GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Queensland University of Technology  (5)
  • Bradfield, Abraham  (5)
Material
Publisher
  • Queensland University of Technology  (5)
Person/Organisation
Language
Years
Subjects(RVK)
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Queensland University of Technology ; 2023
    In:  M/C Journal Vol. 26, No. 1 ( 2023-03-14)
    In: M/C Journal, Queensland University of Technology, Vol. 26, No. 1 ( 2023-03-14)
    Abstract: Introduction The Uluru Statement from the Heart (2017) offers an opportunity for the nation to cement the foundation for prosperous Indigenous futures and meaningful reconciliation between Indigenous and non-Indigenous peoples. In this article, we discuss the theme of uniformity in relation to the “From the Heart” campaign which seeks to enact the Uluru Statement by establishing a constitutionally enshrined First Nations’ Voice to Parliament via a referendum. It is important however that we first clarify our use of the word uniform as we do not wish to suggest that all supporters of the Uluru Statement from the Heart are homogenous in their views or positioning. Far from it, the campaign aims to generate support from all walks of life, and with this, it naturally conjures diverse opinions, and at times disagreement (Pearson). Whilst unification corresponds to different persons coming together to form a collective whole – and the From the Heart Campaign can certainly be characterised in this way – uniformity refers to the uncompromising stance needed to enact the reform proposed in the Statement. In this article, we discuss how a constitutionally enshrined First Nations’ Voice to Parliament is the heart of the Uluru Statement and how the push towards a referendum requires not just a unified and united response, but one that is uniformed in its resolve – that is unwavering, steadfast, and determined in delivering its vision of a constitutionally enshrined First Nations’ Voice to Parliament. We therefore consider how images, symbols, icons, and material objects – both digital and tangible – are used to unite the campaigns’ supporters by presenting a uniformed front that advocates for constitutional reform. The Heart as Uniform and Icon Bleiker argues that icons, particularly within the digital space, are effective means of communication due to their ability to quickly disseminate messages in succinct and memorising ways that are relevant and responsive to its users’ needs (Petray; Carlson et al. ‘They Got Filters’; Fredericks and Bradfield ‘Disrupting the Colonial’). The ability of digital media to spread messages over vast distances and in ways that compress time and space, however, also means that the icons communicated through media such as memes (Blackmore; Petray; Fredericks and Bradfield ‘Co-Designing Change’) are in danger of becoming fleeting, empty, or meaningless (Fredericks and Bradfield ‘Disrupting the Colonial’; Petray; Carlson and Frazer ‘Indigenous activism’). Bleiker (9) warns that “when images are produced and circulated with ever greater speed and reach, icons can emerge in a short period. But this very proliferation of images can also lead to a situation where icons are short-lived and soon become superseded from their original setting”. Due to the fluid and often fickle nature of online culture where symbols and images are quickly adopted, transformed, repurposed, disposed, and replaced, icons are most powerful when they reflect a uniformed message, for uniforms demonstrate stability, endurance, and longevity. Uniforms therefore share some affiliation with icons in their ability to transmit messages of social significance. In their sociological study of uniforms, Joseph and Alex (719) argue that the uniform is viewed as a device to resolve certain dilemmas of complex organizations – namely, to define their boundaries, to assure that members will conform to their goals, and to eliminate conflicts in the status sets of their members. The uniform serves several functions: it acts as a totem, reveals and conceals statuses, certifies legitimacy, and suppresses individuality. The interaction of these components and the acceptance or rejection of the uniform and its associated status by the wearer are described. The use of hearts during the Uluru Statement from the Heart campaign can be likened to icons that convey uniformed messages relating to the need for constitutional reform and the creation of a First Nations’ Voice to Parliament. Repeated imagery of hearts, particularly in the colours of the Aboriginal flag – black, red, and yellow – alongside images of Uluru – an unmistakable icon of Aboriginality – has the potential to provoke political and social discussion amongst those who witness them. Online media have provided fora where information and support for the campaign has been shared, creating some uniformity amongst diverse audiences (Fredericks and Bradfield ‘Seeking to be Heard’; ‘More than a thought’). Emoticons, symbols, and hashtags have formed a type of digital uniform that has congealed ideas and helped centralise messages (Grieve-Williams), in this case in relation to the importance of the constitutional enshrinement of a First Nations’ Voice to Parliament. A heart also describes a centralised location that drives action or is seen to represent the underlying ethos of a community, movement, or object. In terms of physiology, the heart is located at the centre of a body and sustains life by pumping blood throughout the cardiovascular system. Similarly, Uluru is physically located in Central Australia, with many considering it as symbolling the geographical and spiritual heart of the nation. Whilst Uluru will always remain a part of the sacred grounds of the Anangu People (Schultz), its iconography resonates with Indigenous and non-Indigenous peoples throughout the nation, acting as a beacon for Indigenous rights and sovereignty. For the Anangu People, Uluru is a site of conflict resolution and great power (Anandakugan), making it an appropriate icon of reconciliation, Makarrata, and healing relationships between Indigenous and non-Indigenous peoples. Wearing Our Hearts on Our Sleeves Amongst other things, jewelry, art, and material objects function as communicative tools which present agreed-upon symbols and codes that represent messages that are collectively decided upon by a particular social group (Geertz; Shaw). Writing on art as a cultural system, Geertz (1488) famously observed how “it is out of participation in the general system of symbolic forms we call culture that participation in the particular we call art, which is in fact but a sector of it, is possible. A theory of art is thus at the same time a theory of culture, not an autonomous enterprise”. Langley writes on how human societies have used beads in jewelry to disseminate social information for at least 100,000 years. Throughout history, jewelry and fashion accessories have been used as visual representations of uniformity amongst activists and protestors (Gulliver). These icons aim to communicate an unwavering front which at times of protest or social upheaval often counter the icons and uniforms of opposing camps, whether the police force, military, or political rivals. The umbrella movement in Hong Kong is one visually striking example of uniformity and civil disobedience where pro-democracy messages were communicated via yellow umbrellas that contrasted the pro-establishment camp who wore blue (Radio Free Asia). The t-shirt for the Uluru campaign depicts an image of Uluru which visibly sits on the land but is also embedded below the surface of Country. Both parts collectively form the shape of a red heart. The shirt reads “We Support the Uluru Statement”, emitting the words “From the Heart”. This clever form of marketing invokes a sense of communitas amongst those who can collectively interpolate and understand its meaning (Turner). It is the shared knowledge that the statement comes “from the heart” (even though it is not written on the t-shirt) amongst those who form the collective “we” that gives the shirt a function that can be likened to a uniform. It is a visual embodiment of the Statement that seeks to “certify its legitimacy” (Joseph and Alex). Brooches and jewelry have also been used as means to provoke conversation and add social or political commentary during public engagements; often in satirical and/or ironic ways (Shaw). Former US Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, for example, famously wore a brooch of a snake after being called an “unparalleled serpent” by Iraqi state media under the Saddam Hussein regime (Becker). For Albright, brooches complemented her political agenda and became part of her “diplomatic arsenal” (Becker), which she described as effective mnemic communication that helped generate greater understandings amongst the wider public (Albright). Whilst an expression of her individuality, the jewelry delivers a uniformed statement and commentary that defines boundaries, assures goals, and seeks to eliminate conflicts or ambiguity in the messages she seeks to deliver. In this respect, it functions as part of her uniform. Similarly, when Lady Hale, the president of the UK Supreme Court, claimed Boris Johnson’s decision to prorogue parliament was unlawful in 2019, she strategically wore a spider brooch (Cochrane and Belam). The imagery was quickly seized upon by activists who interpreted it as a symbol of the government’s dysfunction, or venomous nature, and printed the design on t-shirts. The shirts sold out in less than 24 hours and presented a uniformed front that both critiqued the government and raised money for a homeless shelter (Butchart). A Gift Worth Sharing The Uluru Statement was gifted to the Australian people to affirm the campaign as one for and led by the Australian public (Synott; Appleby and Davis). The decision to disseminate the outcomes of the National Convention via a poetic and concise statement, rather than a formalised petition or legal declaration, emphasises its intent to remain accessible to the public (Davis ‘The Long Road’). The fact that it was gifted to the public instead of being “presented” or “submitted” to government signifies that it is a gesture of good faith that invites the Australian people to join the movement, whilst also placing onus on the public to accept or reject the gift that is offered and placing pressure on the government to call a referendum (Mayor). In the spirit of the Uluru Statement’s gifting, heart icons and paraphernalia are often exchanged amongst its supporters with aim of building awareness and provoking conversation. One of the authors of this paper, Professor Bronwyn Fredericks, is known for having accumulated an extensive collection of heart objects, many of which have been gifted to her. These objects range from brooches, earrings, necklaces, and other forms of jewelry to clothes, fabrics, and novelty glasses. Although the medium varies, the heart iconography and messages remain uniform. The Uluru from the Heart Campaign, however, has suffered many arrhythmias, at times speeding up whilst at others becoming really slow. After the reforms were presented to the Australian Government in 2017, the then prime minister Malcom Turnbull rejected them on account that an Indigenous Voice to Parliament was undesirable, too “radical” in nature, and unlikely to pass a referendum (Wahlquist; Brennan). A media release from the government published on 26 October 2017 declared that “the Government does not believe such a radical change to our constitution’s representative institutions has any realistic prospect of being supported by a majority of Australians in a majority of States” (Prime Minister et al.). The chief executive of the Victorian Community Controlled Health Organisation, Jill Gallagher, has commented that many politicians were too preemptive in their dismissal of the reforms; and in doing so, prevented the public from engaging in the critical discussion that is needed before a referendum (Brennan). Public discussion is now increasing after the Albanese-led Labor government announced that a referendum will be held during their first term of their government, which was formed in 2022 (Kunc). Turnbull’s rejection was also premised on the notion that the Uluru Statement, and its call for a First Nations Voice to Parliament, was too uniform in its “take it or leave it” positioning, which the government was unwilling to commit to (Prime Minister et al.). After years of having reforms and recommendations diluted or ignored by governments, and political promises and commitments dismissed (see Fredericks for an example), the Referendum Council were unapologetic in their stance that the Statement remain untouched and unmanipulated by politicians and political agendas (Referendum Council). The proposed reforms are the manifestation of Indigenous peoples’ will and desire as expressed during the regional dialogue (Anderson, Davis, and Pearson; Davis and Williams). The Final Report of the Referendum Council reads that “it is the Council’s view that there is no practical purpose to suggesting changes to the Constitution unless they are what Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples want” (Referendum Council, 5). It must be remembered that the Referendum Council was established by Malcom Turnbull in 2015, tasked with finding out what Indigenous peoples wanted to see in constitutional reform. Whilst the Turnbull government were willing to provide a forum in which Indigenous views on constitutional reform could be expressed, they were unwilling to honour their aspirations. After sharing deeply personal and at times traumatic stories of colonial harm and violence at the dialogues (Appleby and Davis), along with entertaining the idea of having greater input into parliamentary discussions, the flat-out rejection by the government was heartbreaking. Aboriginal lawyer, activist, and academic Noel Pearson spoke of the anguish caused by Malcolm Turnbull’s rejection in a Radio National interview, describing him as having “broken the hearts of the First Nations people of this country” (Brennan). Constitutional lawyer Megan Davis was with a young Indigenous law student who had participated in the regional dialogues when the interview aired (Davis ‘The Long Road’). Like many, this was the first she had heard of the Statement’s rejection. Davis recalls how “I could see her faith in the rule of law, fairness and equality – all the important characteristics of our public law system – drain from her face” (Davis, 2019). The impact of Turnbull’s rejection was described by some as “mean-spirited bastardry” (Wahlquist) and is articulated in a cartoon depicting a heart being surgically removed from Uluru (Grant). We wear heart icons as uniforms not only in support of the campaign but as a reminder of its fragility. Whilst hearts are prone to break, like all muscles it is through their tearing and growth that they become stronger. A Voice to Parliament The imagery of hearts aims to generate wider public recognition of the need to recognise First Nations’ peoples within Australia’s constitution via Voice, Truth, Treaty, and in that order (Davis and Williams; Fredericks and Bradfield ‘More than a Thought’; Larkin and Galloway). The need for a visible and uniformed campaign towards constitutional reform, however, is challenged when politicians including the former Indigenous Affairs minister Ken Wyatt (Anderson et al.) or former Greens and now independent senator Lidia Thorpe (Larkin and Maguire) question the premise that reforms such as a constitutionally enshrined First Nations’ Voice to Parliament are representative of Indigenous peoples’ will. Thorpe’s objection is based on the premise that Treaty should be sought first. Our criticism is not placed on their oppositional stance but rather on their false characterisation that it does not reflect the desire of the majority of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as expressed through the Uluru Dialogues. Despite seven delegates walking out on the convention in protest that it would hinder Indigenous sovereignty via a treaty (Hobbs), the 13 regional dialogues conducted by the Referendum Council and led by Indigenous leaders such as Megan Davis, Pat Anderson, and numerous others, as well as delegates at Uluru, clearly expressed a near unanimous and uniformed decision to establish an Indigenous representative body that was protected by the constitutional enshrinement (Davis ‘The Long Road’; Davis and Williams; Fredericks and Bradfield ‘We Don’t Want to’). Subsequent polling has shown strong continued majority support amongst the public for a constitutionally enshrined voice (Centre for Governance and Public Policy; Ford and Blumer; Zillman, Wellauer and Brennan; Reconciliation Australia). Past reconciliation movements have centred around the notion of restoring relationships between Indigenous and non-Indigenous peoples (Reynolds). This is problematic as colonisation in Australia was, and in many cases still is, dependent on the denial of Indigenous peoples and cultures, which was accompanied by epistemic and physical acts of violence (Moreton-Robinson; Lee, Richardson, and Ross). In 1999, then prime minister John Howard held a referendum on whether Australia should become a republic. Attached to the question was whether Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people should be recognised in the constitution’s preamble (Pearson, Davis, and Appleby ‘The Uluru Statement’). Despite this being rejected by Indigenous land councils and elected representatives, on account of its symbolism, Howard proceeded with the referendum which ultimately failed (Davis ‘The Status Quo’). The Recognise campaign ran from 2012 to 2017 and sought public awareness of questions relating to constitutional recognition of Indigenous peoples. This too was rejected by Indigenous communities (Maddison). Online polling conducted by Indigenous-controlled media forum IndigenousX showed that only 32.3% of its respondents supported the campaign, with many criticising what they saw as a top-down approach tailored towards the appeasement of non-Indigenous sensibilities (Latimore; Fredericks and Bradfield ‘Disrupting the Colonial’). Reconciliation Australia, the organisation that led the campaign, however, stated that it was successful in generating public awareness, which increased from 30% to 75% nationally (Reconciliation Australia). Conclusion What sets the Uluru campaign apart from its predecessors such as Recognise is that it is a grassroots initiative that emerged out of Indigenous-led consultations and dialogues with community members and stakeholders. It was conceived with awareness of the “limitations of the political class” (Davis, ‘The Long Road’) – illustrated by the ineptitude of Turnbull and other critics – and consciously spoke to the hearts of the Australian public. To ensure that different Indigenous perspectives and interest groups were represented during the National Conference, 60% of attendees were traditional owners, 20% came from Aboriginal community organisations, and 20% were individual community members (Lee, Richardson, and Ross; Davis ‘The Long Road'). The reforms of the Uluru Statement, including a First Nations’ Voice to Parliament, aim to create a framework and functioning mechanism that will help build and repair partnerships through which relationships between Indigenous and non-Indigenous peoples can improve, whilst “gaps” across a range of social outcomes can be redressed by policies led and informed by Indigenous people in accordance with national (Coalition of Peaks) and international (Synott ‘The Universal Declaration’) charters. Whilst Indigenous views are diverse, what remains uniform amongst them is that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander strength and power, which has always come from their voices, “are the most powerful of all” when they are together (Davis, ‘Together Our Voices’). Despite the campaigns’ critics and setbacks, our hearts continue to beat as one and our uniformed advance towards referendum remains steadfast.  References Albright, Madlelaine. Read My Pins: Stories from a Diplomat's Jewel Box. Harper Collins, 2009. Anandakugan, Nithyani. “The Uluru Statement from The Heart: Contextualizing A First Nations Declaration.” Harvard International Review 41.1 (2020): 30-33. 〈 https://www.jstor.org/stable/26917278 〉 . Anderson, Pat, Megan Davis, and Noel Pearson. “Don’t Silence Our Voice, Minister: Uluru Leaders Condemn Backward Step.” The Sydney Morning Herald 20 Oct. 2017. 