used the acquisition protocol from Barral et al. (2010). Researchers collected T 1 mapping data on the ISMRM/NIST phantom and/or in human brains. Data submission, pipeline development, and analysis were conducted using open‐source platforms. Intersubmission and intrasubmission comparisons were performed. Results Eighteen submissions (39 phantom and 56 human datasets) on scanners by three MRI vendors were collected at 3 T (except one, at 0.35 T). The mean coefficient of variation was 6.1% for intersubmission phantom measurements, and 2.9% for intrasubmission measurements. For humans, the intersubmission/intrasubmission coefficient of variation was 5.9/3.2% in the genu and 16/6.9% in the cortex. An interactive dashboard for data visualization was also developed: https://rrsg2020.dashboards.neurolibre.org . Conclusion The T 1 intersubmission variability was twice as high as the intrasubmission variability in both phantoms and human brains, indicating that the acquisition details in the original paper were insufficient to reproduce a quantitative MRI protocol. This study reports the inherent uncertainty in T 1 measures across independent research groups, bringing us one step closer to a practical clinical baseline of T 1 variations in vivo.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
0740-3194
,
1522-2594
Language:
English
Publisher:
Wiley
Publication Date:
2024
detail.hit.zdb_id:
605774-3
detail.hit.zdb_id:
1493786-4
