GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Ihre E-Mail wurde erfolgreich gesendet. Bitte prüfen Sie Ihren Maileingang.

Leider ist ein Fehler beim E-Mail-Versand aufgetreten. Bitte versuchen Sie es erneut.

Vorgang fortführen?

Exportieren
Filter
  • Wiley  (1)
  • Nash, Patrick R.  (1)
  • 2010-2014  (1)
  • Geographie  (1)
Materialart
Verlag/Herausgeber
  • Wiley  (1)
Person/Organisation
Sprache
Erscheinungszeitraum
  • 2010-2014  (1)
Jahr
Fachgebiete(RVK)
  • Geographie  (1)
RVK
  • 1
    Online-Ressource
    Online-Ressource
    Wiley ; 2012
    In:  Soil Science Society of America Journal Vol. 76, No. 3 ( 2012-05), p. 983-993
    In: Soil Science Society of America Journal, Wiley, Vol. 76, No. 3 ( 2012-05), p. 983-993
    Kurzfassung: Poorly drained soils can potentially have large amounts of applied fertilizer N lost through denitrification which can be a major contributor to soil nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emissions. These soil N 2 O emissions due to agricultural practices are significant because they contribute to global warming and ozone depletion. The objectives of this research were to quantify the effects of tillage/fertilizer placement (i.e., no‐till/surface broadcast and strip‐till/deep banded) and N fertilizer source [i.e., non‐coated urea (NCU), polymer‐coated urea (PCU), nontreated control] on soil N 2 O emissions from corn ( Zea mays L.) production over the 2009 and 2010 growing seasons in a poorly drained claypan soil in Northeast Missouri. Averaged over 2009 and 2010, no significant differences were observed in cumulative soil N2O emissions, between treatment plots with NCU (5.21 kg N 2 O‐N ha −1 ) and PCU (5.48 kg N 2 O‐N ha −1 ). Soil N 2 O losses represented between 2.8 and 3.0% of annual fertilizer N applied, respectively. Strip‐till/deep banded N placement emitted 28% less N 2 O (0.2 kg N 2 O‐N) per Mg grain produced ( P = 0.0284) compared to that of no‐till/surface broadcasted N. Impacts of alternative management practices on soil N 2 O losses may also need to consider changes in agricultural production to allow producers to decide which practices are best suited to balance their production and environmental goals.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0361-5995 , 1435-0661
    RVK:
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: Wiley
    Publikationsdatum: 2012
    ZDB Id: 241415-6
    ZDB Id: 2239747-4
    ZDB Id: 196788-5
    ZDB Id: 1481691-X
    SSG: 13
    SSG: 21
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
Schließen ⊗
Diese Webseite nutzt Cookies und das Analyse-Tool Matomo. Weitere Informationen finden Sie hier...