GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 11
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Cambridge University Press (CUP) ; 1990
    In:  American Journal of Germanic Linguistics and Literatures Vol. 2, No. 2 ( 1990-07), p. 137-148
    In: American Journal of Germanic Linguistics and Literatures, Cambridge University Press (CUP), Vol. 2, No. 2 ( 1990-07), p. 137-148
    Abstract: Anatoly Liberman's recent article in this journal (“The phonetic organization of Early Germanic” 2,1:1990) contains a number of potentially important claims about the nature of early Germanic accentuation. (1) His major conclusion appears to be twofold: first, the syllable struture of early Germanic disyllabics must have normally been CVC.V (using “.” to represent a syllable boundary), because CV (and by extension therefore CV.CV) was not a possible structure of a Gothic word. Second, early Germanic possessed no lexical stress (“word stress”), but instead only phrasal stress. (2) These conclusions are at least provocative to those familiar with the massive literature on Germanic accentology, and this was no doubt their intent. In this brief piece, I would like to note several implications and possible extensions of the points Liberman raises and the conclusions he draws, but also to disagree on some points. My perspective here differs from Liberman's primarily in focusing not on early Germanic in relation to its attested daughter languages, but rather on Germanic vis-à-vis Indo-European and some data from the languages of the world, that is, typological data.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1040-8207 , 2163-2030
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
    Publication Date: 1990
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 12
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Cambridge University Press (CUP) ; 1992
    In:  New Theatre Quarterly Vol. 8, No. 31 ( 1992-08), p. 249-261
    In: New Theatre Quarterly, Cambridge University Press (CUP), Vol. 8, No. 31 ( 1992-08), p. 249-261
    Abstract: The Polish actor Ryszard Cieslak, who died in June 1990, joined Jerzy Grotowski's first theatrical venture, the Theatre of the Thirteen Rows in Opole, in 1962, three years after its formation, remaining with Grotowski throughout the life of the Laboratory Theatre in Wroclaw, and until it ceased touring early in 1980 after Grotowski's period of paratheatrical experiments had begun. Cieslak is best remembered for his performances in The Constant Prince and Apocalypsis cum Figuris , and his achievements as an actor were in some senses inseparable from those of Grotowski – but in later years he worked independently, both as a director and, before his death, in the memorable Tiresias-like role of Dhrtarastra in Peter Brook's version of The Mahabharata . In the first part of this feature, Ferdinando Taviani explores the nature and the quality of Cieslak's work, and its relationship with the Laboratory Theatre. To complement his analysis, we are reprinting the final interview given by Cieslak before his death, which was first published on 2 May 1990 in the literary supplement of the Polish-language American journal Nowy Dziennik . Its occasion was the screening of the film of The Mahabharata in Los Angeles and other United States cities in May and June 1990.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0266-464X , 1474-0613
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
    Publication Date: 1992
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2030067-0
    SSG: 9,3
    SSG: 7,25
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 13
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Cambridge University Press (CUP) ; 1994
    In:  Prospects Vol. 19 ( 1994-10), p. 315-347
    In: Prospects, Cambridge University Press (CUP), Vol. 19 ( 1994-10), p. 315-347
    Abstract: We start with a crystallizing moment in Emerson's career: the famous moment, ecstatically recorded in his 1833 journal, when Emerson recognized the future shape of his work in the vast natural history displays at the Muséum d'histoire naturelle (Jardin des Plantes) in Paris. Brooding over “this bewildering series of organized forms,” Emerson found himself driven into making a vow: “I am moved by strange sympathies, I say continually, ‘I will be a naturalist’” (JMN, vol. 4, p. 200). The vow would soon be heard again in his first lyceum lecture, “The Uses of Natural History,” and many times throughout his career Emerson would remind audiences of his central calling as a “natural historian” of life, the intellect, and the soul. Emerson's vision of natural history in Paris gave definitive focus to ambitions that had found no proper outlet in his earlier life in America. The results were almost immediate: by the time he began his return trip to America, he was settled on the subject of his early lectures and was already contemplating the larger project of Nature . Emerson came back to America to found himself as an institution of private research and public presentation not unlike the Museum itself, methodically gathering specimens from the exotic frontiers of experience and setting them out, in their multiple dark affinities, on common ground.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0361-2333 , 1471-6399
