GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

X

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Cambridge University Press (CUP)  (9)
  • Political Science  (9)
Material
Publisher
  • Cambridge University Press (CUP)  (9)
Person/Organisation
Language
Years
Subjects(RVK)
  • Political Science  (9)
RVK
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Allocating the Credit in Collaborative Research
    Cambridge University Press (CUP) ; 2008
    In:  PS: Political Science & Politics Vol. 41, No. 1 ( 2008-01), p. 246-247
    Details
    In: PS: Political Science & Politics, Cambridge University Press (CUP), Vol. 41, No. 1 ( 2008-01), p. 246-247
    Abstract: For years journal articles from the natural sciences have been characterized by multiple authors, reflecting the collaborative nature of the research. The articles have also conformed to a professional norm in giving credit to the authors and, at least implicitly, indicating their relative contributions. Although such collaborative research has grown significantly in political science, the discipline is still wrestling with any standard to indicate who gets credit and the nature of multiple authors' relative contributions. This is an issue with which political scientists from the most junior to the most senior continue to deal.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1049-0965 , 1537-5935
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1017/S1049096508280364
    RVK:
    MA 1000
    Language: English
    Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
    Publication Date: 2008
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 123834-6
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2049336-8
    SSG: 3,6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Political Science Student Journals: What Students Publish and Why Student Publishing Matters
    Cambridge University Press (CUP) ; 2018
    In:  PS: Political Science & Politics Vol. 51, No. 4 ( 2018-10), p. 804-810
    Details
    In: PS: Political Science & Politics, Cambridge University Press (CUP), Vol. 51, No. 4 ( 2018-10), p. 804-810
    Abstract: Whereas there is a substantial body of scholarship assessing the merits of student journals, and an equally sizable amount of how-to-publish advice for students in higher education, there is little empirical research exploring the content of disciplinary student publications. To gain a sense of what political science students are publishing, this study examines articles in three peer-reviewed student journals of politics between 2005 and 2015: The Pi Sigma Alpha Undergraduate Journal of Politics, Critique , and Politikon . Content analysis reveals the nature of published student work by subfield, methodology, and topic, with findings discussed in the context of research trends in the profession and the debate about advantages and disadvantages of student journal publishing.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1049-0965 , 1537-5935
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1017/S1049096518000057
    RVK:
    MA 1000
    Language: English
    Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 123834-6
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2049336-8
    SSG: 3,6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    The Journal as a System of Norms
    Cambridge University Press (CUP) ; 2010
    In:  British Journal of Political Science Vol. 40, No. 3 ( 2010-07), p. 477-485
    Details
    In: British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press (CUP), Vol. 40, No. 3 ( 2010-07), p. 477-485
    Abstract: As with any other institution, a scholarly journal can be understood as a system of norms. This article examines those norms, drawing its evidence from participant observation over a number of years. It discusses particular norms as they apply to authors, reviewers and editors, before considering some general themes including: the implicit nature of the norms and tacit knowledge, changes in norms and monitoring.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0007-1234 , 1469-2112
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1017/S0007123410000116
    RVK:
    MA 1000
    Language: English
    Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
    Publication Date: 2010
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1466320-X
    SSG: 3,6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 4
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Two Houses: Legislative Studies and the Atlantic Divide
    Cambridge University Press (CUP) ; 2008
    In:  PS: Political Science & Politics Vol. 41, No. 3 ( 2008-07), p. 557-565
    Details
    In: PS: Political Science & Politics, Cambridge University Press (CUP), Vol. 41, No. 3 ( 2008-07), p. 557-565
    Abstract: Legislative scholars have a history of stepping back occasionally to examine the development and state of the sub-discipline (Budge 1973; Gamm and Huber 2002; Loewenberg, Patterson, and Jewell 1985; Mezey 1993; Morris-Jones 1983; Pasquino 1973; Patterson 1989). Many of these existing reviews, although valuable, are predominantly of a qualitative and subjective nature and are, in most cases, now dated. This paper provides a bibliometrical analysis of the state of legislative studies in the United States and Europe by exploring the content of eight political science journals. I looked at six general political science journals, three originating in the United States and three in Europe, as well as the content of two legislative studies journals—the American-based Legislative Studies Quarterly and the British-based Journal of Legislative Studies .