〈 https://www.smh.com.au/national/don-t-silence-our-voice-minister-uluru-leaders-condemn-backward-step-20191020-p532h0.html 〉 . Appleby, Gabrielle, and Megan Davis. “The Uluru Statement and the Promises of Truth.” Australian Historical Studies 49.4 (2018): 501–9. 〈 https://doi.org/10.1080/1031461X.2018.1523838 〉 . Becker, Vivienne. “The Power of the Brooch.” Financial Times, 4 Nov. 2020. 15 June 2022 〈 https://www.ft.com/content/dfb54b62-2ae0-48ec-b0af-dd8538e3c796 〉 . Blackmore, Susan J. The Meme Machine. Oxford UP, 1999. Brennan, Bridget. "Indigenous Leaders Enraged as Advisory Board Referendum Is Rejected by Malcolm Turnbull." ABC News 27 Oct. 2017. 〈 https://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-10-27/indigenous-leaders-enraged-by-pms-referendum-rejection/9090762 〉 . Butchart, Amber. “Lady Hale’s Spider and the Political History of the Brooch.” Frieze 3 Oct. 2019. 17 Apr. 2022 〈 https://www.frieze.com/article/lady-hales-spider-and-political-history-brooch 〉 . Carlson, Bronwyn, Daniel Browning, Summer May Finlay, Allan Clarke, and Dale Husband. “Deterritorialising Media: Resilience and Activism.” Communication Research and Practice 4.1 (2018): 4-16. Carlson, Bronwyn, and Ryan Frazer. “‘They Got Filters’: Indigenous Social Media, the Settler Gaze, and a Politics of Hope.” Social Media + Society 6.2 (2020): 1-11. 〈 https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120925261 〉 . Carlson, Bronwyn, and Frazer Ryan. “Indigenous Activism and Social Media”. Negotiating Digital Citizenship: Control, Contest Culture. Eds. A. McCosker, S. Vivienne, and A. Johns. London: Rowman & Littlefield, 2016. 115–131. Centre for Governance and Public Policy. “Omnipoll Australian Constitutional Values Survey 2017.” Griffith University: Centre for Governance and Public Policy, 30 Oct. 2017. 〈 https://news.griffith.edu.au/wpcontent/uploads/2017/10/Griffith-University-UNSW-Australian-ConstitutionalValues-Survey-Sept-2017-Results-2.pdf 〉 . Coalition of Peaks. New National Agreement on Closing the Gap. 2020. 28 July 2020 〈 https://coalitionofpeaks.org.au/new-national-agreement-on-closing-the-gap/ 〉 . Cochrane, Lauren, and Martin Belam. “Say It with a Brooch: What Message Was Lady Hale's Spider Sending?” The Guardian, 24 Sep. 2019. 19 Nov. 2021 〈 https://www.theguardian.com/fashion/2019/sep/24/say-it-with-a-brooch-how-a-fashion-item-became-a-political-statement 〉 . Davis, Megan. “Some Say a Voice to Parliament Is Toothless. But Together Our Voices Are Powerful.” The Guardian, 13 Aug. 2020. 13 Aug. 2020 〈 https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/aug/13/some-say-a-voice-to-parliament-is-toothless-but-together-our-voices-are-powerful 〉 . ———. “Together Our Voices Are the Most Powerful of All.” IndigenousX, 17 Aug. 2020. 27 Aug. 2020 〈 https://indigenousx.com.au/together-our-voices-are-the-most-powerful-of-all/ 〉 . ———. “The Long Road to Uluru: Walking Together – Truth before Justice.” Griffith Review 60 (Apr. 2018). 15 June 2020 〈 https://www.griffithreview.com/articles/long-road-uluru-walking-together-truth-before-justice-megan-davis/ 〉 . ———. “The Status Quo Ain’t Working.” The Monthly, 7 June 2018. 17 July 2021 〈 https://www.themonthly.com.au/blog/megan-davis/2018/07/2018/1528335353/status-quo-ain-t-working 〉 . Davis, Megan, and George Williams. Everything You Need to Know about the Uluru Statement from the Heart. UNSW Press/NewSouth Publishing, 2021. Ford, Mazoe, and Clare Blumer. “Vote Compass: Most Australians Back Constitutional Recognition for Indigenous Australians.” ABC News 20 May 2016. 〈 https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-05-20/vote-compass-indigenousrecognition/7428030?nw=0 〉 . Frazer, Ryan, and Bronwyn Carlson. “Indigenous Memes and the Invention of a People.” Social Media + Society 3.4 (2017): 1-12. 〈 https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2056305117738993 〉 . Fredericks, Bronwyn. “Why I Still Hear It on the Radio and I Still See It in the Television: Treaty and the Uluru Statement from the Heart.” Journal of Australian Indigenous Issues 25 (2022): 1-2. Fredericks, Bronwyn, and Abraham Bradfield. “Designing Change: Discussing an Indigenous Voice to Parliament and Constitutional Reform in Australia.” M/C Journal 24.4  (2021). 〈 https://doi.org/10.5204/mcj.2801 〉 . Fredericks, Bronwyn, and Abraham Bradfield. "‘More than a Thought Bubble…’: The Uluru Statement from the Heart and an Indigenous Voice to Parliament." M/C Journal 24.1 (2021). 〈 https://doi.org/10.5204/mcj.2738 〉 . Fredericks, Bronwyn, and Abraham Bradfield. “‘Seeking to Be heard’: The Role of Social and Online Media in Advocating for the Uluru Statement from the Heart and Constitutional Reform in Australia.” Journal of Alternative & Community Media 6.1 (2021): 29-54. 〈 https://doi.org/10.1386/joacm_00092_1 〉 . Fredericks, Bronwyn, and Abraham Bradfield. “We Don't Want to Go Back to 'Normal', When 'Normal' Wasn't Good for Everyone.” Axon 10.2 (2020). 〈 https://www.axonjournal.com.au/issue-vol-10-no-2-dec-2020/we-don-t-want-go-back-normal-when-normal-wasn-t-good-everyone 〉 . Fredericks, Bronwyn, Abraham Bradfield, Jenny Nguyen, and Samar Ansell. “Disrupting the Colonial Algorithm: Indigenous Australia and Social Media.” Media International Australia 183 (2021). 〈 https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X211038286 〉 . From the Heart. The Uluru Statement – From the Heart. 2020. 1 June 2020 〈 https://fromtheheart.com.au/ 〉 . Geertz, Clifford. “Art as a Cultural System.” MLN 91.6 (1976): 1473-1499. Grant, Stan. “Three Years on From Uluru, We Must Lift the Blindfolds of Liberalism to Make Progress.” The Conversation, 25 May 2020. 27 May 2020 〈 https://theconversation.com/three-years-on-from-uluru-we-must-lift-the-blindfolds-of-liberalism-to-make-progress-138930 〉 . Grieve Williams, Victoria. “‘We Have Survived the White Man’s World’: A Critical Review of Aboriginal Australian Activism in Media and Social Media.” Sit-Ins to #revolutions: Media and the Changing Nature of Protests. Eds. Olivia Guntarik and Victoria Grieve-Williams. 2020. 19-38. Gulliver, Robyn. "The Iconic 21st Century Activist 'T-Shirt and Tote-Bag' Combination Is Hard to Miss These Days! How Fashion Manifests in Environmental Activism." M/C Journal 25.4 (2022) 〈 https://doi.org/10.5204/mcj.2922 〉 . Kunc, Francois. “A Referendum on the Voice Comes Closer.” Australian Law Journal 96.9 (2022): 621. 〈 https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/agispt.20220922074580 〉 . Larkin, Dani, and Kathrine Galloway. “Uluru Statement from the Heart: Australian Public Law Pluralism.” Bond Law Review 30.2 (2018): 1–11. 〈 https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/agispt.20190405008581 〉 . Larkin, Dani, and Amy Maguire. “Lidia Thorpe Wants to Shift Course on Indigenous Recognition. Here’s Why We Must Respect the Uluru Statement.” The Conversation, 8 July 2020. 17 May 2021 〈 https://theconversation.com/lidia-thorpe-wants-to-shift-course-on-indigenous-recognition-heres-why-we-must-respect-the-uluru-statement-141609 〉 . Langley, Michelle. “How ‘Bling’ Makes Us Human.” The Conversation, 20 Aug. 2018. 23 Aug. 2022 〈 https://theconversation.com/how-bling-makes-us-human-101094 〉 . Lee, Emma, Benjamin J. Richardson, and Helen Ross. “The 'Uluru Statement from the Heart': Investigating Indigenous Australian Sovereignty.” Journal of Australian Indigenous Issues 23.1-2 (2020): 18-41.  〈 https://search.informit.org/doi/abs/10.3316/informit.386298778751454 〉 . Maddison, Sarah. “Recognise What?: Problems with the Campaign for Constitutional Recognition.” Indigenous Law Bulletin 8.24 (2016): 20-24. 〈 https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.164154921010339 〉 . Mayor, Thomas. “Understanding the Uluru Statement: Taking the Invitation to the People through the Classrooms.” Journal of Professional Learning 15 (2022): 63–66. 〈 https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.556989742257690 〉 . Pearson, Luke. “Social Media Amplifies Indigenous Voices, Even If They Don’t Always Agree.” ABC Radio National 29 May 2017. 〈 https://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-05-29/luke-pearson-social-media-amplifying-indigenous-voices/8349862 〉 . Pearson, Noel, Megan Davis, Rosalind Dixon, and Gabrielle Appleby. “The Uluru Statement.” Bar News: The Journal of the NSW Bar Association (2018): 41-48. 〈 https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/agispt.20180726000224 〉 . Petray, Theresa Lynn. "Self-Writing a Movement and Contesting Indigeneity: Being an Aboriginal Activist on Social Media." Global Media Journal: Australian Edition 7 (2013): 1-20. ———. “Protest 2.0: Online Interactions and Aboriginal Activists.” Media, Culture & Society 33.6 (2011): 923–940. 〈 https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443711411009 〉 . Prime Minister, Attorney General & Minister for Indigenous Affairs. Response to Referendum Council's Report on Constitutional Recognition. 2017. 〈 https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/media/pressrel/5596294/upload_binary/ 5596294.pdf;fileType=application%2Fpdf#search=%22media/pressrel/5596294%22 〉 . Radio Free Asia. Walking with A Yellow Umbrella Bearing Witness to a Revolution. 2015. Reconciliation Australia. "2022 Australian Reconciliation Barometer." 2022. 〈 https://www.reconciliation.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Australian-Reconciliation-Barometer-2022.pdf 〉 . ———. "Recognise Campaign Successful in Raising Awareness." 29 June 2018. 25 Nov. 2022 〈 https://www.reconciliation.org.au/recognise-campaign-successful-in-raising-awareness/ 〉 . Referendum Council. Referendum Council Final Report. 2017. 〈 https://www.referendumcouncil.org.au/sites/default/files/report_attachments/Referendum_Council_Final_Report.pdf 〉 . Reynolds, Henry. This Whispering in Our Hearts Revisited. NewSouth, 2018. Schultz, Julianne. “Whispering in Our Hearts: Time to Learn from the Past.” Griffith Review 60 (2018): 7–11. 〈 https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.585273018226783 〉 . Shaw, Elizabeth. “Jewellery Is Political: Ethical Jewellery Practice.” Craft Is Political. Ed. D Wood. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2021. 136-147. ———. “Michelle Obama’s Necklace and the Power of Political Jewellery — from Suffragettes to a Secretary of State.” The Conversation, 25 Aug. 2020. 28 Sep. 2022 〈 https://theconversation.com/michelle-obamas-necklace-and-the-power-of-political-jewellery-from-suffragettes-to-a-secretary-of-state-144741 〉 . Synott, Eddie. “Uluru Statement from the Heart Is the Only Way Forward for Meaningful Change.” Crikey 1 Sep. 2022. 〈 https://www.crikey.com.au/author/eddie-synot/ 〉 . ———. “The Uluru Statement Showed How to Give First Nations People a Real Voice – Now It’s the Time for Action.” The Conversation 5 Mar. 2019. 〈 https://theconversation.com/the-uluru statement-showed-how-to-give-first-nations-people-a-real-voice-now-its-time-for-action-110707 〉 . ———. “The Universal Declaration of Human Rights at 70: Indigenous Rights and the Uluru Statement from the Heart.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 73 (2019): 320-325. 〈 https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2019.1631252 〉 . Turner, Victor. From Ritual to Theatre: The Human Seriousness of Play. Vol. 1. Performing Arts Journal Publishing, 1998. Wahlquist, Calla. “Turnbull’s Uluru Statement Rejection Is ‘Mean-Spirited Bastardry’ – Legal Expert.” The Guardian 26 Oct. 2017. 15 Mar. 2021 〈 https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2017/oct/26/turnbulls-uluru-statement-rejection-mean-spirited-bastardry-legal-expert 〉 . Wellauer, Kirstie, and Bridget Brennan. “Vote Compass Data Finds Most Australians Support Indigenous Voice to Parliament — and It Has Grown since the Last Election.” ABC News 4 May 2022. 〈 https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-05-04/indigenous-voice-to-parliament-vote-compass/101031774 〉 . Zillman, Stephanie. “Indigenous Advisory Body Would Be Supported by Australians, Survey Finds.” ABC News 30 Oct. 2017. 〈 https://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-10-30/australians-would-support-referendumindigenous-voice-parliament/9101106 〉 .
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1441-2616
    RVK:
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Queensland University of Technology
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2018737-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Queensland University of Technology ; 2021
    In:  M/C Journal Vol. 24, No. 4 ( 2021-08-13)
    In: M/C Journal, Queensland University of Technology, Vol. 24, No. 4 ( 2021-08-13)
    Abstract: Introduction In March 2021, the Ever Given, a containership wedged between the banks of the Suez Canal in Egypt caused major disruption to global supply chains (Leivestad et al.). The much-shared image of a relatively miniscule earthmover performing the monumental task of dislodging the vessel captured the imagination of social media users worldwide (Salem). Many drew on the event to design memes that, amongst other things, spoke to an array of significant but seemingly overwhelming tasks (The Indian Express). Wiradjuri man James Blackwell, a Research Fellow at the Centre for Social Impact, provided an Indigenous Australian perspective to this global trend, using it to comment on establishing an Indigenous representative Voice within Australia’s parliamentary system (fig. 1). Figure 1: Meme by James Blackwell (posted to Twitter @BlackwellJ_ on 27 March 2021) In this article, we draw on Blackwell’s meme and his intention to encourage an informed discussion about what an Indigenous Voice to Parliament entails and what “co-design” demands. Activists are embracing digital media to address, talk-back, and re-insert Indigenous voices into discourses that have traditionally ignored and silenced them. We consider how media such as memes are advancing campaigns that call for socio-pollical change. We begin by discussing memes as a socially designed medium that reflects socio-political contexts at moments in time. We then turn our attention to the content and context of Blackwell’s image with reference to the “co-design” process in which the Australian Government has committed to work alongside, and in partnership with, Indigenous peoples, nations, and communities. We argue that to achieve effective co-design, governments must be willing to relinquish some control and support structures bound to the interests of Indigenous populations as set out in seminal documents and frameworks like the Uluru Statement from the Heart. The Uluru Statement from the Heart presents a pathway towards Indigenous recognition and self-determination which was devised out of the delegations of some 250 Indigenous community leaders and representatives who attended the federally-funded First Nations National Constitutional Convention on the lands of the Anangu people in 2017 (Appleby and Davis; Davis and Williams; Larkin and Galloway). The convention built on community consultation which included 13 regional dialogues run by the 16-member Referendum Council (Davis “Quarterly Essay”). The Council documented Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples’ perspectives and identified five options for constitutional change, one of which was establishing a constitutionally enshrined Indigenous Voice to Parliament (Davis et. al; Referendum Council). It is this proposal and its call for it to be “co-designed” between Indigenous peoples and the non-Indigenous public, which is addressed in Blackwell’s meme. Memes as Demand for Co-Design The term “meme” was coined by Richard Dawkins in 1976 in reference to cultural expressions, thoughts, practices, and ideas that spread via repetition and imitation (Blackmore). In the current internet age known as “Web 2.0” (Corbett et al.) memes have cemented themselves as legitimate means of communication and are often used as a form of protest and resistance (Petray). Shared via social media, memes enhance the ability to replicate, re-design, and re-distribute messages in ways that provoke dialogue over widespread networks. They have therefore been integral in spreading information and awareness relating to numerous topics such as colonisation (Frazer and Carlson; Land); mental health (Chateau); gender (Kanai; Zillman); resistance and counterculture (Marsh); and documenting responses to emerging crises and world events such as COVID-19 (de Saint Laurent et al.; Flecha Ortiz et al.). As a form of communication memes are inherently products of appropriation, juxtaposition, and transformation, drawing influence from diverse sources. They are intertextual in that they blend pop culture and politics in unexpected and creative ways (Shifman). Messages are conveyed through intersecting events, dialogues, and understandings, which result in unfolding conversations reflective of diverse perspectives. Memes are not fixed, nor do they portray objective truths, but rather are fluid and transformative (Milner). Through their ability to antagonise texts that lack Indigenous perspectives, memes such as Blackwell’s disrupt public discourses by forcibly inserting Indigenous voices in ways that expose the limited manner in which the world is often presented. Memes transform seemingly mono-vocal texts by making them sites of contestation, pluralism, and agonism. They demand not only the recognition of Indigenous peoples but provoke audiences to confront their failure to see the persons, views, and perspectives they would otherwise overlook (Frazer and Carlson).   Within the political arena, Shifman argues that memes are effective forms of political participation as they are “a careful articulated, strategic exposure of a political backstage, presented frontstage” (140). Memes help render visible the politicised rhetoric and power imbalances that tend to distort Indigenous views and agendas. Doing so “breaks the façade of optimism and unity presented in official mass media, showing that things are not as ‘harmonious’ as the party would like to present them” (Shifman 149). The adaptive and fluid nature of internet memes enables rapid communication of messages over vast spaces that are rooted within but also transcend specific localities and socio-cultural contexts. As expressions of cultural information, memes require some insider knowledge and cultural capital so that audiences may understand the content and context on a deeper level. Cho describes memes as creating “reverberations” and “repetitions” through reproducing and re-contextualising content in ways that provokes conversations among those with shared interests and knowledge. Morimoto writes on this in the context of fan art where memes create a “third space” through which audiences enter a dialogue that critiques and unpacks views pertaining to pop culture. It is through a nuanced understanding of the language and content of memes that group affiliations are established and reaffirmed. For Indigenous peoples, the content produced, displayed, adapted, and shared via memes is done so within a wider context of setter-colonialism (Frazer and Carlson). The messages “reverberated” often correspond to the pervasive nature of colonial power structures in which the displayed words, images, and content signify experiences of subordination and treatment as if one were less than human (Moreton-Robinson). For many, it is the survivance of a lived experience of continuing coloniality that creates a sense of affiliation among Indigenous peoples, both in Australia and abroad. Indigenous peoples throughout the world are using memes to highlight historical truths, and in doing so are exposing injustices in ways that refute deficit discourses and imposed labels of victimhood (Monkman). For example, a Barkidji/Wakawaka/Birrigubba woman known as Emily (@howdoidelete1) has over 67,000 followers and 2.9 million likes on TikTok. Emily posts on topics relating to Indigeneity and settler-colonialism and her video memes have gone viral, inserting an Indigenous Australian voice into global conversations relating to topics such as racism. In a socio-political setting dominated by western-centric outlooks, memes reinsert Indigenous voices and opinions in culturally specific and relevant ways. Designing a meme enables an author to rearrange everyday norms, behaviours, understandings, and images in ways that expose issues that often remain invisible (Moreton-Robinson). Like art, memes are embedded within socio-cultural systems—informed by religion, morality, science, commerce, technology, politics, law, etc.