    Language: English
    Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
    Publication Date: 1994
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2534180-7
    SSG: 7,26
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 14
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Cambridge University Press (CUP) ; 1994
    In:  Harvard Theological Review Vol. 87, No. 3 ( 1994-07), p. 347-362
    In: Harvard Theological Review, Cambridge University Press (CUP), Vol. 87, No. 3 ( 1994-07), p. 347-362
    Abstract: Fifty years ago, Charles C. Torrey, writing about Esther, asked on the pages of this journal, “Why is there no Greek translation of the Hebrew text? Every other book of the Hebrew Bible, whatever its nature, has its faithful rendering (at least one, often several) in Greek. For the canonical Esther, on the contrary, no such version is extant, nor is there evidence that one ever existed.” It is common knowledge that the extant Greek versions of Esther, both the longer Septuagint text and the shorter A-text, are textually distant from the Hebrew Masoretic version. Indeed, the distance is so great that when a passage in the Complutensian edition (5:1–2) does correspond to the Masoretic text, Robert Hanhart confidently labels it as “newly translated.” His characterization seems justified in this case; the two verses required a new translation because the original Septuagint text had been removed, along with the apocryphal addition D, and put at the end of the book in accordance with the Latin tradition. Hanhart correctly states, “It is improbable that such an intervention, which sacrifices the inner coherence of the Greek text to the benefit of the Masoretic text, belongs to old Greek tradition,” indicating “a scholarly re-working according to the Masoretic text in the period of the Renaissance”; his confidence, however, rests on the fact that scholarly literature contains nothing about a Greek Esther that resembles the Masoretic text.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0017-8160 , 1475-4517
    Language: English
    Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
    Publication Date: 1994
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2051494-3
    SSG: 1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 15
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Cambridge University Press (CUP) ; 1990
    In:  Rural History Vol. 1, No. 1 ( 1990-04), p. 1-4
    In: Rural History, Cambridge University Press (CUP), Vol. 1, No. 1 ( 1990-04), p. 1-4
    Abstract: Two questions will no doubt greet the arrival of this journal: why rural history? and why now? The current economic climate is hardly favourable for ventures of this kind. But recent developments in the numerous fields which touch on matters rural indicate a real academic need for a new forum for interdisciplinary exchange. Much exciting and innovative work has been carried out over the past decade – on the nature and structure of rural communities; on regional differences and identity; on how rural workers are defined and represented by others and by themselves; on the relationship between the urban and the rural. Yet this research has been scattered across a range of disciplines and subdisciplines, many of which tend to be regarded as marginal to the central thrust of historical investigation. In areas like folklore studies or art history, ideas of the rural have developed apace, and the terms of the analysis of the rural community have acquired considerable methodological complexity. Yet the study of ‘rural history’ continues to be rather narrowly defined, confined by an essentially economistic agenda that has excluded much of the most fascinating recent work. Rural history is often seen as synonymous with agricultural history, and although the latter has generated a great deal of valuable and interesting research, its privileging of the economic perspective has tended to preclude the methodological inclusiveness that now seems necessary to foster cross-fertilisation between the disparate areas in which the study of rural society is being pursued.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0956-7933 , 1474-0656
    Language: English
    Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
    Publication Date: 1990
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2082270-4
    SSG: 7,25
    SSG: 8
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 16
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Cambridge University Press (CUP) ; 1992