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1049-0965 , 1537-5935
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1017/S104909650808075X
    RVK:
    MA 1000
    Language: English
    Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
    Publication Date: 2008
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 123834-6
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2049336-8
    SSG: 3,6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 5
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Background to the Study of Opposition in Communist Eastern Europe
    Cambridge University Press (CUP) ; 1968
    In:  Government and Opposition Vol. 3, No. 3 ( 1968-07-01), p. 294-324
    Details
    In: Government and Opposition, Cambridge University Press (CUP), Vol. 3, No. 3 ( 1968-07-01), p. 294-324
    Abstract: TO DISCUSS ‘OPPOSITION’ IN A ONE-PARTY SYSTEM, AND IN PARTICULAR in a communist one, might seem on first thought to involve a contradiction in terms. Communist governments have normally been regarded in the West as systems without opposition except in the form of illegal resistance by sections of the population to the regimes themselves. Yet Leonard Schapiro, in his foreword to the first issue of the journal, Government and Opposition , expressed the view that both government and opposition are always and at all times present (or potentially present) in every political order and referred to ‘the tentative process of loyal dissent’ becoming apparent in one-party states. A striking feature of many of the communist states since the death of Stalin has in fact been the emergence of political tendencies that can only be called ‘oppositional’, in the form either of resisting policies enacted or offered by the ruling party, or of proposing alternative courses of action. The observation of these tendencies by Western scholars, and the analysis of the experience of noncommunist states in Africa and Asia, have led to a re-examimtion of the nature of one-party states in general, and to the recognition that not only has opposition never been totally absent from communist systems, but that it has assumed more vigorous and varied forms in recent years.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0017-257X , 1477-7053
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-7053.1968.tb01293.x
    RVK:
    MA 1000
    Language: English
    Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
    Publication Date: 1968
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2301-2
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2050450-0
    SSG: 3,6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 6
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    What to Gain from Technical Sophistication?
    Cambridge University Press (CUP) ; 1995
    In:  PS: Political Science & Politics Vol. 28, No. 3 ( 1995-09), p. 505-506
    Details
    In: PS: Political Science & Politics, Cambridge University Press (CUP), Vol. 28, No. 3 ( 1995-09), p. 505-506
    Abstract: In a recent article in this journal, James McGregor (1993) criticizes political scientists for practicing regression analysis without recognizing the limitations in the regression technique. McGregor argues that the technique is inappropriate for political science research in many cases and suggests that we pay close attention to both the substantive (e.g., linearity and additivity) and statistical aspects of the technique. While acknowledging that many of us have not done enough to meet the statistical assumptions of regression analysis, George Krause (1994) argues that McGregor has underestimated the value of the technique to political science research. To support his argument, Krause directs our attention to a number of complicated regression models, including those designed for situations in which the dependent measure is a discrete variable (logit, probit, ordered probit, multinomial logit, Poisson, negative binomial and generalized event count) or the independent effects on the dependent variable are lagged distributed (polynomial distributed lag). He also mentions the recent developments related to event history regression, bootstrapping (a nonparametric approach to statistical inference), and vector autoregression (VAR, a creative use of OLS in simultaneous time series data). Krause deserves credit for his attempt to show us that the scope of the regression technique is not as narrow as McGregor might have assumed. However, in rejecting McGregor's pessimism, Krause does not realize that McGregor's major concern with regression analysis, as he illuminates by applying OLS to certain laws of nature, is not about the type of dependent variable but about relationships.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1049-0965 , 1537-5935
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.2307/420319
    RVK:
    MA 1000
    Language: English
    Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
    Publication Date: 1995
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 123834-6
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2049336-8
    SSG: 3,6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 7
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Well, Does Leviathan…?