—and are always understood within specific local settings (Geertz). For Indigenous peoples, the local setting is shaped by settler-colonialism and competing and contested ways of knowing, doing, and being (Martin; Martin and Mirraboopa). Due to the lack of representation of Indigenous views and perspectives within mainstream media (Media Diversity Australia), online platforms can create safe spaces that may be controlled, monitored, and censored by Indigenous authors and account holders (Fredericks and Bradfield "‘I’m Not Afraid”). Jacqueline Land (185), for example, observes how Instagram accounts, such as @since.time.immemorial, archive Indigenous views and continue traditions of colonial resistance (see also Carlson and Frazer). Frazer and Carlson similarly observe how Facebook groups such as “Blackfella Revolution” (BFR) effectively use digital media to present a series of memes that collectively document Australia’s colonialism and its ongoing impact. Memes and digital media have also offered critiques in relation to countering mainstream silences and misrepresentations pertaining to the co-design reforms posed by the Uluru Statement from the Heart. It is this that we now turn to. Figure 2: “Rocking On.” Kudelka Cartoons, 15 February 2020. Co-Designing a Voice to Parliament Following the gift of the Uluru Statement from the Heart in 2017, and the final report of the Joint Select Committee on Constitutional Recognition in 2018, the government entered a period of “co-design” to establish a mechanism that would achieve the goal of forming a model of Indigenous “Voice” (Markham and Sanders). To facilitate the process, $7.3 million was budgeted in 2019 along with the establishment of a Senior Advisory Group headed by scholar Marcia Langton and human rights campaigner Tom Calma (Davis and Williams). This was followed by a National Co-Design Group and Local Co-Design Group in 2020 (Chesterman). The government’s Interim Report on the Indigenous Voice Co-Design Process (Commonwealth of Australia), released in October 2020, clearly outlines its desired objective of designing a model for an Indigenous Voice across all levels of government. Yet, it remains somewhat silent on what the term “co-design” means. Such lack of definition can be problematic for the space in which different parties come together to “co-design” solutions remains based within governing structures ultimately informed by western ontologies. We argue that co-design must be equally informed by Indigenous Knowledges and methodologies characterised by guiding protocols (Martin; Martin and Mirraboopa; Smith). Furthermore, it must be reflective of Indigenous peoples’ priorities as outlined in the Uluru Statement from the Heart and subsequent reports. This raises questions as to whether the government is engaging in a process that is equally accountable and receptive to Indigenous peoples. Has “co-design” become yet another empty slogan synonymous with white benevolence, sustained inaction, and a refusal to concede power to Indigenous peoples? O’Neil observes how positioning negotiations and discussions of constitutional reform within Indigenous frameworks pose a direct challenge to white sovereignty: First Peoples’ voices are rarely convenient for governments. They are voices of critique; voices that challenge the stories that settler-colonial governments have attempted to craft about an empty land, terra nullius, and a race doomed to fail. They are voices that draw their authority from their connection to land and Country, challenging the foundational assumptions of settler-colonial sovereignty in Australia. (2) The fact that current discussions avoid topics pertaining to constitutionally enshrining a First Nations’ Voice—as clearly stipulated in the Uluru Statement from the Heart—signifies that the government is unwilling to compromise on issues it sees as “inconvenient” to its own political agenda. This is despite the Interim Report acknowledging the government’s commitment, “to develop proposals to give Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples a say in the laws, policies, and programs that affect them” (Commonwealth, 14). The failure to engage with the call for constitutional enshrinement during the co-design process indicates that the government may continue with its own agenda. Memes such as Blackwell’s juxtapose and repurpose icons, symbols, and current affairs (such as the lodging of the Ever Given in the Suez Canal) in ways that blend politics, humour, and activism. Frazer and Carlson argue that memes “map the shifting ideological justifications and material practices of colonialism” (2). Through voicing his commentary via a meme, Blackwell creatively maps the diluted reforms pursued by the government, which maintains political control over the co-design process. Indigenous people’s participation within political processes has always been at a disadvantage due to disempowerment and population size. Mechanisms are in place within Australia’s constitution to ensure that all states and territories (regardless of their size) have an equal say/vote over matters concerning their welfare within the Commonwealth. Indigenous nations, communities, and language groups, however, go unrecognised, meaning that Indigenous views are disproportionally represented in comparison to the wider non-Indigenous population. Aricioni observes that: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, given their numbers as compared with the overall Australian population, do not have ready access to representation within our system of government. The Voice would go some way to remedying this. (2) Although the proposed Indigenous Voice to Parliament would be non-justiciable and obtain no veto powers, it would nonetheless provide a mechanism that ensures Indigenous perspectives are proportionally considered when co-designing policies directly or indirectly relating to Indigenous affairs (Appleby and Synot). Since the Uluru Statement was gifted to the people of Australia in 2017, high-profile politicians and media commentators have continued to project the distorted narrative that the proposed reforms lack majority support and would fail to pass a referendum (Harris; Knowles; Wahlquist). The earliest polls pertaining to constitutional reform since the Uluru Statement however have always shown strong public support (Zillman). An Omnipoll in 2017 declared 60.7% of respondents supported a constitutionally enshrined voice (Centre for Governance and Public Policy), while a Newspoll indicated 57% (Morris). Since that time, support has increased with Reconciliation Australia documenting 77% support in 2018, and 88% in 2020 (Reconciliation Australia). A more recent 2021 survey places support for an Indigenous Voice to Parliament at 60%, with 51% expressing a desire for constitutional enshrinement (Deem et al.). Early assessment of public submissions entered as part of the co-design enquiry, conducted by the UNSW Indigenous Law Centre, similarly points towards an overwhelming desire for constitutionally protected First Nations Voice. 87% of public submissions support constitutional change, 82% of which directly call for constitutional enshrinement (Daley; Phelan). In a political landscape driven by opinion polling, it is bewildering to think why a topic that has overwhelming public support has received inadequate consideration within politics and the mainstream media. In an act described as “mean-spirited bastardry” by Dylan Lino, a legal expert from the University of Queensland (in Wahlquist), Malcolm Turnbull’s initial rejection of the Statement in October 2017—on account of him seeing it as “too ambitious”—stunted the movement and denied its wider debate and exposure. During a recent ceremony that saw the Uluru Statement from the Heart being awarded the 2021 Sydney Peace Prize, Pat Anderson stated that “Malcolm Turnbull, when he was prime minister, wouldn’t even allow a national conversation. Well, despite that, the nation once again, is ahead of its leaders” (in Zhou). Blackwell’s meme materialises Anderson’s comment by visually emphasising the determination of activists and the Australian public’s desire for a constitutionally enshrined Indigenous Voice to Parliament. Political figures such as Malcolm Turnbull or Scott Morrison may continue to oppose the movement, but according to Anderson and Blackwell, their opposition ultimately pales in comparison to the will of the Australian people. This message is conveyed by both Anderson, at a formal awards ceremony, and Blackwell, via an online meme, but does so through media that effectively target different audiences, broadening the reach of the campaign. While awareness and support continue to grow within the public, there is concern amongst Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander scholars, leaders, and members of Indigenous communities that the co-design process will be yet another example of “kicking the can down the street” (Davis), resulting in superficial reform weighted in the government’s favour that will maintain the status quo and ignore the people’s mandate for constitutional change. Pat Turner, CEO of the National Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisation and a member of the Senior Advisory Group, has also expressed her concerns that Indigenous voices are not being heard within the co-design process (in Snow). The potential of the Uluru Statement to translate into sustained positive outcomes for Indigenous peoples lies in its ability to transcend the status quo (Fredericks and Bradfield, "We Don’t Want”) and act as a “circuit breaker” (Morris). The proposed reforms, inclusive of a constitutionally enshrined Voice to Parliament, offer relatively minor disruptions to current political structures and the foundation of Australia’s constitution, but will have significant benefits in healing relationships and improving outcomes for Indigenous peoples. An enshrined Voice to Parliament would act as a circuit breaker, as it would potentially revolutionise relationships between Indigenous communities and policy makers across all levels of government, providing a mechanism that can inform equitable and lasting benefits for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. Indigenous Australian responses to COVID-19 have further demonstrated the benefits of co-design informed by Indigenous self-determination (Stünzner). Recently, however, the government has signified a preference for an Indigenous Voice to Government rather than Parliament (Daley; Dodson). Prime Minister Scott Morrison has expressed that constitutional e nshrinement was never on the government’s agenda, and deceptively indicated that as it does not have widespread public support it is therefore not something his government will pursue at the present time (Knowles). Scott Morrison’s words and the proposals outlined in the Interim Report on the Indigenous Voice Co-Design Process are far from the circuit breaker envisioned in the Uluru Statement from the Heart. Without constitutional enshrinement Indigenous sovereignty continues to go unrecognised, while the right for Indigenous peoples to govern matters that directly impact their lives and futures—as declared in the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples—remains threatened. A legislative representative body lacks the security needed to ensure that Indigenous voices are acknowledged and documented in parliamentary records, regardless of whether governments are receptive to its messaging or not. As the past has shown, the survival of bodies, such as the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission (dissolved in 2005), remains at the discretion of political agendas and funding, meaning they are too easily disbanded. An enshrined Voice to Parliament offers the foundation upon which policies may be effectively co-designed with Indigenous peoples, without the looming threat of disbandment or defunding. The “heart” of the Uluru Statement lies in recognising the enduring right of Indigenous self-determination as eternally present, despite the whim of government and changing political agendas. Within western democracies, constitutions operate as if they are universal, and despite the possibility of amendment, give the impression of being the eternal “law of the land”. Acknowledging Indigenous sovereignty within the constitution is but a small step towards co-designing policies and practices that reflect the interests of Indigenous peoples whilst building capacity for greater advancement. Conclusion As highlighted by Fazer and Carlson, memes created by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples create a collective archive that can document an ongoing history of colonialism. This helps educate non-Indigenous audiences by bringing topics pertaining to colonial power disparities to the surface, a process of bringing “backstage politics upfront” (Shifman). Memes also create conversations among Indigenous peoples where a sense of solidarity is formed through shared experiences of oppression and survivance, providing a safe space where a diversity of opinions and expressions of Indigeneity can be shared. James Blackwell’s meme drew on the blocking of the Suez Canal by a cargo ship earlier this year and provided Aboriginal input to a global trend that was used to depict messages relating to seemingly impossible or incommensurable tasks. Through memes such as Blackwell’s (fig. 1), and other images (see figs. 2 and 3), the voices and agendas of Indigenous peoples are reinserted into national conversations in ways that reflect, reverberate, and reiterate their interests and visions for the future. In doing so, Indigenous people are contributing to critical conversations that expose the obstacles faced in relation to creating meaningful change within settler-colonial settings: in this case, the obstacle of a legislated voice to government.  By inserting and positioning images and text into scenarios not typically envisioned as natural or “normal”, memes challenge the status quo. In the case of Blackwell’s meme, it exposes the oppressive colonial structures that silence or compromise on Indigenous voices and interests as put forward in the Uluru Statement from the Heart. The intertextual nature of memes, alongside the ability to quickly respond and distribute information, has enabled Blackwell to reiterate the message that a “co-design” process where Indigenous peoples are overlooked is doomed to failure, just as the hopes of the earthmover dislodging the Ever Given. For Blackwell and others who strategically embrace online media as both protest and entertainment, memes are an expression of self-determination in praxis. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are well accustomed to the empty and broken promises of governments that continue to speak of the need to consult and listen to Indigenous peoples but fail to hear and implement the structural changes needed to enact meaningful change, no matter how accessible proposed solutions are (fig. 2). Tokenistic symbolic reform was rejected by Indigenous peoples in response to the “Recognise” campaign in 2017 (Dreher et al.). The Uluru Statement from the Heart, which culminated in the same year, sought meaningful substantive reforms that will empower Indigenous voices and protect self-determination. As depicted in Blackwell's meme, symbolic, tokenistic piecemeal offerings such as a legislative voice to government pale in comparison to the aspirations of Indigenous peoples (Fredericks and Bradfield, "More Than”). The Uluru Statement from the Heart concludes: in 1967 we were counted, in 2017 we seek to be heard. We leave base camp and start our trek across this vast country. We invite you to walk with us in a movement of the Australian people for a better future. Since its gifting to the people of Australia in 2017, many non-Indigenous Australians have indeed walked alongside Indigenous people on the journey towards constitutional reform. Polling and surveys demonstrate that the people of Australia, both Indigenous and non-Indigenous people, overwhelmingly support a constitutionally enshrined Voice to Parliament. Like the cargo ship that blocked the Suez Canal, the campaign remains steadfast, committed, and will not be easily moved by symbolic compromise, the spread of mistruth, or delay tactics that propagate narratives suggesting the public is “not yet ready”. Co-design—as a process of collaborative planning and partnership between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australia—is doomed to failure if it reverts to the status quo and to power structures that ignore Indigenous voices that are overwhelmingly calling for constitutional protection. It is time for the government to grant the public an opportunity to play their part in co-designing a better future for all and call a referendum.  Figure 3: “A Rock and a Hard Place.” Kudelka Cartoons, 15 February 2020. References @howdoidelete1. TikTok. 17 Apr. 2021. 〈 https://www.tiktok.com/@howdoidelete1?lang=en 〉 . Appleby, Gabrielle, and Eddie Synot. "A First Nations Voice: Institutionalising Political Listening." Federal Law Review 48.4 (2020): 529-42. 〈 https://doi.org/10.1177/0067205X20955068 〉 . Appleby, Gabrielle, and Megan Davis. “The Uluru Statement and the Promises of Truth.” Australian Historical Studies 49.4 (2018): 501–9. 〈 https://doi.org/10.1080/1031461X.2018.1523838 〉 . Arcioni, Elisa. "The Voice to Parliament Proposal and ‘the People’ of the Constitution." Alternative Law Journal (2021). 〈 https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969X211010827 〉 . Blackmore, Susan J. The Meme Machine. Oxford UP, 1999. Carlson, Bronwyn, and Ryan Frazer. "‘They Got Filters’: Indigenous Social Media, the Settler Gaze, and a Politics of Hope." Social Media + Society 6.2 (2020): 1-11. 〈 https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120925261 〉 . Centre for Governance and Public Policy. Australian Constitutional Values Survey 2021. 2021. 〈 https://www.cqu.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0021/190092/australian-constitutional-values-survey-2021.pdf 〉 . Chateau, Lucie. “‘Damn I Didn’t Know Y’all Was Sad? I Thought It Was Just Memes’: Irony, Memes and Risk in Internet Depression Culture." M/C Journal 23.3 (2020). 〈 https://doi.org/10.5204/mcj.1654 〉 . Chesterman, John. "Settling on a National Indigenous Australian ‘Voice’." Australian Journal of Public Administration (2021): 361-73. 〈 https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12462 〉 . Cho, Alexander. "Queer Reverb: Tumblr, Affect, Time." Networked Affect (2015): 43-58. Commonwealth of Australia. Indigenous Voice Co-Design Process: Interim Report to the Australian Government. 2020. 〈 https://voice.niaa.gov.au/sites/default/files/2021-01/indigenous-voice-codesign-process-interim-report-2020.pdf 〉 . Corbett, Jon, et al. "Web 2.0 for Aboriginal Cultural Survival: A New Australian Outback Movement." Participatory Learning and Action 59.1 (2009): 71-78. Daley, Paul. "Australians Back a Voice to Parliament. The Moment Is There to Be Seized." The Guardian, 4 Jun 2021. 〈 https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/postcolonial-blog/2021/jun/04/australians-back-a-voice-to-parliament-the-moment-is-there-to-be-seized 〉 . Davis, Megan. “Moment of Truth.” Quarterly Essay 69 (2019). 〈 https://www.quarterlyessay.com.au/content/correspondence-megan-davis 〉 . ———. "The Long Road to Uluru: Walking Together – Truth before Justice." Griffith Review 60 (Apr. 2018). 15 June 2020 〈 https://www.griffithreview.com/articles/long-road-uluru-walking-together-truth-before-justice-megan-davis/ 〉 . Davis, Megan, and George Williams. "Politicians Must Trust the People on Indigenous Voice to Parliament." Sydney Morning Herald, 24 May 2021. 28 May 2021 〈 https://www.smh.com.au/national/politicians-must-trust-the-people-on-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-20210519-p57tdn.html 〉 . Dawkins, Richard. The Selfish Gene. Oxford UP, 1976. De Saint Laurent, Constance, et al. "Internet Memes as Partial Stories: Identifying Political Narratives in Coronavirus Memes." Social Media + Society 7.1 (2021): 1-13. 〈 https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305121988932 〉 . Deem, Jacob, et al. "Most Australians Support First Nations Voice to Parliament: Survey." The Conversation, 9 Apr. 2021. 15 May 2021 〈 https://theconversation.com/most-australians-support-first-nations-voice-to-parliament-survey-157964 〉 . Dodson, Patrick. "Coalition Stands in the Way of True Reconciliation." The Australian, 7 June 2021. 