Publication Date:
2014-11-28
Description:
ABSTRACT High N fertilizer and flooding irrigation applied to rice in anthropogenic-alluvial soil often result in N leaching and low use efficiency of applied fertilizer N from the rice field in Ningxia irrigation region in the upper reaches of the Yellow River. Sound N management practices need to be established to improve N use efficiency while sustaining high grain yield levels and minimize fertilizer N loss to the environment. We investigated the effects of Nursery Box Total Fertilization technology (NBTF) on N leaching at different rice growing stages, N use efficiency and rice yield in 2010 and 2011.The four fertilizer N treatments were 300 kg N · ha -1 (CU, Conventional treatment of urea at 300 kg N · ha -1 ), 120 kg N · ha -1 (NBTF120, NBTF treatment of controlled-release N fertilizer at 120 kg N · ha -1 ), 80 kgN · ha -1 (NBTF80, NBTF treatment of controlled-release N fertilizer at 80 kg N · ha -1 ) and no N fertilizer application treatment (CK). The results showed that the NBTF120 treatment increased N use efficiency, maintained crop yields and substantially reduced N losses to the environment. Under the CU treatment, the rice yield was 9634 and 7098 kg · ha -1 ; the N use efficiency was 31.6% and 34.8%; and the leaching losses of TN was 44.51 and 39.89 kg · ha -1 ,NH 4 + -N was 5.26 and 5.49 kg · ha -1 ,NO 3 - -N was 27.94 and 26.22 kg · ha -1 during the rice whole growing period in 2010 and 2011, respectively. Compared with CU, NBTF120 significantly increased the N use efficiency and decreased the N losses from the paddy field. Under NBTF120, the N use efficiency was 56.3% and 51.4%, which was 24.7% and 16.6% higher than that of CU, and the conventional fertilizer application rate could be reduced by 60% without lowering the rice yield while decreasing the leaching losses of TN by 16.27 and 14.36 kg · ha -1 , NH 4 + -N by 0.90 and 1.84 kg · ha -1 , NO 3 - -N by 110.6 and 10.14 kg · ha -1 in 2010 and 2011, respectively. Our results indicate that the CU treatment resulted in relatively high N leaching losses, and that alternative practice of NBTF which synchronized fertilizer application with crop demand substantially reduced these losses. We therefore suggest the NBTF120 be a fertilizer application alternative which leads to high food production but low environmental impact. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Print ISSN:
1085-3278
Electronic ISSN:
1099-145X
Topics:
Geography
,
Agriculture, Forestry, Horticulture, Fishery, Domestic Science, Nutrition
Permalink