    Cambridge University Press (CUP) ; 1974
    In:  British Journal of Political Science Vol. 4, No. 2 ( 1974-04), p. 245-250
    Details
    In: British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press (CUP), Vol. 4, No. 2 ( 1974-04), p. 245-250
    Abstract: In the October 1973 issue of this Journal , John Orbell and Brent Rutherford published an article which sought to test the central thesis of Hobbes’ Leviathan . Although I shall try to show that as a piece of research it was fatally flawed, the authors deserve acclaim for their boldness, and for showing the way back to serious comparative government research in the Aristotelian manner. To test the basic principles of constitutions against the claims made for them is so obviously worthwhile that it is inexplicable and sad that their article stands virtually alone. In part its rarity reflects the unspoken assumption in modern political science that, after the behavioural revolution, anyone taking constitutions seriously was bound to be returning to the discredited legalism of the past. This overreaction has had its worst excess in political theory, for we seem all to have forgotten that political theory used to be an attempt to devise constitutional frameworks within which human nature would be led to produce the good life. As a theorist I hope we will return to that, and as an empirical researcher I hope we take up Orbell and Rutherford's lead and start to test such general constitutional claims. There are plenty of examples to go on with, starting perhaps with the claim that the United States Constitution is apt to ‘establish justice, insure domestic tranquillity, provide for the common defence, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty’.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0007-1234 , 1469-2112
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1017/S0007123400009492
    RVK:
    MA 1000
    Language: English
    Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
    Publication Date: 1974
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1466320-X
    SSG: 3,6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 8
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    A Comment on Electoral Forecasting from Poll Data
    Cambridge University Press (CUP) ; 1980
    In:  British Journal of Political Science Vol. 10, No. 2 ( 1980-04), p. 271-271
    Details
    In: British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press (CUP), Vol. 10, No. 2 ( 1980-04), p. 271-271
    Abstract: I heartily approve of research based upon poll data, in which I include specifically the contribution by Paul Whiteley, ‘Electoral Forecasting from Poll Data: The British Case’ (this Journal , IX (1979), 219–36). I note with pleasure the fact that the author has relied heavily upon Gallup data for the testing of his time-series model. There is one specific objection that I have to the detail of the contents of this paper. I refer to the sentence bridging pages 231–2, in which he states: ‘the large inaccuracy of the 1951 forecast is not, in fact, due to the model so much as Gallup data, which were extremely inaccurate in that year’. There is a footnote which states that this was inferred from the residuals of the forecasting model. The error quoted is 8·3 per cent. This does refer to the last pre-campaign poll, admittedly. The last campaign poll, the only one that could be compared with the result itself, shows, according to Gallup records, a deviation of 2·2 per cent. The bland assertion of Mr Whiteley that our results were inaccurate in that year is totally unsupported by any evidence of a practical kind. Instead we have the statement that the fit of the model was rather bad on this occasion. Remembering that public opinion, including support for a specific political party, is known to change radically between elections, between local elections and by-elections, and so on (I confine myself here to actual elections – I do not depend upon poll data to substantiate my case) and knowing that among the causes of this are political events, and events of a social and economic nature which affect the mood and attitude of the electorate, it does not surprise me that a purely mathematical model does not necessarily fit from time to time. Indeed elsewhere in the article the author mentions the possibility of shocks affecting public opinion and the degree to which these shocks are effected in the auto-regressive scheme that he has put forward.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0007-1234 , 1469-2112
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1017/S0007123400002167
    RVK:
    MA 1000
    Language: English
    Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
    Publication Date: 1980
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1466320-X
    SSG: 3,6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 9
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Georgia's Proposed New Constitution
    Cambridge University Press (CUP) ; 1945
    In:  American Political Science Review Vol. 39, No. 3 ( 1945-06), p. 459-463
    Details
    In: American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press (CUP), Vol. 39, No. 3 ( 1945-06), p. 459-463
    Abstract: Fully as interesting as the provisions of the proposed new constitution that will be submitted to the voters of Georgia at a special election on August 7, 1945, is the method by which the document was framed. The constitution of the state now in force, adopted in 1877 soon after the state was freed from carpet-bag rule, is a long and complicated document, filled with detailed limitations on the government, particularly in the field of finance. As a result of the inclusion of numerous provisions statutory in nature, the document has been amended three hundred and one times in a period of sixty-eight years. Recognizing the need for a new constitution, the Institute of Public Affairs of the University of Georgia drew up A Proposed Constitution for Georgia in 1931. This document proposed a thorough revision of the structure of the government, including such radical changes as the substitution of 30 districts for the existing 161 counties as the basis of representation in the General Assembly. The widespread publicity given the document served to stimulate interest in constitutional revision, and most of the press of the state, notably the Atlanta Journal , has in recent years actively supported the movement. In March, 1943, the General Assembly passed a resolution, sponsored by Governor Ellis Arnall, providing for a commission of twenty-three members to revise the constitution. The commission was to be composed of the governor, the president of the senate, the speaker of the house of representatives, three members of the senate appointed by the president, five members of the house appointed by the speaker, a justice of the supreme court designated by the court, a judge of the court of appeals designated by the court, the attorney general, the state auditor, two judges of the superior courts, three practicing attorneys-at-law, and three laymen to be appointed by the governor. The resolution provided that the report of this commission should be submitted to the General Assembly either in the form of proposed amendments to the constitution or as a proposed new constitution, to be acted upon by the General Assembly and submitted to the people for ratification or rejection.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0003-0554 , 1537-5943
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.2307/1949527
    RVK:
    MA 1000
    Language: English
    Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
    Publication Date: 1945
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2010035-8
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 123621-0
    SSG: 7,26
    SSG: 3,6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...