7 June 2021 〈 https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/coalition-stands-inthe-way-of-true-reconciliation/news-story/c8827ece454647707dc53b8df234e42d 〉 . Dreher, Tanja, et al. "Indigenous Voices and Mediatized Policy-Making in the Digital Age." Information, Communication & Society 19.1 (2016): 23-39. 〈 https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1093534 〉 . Flecha Ortiz, José A., et al. "Analysis of the Use of Memes as an Exponent of Collective Coping during Covid-19 in Puerto Rico." Media International Australia 178.1 (2021): 168-181. 〈 https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X20966379 〉 . Frazer, Ryan, and Bronwyn Carlson. "Indigenous Memes and the Invention of a People." Social Media + Society 3.4 (2017): 1-12. 〈 https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2056305117738993 〉 . Fredericks, Bronwyn, and Abraham Bradfield. "‘I’m Not Afraid of the Dark’: White Colonial Fears, Anxieties, and Racism in Australia and Beyond." M/C Journal 24.2 (2021). 〈 https://doi.org/10.5204/mcj.2761 〉 . ———. "‘More than a Thought Bubble…’: The Uluru Statement from the Heart and Indigenous Voice to Parliament." M/C Journal 24.1 (2021). 〈 https://doi.org/10.5204/mcj.2738 〉 . ———. "We Don’t Want to Go Back to ‘Normal’, When ‘Normal’ Wasn’t Good for Everyone." Axon: Creative Explorations 10.2 (2020). 〈 https://www.axonjournal.com.au/issue-vol-10-no-2-dec-2020/we-don-t-want-go-back-normal-when-normal-wasn-t-good-everyone 〉 . Geertz, Clifford. "Art as a Cultural System." MLN 91.6 (1976): 1473-1499. Harris, Rob. "‘Not Our Policy’: Scott Morrison Rejects Push for Referendum on Voice." Sydney Morning Herald, 18 Mar. 2021. 18 Mar. 2021 〈 https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/not-our-policy-scott-morrison-rejects-push-for-referendum-on-voice-20210318-p57bxc.html 〉 . Indian Express. "Excavator Brought in to Help Free Ship Stuck on Suez Canal Sparks Meme-Fest Online." Indian Express, 27 Mar. 2021. 30 Mar. 2021 〈 https://indianexpress.com/article/trending/trending-globally/excavator-brought-in-to-aide-suez-canal-ship-blockage-sparks-meme-fest-online-7244388/ 〉 . Kanai, Akane. "Whatshouldwecallme? Self-Branding, Individuality and Belonging in Youthful Femininities on Tumblr." M/C Journal 18.1 (2015). 〈 https://doi.org/10.5204/mcj.936 〉 . Knowles, Rachael. "Prime Minister Says No ‘Mainstream Support’ for Constitutional Recognition, Ignores Uluru Statement." National Indigenous Times, 19 Mar. 2021. 1 May 2021 〈 https://nit.com.au/prime-minister-says-no-mainstream-support-for-constitutional-recognition-ignores-uluru-statement/ 〉 . Kudelka Cartoons. "A Rock and a Hard Place." Kudelka Cartoons, 25 Sep. 2018. 4 Mar. 2028 〈 https://www.kudelka.com.au/2018/09/from-the-heart/ 〉 . ———. "Rocking On." Kudelka Cartoons, 15 Feb. 2020. 4 Mar. 2021 〈 https://www.kudelka.com.au/2020/02/rocking-on/ 〉 . Land, Jacqueline. "'Since Time Im-Meme-Morial'! Indigenous Meme Networks and Fan-Activism." JCMS: Journal of Cinema and Media Studies 60.2 (2021): 181-186. 〈 https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/cj.2021.0012 〉 . Larkin, Dani, and Kate Galloway. “Uluru Statement from the Heart: Australian Public Law Pluralism.” Bond Law Review 30.2 (2018): 335–345. 〈 https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.6796 〉 . Leivestad, Hege Hoyer, et al. "Beyond Suez: Escalating Ship Sizes and Their Consequences." Observatorio Internacional, 6 Apr. 2021. 17 Apr. 2021 〈 https://internacional.laurocampos.org.br/en/2021/04/beyond-suez-escalating-ship-sizes-and-their-consequences/ 〉 . Markham, Francis, and William Sanders. "Support for a Constitutionally Enshrined First Nations Voice to Parliament: Evidence from Opinion Research since 2017." 2020. 〈 https://caepr.cass.anu.edu.au/research/publications/support-constitutionally-enshrined-first-nations-voice-parliament-evidence 〉 . Marsh, Victor. "The Evolution of a Meme Cluster: A Personal Account of a Countercultural Odyssey through the Age of Aquarius." M/C Journal 17.6 (2014). 〈 https://doi.org/10.5204/mcj.888 〉 . Martin, Karen Lillian. Please Knock before You Enter: Aboriginal Regulation of Outsiders and the Implications for Researchers. Post Pressed, 2008. Martin, Karen, and Booran Mirraboopa. "Ways of Knowing, Being and Doing: A Theoretical Framework and Methods for Indigenous and Indigenist Re-Search." Journal of Australian Studies 27.76 (2003): 203-214. 〈 https://doi.org/10.1080/14443050309387838 〉 . Media Diversity Australia. Who Gets to Tell Australian Stories? 2020. 〈 https://www.mediadiversityaustralia.org/research/ 〉 . Milner, Ryan M. "The World Made Meme: Discourse and Identity in Participatory Media." University of Kansas, 2012. 〈 http://hdl.handle.net/1808/10256 〉 . Monkman, Lenard. "Indigenous Meme Creators Point Out Harsh Truths with Dark Humour." CBC News, 19 Sep. 2018. 23 Mar. 2021 〈 https://www.cbc.ca/news/indigenous/indigenous-meme-creators-instagram-1.4828555 〉 . Moreton-Robinson, Aileen. The White Possessive: Property, Power, and Indigenous Sovereignty. U of Minnesota P, 2015. Morimoto, Lori. "The ‘Totoro Meme’ and the Politics of Transfandom Pleasure." East Asian Journal of Popular Culture 4.1 (2018): 77-92. 〈 https://doi.org/10.1386/eapc.4.1.77_1 〉 . Morris, Shireen. "The Torment of Our Powerless: Addressing the Indigenous Constitutional Vulnerability through the Uluru Statement's Call for a First Nations Voice in Their Affairs." UNSWLJ 41 (2018): 629. 〈 http://www6.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/journals/UNSWLJ/2018/23.html 〉 . Mullins, Robyn M., et al. "‘No‐One Has Listened to Anything I’ve Got to Say Before’: Co‐Design with People Who Are Sleeping Rough." Health Expectations (2021). 〈 https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13235 〉 . O’Neil, Jason. "Designing an Indigenous Voice That Empowers: How Constitutional Recognition Could Strengthen First Nations Sovereignty." Alternative Law Journal (2021). 〈 https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969X211009628 〉 . Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia. Joint Select Committee on Constitutional Recognition Relating to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples—Final Report. 2018. 〈 https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/committees/reportjnt/024213/toc_pdf/Finalreport.pdf; fileType=application%2Fpdf 〉 . Petray, Theresa Lynn. "Protest 2.0: Online Interactions and Aboriginal Activists." Media, Culture & Society 33.6 (2011): 923-940. 〈 https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443711411009 〉 . Phelan, Adam. "Indigenous Voice: Overwhelming Support for Constitutional Enshrinement." UNSW Newsroom, 3 May 2021. 15 May 2021 〈 https://newsroom.unsw.edu.au/news/business-law/indigenous-voice-overwhelming-support-constitutional-enshrinement 〉 . Reconciliation Australia. 2020 Australian Reconciliation Barometer. 2020. 〈 https://www.reconciliation.org.au/australian-reconciliation-barometer-2020/ 〉 . Said, Edward W. Culture and Imperialism. Alfred A. Knopf, 1993. Salem, Merryana. "A Giant Ship Got Stuck in the Tiny Suez Canal So Naturally It Was Turned into a Meme." Junkee, 25 Mar. 2021. 19 Apr. 2021 〈 https://junkee.com/suez-canal-memes/291123 〉 . Shifman, Limor. Memes in Digital Culture. MIT Press, 2014. Smith, Linda Tuhiwai. Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. 2nd ed. Zed Books; Otago University Press, 2012. Snow, Deborah. "'We Have Not Been Heard': Indigenous Leader Slams Voice Process." Sydney Morning Herald, 30 Sep. 2020. 15 May 2021 〈 https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/we-have-not-been-heard-indigenous-leader-slams-voice-process-20200929-p560de.html 〉 . Stünzner, Inga. "Indigenous Community Response to Coronavirus a Blueprint for Self-Determination." ABC Capricornia, 14 Nov. 2020. 17 Mar. 2021 〈 https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-11-14/indigenous-community-covid-response-blueprint-self-determination/12882080 〉 . Uluru Statement from the Heart. "The Statement: Uluru Statement from the Heart." 23 Apr. 2021 〈 https://ulurustatement.org/the-statement 〉 . Wahlquist, Calla. "Turnbull's Uluru Statement Rejection Is 'Mean-Spirited Bastardry' – Legal Expert." Sydney Morning Herald, 26 Oct. 2017. 25 June 2020 〈 https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2017/oct/26/turnbulls-uluru-statement-rejection-mean-spirited-bastardry-legal-expert 〉 . Zhou, Naaman. "Uluru Statement from the Heart Awarded 2021 Sydney Peace Prize." The Guardian, 26 May 2021. 26 Mar. 2021 〈 https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2021/may/26/uluru-statement-from-the-heart-awarded-2021-sydney-peace-prize 〉 . Zillman, Stephanie. "Indigenous Advisory Body Would Be Supported by Australians, Survey Finds." ABC News, 30 Oct. 2017. 23 May 2021 〈 https://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-10-30/australians-would-support-referendum-indigenous-voice-parliament/9101106 〉 .
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1441-2616
    RVK:
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Queensland University of Technology
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2018737-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Queensland University of Technology ; 2020
    In:  M/C Journal Vol. 23, No. 4 ( 2020-08-12)
    In: M/C Journal, Queensland University of Technology, Vol. 23, No. 4 ( 2020-08-12)
    Abstract: In 2013, the Capricornia Arts Mob (CAM), an Indigenous collective of artists situated in Rockhampton, central Queensland, Australia, successfully tendered for one of three public art projects that were grouped under the title Flood Markers (Roberts; Roberts and Mackay; Robinson and Mackay). Commissioned as part of the Queensland Government's Community Development and Engagement Initiative, Flood Markers aims to increase awareness of Rockhampton’s history, with particular focus on the Fitzroy River and the phenomena of flooding. Honouring Land Connections is CAM’s contribution to the project and consists of several “memory poles” that stand alongside the Fitzroy River in Toonooba Park. Rockhampton lies on Dharumbal Country with Toonooba being the Dharumbal name for the Fitzroy River and the inspiration for the work due to its cultural significance to the Aboriginal people of that region. The name Toonooba, as well as other images and icons including boomerangs, spears, nets, water lily, and frogs, amongst others, are carved, burnt, painted and embedded into the large ironbark poles. These stand with the river on one side and the colonial infrastructure of Rockhampton on the other (see fig. 1, 2 and 3).Figure 1 Figure 2Figure 3Within this article, we discuss Honouring Land Connections as having two main functions which contribute to its significance as Indigenous cultural expression and identity affirmation. Firstly, the memory poles (as well as the process of sourcing materials and producing the final product) are a manifestation of Country and a representation of its stories and lived memories. Honouring Land Connections provides a means for Aboriginal people to revel in Country and maintain connections to a vital component of their being as Indigenous. Secondly, by revealing Indigenous stories, experiences, and memories, Honouring Land Connections emphasises Indigenous voices and perspectives within a place dominated by Eurocentric outlooks and knowledges. Toonooba provides the backdrop on which the complexities of cultural and identity formation within settler-colonial spaces are highlighted whilst revelling in continuous Indigenous presence.Flood Markers as ArtArtists throughout the world have used flood markers as a means of visual expression through which to explore and reveal local histories, events, environments, and socio-cultural understandings of the relationships between persons, places, and the phenomena of flooding. Geertz describes art as a social text embedded within wider socio-cultural systems; providing insight into cultural, social, political, economic, gendered, religious, ethnic, environmental, and biographical contexts. Flood markers are not merely metric tools used for measuring the height of a river, but rather serve as culture artefacts or indexes (Gell Art and Agency; Gell "Technology of Enchantment") that are products and producers of socio-culture contexts and the memories and experiences embedded within them. Through different methods, mediums, and images, artists have created experiential and intellectual spaces where those who encounter their work are encouraged to engage their surroundings in thought provoking and often-new ways.In some cases, flood markers have brought attention to the “character and natural history” of a particular place, where artists such as Louise Lavarack have sought to provoke consciousness of the movement of water across flood plains (Lavarack). In other works, flood markers have served as memorials to individuals such as Gilbert White whose daughter honoured his life and research through installing a glass spire at Boulder Creek, Colorado in 2011 (White). Tragedies such as Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans in 2005 have also been commemorated through flood markers. Artist Christopher Saucedo carved 1,836 waves into a freestanding granite block; each wave representing a life lost (University of New Orleans). The weight of the granite symbolises the endurance and resilience of those who faced, and will continue to face, similar forces of nature. The Pillar of Courage erected in 2011 in Ipswich, Queensland, similarly contains the words “resilience, community, strength, heroes, caring and unity” with each word printed on six separate sections of the pillar, representing the six major floods that have hit the region (Chudleigh).Whilst these flood markers provide valuable insights into local histories, specific to each environmental and socio-cultural context, works such as the Pillar of Courage fail to address Indigenous relationships to Country. By framing flooding as a “natural disaster” to be overcome, rather than an expression of Country to be listened to and understood, Euro and human-centric perspectives are prioritised over Indigenous ways of knowing and being. Indigenous knowledges however encourages a reorientation of Eurocentric responses and relationships to Country, and in doing so challenge compartmentalised views of “nature” where flooding is separated from land and Country (Ingold Perception; Seton and Bradley; Singer). Honouring Land Connections symbolises the voice and eternal presence of Toonooba and counters presentations of flooding that depict it as historian Heather Goodall (36) once saw “as unusual events of disorder in which the river leaves its proper place with catastrophic results.”Country  To understand flooding from Indigenous perspectives it is first necessary to discuss Country and apprehend what it means for Indigenous peoples. Country refers to the physical, cosmological, geographical, relational, and emotional setting upon which Indigenous identities and connections to place and kin are embedded. Far from a passive geographic location upon which interactions take place, Country is an active and responsive agent that shapes and contextualises social interactions between and amongst all living beings. Bob Morgan writes of how “Country is more than issues of land and geography; it is about spirituality and identity, knowing who we are and who we are connected to; and it helps us understand how all living things are connected.” Country is also an epistemological frame that is filled with knowledge that may be known and familiarised whilst being knowledge itself (Langton "Sacred"; Rose Dingo; Yunupingu).Central to understanding Country is the fact that it refers to a living being’s spiritual homeland which is the ontological place where relationships are formed and maintained (Yunupingu). As Country nurtures and provides the necessities for survival and prosperity, Indigenous people (but also non-Indigenous populations) have moral obligations to care for Country as kin (Rose Nourishing Terrains). Country is epistemic, relational, and ontological and refers to both physical locations as well as modes of “being” (Heidegger), meaning it is carried from place to place as an embodiment within a person’s consciousness. Sally Morgan (263) describes how “our country is alive, and no matter where we go, our country never leaves us.” Country therefore is fluid and mobile for it is ontologically inseparable to one’s personhood, reflected through phrases such as “I am country” (B. Morgan 204).Country is in continuous dialogue with its surroundings and provides the setting upon which human and non-human beings; topographical features such as mountains and rivers; ancestral beings and spirits such as the Rainbow Snake; and ecological phenomena such as winds, tides, and floods, interact and mutually inform each other’s existence (Rose Nourishing Terrains). For Aboriginal people, understanding Country requires “deep listening” (Atkinson; Ungunmerr), a responsive awareness that moves beyond monological and human-centric understandings of the world and calls for deeper understandings of the mutual and co-dependant relationships that exist within it. The awareness of such mutuality has been discussed through terms such as “kincentrism” (Salmón), “meshworks” (Ingold Lines), “webs of connection” (Hokari), “nesting” (Malpas), and “native science” (Cajete). Such concepts are ways of theorising “place” as relational, physical, and mental locations made up of numerous smaller interactions, each of which contribute to the identity and meaning of place. Whilst each individual agent or object retains its own autonomy, such autonomy is dependent on its wider relation to others, meaning that place is a location where “objectivity, subjectivity and inter-subjectivity converge” (Malpas 35) and where the very essence of place is revealed.Flooding as DialogueWhen positioned within Indigenous frameworks, flooding is both an agent and expression of Toonooba and Country. For the phenomenon to occur however, numerous elements come into play such as the fall of rain; the layout of the surrounding terrain; human interference through built weirs and dams; and the actions and intervention of ancestral beings and spirits. Furthermore, flooding has a direct impact on Country and all life within it. This is highlighted by Dharumbal Elder Uncle Billy Mann (Fitzroy Basin Association "Billy Mann") who speaks of the importance of flooding in bringing water to inland lagoons which provide food sources for Dharumbal people, especially at times when the water in Toonooba is low. Such lagoons remain important places for fishing, hunting, recreational activities, and cultural practices but are reliant on the flow of water caused by the flowing, and at times flooding river, which Uncle Mann describes as the “lifeblood” of Dharumbal people and Country (Fitzroy Basin Association "Billy Mann"). Through her research in the Murray-Darling region of New South Wales, Weir writes of how flooding sustains life though cycles that contribute to ecological balance, providing nourishment and food sources for all beings (see also Cullen and Cullen 98). Water’s movement across land provokes the movement of animals such as mice and lizards, providing food for snakes. Frogs emerge from dry clay plains, finding newly made waterholes. Small aquatic organisms flourish and provide food sources for birds. Golden and silver perch spawn, and receding waters promote germination and growth. Aboriginal artist Ron Hurley depicts a similar cycle in a screen-print titled Waterlily–Darambal Totem. In this work Hurley shows floodwaters washing away old water lily roots that have been cooked in ant bed ovens as part of Dharumbal ceremonies (UQ Anthropology Museum). The cooking of the water lily exposes new seeds, which rains carry to nearby creeks and lagoons. The seeds take root and provide food sources for the following year.  