    In:  The Paleontological Society Special Publications Vol. 6 ( 1992), p. 38-38
    In: The Paleontological Society Special Publications, Cambridge University Press (CUP), Vol. 6 ( 1992), p. 38-38
    Abstract: Small skeletal sediment particles, by virtue of their size, experience physical sedimentological conditions different from those affecting large (i.e., 〉 4 mm) particles. In shallow, high-energy marine carbonate environments with an overall fine-grained ( 〈 4 mm) sediment composition, grain-to-grain impacts are probably of insufficient magnitude to overcome the cushioning effect of water and cause abrasive wear. Very large skeletal grains within such a setting will promote physical degradation, but biological activity (microboring, bioerosion) is more effective in modifying particle surfaces and diminishing grain size. Only in eolian environments are collisions between small grains effective in causing abrasion. Quartz sand, a particularly important abrasive agent in the destruction of large skeletal parts under even moderate energy regimes, also appears to be appreciably important for the degradation of small skeletons only under eolian conditions. Conodonts are small (0.2–2.0 mm), phosphatic teeth, which may have belonged to an extinct (Cambrian-Triassic) group of jawless fish. They occur principally in marine and marginal marine sedimentary rocks; most specimens probably were deposited as discrete particles or as components of fecal masses. Because the extent and nature of degradation of a skeleton reflects its taphonomic history, evaluation of the susceptibility of conodonts to physical abrasion is important. Bioerosion, probably the principal cause of degradation of calcareous skeletons, was probably insignificant in alteration of conodonts. Their mineralogical composition made conodonts unlikely substrates for endoliths, and they were insufficiently abundant to serve as a recyclable source of phosphate for larger metazoans. Chemical breakdown of skeletal apatite would not have occurred, although atmospheric exposure may have promoted degradation of organic laminae, causing exfoliation. Experimental studies of abrasion (elements of Palmatolepis sp., Polygnathus sp. - U. Devonian, Iowa) plus petrographic examination of conodont bearing marine, marginal marine, and eolian facies of the Morgan Formation (M. Pennsylvanian, Utah and Colorado) suggests that abrasion of conodonts is insignificant in aqueous environments, and likely to occur to a major degree only under eolian conditions. High-energy (25.6 cm/sec) conditions were simulated in a tumbler containing quartz sand (4Φ − 2Φ), artificial sea water and moderate conodont abundances (50 specimens/kg). Abrasion produced under these artificially extreme conditions (e.g., continuous motion for up to 20 km travel distance) was at a scale detectable only with SEM. “Dry” tumbling experiments were ineffective, as noted by other authors simulating conditions for abrasion of mineral grains. Eolian conditions were simulated in a glass “wind tube” (see Kuenen, 1960, Journal of Geology) using a similar range of quartz sand sizes. Air velocity of approximately 100 cm/sec produced subtle visually detectable abrasion following 5 hours of exposure/transport in 2Φ quartz sand (1667 specimens/kg), but exhibited no visual evidence of abrasion under similar conditions with 3Φ sand. The Morgan Formation is a mixed carbonate/siliciclastic sequence that reflects repeated episodes of submergence and exposure of a carbonate shelf and laterally adjacent siliciclastic eolian “sand sea.” It represents a virtually ideal ancient example for the interpretation of the effects of natural sedimentary processes because of its well-documented environmental heterogeneity and contains both abraded and unabraded conodonts. Conodonts sampled from high-energy subtidal carbonate facies of the Morgan are unabraded, irrespective of the presence of quartz sand; platform and delicate ramiform elements are all represented. Conodonts sampled from mixed siliciclastic/carbonate eolian facies are extremely abraded; only the most durable Pa elements of Adetognathus sp. and Idiognathodus sp. are preserved, although fine surface details and denticles are worn and anterior blades are missing. Laboratory simulations confirm the interpretation that marine processes are generally insufficient to physically abrade small phosphatic skeletal grains and that highly abraded Morgan conodonts experienced extremely long residence times in the eolian environment where they were transported, repeatedly buried, and exposed to bombardment and abrasion by quartz sand. Supported by NSF EAR9004300
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2475-2622 , 2475-2681
    Language: English
    Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
    Publication Date: 1992
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...