GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Oxford University Press (OUP)  (11)
  • Pharmacy  (11)
Material
Publisher
  • Oxford University Press (OUP)  (11)
Language
FID
  • Pharmacy  (11)
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Oxford University Press (OUP) ; 1996
    In:  Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy Vol. 37, No. suppl B ( 1996-05-01), p. 171-183
    In: Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 37, No. suppl B ( 1996-05-01), p. 171-183
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0305-7453 , 1460-2091
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 1996
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1467478-6
    SSG: 15,3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Oxford University Press (OUP) ; 2012
    In:  Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy Vol. 67, No. 7 ( 2012-07-01), p. 1807-1809
    In: Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 67, No. 7 ( 2012-07-01), p. 1807-1809
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0305-7453 , 1460-2091
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1467478-6
    SSG: 15,3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Oxford University Press (OUP) ; 1977
    In:  Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy Vol. 3, No. suppl A ( 1977-01-01), p. 33-46
    In: Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 3, No. suppl A ( 1977-01-01), p. 33-46
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0305-7453 , 1460-2091
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 1977
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1467478-6
    SSG: 15,3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 61, No. 6 ( 2008-03-13), p. 1205-1216
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0305-7453 , 1460-2091
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2008
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1467478-6
    SSG: 15,3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Oxford University Press (OUP) ; 2012
    In:  Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy Vol. 67, No. 11 ( 2012-11-01), p. 2661-2664
    In: Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 67, No. 11 ( 2012-11-01), p. 2661-2664
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0305-7453 , 1460-2091
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1467478-6
    SSG: 15,3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 68, No. 6 ( 2013-06-01), p. 1448-1450
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0305-7453 , 1460-2091
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1467478-6
    SSG: 15,3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 67, No. 4 ( 2012-04-01), p. 984-987
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0305-7453 , 1460-2091
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1467478-6
    SSG: 15,3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Oxford University Press (OUP) ; 2010
    In:  International Journal of Pharmacy Practice Vol. 16, No. 4 ( 2010-02-18), p. 223-230
    In: International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 16, No. 4 ( 2010-02-18), p. 223-230
    Abstract: To determine the frequency and nature of news stories of prescription drugs in a range of widely distributed UK newspapers, and to examine what information is presented. Setting UK newsprint media. Method Content analysis. Key findings Seven-hundred and eighty-five daily and 130 Sunday newspapers were examined. A total of 556 articles mentioning at least one prescription medicine were identified. The majority of news stories (n = 352) present one of two dominant, but conflicting characterisations of modern medicine. On one side, most articles (n = 251) are positive in their portrayal of medicines, with an emphasis on the potential benefits of new drugs. Of these, only 21 (14%) were concerned with new drugs currently available and licensed in the UK. On the other side, a smaller number of articles represented ‘negative news’ about medicines, generally reporting the side-effects or iatrogenic effects of prescription drugs. Positive stories frequently excluded mention of the harmful effects or potential risks of drugs, and equally, ‘negative’ stories frequently excluded any mention of a drug's beneficial effects. Just over one-third of articles (36%, 128/352) included reference to other treatment options. Fifty-six per cent of articles referred to the findings of a specific research study. Of these, 58% cited a specific information source - a journal (66%) or scientific meeting/conference (34%). Conclusion The findings indicate that while the news print media are prolific communicators of information about medicines, the information provided is often incomplete and ambiguous, thus constraining the reader's ability to evaluate the risks and benefits of medicines and make informed treatment decisions. It emphasises the benefits of new drugs, particularly those yet to receive a product licence, and the harms of established prescription drugs. Findings highlight the need to make medicines reporting in the UK press more comprehensive.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2042-7174 , 0961-7671
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2010
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2122383-X
    SSG: 15,3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Oxford University Press (OUP) ; 2022
    In:  International Journal of Pharmacy Practice Vol. 30, No. Supplement_1 ( 2022-04-01), p. i36-i36
    In: International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 30, No. Supplement_1 ( 2022-04-01), p. i36-i36