Cooking water lily during Dharumbal ceremonies contributes to securing and maintaining a sustainable food source as well as being part of Dharumbal cultural practice. Culture, ecological management, and everyday activity are mutually connected, along with being revealed and revelled in. Aboriginal Elder and ranger Uncle Fred Conway explains how Country teaches Aboriginal people to live in balance with their surroundings (Fitzroy Basin Association "Fred Conway"). As Country is in constant communication, numerous signifiers can be observed on land and waterscapes, indicating the most productive and sustainable time to pursue certain actions, source particular foods, or move to particular locations. The best time for fishing in central Queensland for example is when Wattles are in bloom, indicating a time when fish are “fatter and sweeter” (Fitzroy Basin Association "Fred Conway"). In this case, the Wattle is 1) autonomous, having its own life cycle; 2) mutually dependant, coming into being because o f seasonal weather patterns; and 3) an agent of Country that teaches those with awareness how to respond and benefit from its lessons.Dialogue with Country As Country is sentient and responsive, it is vital that a person remains contextually aware of their actions on and towards their surroundings. Indigenous peoples seek familiarity with Country but also ensure that they themselves are known and familiarised by it (Rose Dingo). In a practice likened to “baptism”, Langton ("Earth") describes how Aboriginal Elders in Cape York pour water over the head of newcomers as a way of introducing them to Country, and ensuring that Country knows those who walk upon it. These introductions are done out of respect for Country and are a way of protecting outsiders from the potentially harmful powers of ancestral beings. Toussaint et al. similarly note how during mortuary rites, parents of the deceased take water from rivers and spit it back into the land, symbolising the spirit’s return to Country.Dharumbal man Robin Hatfield demonstrates the importance of not interfering with the dialogue of Country through recalling being told as a child not to disturb Barraru or green frogs. Memmott (78) writes that frogs share a relationship with the rain and flooding caused by Munda-gadda, the Rainbow Snake. Uncle Dougie Hatfield explains the significance of Munda-gadda to his Country stating how “our Aboriginal culture tells us that all the waterways, lagoons, creeks, rivers etc. and many landforms were created by and still are protected by the Moonda-Ngutta, what white people call the Rainbow Snake” (Memmott 79).In the case of Robin Hatfield, to interfere with Barraru’s “business” is to threaten its dialogue with Munda-gadda and in turn the dialogue of Country in form of rain. In addition to disrupting the relational balance between the frog and Munda-gadda, such actions potentially have far-reaching social and cosmological consequences. The rain’s disruption affects the flood plains, which has direct consequences for local flora and transportation and germination of water lily seeds; fauna, affecting the spawning of fish and their movement into lagoons; and ancestral beings such as Munda-gadda who continue to reside within Toonooba.Honouring Land Connections provided artists with a means to enter their own dialogue with Country and explore, discuss, engage, negotiate, and affirm aspects of their indigeneity. The artists wanted the artwork to remain organic to demonstrate honour and respect for Dharumbal connections with Country (Roberts). This meant that materials were sourced from the surrounding Country and the poles placed in a wave-like pattern resembling Munda-gadda. Alongside the designs and symbols painted and carved into the poles, fish skins, birds, nests, and frogs are embalmed within cavities that are cut into the wood, acting as windows that allow viewers to witness components of Country that are often overlooked (see fig. 4). Country therefore is an equal participant within the artwork’s creation and continuing memories and stories. More than a representation of Country, Honouring Land Connections is a literal manifestation of it.Figure 4Opening Dialogue with Non-Indigenous AustraliaHonouring Land Connections is an artistic and cultural expression that revels in Indigenous understandings of place. The installation however remains positioned within a contested “hybrid” setting that is informed by both Indigenous and settler-colonial outlooks (Bhabha). The installation for example is separated from the other two artworks of Flood Markers that explore Rockhampton’s colonial and industrial history. Whilst these are positioned within a landscaped area, Honouring Land Connections is placed where the grass is dying, seating is lacking, and is situated next to a dilapidated coast guard building. It is a location that is as quickly left behind as it is encountered. Its separation from the other two works is further emphasised through its depiction in the project brief as a representation of Rockhampton’s pre-colonial history. Presenting it in such a way has the effect of bookending Aboriginal culture in relation to European settlement, suggesting that its themes belong to a time past rather than an immediate present. Almost as if it is a revelation in and of itself.   Within settler-colonial settings, place is heavily politicised and often contested. In what can be seen as an ongoing form of colonialism, Eurocentric epistemologies and understandings of place continue to dominate public thought, rhetoric, and action in ways that legitimise White positionality whilst questioning and/or subjugating other ways of knowing, being, and doing (K. Martin; Moreton-Robinson; Wolfe). This turns places such as Toonooba into agonistic locations of contrasting and competing interests (Bradfield). For many Aboriginal peoples, the memories and emotions attached to a particular place can render it as either comfortable and culturally safe, or as unsafe, unsuitable, unwelcoming, and exclusionary (Fredericks). Honouring Land Connections is one way of publicly asserting and recognising Toonooba as a culturally safe, welcoming, and deeply meaningful place for Indigenous peoples.    Whilst the themes explored in Honouring Land Connections are not overtly political, its presence on colonised/invaded land unsettles Eurocentric falsities and colonial amnesia (B. Martin) of an uncontested place and history in which Indigenous voices and knowledges are silenced. The artwork is a physical reminder that encourages awareness—particularly for non-Indigenous populations—of Indigenous voices that are continuously demanding recognition of Aboriginal place within Country. Similar to the boomerangs carved into the poles representing flooding as a natural expression of Country that will return (see fig. 5), Indigenous peoples continue to demand that the wider non-Indigenous population acknowledge, respect, and morally responded to Aboriginal cultures and knowledges.Figure 5Conclusion Far from a historic account of the past, the artists of CAM have created an artwork that promotes awareness of an immediate and emerging Indigenous presence on Country. It creates a space that is welcoming to Indigenous people, allowing them to engage with and affirm aspects of their living histories and cultural identities. Through sharing stories and providing “windows” into Aboriginal culture, Country, and lived experiences (which like the frogs of Toonooba are so often overlooked), the memory poles invite and welcome an open dialogue with non-Indigenous Australians where all may consider their shared presence and mutual dependence on each other and their surroundings.The memory poles are mediatory agents that stand on Country, revealing and bearing witness to the survival, resistance, tenacity, and continuity of Aboriginal peoples within the Rockhampton region and along Toonooba. Honouring Land Connections is not simply a means of reclaiming the river as an Indigenous space, for reclamation signifies something regained after it has been lost. What the memory poles signify is something eternally present, i.e. Toonooba is and forever will be embedded in Aboriginal Country in which we all, Indigenous and non-Indigenous, human and non-human, share. The memory poles serve as lasting reminders of whose Country Rockhampton is on and describes the life ways of that Country, including times of flood. Through celebrating and revelling in the presence of Country, the artists of CAM are revealing the deep connection they have to Country to the wider non-Indigenous community.ReferencesAtkinson, Judy. Trauma Trails, Recreating Song Lines: The Transgenerational Effects of Trauma in Indigenous Australia. Spinifex Press, 2002.Bhabha, Homi, K. The Location of Culture. Taylor and Francis, 2012.Bradfield, Abraham. "Decolonizing the Intercultural: A Call for Decolonizing Consciousness in Settler-Colonial Australia." Religions 10.8 (2019): 469.Cajete, Gregory. Native Science: Natural Laws of Interdependence. 1st ed. Clear Light Publishers, 2000.Chudleigh, Jane. "Flood Memorial Called 'Pillar of Courage' Unveiled in Goodna to Mark the Anniversary of the Natural Disaster." The Courier Mail 2012. 16 Jan. 2020 〈 http://www.couriermail.com.au/questnews/flood-memorial-called-pillar-of-courage-unveiled-in-goodna-to-mark-the-anniversary-of-the-natural-disaster/news-story/575b1a8c44cdd6863da72d64f9e96f2d 〉 .Cullen, Peter, and Vicky Cullen. This Land, Our Water: Water Challenges for the 21st Century. ATF P, 2011.Fitzroy Basin Association. "Carnarvon Gorge with Fred Conway." 8 Dec. 2010 〈 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RbOP60JOfYo 〉 .———. "The Fitzroy River with Billy Mann." 8 Dec. 2019 〈 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=00ELbpIUa_Y 〉 .Fredericks, Bronwyn. "Understanding and Living Respectfully within Indigenous Places." Indigenous Places: World Indigenous Nations Higher Education Consortium Journal 4 (2008): 43-49.Geertz, Clifford. "Art as a Cultural System." MLN 91.6 (1976): 1473-99.Gell, Alfred. Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory. Clarendon P, 1998.———. "The Technology of Enchantment and the Enchantment of Technology." Anthropology, Art, and Aesthetics, eds. J. Coote and A. Shelton. Clarendon P, 1992. 40-63.Goodall, Heather. "The River Runs Backwards." Words for Country: Landscape & Language in Australia, eds. Tim Bonyhady and Tom Griffiths. U of New South Wales P, 2002. 30-51.Heidegger, Martin. Being and Time. 1st English ed. SCM P, 1962.Hokari, Minoru. Gurindji Journey: A Japanese Historian in the Outback. U of New South Wales P, 2011.Ingold, Tim. Lines: A Brief History. Routledge, 2007.———. The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling & Skill. Routledge, 2000.Langton, Marcia. "Earth, Wind, Fire and Water: The Social and Spiritual Construction of Water in Aboriginal Societies." Social Archaeology of Australian Indigenous Societies, eds. Bruno David et al. Aboriginal Studies P, 2006. 139-60.———. "The Edge of the Sacred, the Edge of Death: Sensual Inscriptions." Inscribed Landscapes: Marking and Making Place, eds. Bruno David and M. Wilson. U of Hawaii P, 2002. 253-69.Lavarack, Louise. "Threshold." 17 Jan. 2019 〈 http://www.louiselavarack.com.au/ 〉 .Malpas, Jeff. Place and Experience: A Philosophical Topography. Cambridge UP, 1999.Martin, Brian. "Immaterial Land." Carnal Knowledge: Towards a 'New Materialism' through the Arts, eds. E. Barret and B. Bolt. Tauris, 2013. 185-04.Martin, Karen Lillian. Please Knock before You Enter: Aboriginal Regulation of Outsiders and the Implications for Researchers. Post Pressed, 2008.Memmott, Paul. "Research Report 10: Aboriginal Social History and Land Affiliation in the Rockhampton-Shoalwater Bay Region." Commonwealth Commission of Inquiry, Shoalwater Bay Capricornia Coast, Queensland: Research Reports, ed. John T. Woodward. A.G.P.S., 1994. 1-107.Moreton-Robinson, Aileen. The White Possessive: Property, Power, and Indigenous Sovereignty. U of Minnesota P, 2015.Morgan, Bob. "Country – a Journey to Cultural and Spiritual Healing." Heartsick for Country: Stories of Love, Spirit and Creation, eds. S. Morgan et al. Freemantle P, 2008: 201-20.Roberts, Alice. "Flood Markers Unveiled on Fitzroy." ABC News 5 Mar. 2014. 10 Mar. 2014 〈 https://www.abc.net.au/local/photos/2014/03/05/3957151.htm 〉 .Roberts, Alice, and Jacquie Mackay. "Flood Artworks Revealed on Fitzroy Riverbank." ABC Capricornia 29 Oct. 2013. 5 Jan. 20104 〈 http://www.abc.net.au/local/stories/2013/10/29/3879048.htm?site=capricornia 〉 .Robinson, Paul, and Jacquie Mackay. "Artwork Portray Flood Impact." ABC Capricornia 29 Oct. 2013. 5 Jan. 2014 〈 http://www.abc.net.au/lnews/2013-10-29/artworks-portray-flood-impact/5051856 〉 .Rose, Deborah Bird. Dingo Makes Us Human: Life and Land in an Aboriginal Australian Culture. Cambridge UP, 1992.———. Nourishing Terrains: Australian Aboriginal Views of Landscape and Wilderness. Australian Heritage Commission, 1996.Salmón, Enrique. "Kincentric Ecology: Indigenous Perceptions of the Human-Nature Relationship." Ecological Applications 10.5 (2000): 1327-32.Seton, Kathryn A., and John J. Bradley. "'When You Have No Law You Are Nothing': Cane Toads, Social Consequences and Management Issues." The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology 5.3 (2004): 205-25.Singer, Peter. Practical Ethics. 3rd ed. Cambridge UP, 2011.Toussaint, Sandy, et al. "Water Ways in Aboriginal Australia: An Interconnected Analysis." Anthropological Forum 15.1 (2005): 61-74.Ungunmerr, Miriam-Rose. "To Be Listened To in Her Teaching: Dadirri: Inner Deep Listening and Quiet Still Awareness." EarthSong Journal: Perspectives in Ecology, Spirituality and Education 3.4 (2017): 14-15.University of New Orleans. "Fine Arts at the University of New Orleans: Christopher Saucedo." 31 Aug. 2013 〈 http://finearts.uno.edu/christophersaucedofaculty.html 〉 .UQ Anthropology Museum. "UQ Anthropology Museum: Online Catalogue." 6 Dec. 2019 〈 https://catalogue.anthropologymuseum.uq.edu.au/item/26030 〉 .Weir, Jessica. Murray River Country: An Ecological Dialogue with Traditional Owners. Aboriginal Studies Press, 2009.White, Mary Bayard. "Boulder Creek Flood Level Marker Projects." WEAD: Women Eco Artists Dialog. 15 Jan. 2020 〈 https://directory.weadartists.org/colorado-marking-floods 〉 .Wolfe, Patrick. "Settler Colonialism and the Elimination of the Native." Journal of Genocide Research 8.4 (2006): 387-409.Yunupingu, Galarrwuy. Our Land Is Our Life: Land Rights – Past, Present and Future. University of Queensland Press, 1997.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1441-2616
    RVK:
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Queensland University of Technology
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2018737-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: M/C Journal, Queensland University of Technology, Vol. 25, No. 1 ( 2022-03-17)
    Abstract: Introduction Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, and its fluctuating waves of infections and the emergence of new variants, Indigenous populations in Australia and worldwide have remained at high risk. Indigenous populations are all too familiar with the deadly consequences of introduced disease. Outbreaks such as the H1N1 influenza epidemic in 2009 disproportionately impacted Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples (Komesaroff et al.; Eades et al.), while past epidemics introduced by colonisers have decimated, and in some cases eradicated entire language groups (Fredericks, Holcombe, and Bradfield). As COVID-19 spreads, and highly contagious variants such as Omicron emerge, preventative measures and vaccinations have never been so important. Vaccination rates in some Indigenous communities, however, remain stubbornly low, with hesitancy coinciding with the spread of misinformation and amplification of conspiracy theories. In some cases, conspiracies have infiltrated Indigenous communities, playing on anxieties derived in part from the impact of colonisation, as well as past and present trauma. The scale of misinformation relating to COVID-19, particularly online, has become a worldwide problem with the World Health Organization terming it an “infodemic” (World Health Organization) and others a “misinfodemic” (Pickles et al.). In this article, we discuss how conspiracies have impacted vaccination rates in some Indigenous communities in Australia. We acknowledge that vaccine hesitancy is not universal amongst all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and that differing responses to public health messaging are informed by diverse socio-historic factors. The most effective strategies towards curbing the spread of misinformation, and hopefully disease, however, arise from community-led and driven initiatives that are informed by evidence-based messaging that empowers Indigenous agency and choice. Methodology Our article draws on a study conducted at the University of Queensland (UQ) which documented and mapped some of the risk and protective measures that influence responses to COVID-19 in urban Brisbane (Fredericks et al. ‘Innovative Research’ and ‘Understanding Health’). Over the course of three workshops, held throughout 2021, stakeholder participants from the Indigenous health sector (both Indigenous and non-Indigenous) – including representation from Aboriginal Controlled Community Health Organisations – shared anecdotal and empirical evidence that amongst other findings demonstrated the impact of circulating misinformation. In this article, we triangulate some of the findings from these workshops with accompanying literature gathered from journal articles, news and social media, and other online sources that have documented accounts relating to conspiracies in Indigenous Australian communities. We argue that successful communications relating to COVID-19 in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities necessitates that health messaging centralise Indigenous voices and expertise. Conspiracies and Colonialism Settler colonialism is relevant to our discussion concerning the prevalence of conspiracy theories in some Indigenous communities in Australia, as their pervasive nature has shaped a culture of mistrust and scepticism towards dominant hegemonic structures. Colonisation was, and still is, an ongoing process that impacts on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in different regions, in different ways (Wolfe). The prolonged invasion and spread of colonisers throughout the continent resulted in varied, but equally violent, frontier encounters that were informed by the authoritarian structures, policies, and attitudes of the time. Whilst “Indigenous Affairs” – and the policies relating to them – have changed over Australia’s history, responses were/are united through an ethos of “possession” that dehumanises Indigenous peoples and cultures through the proclamation of white sovereignty (Moreton-Robinson). This is demonstrated through state sanctioned practices, such as the removal and institutionalisation of Aboriginal children, now known as the Stolen Generations, or the disproportionate rates of policing and incarceration that have contributed to Indigenous deaths in custody. Missionaries are the by-products of colonisation, and as Noel Pearson has written have complex and conflicting places in some Indigenous peoples‘ lives; being both locations of immense traumas as well as sanctuaries separated from the violence that took place beyond their confines. While missionaries have since transitioned into state-controlled settlements, and then communities and outstations, Christianity and the Christian Church continues to be meaningful for many Indigenous peoples who came from or are kin to those who live in areas formerly controlled and run by religious institutions. As we discuss in the next section, religious dogma and rhetoric has been manipulated and used to target and spread conspiracies about COVID-19 in some Indigenous communities. To better understand conspiracies, however, we argue that we must move beyond the impulse to dismiss them as mere absurdities, but rather unpack the socio-political contexts in which they are constructed, framed, and interpreted (Jane and Fleming). Prasad (13) argues that conspiracies “seem to embody displacement and condensation of not only the past experiences of an individual but also the history of the social group to which s/he/they belong”. Pierre suggests that conspiracies are best understood not through the narratives they propagate, but rather through those they reject. Beliefs in conspiracies therefore can provide a sense membership and belonging among those who rightly or wrongly feel disenfranchised (Douglas et al.). While a sense of disenfranchisement can influence a person’s inclination towards a conspiracy, conspiracists do not always exist on the fringes of society, nor do their theories reflect the nonsensical ramblings of vocal minorities who counter the so-called “rational” views of the mainstream.  