GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences  (3)
  • PHILOS  (3)
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences ; 2021
    In:  Voprosy Filosofii , No. 11 ( 2021), p. 123-137
    In: Voprosy Filosofii, Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences, , No. 11 ( 2021), p. 123-137
    Abstract: The article analyzes a little-known episode in the history of Russian philoso­phy – the polemic of the editor of the journal “Questions of Philosophy and Psy­chology” N.Ya. Grot and the outstanding publicist of the conservative newspaper “Moskovskie Vedomosti” Yu.N. Govorukha-a boy who spoke under the pseudo­nym Yu. Nikolaev. The controversy took place in the first year of the magazine’s existence, when the principle and direction of the editorial policy were deter­mined. Yu.N. Govorukha-Otrok, sharing together with N.Ya. Grotto hope that the journal will lead to the formation of Russian national philosophy, insisted on the conscious circulation of the publication to the Slavophile tradition, defining the end goal of philosophical search for the creation of the Orthodox meta­physics meet the needs of aboriginal people's lives. His opponent, N.Ya. Grot, was a typical representative of the liberalism of the 80s of the XIX century, which was undecided in its socio-political preferences. Being a neophyte of meta­physics, the editor of “Questions” proceeded from an understanding of the ratio­nal nature of philosophical knowledge and justified the variety of directions of philosophical searches. He gave the pages of his magazine to the positivist authors from the liberal populist camp, which was completely unacceptable to his opponent. Thus, the circumstances of public life complicated the nature of the polemic on the issues of theoretical content and introduced social-evaluative judgments into it. Talker-Boy considered the polemic as an episode of the world-historical struggle of Christianity with the eudaemonistic idea of progress. The article claims that the subsequent development of Russian philosophy in the early twentieth century confirmed the correctness of the editorial line of the journal.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0042-8744
    Uniform Title: Идеолог Ю.Н. Говоруха-Отрок и философ Н.Я. Грот: полемика 1890–1891 гг.
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 201233-9
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2246243-0
    SSG: 5,1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Voprosy Filosofii, Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences, , No. 10 ( 2022), p. 70-75
    Abstract: Earlier, the journal Voprosy Filosofii (2018, No. 10) already published some ex­cerpts from the previously unknown, newly identified draft book by A.F. Losev “Philosophy of the Name” (1927). As follows from archival data, the author in the early 1920s planned to deploy an extensive theoretical part called “On the dialecti­cal nature of the name” (24 paragraphs), which, as a result, was not included in the book. For this publication, the initial part of paragraph is chosen, in the gen­eral plan of the book called “Dialectics of Foreign Affairs from Above”. The pas­sage is of undeniable interest to the philosophy historian, at least by the virtuosity with which A.F. Losev demonstrates the possibilities of building a synthetic “dia­lectic name”, combining several structural-typological approaches: the famous constructions of Plato’s dialogue “Parmenides” (eight “unity”), neoplatonic “qua­trains” or tetractids (One, One existing, Formation, Becoming) and Hegelian triads (Inside-yourself, For-yourself, In-yourself-and-for-yourself)
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0042-8744
    Uniform Title: Отрывок из неизданной части «Философии имени» А.Ф. Лосева: [Диалектика инобытия сущности в нисходящем порядке]
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 201233-9
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2246243-0
    SSG: 5,1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences ; 2021
    In:  Ethical Thought Vol. 21, No. 2 ( 2021), p. 143-155
    In: Ethical Thought, Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences, Vol. 21, No. 2 ( 2021), p. 143-155
    Abstract: The article examines the project-oriented potential of the conceptual direction “Innovative paradigm of applied ethics”, which was formed in Russia in the second half of the XX and early XXI centuries. The basis of this direction is formed by theoretical ethical knowledge, project-oriented knowledge for the purposeful transformation of “small systems”, phronesis (that is the ability to understand and interpret the situation at hand and decide about appropriate actions). The main issue under discussion is the relevance of the project-oriented potential of applied ethics in the knowledge of modern situations of moral choice. The experience of applying the project-oriented potential of the innovative paradigm of applied ethics in the context of the transformation of a Russian university is analyzed. Experience, which is presented on the pages of the journal “Semestrial Papers Applied Ethics”. The dynamics of the features of the application of ethical and applied knowledge to the study of changing situations is fixed: theoretical comprehension of new situations of moral choice; recognition of choice alternatives; project-oriented impact on the value-normative system; humanitarian examination of the conflict interaction of value systems. It is concluded that the mission of the innovative paradigm of applied ethics from the point of view of its project-oriented potential is feasible when applied to situations of uncertainty in moral choice, when there is a request from the acting subject for humanitarian expertise, consulting and project activities. In the absence of a situation of moral choice, with a decrease in the possibility of self-determination of the acting subject, and a reduction in the sphere of his responsibility, the mission of the innovative paradigm of applied ethics is hardly feasible. At the same time, the nature of ethical issues in a changing society indicates a potential demand for project-oriented potential of applied ethics in the near future.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2074-4870 , 2074-4897
    Uniform Title: Инновационная парадигма прикладной этики: миссия (не)выполнима?
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences
    Publication Date: 2021
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...