GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Patel, Ravish J.  (4)
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Society of Pharmaceutical Tecnocrats ; 2022
    In:  International Journal of Drug Regulatory Affairs Vol. 10, No. 2 ( 2022-06-19), p. 14-27
    In: International Journal of Drug Regulatory Affairs, Society of Pharmaceutical Tecnocrats, Vol. 10, No. 2 ( 2022-06-19), p. 14-27
    Abstract: A Drug Master File is a record that consists of detailed, correct data approximately an Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API) or Dosage Form of a Finished Product (FP). It is a classified document containing thorough, accurate, and up-to-date information regarding the active medicinal ingredient and medicament. A DMF is divided into two sections: (a) Open part (the Applicant's Part), which includes all of the details needed to determine the quality of a product. And (b) the Closed Part (Restricted Part). The Restricted Part (Closed Part) comprises openly undisclosed manufacturing method knowledge only given to authorized individuals. This compilation aims to offer a comparison of DMF regulatory necessities in addition to the exact data for the registration of lively pharmaceutical ingredients (API) for common drugs in various regulatory governments, including EUROPE (EDQM, EMA), BRAZIL (ANVISA), and SOUTH AFRICA (SAHPRA). This review will provide information on the differences and similarities in the DMF filing requirements in EUROPE, BRAZIL, and SOUTH AFRICA. The regulatory criteria for API registration vary by jurisdiction. Despite the existence and widespread adoption of an ICH-CTD standard format, there are also some limitations. There are a few particular requirements set provided to drug authorities along with the submission. The registration procedure is a regulatory undertaking that permits a person/organization/sponsor/innovator to get permission to participate in the regulation process for fetching marketing authorization/approval.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2321-6794 , 2321-7162
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Society of Pharmaceutical Tecnocrats
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2738279-5
    SSG: 15,3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Society of Pharmaceutical Tecnocrats ; 2022
    In:  International Journal of Drug Regulatory Affairs Vol. 10, No. 2 ( 2022-06-19), p. 28-34
    In: International Journal of Drug Regulatory Affairs, Society of Pharmaceutical Tecnocrats, Vol. 10, No. 2 ( 2022-06-19), p. 28-34
    Abstract: Extensive research in chemistry, manufacturing, controls, preclinical science, and clinical trials is required when developing a novel biological medication. Drug reviewers in regulatory bodies throughout the world and all regulatory bodies are entrusted with determining whether research evidence establishes new drug product safety, effectiveness, and quality control in order to protect public health. Among the world every province has its own regulatory organization in charge of enforcing laws and regulations and developing guidelines for drug marketing. There are some particular requirements sets by regulatory authority that must be satisfied when submitting in the particular nation. The world is split into various approval procedures, it is pivotal for manufacturers to carefully assess market interest, expenditures, target zones, and regulatory standards before establishing biologics. Despite the existence and widespread adoption of an ICH-CTD standard format, some limitations are included. This article discusses the comparison considerations used for biological product approval in the United States, Canada, Europe, Australia, and Singapore.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2321-6794 , 2321-7162
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Society of Pharmaceutical Tecnocrats
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2738279-5
    SSG: 15,3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Society of Pharmaceutical Tecnocrats ; 2022
    In:  International Journal of Drug Regulatory Affairs Vol. 10, No. 2 ( 2022-06-19), p. 56-61
    In: International Journal of Drug Regulatory Affairs, Society of Pharmaceutical Tecnocrats, Vol. 10, No. 2 ( 2022-06-19), p. 56-61
    Abstract: In the last three decades, the notion of bioequivalence has gotten a lot of attention as it has been applied to new branded and generic medications. Generic medications must meet the same quality, efficacy, and safety requirements. Conventional products should be therapeutically equal to the reference product and compatible. The evolution of regulatory standards for bioequivalence in the United States, Europe, and Australia are examined in this paper. There is no international harmonization of regulatory requirements for bioequivalence, but the scope of bioequivalence and statistical analysis is partially harmonized; however, there are differences in applying single-dose trials and in vitro dissolution tests due to subject selection and reference product selection. The drug management system and drug regulating laws determine the pharmaceutical market's share. A bioequivalence study is one of the essential elements in the generic medicine approval process. The plasma time-concentration curve is frequently used in bioequivalence studies to determine absorption pace and absorption. The bioequivalence of the goods examined can be determined using the selected pharmacokinetic parameters and predefined acceptability thresholds. Recent advancements and information on crucial areas of bioequivalence study design and specification recommendations for each endpoint are included in this review.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2321-6794 , 2321-7162
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Society of Pharmaceutical Tecnocrats
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2738279-5
    SSG: 15,3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Society of Pharmaceutical Tecnocrats ; 2022
    In:  International Journal of Drug Regulatory Affairs Vol. 10, No. 2 ( 2022-06-19), p. 35-38
    In: International Journal of Drug Regulatory Affairs, Society of Pharmaceutical Tecnocrats, Vol. 10, No. 2 ( 2022-06-19), p. 35-38
    Abstract: Any oral medication product control strategy must include the creation of a dissolve method with appropriate specifications. In the creation of drug, dissolution testing is critical IV approach. In some cases, an IV dissolution test can be used instead of an in vivo dissolution test. As a result, regulatory agencies have formally acknowledged in vitro methods to determine the dissolution frequency of API from the solid oral form as a significant factor when manufacturing solid-oral-dosage forms. Dissolution tests have long been acknowledged as critical quality-control tools for ensuring batch-to-batch consistency. Following post-approval changes to pharmaceutical products, dissolution testing is also important in providing quality information of the product.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2321-6794 , 2321-7162
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Society of Pharmaceutical Tecnocrats
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2738279-5
    SSG: 15,3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...