Within colonial spaces, topics relating to invasion, possession, and dispossession have resulted in conspiratorial silences that veil the ongoing impact of imperialism on Indigenous peoples in Australia and throughout the world (Moreton-Robinson). The failure of settler-nations to confront and address the ongoing violence of colonisation have been described by some as a “conspiracy of silence” (Bottoms and Evans), or a form of hegemonic “amnesia” (Langton). These national silences fuel some Indigenous people’s mistrust in the governing authorities who continuously fail to recognise Indigenous sovereignty. Public health mandates, therefore – when delivered by governments blind to Indigenous cultural protocols – become less about health protection or inoculation per se, but rather serve as touchpoints of conflict that render the unresolved nature of colonisation, visible. In other words, it reflects the question over who has the right and authority to insert their power over Indigenous bodies? Everyday lived experiences with racism, stereotype, intergenerational harm, and maltreatment within the health system can correlate with a person’s receptivity to conspiracy theories (Smith et al.). Indigenous people, and other persons of colour, have long been subjected to maltreatment and/or medical experimentation that has manifested in intergenerational harm and mistrust (Anderson; Pierre). In The Cultivation of Whiteness, Anderson presents a body of work that centralises whiteness within the medical field, outlining how in the twentieth century medicine operated (and still operates) as a “discourse of settlement” through the definition and control of Black bodies (Fredericks). Anderson writes, “the medical construction of white Australia provides another lens through which we may view two hundred years of European settlement” (5). Explanations for vaccine hesitancy amongst Indigenous people – even if they are rooted in conspiracy – cannot be removed from this context of colonial disempowerment. The anti-vax movement – like other discourses and praxes in the public and private sector (Bargallie) – often reflects a racialised colonial discourse. Day and Carlson observe how TikTok influencers and white supremacists in the USA have used language such as “pureblood” in reference to their so-called “supremacy” of having blood untainted by the vaccine (Owen). While messaging such as this often originates abroad, far right groups have strategically manipulated information online so that it may infiltrate Indigenous communities in Australia, preying on pre-existing anxieties. Northern Territory Chief Minister Michael Gunner has directly attributed many of the rumours circulating in Central Australia to foreign intervention (Allam), with similar claims being made in Western Australia and elsewhere (Orr). The Spread of Conspiracy in Indigenous Communities Since the outbreak of COVID-19, numerous conspiracies have emerged attempting to explain the virus through narratives that suggest it is part of an organised initiative to dismantle world order or control global populations. One such conspiracy posits that the virus and the major organisations, individuals, and authorities associated with its prevention are carrying out the work of the devil or the “Beast” (Bohlinge; Letšosa). The spread of misinformation associating vaccines to the “mark of the Beast” has gained momentum in some Aboriginal communities in Australia (Roussos) – particularly in locations that have long histories with Christian missionaries. In some instances, as discussed in the case studies below, individuals have deliberately targeted Indigenous communities and played on anxieties for personal and ideological gain. This is concerning given the already low vaccination rate in communities such as Ali Curung in the Barkley Region, Northern Territory (Roussos), and regions such as the Kimberly and Pilbara where just 10% of the Aboriginal population is vaccinated (Parke and Lynch). Between March and June 2021, emails were sent to the Pastor of Ninga Mia in Western Australia which likened vaccines to the “mark of the Beast” and suggested that it contained an enzyme named after the devil (Richards et al.). These were reportedly sent by Kris Schlyder, the head of the Australian Indigenous Prayer Network in Queensland, who claimed he forwarded the emails after receiving them from a pastor in the United States. Similar examples have occurred in other communities such as Santa Teresa (Roussos). Ninga Mia’s pastor, Geoffrey Stokes, and his wife Dr. Jeffries-Stokes have stated that rumours and awareness of the (false) claims have become so pervasive in their community that vaccine advocacy is met with condemnation by some members of the community who believe the pair have turned their backs on their faith. This suggests that the mere spread of rumour can sow the seed of doubt and exacerbate pre-existing hesitancies. Despite platforms such as Twitter banning the hashtags #MarkOfTheBeastIsTheCovid19Vaccine and #VaccineIsTheMarkOfTheBeast, in attempts to stop the spread of religious misinformation (Dwoskin 2021), they continue to circulate and hinder assurances. In some cases, Indigenous and non-Indigenous service providers have contributed and accelerated the spread of misinformation (Bryne et al.). Community representatives from the Larrakia Nation for example were forced to issue a declaration refuting the views of the Larrakia Sovereign Tribal Council (see Fig. 1) who falsely proclaimed that morgues were in danger of being overrun due to the increasing deaths associated with vaccinations on Groote Eylandt (Bryne et al.). This demonstrates the challenge of how to effectively communicate and expose health messaging from sources that are COVID-19 literate, trusted, and able to counter the spread of misinformation.    Fig. 1: Larrakia Nation Facebook post (2021) Involvement of the Australian Defence Force, who assisted in moving residents in remote locations living in overcrowded houses containing upwards of 30 people, has falsely been likened to the Stolen Generations by some (Allam). Historic events and ongoing processes of removing Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children; unsolicited involvement of Australia’s Defence Forces during the “National Emergency” of 2007; and other exploits of government intervention in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people’s lives have been manipulated in ways that empowers the divisive agenda of extremist groups. False associations such as these not only impacts vaccine hesitancy but resurface trauma by trivialising past lived experiences and falsifying narratives for a racialised agenda. Katherine community health worker Luke Ellis, whose mother is a member of the Stolen Generations, has stated that any “comparison to stolen generation is spitting on what those poor souls went through in those days” (Allam). There have also been reports of “Blackfishing” in some communities, a process that seeks to manipulate and capitalise on Black culture for economic and/or political gain (Stevens). Blackfishing has targeted remote Indigenous people by falsely associating COVID-19 vaccinations with a “new genocide”. Lorraine Anderson, member of the Kimberley Aboriginal Medical Service, has commented that “unfortunately, because of historical injustice around how the various governments have treated Indigenous people, there is an underlying mistrust of government information. So it’s a minefield for us to work our way around that” (Aboriginal Medical Services Alliance Northern Territory). This poses the question of how to successfully navigate such “minefields” and deliver verified information from trusted sources. Taming the Beast of Misinformation Indigenous peoples have long been aware of the risks of pandemics (Fredericks, Holcombe, and Bradfield) and were quick to implement the measures necessary to ensure the safety of their communities (Fredericks and Bradfield “Indigenous Australians and COVID-19” and “We Don’t Want”). In some locations, testing rates amongst Aboriginal peoples exceeded those of non-Indigenous populations (Wilson-Matenga et al.). Some communities were mobilising and working on messaging before the outbreak was officially declared a pandemic in March 2020 (Stefanoff). Furthermore, Indigenous communities in Victoria embraced vaccination at a rate that exceeded that of non-Indigenous Australians, the success being attributed to transparency, effective communication, and the trust placed in the Victorian Aboriginal Health Services (Syron). In September 2021, the National Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisation (NACCHO) organised a meeting with 14 Aboriginal church leaders to discuss the spread of misinformation (Jenkins). Led by NACCHO CEO Pat Turner and Minister for Indigenous Australians Ken Wyatt, the meeting provided an opportunity to discuss strategies to counter misinformation in ways that are culturally appropriate and respectful of communities’ beliefs (Wyatt). Minister Wyatt acknowledged that “uniting faith-based and medical messaging will be key to stamping out the dangerous rhetoric and boost vaccine uptake in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities” (Coughlan). National Cabinet also met in January 2022, recognising that “everyone was facing difficulties driving Indigenous vaccination rates given misinformation in parts of those [remote] communities" (Stayner). Vicki O’Donnell, the CEO of Kimberley Aboriginal Medical Services, has observed that over her 25-year career, this is the first instance of religious groups being active around the anti-vaccination space. Chief Executive of the Mallee District Aboriginal Services in Victoria Jacki Turfrey has called for more targeted responses to address and dispel each of the myths circulating, indicating that this burden often falls on the shoulders of frontline workers (Bain). Community health organisations and frontline workers have placed considerable time and energy in countering misinformation. In Western Australia, Yamatji Noongar community leader Sharon Wood-Kenney has talked through communities’ concerns in a manner that acknowledges the impact of past government policies such as the Stolen Generations and the understandable mistrust that has come from it, while reiterating the importance and relative low risk of vaccination (Bain). Principle 8 of the Roadmap to Recovery – an independent report devised by a taskforce made up of eight leading Australian universities – refers to the need to counter misinformation through increasing transparency, and in doing so, preventing “information gaps” being filled by conspiracy theories. Frontline Indigenous workers and community leaders who are knowledgeable in health practice, trusted members of their community, and are astute to the diversity of cultural protocols play a vital role in alleviating these gaps (Danchin et al.). Hyland-Wood, Gardner, Leask, and Ecker argue that while trust must be a two-way process between governments and communities, it should always be communicated by credible and trusted sources who have nuanced knowledge specific to particular socio-cultural contexts. Social media networks have provided many Indigenous people with access to information via trusted sources that counter and refute misinformation and/or anxieties associated with dominant heath advice and messaging (Carlson et al.; Fredericks and Bradfield “‘Seeking to Be Heard”; Fredericks et al.). Indigenous communities are taking charge in addressing vaccine hesitancy and the conspiracies often attached to them. COVID-19 has largely highlighted the strengths of Indigenous peoples’ capacity to mitigate risk by implementing the measures necessary for their specific local needs (Wilson-Matenga et al.). As social media is a popular outlet of communication for many Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, in both remote and urban settings (Carlson and Frazer), its ability to disseminate targeted information makes it particularly effective in educating and reassuring communities of the necessity, and relative low risk, of vaccination. Online trends such as posting photos and videos of Indigenous people getting vaccinated, situates the messaging within a local and relational setting.    Clear, transparent, and culturally appropriate language and imagery is vital to delivering health messaging. The Ampilatwatja community, for example, translated health messaging into culturally appropriate terms making it not only linguistically comprehensive but placing it within a familiar lived context. Social distancing was translated to ament angkem meaning “separate talking” while arteny, or “sitting down”, was used to explain lockdowns (Stefanoff). In Arnhem Land, the Yolngu word goŋwukundi, meaning a law determining what you can do and where you can go was used to explain “social distancing”. The concept of a virus which is present but invisible was explained via the phrase buwayak warrakan mala describing animals and birds who remain invisible. The importance of framing vaccination as a continuation of ongoing practices of keeping kin and Country healthy – demonstrated through memes such as “My mob said it was okay” (see Fig. 2) – cannot be understated. Fig. 2: uprisingofthepeople (2021) Responses to COVID-19 and the spread of misinformation must be forward-thinking, long-term, and holistic. Interventions and education should be responsive to varying levels of health literacy, as this, paired with disparate socio-economic status and inherent mistrust of mainstream authorities (Lewandowsky and Cook) have correlations to vaccination rates and one’s potential to turn to conspiracies (McCaffery et al.; Pickles et al.). This is exacerbated in “high-impact scenarios” where risk and high probability of a real or perceived threat increases anxieties and creates a “cognitive bias” that informs how such scenarios are understood and responded to (Kovic and Fuchslin). Vaccine hesitancy is best understood and addressed in relation to the interlocking factors that drive anxieties and limit vaccine uptake (Goorie; Fredericks et al.). Inoculation theory or pre-bunking, where communities are equipped with the health literacy needed to evaluate (mis)information before it takes hold (Cook et al.; Jolley and Douglas), can potentially address vaccine hesitancy by empowering communities with knowledge. Many Indigenous communities and organisations are already taking pre-bunking approaches. Organisations such Why Warriors, for example, have remained dedicated to providing accessible information that empowers Aboriginal communities to make informed decisions. Why Warriors, based in Yolngu Country in the Northern Territory has procured a range of resources including podcasts, radio outputs, videos, and in-person sessions held in Yolngu Matha language (Why Warriors). The organisation has observed that there is a great desire for in-depth scientific knowledge pertaining to the virus within Aboriginal communities; however, this is not always accessible due to language and cross-cultural barriers. The resources Why Warriors produce are based on an informed cross-cultural methodology that seeks to understand and respond to communities’ concerns and the drivers behind vaccine hesitancy. The information provided is based on medical and Indigenous knowledge, and is a direct response to the questions, information gaps, and contradictions prevalent in community. Why Warriors is just one example of culturally appropriate approaches to pre-bunking that “is not just about getting vaccinated but having a well-rounded understanding of the whole subject in order to deal with new developments and health issues in the future” (Trudgen et al. 3). The organisation with community organisations and frontline workers has successfully boosted vaccination rates, with estimates indicating that due to their community engagement on Elcho Island, and a presence during the Galiwin'ku Festival, vaccination rates increased from 30 inoculations to 80 per day (Trudgen et al.). Conclusion The word “conspire” derives from Latin, meaning to “breathe together” (Jane and Fleming). Co-designed Indigenous-led partnerships between governments (policymakers) and Indigenous communities are critical in ensuring that community leaders, organisations, and frontline workers are adequately resourced and financed so that health literacy can be improved as a protective strategy. For many Indigenous peoples, mistrust in government-led health interventions such as the COVID-19 vaccination rollout is a by-product of settler-colonialism informed by a history of state-sanctioned violence, invasion (of Country and body), and punitive measures of control. For some Indigenous people, conspiracies may provide an outlet through which to voice outrage at white systems of governance that are inherently violent and oppressive. While mistrust does not necessarily equate to a proclivity towards conspiracy theories, greater accessibility to misinformation online has provided fertile ground for an infodemic of manipulated and distorted facts, circulated for personal and/or ideological gain (Alam and Chu). The stakeholders who contributed to UQ’s study on COVID-19 responses in urban Indigenous communities expressed their grave concerns over the impact of spreading misinformation. Such mistruths have the potential of further infiltrating Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities, exacerbating pre-existing anxieties, breaking down trust and relationships, and having a ripple effect that places an already vulnerable population at further risk of succumbing to COVID-19. Throughout this article we have discussed the spread of misinformation primarily through conspiracy theories with religious connotations and that liken vaccination to the biblical reference of the “mark of the Beast”. It is important to note, however, that such claims represent an extremist view and have been refuted by religious leaders such as Aboriginal pastor Geoffrey Stoke and, at the highest level, Pope Francis. Within communities where distrust of government is ripe, and fears and lived experiences of disposition ongoing, rumours and misinformation can quickly spread via social networks. Whilst more needs to be done to regulate the spread of misinformation on social and online media, responses to information gaps and trust in health directives must be informed by Indigenous peoples, including the messaging. The stakeholders who took part in UQ’s study identified several touchpoints where interventions could help counter the spread of misinformation and the mistruths that compromise preventative behaviours. Some of these include: Substantiating medical messaging with the voices of Elders, leaders, and trusted community members. Increasing the Indigenous workforce to continue to provide trusted services, while also offsetting burnout. Provide greater resourcing and financing to existing services who are carrying the burden of countering misinformation, often from sources external to the community. Recognise that services and organisations may help engage Indigenous communities and provide access to verified information. Address the systemic and underlying social and health “gaps” that inform Indigenou s peoples’ vulnerabilities and contribute to a culture of mistrust in non-Indigenous authorities. Create and/or enforce the legal and political mechanisms that will ensure Indigenous representation across all levels of governments and provide a voice that may oversee the implementation of co-designed strategies. The burden carried as a result of spreading conspiracy theories can be alleviated by empowering Indigenous communities via decision-making and governance processes, creating structural and systemic change, closing pre-existing health gaps, improving health literacy, and increasing Indigenous representation in the workforce and across all levels of government, along with resourcing. Only when health systems “breathe together” with Indigenous peoples may the burden of the so-called Beast be overcome, and Indigenous and non-Indigenous peoples can collectively conspire towards equitable health outcomes.   References Aboriginal Medical Services Alliance Northern Territory. "Blackfishing Used to Spread Anti-Vax Message: From the Weekend Australian." Facebook 29 Jan. 2022. 30 Jan. 2022 〈 https://m.facebook.com/101029641248834/posts/651673502851109/ 〉 . Alam, Noore, and Cordia Chu. “Covid-19 Pandemic: Tackling ‘Infodemics’ through an Integrated One Health–Social Science Approach”. Proceedings of The Royal Society of Queensland 128 (2020). Allam, Lorena. "‘Tinfoil Hat Wearing Tossers’: Nt Chief Minister and Aboriginal Elders Hit Back at Covid ‘False Information’." The Guardian, 25 Nov. 2021. 