In:
Journal of Linguistics, Cambridge University Press (CUP), Vol. 20, No. 2 ( 1984-09), p. 351-359
Abstract:
This is a book written by a philosopher for philosophers; it needs a philosopher to review it properly. A review by a non-philosopher in the pages of a linguistics journal is justified, however, by the fact that the core of the book consists of a series of proposals concerning one of the fundamental questions of lexical semantics: what are we to make of the apparent variability in the meaning of a word from context to context? (This fact is not immediately inferrable from the title.) The present review focuses exclusively on this topic; it should be borne in mind, however, that the author's exposition of his views on word-meaning occurs as part of a more general discussion concerning the nature of analogy, and its role in literary, religious and legal discourse.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
0022-2267
,
1469-7742
DOI:
10.1017/S0022226700013931
Language:
English
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Publication Date:
1984
detail.hit.zdb_id:
3073-9
detail.hit.zdb_id:
1466491-4
SSG:
7,11
Permalink