    Abstract: Community pharmacies are well-placed to provide public health interventions, yet they are underutilised for services of this nature (1), which are needed to achieve public health policy goals. Previous qualitative studies have explored public perceptions of the role of community pharmacy in delivering public health services (2). However, to date, these views have not been captured quantitatively, which means it is not clear if the general public shares these views. Aim The aim was to design a questionnaire to obtain public perceptions of the role of community pharmacy in public health interventions and to establish any barriers and facilitators that exist regarding community pharmacy utilisation. Methods A questionnaire was developed based on published literature and semi-structured interviews. Following initial piloting of a paper-based then online format (by ten individuals) a 42-item questionnaire was completed digitally via Qualtrics by a self-selecting sample of the general public recruited through social media (i.e., Twitter, Instagram and Facebook) in May and June 2021. Principal component analysis with Varimax rotation was used to identify the underlying factors (scales) of the questionnaire. Cronbach’s alpha analysis was undertaken to ensure good internal consistency. Information on frequency of community pharmacy use and for what reason was collected. Content and thematic analysis were conducted on the free text qualitative comments. Content analysis was conducted first to observe which aspects of the questionnaire were mentioned the most. Further to this, thematic analysis was conducted as there were responses which did not fit into the content analysis. Results There were 306 valid questionnaire responses, where 235 (76.8%) were females. The mean age was 34.5 years (SD=15.09). Factor analysis identified four scales with a total of 18-items, all demonstrating good internal consistency. Scales were labelled as (n=number of items; ἀ =Cronbach’s alpha value): Expertise (n=3, ἀ =0.815); Role (n=4, ἀ =0.745); Privacy (n=3, ἀ =0.770) and Relationship (n=8, ἀ =0.862). Scale scores indicated that a lack of awareness of their role and expertise was a barrier and adequate privacy was an important facilitator in delivering public health services. In support of the quantitative findings, content analysis identified lack of privacy as a dominant theme, and further thematic analysis uncovered lack of knowledge of community pharmacy’s role in public health as an important barrier to uptake of services. Thematic analysis uncovered the themes ‘lack of knowledge of services’ and ‘accessibility’. Conclusion The outcome of this study was the development of a four scale, 18-item questionnaire to capture public perceptions of the community pharmacy’s role in public health. This can, therefore, be used in future studies aiming to explore public perceptions of community pharmacy. Strengths include being the first questionnaire to explore perceptions of community pharmacy. Weaknesses include the possibility of bias using social media in recruitment. This could be tackled using paper versions of the questionnaire in different settings. Further research is needed to continue testing the psychometric properties of the questionnaire with consideration given to the addition of a fifth scale to measure perceptions of Accessibility. References (1) Kember, J., Hodson, K., & James, D. H. (2018). The public’s perception of the role of community pharmacists in Wales. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice (26), 120-128. (2) Gidman, W., & Cowley, J. (2013). A qualitative exploration of opinions on the community pharmacists’ role amongst the general public in Scotland, International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, (21), 288-296.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0961-7671 , 2042-7174
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2122383-X
    SSG: 15,3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Oxford University Press (OUP) ; 2023
    In:  International Journal of Pharmacy Practice Vol. 31, No. Supplement_1 ( 2023-04-13), p. i45-i46
    In: International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 31, No. Supplement_1 ( 2023-04-13), p. i45-i46
    Abstract: Despite significant efforts to increase deprescribing (1), marginal progress has been achieved (2). Deprescribing is a complex process involving multiple steps and activities, of which some may be routinely undertaken whilst others require interventions to support behaviour-change. Aim We aimed to develop an internationally derived specification validated by practitioners from multiple health systems that stipulates both the steps and activities required to deliver those steps of safe deprescribing. We also aimed to estimate the extent to which the required activities are currently undertaken and identify the barriers and enablers that need addressing to deliver safe deprescribing. Methods We formulated an electronic survey comprising literature reported deprescribing activities. Relevant networks in 25 countries e.g., British Geriatrics Society and Australian deprescribing network, emailed the survey link to all of their member practitioners. Respondents reported the frequency with which they thought each deprescribing activity was undertaken in practice within their peer group on a five-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (always) and whether it was important. We invited extended responses regarding the barriers and enablers to deprescribing and analysed these using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Results From 263 respondents 77.9% were prescribers; 110 (41.8%) were doctors, 85 (32.3%) were pharmacists, 44 (16.7%) were nurses and 24 (9.1%) were other healthcare professionals. Eighteen activities were combined into four deprescribing steps summarised in table 1. All were considered important and clinical activities were ‘often’ or ‘always’ undertaken. Patient orientated activities were only ‘sometimes’ undertaken. The barriers and enablers requiring addressing are in the TDF domains of ‘social influence’ to support practitioners to undertake patient orientated activities and ‘environmental context and resources’ to ensure they have sufficient capacity. Conclusion An internationally derived literature and practice informed process for safe deprescribing has been established. Social desirability bias may have inflated reported frequency of activities being undertaken. We therefore chose reporting on the collective rather than own behaviour, to ameliorate these effects. Organisations should prioritise the inadequate collaboration with patients through addressing practitioners’ behavioural determinants. References 1. Scott S, Clark A, Farrow C, May H, Patel M, Twigg MJ, et al. Deprescribing admission medication at a UK teaching hospital; a report on quantity and nature of activity. International journal of clinical pharmacy. 2018;40(5):991–6. 2. O’Mahony D, Gudmundsson A, Soiza RL, Petrovic M, Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Cherubini A, et al. Prevention of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized older patients with multi-morbidity and polypharmacy: the SENATOR* randomized controlled clinical trial. Age and Ageing. 2020;49(4):605–14.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0961-7671 , 2042-7174
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2122383-X
    SSG: 15,3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...