3 Dec. 2021 〈 https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2021/nov/25/tinfoil-hat-wearing-tossers-nt-chief-minister-and-aboriginal-elders-hit-back-at-covid-false-information 〉 . Anderson, Warwick. The Cultivation of Whiteness: Science, Health, and Racial Destiny in Australia. Duke University Press, 2006. Andrews, Robert. "Using Conspiracy Theories to Teach Source Analysis." Teaching History 48.4 (2014): 64-65.  〈 https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.931043490998683 〉 . Bain, Lucy. "‘Myths’ Harmed Indigenous Vaccine Rate, Says Mdas." Sunraysia Daily, 6 Sep. 2021.  17 Sep. 2021 〈 https://www.sunraysiadaily.com.au/coronavirus-covid-19/5090523/myths-harmed-indigenous-vaccine-rate-says-mdas 〉 . Bargallie, Debbie. Unmasking the Racial Contract: Indigenous Voices on Racism in the Australian Public Service. Aboriginal Studies Press, 2020. Barkun, Michael. A Culture of Conspiracy. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2013. Bohlinger, Tavis. "The Covid Vaccine Has 666 Written All over It… and Why That Doesn’t Matter According to Revelation." theLAB 18 May 2020. 7 Sep. 2021 〉 https://academic.logos.com/the-covid-vaccine-has-666-written-all-over-it-and-why-that-doesnt-matter-according-to-revelation/ 〉 . Bottoms, Timothy, and Raymond Evans. “European Invasion of the Future Central Queensland.” In Conspiracy of Silence: Queensland's Frontier Killing-Times. Ed. T. Bottoms. Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin, 2013. 46–59. Bruns, Axel, Stephen Harrington, and Edward Hurcombe. "'Corona? 5G? Or Both?’: The Dynamics of COVID-19/5G Conspiracy Theories on Facebook." Media International Australia 177 (2020): 12-29.  〈 https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X20946113 〉 . Butts, Amber. "Even When Black Conspiracy Theories Are Misguided, They Are Not Nonsensical." Racebaitr 1 Oct. 2019. 18 Sep. 2021 〈 https://racebaitr.com/2019/10/01/even-when-black-conspiracy-theories-are-misguided-they-are-not-nonsensical/ 〉 . Byrne, Conor, Jack Hislop, and Adam Steer. "Doctor Warns Anti-Vax Rumours, 'All Sorts of Really Weird, Irrational Logic', Rife in Remote Communities." ABC News 30 Sep. 2021. 1 Oct. 2021 〈 https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-09-30/gp-warns-anti-vax-rumours-rife-in-remote-communities/100498322 〉 . Carlson, Bronwyn, and Ryan Frazer. "Social Media Mob: Being Indigenous Online." Sydney: Macquarie University, 2018.  Carlson, Bronwyn, Ryan Frazer, and Terri Farrelly. “‘That Makes All the Difference’: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health-Seeking on Social Media.” Health Promotion Journal of Australia 32.3 (2021): 523-531 〈 https://doi.org/10.1002/hpja.366 〉 . Coade, Melissa. “Minister Tries to Map Path to Boost Vaccine Rates among Indigenous Australians.” The Mandarin 7 Sep. 2021. 2 Oct. 2021 〈 https://www.themandarin.com.au/168042-minister-tries-to-map-path-to-boost-vaccine-rates-among-indigenous-australians/ 〉 . Compton, Josh, Sander van der Linden, John Cook, and Melisa Basol. "Inoculation Theory in the Post‐Truth Era: Extant Findings and New Frontiers for Contested Science, Misinformation, and Conspiracy Theories." Social and Personality Psychology Compass 15.6 (2021): e12602. 〈 https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12602 〉 . Cook, John, Stephan Lewandowsky, and Ullrich KH Ecker. "Neutralizing Misinformation through Inoculation: Exposing Misleading Argumentation Techniques Reduces Their Influence." PloS one 12.5 (2017): e0175799. 〈 https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.f17j3 〉 . Coughlan, Matt. “Indigenous Leaders in Talks over Jab Lies.” The Canberra Times 6 Sep. 2021. 10 Sep. 2021 〈 https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/7417592/indigenous-leaders-in-talks-over-jab-lies/ 〉 . Cromb, Nat. “COVOD-19 and Custody – Calls for Release.” IndigenousX 25 Mar. 2020. 17 July 2021 〈 https://indigenousx.com.au/covid-19-and-custody-calls-for-release/ 〉 . Danchin, Margie, Ruby Biezen, Jo-Anne Manski-Nankervis, Jessica Kaufman, and Julie Leask. "Preparing the Public for Covid-19 Vaccines: How Can General Practitioners Build Vaccine Confidence and Optimise Uptake for Themselves and Their Patients?" Australian Journal of General Practice 49.10 (2020): 625-29. 〈 https://doi.org/10.31128/ajgp-08-20-5559 〉 . Day, Madi, and Bronwyn Carlson. "White Supremacist and Far Right Ideology Underpin Anti-Vax Movements." The Conversation 22 Nov. 2021. 25 Nov. 2021 〈 https://theconversation.com/white-supremacist-and-far-right-ideology-underpin-anti-vax-movements-172289 〉 . De Pinho, Helen. "Systems Tools for Complex Health Systems: A Guide to Creating Causal Loop Diagrams." New York: Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 2015. 17-19. 〈 https://www.who.int/alliance-hpsr/resources/publications/CLD_Course_Participant_Manual.pdf 〉 . Dikian, Jack. "Why Tin Foil Hats Are Useful: Are Conspiracy Theories Just Part of Our Evolutionary History?" The Australian Rationalist 119 (2020): 7. 〈 https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.697637095504718 〉 . Doherty, Linda. "Joining the Dots: How Wide-Ranging Forces Are Undermining Public Health Responses to the Pandemic." Croakey Health Media 22 Sep. 2021. 25 Sep. 2021 〈 https://www.croakey.org/joining-the-dots-how-wide-ranging-forces-are-undermining-public-health-responses-to-the-pandemic/ 〉 .   Douglas, Karen M., Robbie M. Sutton, and Aleksandra Cichocka. "The Psychology of Conspiracy Theories." Current Directions in Psychological Science 26.6 (2017): 538-42. 〈 https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0963721417718261 〉 . Dwoskin, Elizabeth. "On Social Media, Vaccine Misinformation Mixes with Extreme Faith." The Washington Post 16 Feb. 2021. 21 July 2021 〈 https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/02/16/covid-vaccine-misinformation-evangelical-mark-beast 〉 . Faasse, Kate, and Jill Newby. "Public Perceptions of Covid-19 in Australia: Perceived Risk, Knowledge, Health-Protective Behaviors, and Vaccine Intentions." Frontiers in Psychology 11 (2020): 551004. 〈 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.551004 〉 . Fegebank, John. "Shifting the Blame: How a Condemnation of the Far Right Became an Open Attack on the Left." Guardian (Sydney). 1950 (2021): 10. 〈 https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.714239072430113 〉 . First Draft. "Vaccine Misinformation Insights Report: July." First Draft News 5 Aug. 2021. 18 Aug. 2021 〈 https://firstdraftnews.org/long-form-article/vaccine-misinformation-insights-report-july/ 〉 . Fredericks, Bronwyn. "'There Is Nothing That Identifies Me to That Place': Indigenous Women's Perceptions of Health Spaces and Places”. Critical Studies Review 15.2 (2009): 29- 44. 〈 https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.699277759963008 〉 . Fredericks, Bronwyn, and Abraham Bradfield. “Indigenous Australians and COVID-19: Highlighting Ongoing Food Security Issues.” International Journal of Home Economics 14.2 (2021): 53–65. 〈 https://www.ifhe.org/fileadmin/user_upload/e_Journal/vol_14_1/P4_Fredericks-Bradfield.pdf 〉 . Fredericks, Bronwyn, and Abraham Bradfield. “‘Seeking to Be Heard’: The Role of Social and Online Media in Advocating for the Uluru Statement from the Heart and Constitutional Reform in Australia.” Journal of Alternative & Community Media 6.1 (2021): 27-52. Fredericks, Bronwyn, and Abraham Bradfield. "We Don’t Want to Go Back to ‘Normal’, When ‘Normal’ Wasn’t Good for Everyone." Axon: Creative Explorations 10.2 (2020). 〈 https://axonjournal.com.au/issue-vol-10-no-2-dec-2020/we-don-t-want-go-back-normal-when-normal-wasn-t-good-everyone 〉 . Fredericks, Bronwyn, Abraham Bradfield, Jenny Nguyen, and Samar Ansell. “Disrupting the Colonial Algorithm: Indigenous Australia and Social Media.” Media International Australia (2021): 1–21. 〈 https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1329878X211038286 〉 . Fredericks, Bronwyn, Sarah Holcombe, and Abraham Bradfield. "Reconciliation Week: A Time to Reflect on Strong Indigenous Leadership and Resilience in the Face of a Pandemic." The Conversation, 29 May 2020. 29 May 2020 〈 https://theconversation.com/reconciliation-week-a-time-to-reflect-on-strong-indigenous-leadership-and-resilience-in-the-face-of-a-pandemic-139311 〉 . Fredericks, Bronwyn, James Ward, Sue McAvoy, Troy Combo, Shae Spierings, Abraham Bradfield, and Agnes Toth-Peter. "Innovative Research Explores Responses to Covid-19 among Indigenous Communities in Brisbane." Croakey Health Media 8 Sep. 2021. 8 Sep. 2021 〈 https://www.croakey.org/innovative-research-explores-responses-to-covid-19-among-indigenous-communities-in-brisbane/ 〉 . Frenkel, Sheera, Davey Alba, and Raymond Zhong. "Surge of Virus Misinformation Stumps Facebook and Twitter." The New York Times 8 Mar. 2020. 3 Nov. 2021 〈 https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/08/technology/coronavirus-misinformation-social-media.html 〉 . Goorie, Nayaka. “Why Vaccination Presents an Ethical Dilemma for Us, But Remains the Best Way to Keep Our Families Safe.” IndigenousX 12 Oct. 2021. 17 Oct. 2021 〈 https://indigenousx.com.au/why-vaccination-presents-an-ethical-dilemma-for-us-but-remains-the-best-way-to-keep-our-families-safe/ 〉 . Graham, Timothy, Axel Bruns, Guangnan Zhu, and Rod Campbell. "Like a Virus: The Coordinated Spread of Coronavirus Disinformation." Canberra: The Australia Institute, 2020. 〈 https://apo.org.au/node/305864 〉 . Group of Eight Australia. "Covid‐19: Roadmap to Recovery: A Report for the Nation." The Group of Eight Ltd, 2020. 〈 https://go8.edu.au/research/roadmap-to-recovery 〉 . Guerin, Cécile, Jacob Davey, Mario Peucker, and Thomas J. Fisher. "The Interplay between Australia's Political Fringes on the Right and Left: Online Messaging on Facebook." CRIS, 2020. 〈 https://www.isdglobal.org/isd-publications/interplay-australia-political-fringes/ 〉 . Hil, Richard. "Here We Go Again: The Conspiracy Theory Freight Train." Social Alternatives 39.3 (2020): 38-39. 〈 https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.767846130739955 〉 . Hokowhitu, Brendan. "Monster: Post-Indigenous Studies." Critical Indigenous Studies: Engagements in First World Locations. Ed. Aileen Moreton-Robinson. Arizona: University of Arizona Press, 2016. 83-101. Hyland-Wood, Bernadette, John Gardner, Julie Leask, and Ullrich K.H. Ecker. "Toward Effective Government Communication Strategies in the Era of Covid-19." Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 8.1 (2021): 1-11. 〈 https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00701-w 〉 . Jane, Emma A., and Chris Fleming. Modern Conspiracy: The Importance of Being Paranoid. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing USA, 2014. Jenkins, Keira. “Indigenous Pastors Link Up to Strike Down COVID Misinformation.” NITV 6 Sep. 2021. 15 Sep. 2021 〈 https://www.sbs.com.au/nitv/article/2021/09/06/indigenous-pastors-link-strike-down-covid-misinformation 〉 . Jolley, Daniel, and Karen M. Douglas. "Prevention Is Better than Cure: Addressing Anti‐Vaccine Conspiracy Theories." Journal of Applied Social Psychology 47.8 (2017): 459-69. 〈 https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1111/jasp.12453 〉 . Klein, Colin, Peter Clutton, and Vince Polito. "Topic Modeling Reveals Distinct Interests within an Online Conspiracy Forum." Frontiers in Psychology 9.189 (2018). 〈 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00189 〉 . Kovic, Marko, and Tobias Füchslin. "Probability and Conspiratorial Thinking." Applied Cognitive Psychology 32.3 (2018): 390-400. 〈 https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3408 〉 . Larrakia Nation. “Larrakia Please Be Aware…” Facebook 13 Sep. 2021. 17 Sep. 2021 〈 https://www.facebook.com/larrakianation/ 〉 . Letšosa, Rantoa. "What Has the Beast’s Mark to Do with the Covid-19 Vaccination, and What Is the Role of the Church and Answering to the Christians?" HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies 77.4 (2021). 〈 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/hts.v77i4.6480 〉 . Lewandowsky, Stephan, and John Cook. The Conspiracy Theory Handbook. Center for Climate Change Communication, George Mason University, 2020. 〈 http://sks.to/conspiracy 〉 .    Mangan, Sinead. “Covid Vax Conspiracies Spread Fear among Regional Indigenous Communities.” ABC Australia Wide 5 July 2021. 20 Aug. 2021 〈 https://www.abc.net.au/radio/programs/australia-wide/australia-wide/13422642 〉 . McCaffery, Kirsten, Rachael Dodd, Erin Cvejic, Julie Ayre, Carys Batcup, Jennifer Isautier, Tessa Copp, Carissa Bonner, Kristen Pickles, Brooke Nickel, Tom Dakin, Samuel Cornell, and Michael Wolf. "Disparities in Covid-19 Related Knowledge, Attitudes, Beliefs and Behaviours by Health Literacy." medRxiv (2020). 〈 https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.03.20121814 〉 . Monk, Paul. "Cognitive Snares: A Few Thoughts on Covid-19 Conspiracy Theories." The Australian Rationalist 117 (2020): 5-6. 〈 https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.696276888602870 〉 . Moreton-Robinson, Aileen. The White Possessive Property, Power and Indigenous Sovereignty. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2015. NACCHO. “Vaccine Conspiracies Target Vulnerable Communities.” NACCHO Aboriginal Health News 4 Sep. 2021. 19 Sep. 2021. 〈 https://nacchocommunique.com/2021/09/04/naccho-aboriginal-health-news-mon-6-7-21/ 〉 . Orr, Aleisha. "Covid-19 Conspiracy Theories Peddled to Aboriginal Communities by US-Based White Supremacists." National Indigenous Times 6 Dec. 2021. 6 Dec. 2021 〈 https://nit.com.au/covid-19-conspiracy-theories-peddled-to-aboriginal-communities-by-us-based-white-supremacists/ 〉 . O'Sullivan, John. "Bill Gates Admits Covid Vaccine Changes DNA, Now Doctors Rebel!" Principia Scientific International 5 Dec. 2020. 18 Feb. 2021 〈 https://principia-scientific.com/bill-gates-admits-covid-vaccine-changes-dna-now-doctors-rebel 〉 . Parke, Erin, and Jacqueline Lynch. "'Vaccine Is Satan' Rumours amid Low Indigenous Covid-19 Jab Rates." ABC News 6 Sep. 2021. 9 Sep. 2021 〈 https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-09-06/anti-vacc-church-speaks-out-against-misinformation/100430208 〉 . Pennycook, Gordon, Jonathon McPhetres, Yunhao Zhang, Jackson G. Lu, and David G. Rand. "Fighting Covid-19 Misinformation on Social Media: Experimental Evidence for a Scalable Accuracy-Nudge Intervention." Psychological Science 31.7 (2020): 770-80. 〈 https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0956797620939054 〉 . Pickles, Kristen, Erin Cvejic, Brooke Nickel, Tessa Copp, Carissa Bonner, Julie Leask, Julie Ayre, Carys Batcup, Samuel Cornell, Thomas Dakin, Rachael Dodd, Jennifer Isautier, and Kirsten McCaffery. "Covid-19: Beliefs in Misinformation in the Australian Community." Medrxiv (2020). 〈 https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.04.20168583 〉 . Pierre, Joseph M. "Mistrust and Misinformation: A Two-Component, Socio-Epistemic Model of Belief in Conspiracy Theories." Journal of Social and Political Psychology 8.2 (2020): 617-41. 〈 https://dx.doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v8i2.1362 〉 . Prasad, Amit. "Anti-Science Misinformation and Conspiracies: Covid–19, Post-Truth, and Science & Technology Studies (STS)." Science, Technology and Society Apr. 2021. 〈 https://doi.org/10.1177%2F09717218211003413 〉 . Rallah-Baker, Kris. “We Live in Dangerous Times, Not Unprecedented Times.” IndigenousX 26 Mar. 2020. 10 July 2021 〈 https://indigenousx.com.au/we-live-in-dangerous-times-not-unprecedented-times/ 〉 . Rendall, Jessica. "Coronavirus Fears Prompts Queensland Boarding School to Quarantine Students Returning from China." ABC News 28 Jan. 2020. 15 July 2021 〈 https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-01-28/coronavirus-queensland-boarding-school-quarantines-students/11903660 〉 . Richards, Abby, Eliza Borrello, and Tom Edwards. "Why Some Aboriginal People Are Too Scared to Get Vaccinated." ABC News 4 July 2021. 7 Sep. 2021 〈 https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-07-04/indigenous-covid-vaccine-pastor/100263770 〉 . Roose, Josh. "‘It’s Almost Like Grooming’: How Anti-Vaxxers, Conspiracy Theorists, and the Far-Right Came Together over Covid." The Conversation 21 Sep. 2021. 25 Sep. 2021 〈 https://theconversation.com/its-almost-like-grooming-how-anti-vaxxers-conspiracy-theorists-and-the-far-right-came-together-over-covid-168383 〉 .   Roussos, Eleni. "Remote Aboriginal Communities Battle Misinformation in Race against Time to Boost Vaccination Rates." ABC News 28 Oct. 2021. 30 Oct. 2021 〈 https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-10-28/nt-remote-communities-covid-vaccination-santa-teresa-ali-curung/10057223029 〉 . Russonello, Giovanni. "Afraid of Coronavirus? That Might Say Something about Your Politics." The New York Times 13 Mar. 2020. 6 Sep. 2021 〈 https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/13/us/politics/coronavirus-trump-polling.html 〉 .   Smith, Andrea C., Jacqueline Woerner, Rochelle Perera, Angela M. Haeny, and Jonathan M. Cox. "An Investigation of Associations between Race, Ethnicity, and Past Experiences of Discrimination with Medical Mistrust and Covid-19 Protective Strategies." Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities (2021): 1-13. 〈 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-021-01080-x 〉 . Stayner, Tom. "‘Misinformation’ Is Stalling Indigenous Vaccination Rates, National Cabinet Warns." SBS News 27 Jan. 2022.  29 Jan. 2022 〈 https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/misinformation-is-stalling-indigenous-vaccination-rates-national-cabinet-warns/s53sbbmo1 〉 .. Stefanoff, Lisa. "Whatever It Takes: The Politics of Indigenous Vulnerability and Extracted Futures in Northern Australia." Arena Quarterly 3 Sep. 2020. 2 Aug. 2021 〈 https://arena.org.au/whatever-it-takes-the-politics-of-indigenous-vulnerability-and-extracted-futures-in-northern-australia/ 〉 . Stevens, Wesley E. "Blackfishing on Instagram: Influencing and the Commodification of Black Urban Aesthetics." Social Media + Society 7.3 (2021). Syron, Mikele. "Victoria Sees First Nations Vaccine Success with Pfizer Rollout." NITV 16 July 2021. 5 Aug. 2021 〈 https://www.sbs.com.au/nitv/article/2021/07/13/victoria-sees-first-nations-vaccine-success-pfizer-rollout 〉 . Thomas, Zoe. "Coronavirus: How Facebook, Tiktok and Other Apps Tackle Fake Claims." BBC News 1 Feb. 2020. 15 Aug. 2021 〈 https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-51337357 〉 . Trudgen, Richard, Djiniyini Gondarra, and Kerry Mills. Proposal Covid-19 Community Education Program. Why Warriors, 2021. 〈 https://www.whywarriors.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/COMMUNITY-EDUCATION-TO-TACKLE-VACCINE-HESITANCY-IN-REMOTE-ABORIGINAL-COMMUNITIES-191021.pdf 〉 . Turner, Bryan S. "Theodicies of the Covid-19 Catastrophe." Covid-19. Ed. J. Michael Ryan. London: Routledge, 2020. 29-42. uprisingofthepeople. "My Mob Said It Was Okay." TikTok Sep 2021. 1 Oct. 2021. 〈 https://www.tiktok.com/@uprisingofthepeople/video/7010266225758571777 〉 . Vosoughi, Soroush, Deb Roy, and Sinan Aral. "The Spread of True and False News Online." Science 359.6380 (2018): 1146-51. 〈 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559 〉 . Waight, Nerita. “Urgent Action on Prisons to Avoid COVD-19 Deaths.” IndigenousX 20 Aug. 2020. 2 Sep. 2021 〈 https://indigenousx.com.au/urgent-action-on-prisons-to-avoid-covid-19-deaths/ 〉 . Weismueller, Jason, Jacob Shapiro, Jan Oldedan, and Paul Harrigan. "Coronavirus Misinformation Is a Global Issue, But Which Myth You Fall for Likely Depends on Where You Live." The Conversation 12 Aug. 2020. 3 Sep. 2021 〈 https://theconversation.com/coronavirus-misinformation-is-a-global-issue-but-which-myth-you-fall-for-likely-depends-on-where-you-live-143352 〉 . Why Warriors. "Why Warrirors." 19 Nov. 2021 〈 https://www.whywarriors.com.au/ 〉 . Wilson‐Matenga, Geraldine, Megan Campbell, Rachel Katterl, Elizabeth Ellis, and Robert Skeen. "Partnership, Trust and Respect: NSW's Response to Covid‐19 among Aboriginal People." Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 45.4 (2021): 315. 〈 https://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2F1753-6405.13138 〉 . World Health Organization. An Overview of Infodemic Management during Covid-19, January 2020–May 2021. 2021.  〈 https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240035966 〉 . Wyatt, Ken. "Aboriginal Christian Leadership Unite on Covid Messaging." Media Release. 6 Sep. 2021. 〈 https://nacchocommunique.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Media-Release-Min-Wyatt-mtg-with-religious-leaders-re-vax-misinfo-6.9.21.pdf 〉 .
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1441-2616
    RVK:
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Queensland University of Technology
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2018737-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Queensland University of Technology ; 2021
    In:  M/C Journal Vol. 24, No. 1 ( 2021-03-15)
    In: M/C Journal, Queensland University of Technology, Vol. 24, No. 1 ( 2021-03-15)
    Abstract: Introduction In 2017, 250 Indigenous delegates from across the country convened at the National Constitution Convention at Uluru to discuss a strategy towards the implementation of constitutional re form and recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples (Referendum Council). Informed by community consultations arising out of 12 regional dialogues conducted by the government appointed Referendum Council, the resulting Uluru Statement from the Heart was unlike any constitutional reform previously proposed (Appleby & Synot). Within the Statement, the delegation outlined that to build a more equitable and reconciled nation, an enshrined Voice to Parliament was needed. Such a voice would embed Indigenous participation in parliamentary dialogues and debates while facilitating further discussion pertaining to truth telling and negotiating a Treaty between Indigenous and non-Indigenous peoples. The reforms proposed are based on the collective input of Indigenous communities that were expressed in good faith during the consultation process. Arising out of a government appointed and funded initiative that directly sought Indigenous perspectives on constitutional reform, the trust and good faith invested by Indigenous people was quickly shut down when the Prime Minster, Malcolm Turnbull, rejected the reforms without parliamentary debate or taking them to the people via a referendum (Wahlquist Indigenous Voice Proposal; Appleby and McKinnon).  In this article, we argue that through its dismissal the government treated the Uluru Statement from the Heart as a passing phase or mere “thought bubble” that was envisioned to disappear as quickly as it emerged. The Uluru Statement is a gift to the nation. One that genuinely offers new ways of envisioning and enacting reconciliation through equitable relationships between Indigenous and non-Indigenous populations. Indigenous voices lie at the heart of reconciliation but require constitutional enshrinement to ensure that Indigenous peoples and cultures are represented across all levels of government. Filter Bubbles of Distortion Constitutional change is often spoken of by politicians, its critics, and within the media as something unachievable. For example, in 2017, before even reading the accompanying report, MP Barnaby Joyce (in Fergus) publicly denounced the Uluru Statement as “unwinnable” and not “saleable”. He stated that “if you overreach in politics and ask for something that will not be supported by the Australian people such as another chamber in politics or something that sort of sits above or beside the Senate, that idea just won't fly”. Criticisms such as these are laced with paternalistic rhetoric that suggests its potential defeat at a referendum would be counterproductive and “self-defeating”, meaning that the proposed changes should be rejected for a more digestible version, ultimately saving the movement from itself. While efforts to communicate the necessity of the proposed reforms continues, presumptions that it does not have public support is simply unfounded. The Centre for Governance and Public Policy shows that 71 per cent of the public support constitutional recognition of Indigenous Australians. Furthermore, an online survey conducted by Cox Inall Ridgeway found that the majority of those surveyed supported constitutional reform to curb racism; remove section 25 and references to race; establish an Indigenous Voice to Parliament; and formally recognise Indigenous peoples through a statement of acknowledgment (Referendum Council). In fact, public support for constitutional reform is growing, with Reconciliation Australia’s reconciliation barometer survey showing an increase from 77 per cent in 2018 to 88 per cent in 2020 (Reconciliation Australia). Media – whether news, social, databases, or search engines – undoubtedly shape the lens through which people come to encounter and understand the world. The information a person receives can be the result of what Eli Pariser has described as “filter bubbles”, in which digital algorithms determine what perspectives, outlooks, and sources of information are considered important, and those that are readily accessible. Misinformation towards constitutional reform, such as that commonly circulated within mainstream and social media and propelled by high profile voices, further creates what neuroscientist Don Vaughn calls “reinforcement bubbles” (Rose Gould). This propagates particular views and stunts informed debate. Despite public support, the reforms proposed in the Uluru Statement continue to be distorted within public and political discourses, with the media used as a means to spread misinformation that equates an Indigenous Voice to Parliament to the establishment of a new “third chamber” (Wahlquist ‘Barnaby’; Karp). In a 2018 interview, PM Scott Morrison suggested that advocates and commentators in favour of constitutional reform were engaging in spin by claiming that a Voice did not function as a third chamber (Prime Minister of Australia). Morrison claimed, “people can dress it up any way they like but I think two chambers is enough”. After a decade of consultative work, eight government reports and inquiries, and countless publications and commentaries, the Uluru Statement continues to be played down as if it were a mere thought bubble, a convoluted work in progress that is in need of refinement. In the same interview, Morrison went on to say that the proposal as it stands now is “unworkable”. Throughout the ongoing movement towards constitutional reform, extensive effort has been invested into ensuring that the reforms proposed are achievable and practical. The Uluru Statement from the Heart represents the culmination of decades of work and proposes clear, concise, and relatively minimal constitutional changes that would translate to potentially significant outcomes for Indigenous Australians (Fredericks & Bradfield). International examples demonstrate how such reforms can translate into parliamentary and governing structures. The Treaty of Waitangi (Palmer) for example seeks to inform Māori and Pākehā (non-Maori) relationships in New Zealand/Aotearoa, whilst designated “Māori Seats” ensure Indigenous representation in parliament (Webster & Cheyne). More recently, 17 of 155 seats were reserved for Indigenous delegates as Chile re-writes its own constitution (Bartlett; Reuters). Indigenous communities and its leaders are more than aware of the necessity of working within the realms of possibility and the need to exhibit caution when presenting such reforms to the public. An expert panel on constitutional reform (Dodson 73), before the conception of the Uluru Statement, acknowledged this, stating “any proposal relating to constitutional recognition of the sovereign status of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples would be highly contested by many Australians, and likely to jeopardise broad public support for the Panel’s recommendations”. As outlined in the Joint Select Committee’s final report on Constitutional Recognition relating to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples (Referendum Council), the Voice to parliament would have no veto powers over parliamentary votes or decisions. It operates as a non-binding advisory body that remains external to parliamentary processes. Peak organisations such as the Law Council of Australia (Dolar) reiterate the fact that the proposed reforms are for a voice to Parliament rather than a voice in Parliament. Although not binding, the Voice should not be dismissed as symbolic or something that may be easily circumvented. Its effectiveness lies in its ability to place parliament in a position where they are forced to confront and address Indigenous questions, concerns, opinions, and suggestions within debates before decisions are made.  Bursting the ‘Self-Referential Bubble’ Indigenous affairs continue to be one of the few areas where a rhetoric of bipartisan agreement is continuously referenced by both major parties. Disagreement, debate, and conflict is often avoided as governments seek to portray an image of unity, and in doing so, circumvent accusations of turning Indigenous peoples into the subjects of political point scoring. Within parliamentary debates, there is an understandable reservation and discomfort associated with discussions about what is often seen as an Indigenous “other” (Moreton-Robinson) and the policies that a predominantly white government enact over their lives. Yet, it is through rigorous, open, and informed debate that policies may be developed, challenged, and reformed. Although bipartisanship can portray an image of a united front in addressing a so-called “Indigenous problem”, it also stunts the conception of effective and culturally responsive policy. In other words, it often overlooks Indigenous voices. Whilst education and cultural competency plays a significant role within the reconciliation process, the most pressing obstacle is not necessarily non-Indigenous people’s inability to fully comprehend Indigenous lives and socio-cultural understandings. Even within an ideal world where non-Indigenous peoples attain a thorough understanding of Indigenous cultures, they will never truly comprehend what it means to be Indigenous (Fanon; de Sousa Santos). For non-Indigenous peoples, accepting one’s own limitations in fully comprehending Indigenous ontologies – and avoiding filling such gaps with one’s own interpretations and preconceptions – is a necessary component of decolonisation and the movement towards reconciliation (Grosfoguel; Mignolo). As parliament continues to be dominated by non-Indigenous representatives, structural changes are necessary to ensure that Indigenous voices are adequality represented. The structural reforms not only empower Indigenous voices through their inclusion within the parliamentary process but alleviates some of the pressures that arise out of non-Indigenous people having to make decisions in attempts to solve so-called Indigenous “problems”. Government response to constitutional reform, however, is ridden with symbolic piecemeal offerings that equate recognition to a form of acknowledgment without the structural changes necessary to protect and enshrine Indigenous Voices and parliamentary participation. Davis and her colleagues (Davis et al. “The Uluru Statement”) note how the Referendum Council’s recommendations were rejected by the then minister of Indigenous affairs Nigel Scullion on account that it privileged Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander voices. They note that, until the Referendum Council's report, the nation had no real assessment of what communities wanted. Yet by all accounts, the government had spent too much time talking to elites who have regular access to them and purport to speak on the mob's behalf. If he [Scullion] got the sense constitutional symbolism and minimalism was going to fly, then it says a lot about the self-referential bubble in which the Canberra elites live. The Uluru Statement from the Heart stands as testament to Indigenous people’s refusal to be the passive recipients of the decisions of the non-Indigenous political elite. As suggested, “symbolism and minimalism was not going to fly”. Ken Wyatt, Scullion’s replacement, reiterated the importance of co-design, the limitations of government bureaucracy, and the necessity of moving beyond the “Canberra bubble”. Wyatt stated that the Voice is saying clearly that government and the bureaucracy does not know best. It can not be a Canberra-designed approach in the bubble of Canberra. We have to co-design with Aboriginal communities in the same way that we do with state and territory governments and the corporate sector. The Voice would be the mechanism through which Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander interests and perspectives may be strategically placed within parliamentary dialogues. Despite accusations of it operating as a “third chamber”, Indigenous representatives have no interest in functioning in a similar manner to a political party. The language associated with our current parliamentary system demonstrates the constrictive nature of political debate. Ministers are expected to “toe the party line”, “crossing the floor” is presented as an act of defiance, and members must be granted permission to enter a “conscience vote”. An Indigenous Voice to Parliament would be an advisory body that works alongside, but remains external to political ideologies. Their priority is to seek and implement the best outcome for their communities. Negotiations would be fluid, with no floor to cross, whilst a conscience vote would be reflected in every perspective gifted to the parliament. In the 2020 Australia and the World Annual Lecture, Pat Turner described the Voice’s co-design process as convoluted and a continuing example of the government’s neglect to hear and respond to Indigenous peoples’ interests. In the address, Turner points to the Coalition of the Peaks as an exemplar of how co-design negotiations may be facilitated by and through organisations entirely formed and run by Indigenous peoples. The Coalition of the Peaks comprises of fifty Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community-controlled peak organisations and was established to address concerns relating to closing the gap targets. As Indigenous peak organisations are accountable to their membership and reliant on government funding, some have questioned whether they are appropriate representative bodies; cautioning that they could potentially compromise the Voice as a community-centric body free from political interference. While there is some debate over which Indigenous representatives should facilitate the co-design of a treaty and Makarrata (truth-telling), there remains a unanimous call for a constitutionally enshrined Voice to Parliament that may lead negotiations and secure its place within decision-making processes. Makarrata, Garma, and the Bubbling of New Possibilities  An Indigenous Voice to Parliament can be seen as the bubbling spring that provides the source for greater growth and further reform. The Uluru Statement from the Heart calls for a three-staged approach comprising of establishing an Indigenous Voice, followed by Treaty, and then Truth-Telling. This sequence has been criticised by some who prioritise Truth and Treaty as the foundation for reform and reconciliation. Their argument is based on the notion that Indigenous Sovereignty must first be acknowledged in Parliament through an agreement-making process and signing of a Treaty. While the Uluru Statement has never lost sight of treaty, the agreement-making process must begin with the acknowledgment of Indigenous people’s inherent right to participate in the conversation. This very basic and foundational right is yet to be acknowledged within Australia’s constitution. The Uluru Statement sets the Voice as its first priority as the Voice establishes the structural foundation on which the conversation pertaining to treaty may take place. It is through the Voice that a Makarrata Commission can be formed and Indigenous and non-Indigenous peoples may “come together after a struggle” – the translation of the word’s Yolngu origins (Gaykamangu; Pearson). Only then may we engage in truth telling and forge new paths towards agreement-making and treaty. This however raises the question as to how a Voice to Parliament may look and what outcomes it aims to achieve. As discussed in the previous section, it is a question that is often distorted by disinformation and conjecture within public, political, and news-media discourses. In order to unpack what a Voice to Parliament may entail, we turn to another Yolngu word, Garma. Garma refers to an epistemic and ontological positioning in which knowledge is attained from a point where differences converge and new insights arise. For Yolngu people, Garma is the place where salt and fresh water intersect within the sea. Fresh and Salt water are the embodiments of two Yolngu clans, the Dhuwa and Yirritja, with Garma referring to the point where the knowledge and laws of each clan come into contact, seeking harmonious balance. When the ebb and flow of the tides are in balance, it causes the water to foam and bubble taking on new form and representing innovative ideas and possibilities. Yolngu embrace thi s phenomenon as an epistemology that teaches responsibility and obligations towards the care of Country. It acknowledges the autonomy of others and finds a space where all may mutually benefit. When the properties of either water type, or the knowledge belonging a single clan dominates, ecological, social, political, and cosmological balance is overthrown. Raymattja Marika-Munungguritj (5) describes Garma as a dynamic interaction of knowledge traditions. Fresh water from the land, bubbling up in fresh water springs to make waterholes, and salt water from the sea are interacting with each other with the energy of the tide and the energy of the bubbling spring. When the tide is high the water rises to its full. When the tide goes out the water reduces its capacity. In the same way Milngurr ebbs and flows. In this way the Dhuwa and Yirritja sides of Yolngu life work together. And in this way Balanda and Yolngu traditions can work together. There must be balance, if not either one will be stronger and will harm the other. The Ganma Theory is Yirritja, the Milngurr Theory is Dhuwa. Like the current push for constitutional change and its rejection of symbolic reforms, Indigenous peoples have demanded real-action and “not just talk” (Synott “The Uluru statement”). In doing so, they implored that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples be involved in all decision-making processes, for they are most knowledgeable of their community’s needs and the most effective methods of service delivery and policy. Indigenous peoples have repeatedly expressed this mandate, which is also legislated under international law through the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Coming together after a struggle does not mean that conflict and disagreement between and amongst Indigenous and non-Indigenous communities will cease. In fact, in alignment with political theories such as agonism and pluralism, coming together within a democratic system necessitates a constructive and responsive embrace of different, competing, and in some cases incommensurable views. A Voice to Parliament will operate in a manner where Indigenous perspectives and truths, as well as disagreements, may be included within negotiations and debates (Larkin & Galloway). Governments and non-Indigenous representatives will no longer speak for or on behalf of Indigenous peoples, for an Indigenous body will enact its own autonomous voice. Indigenous input therefore will not be reduced to reactionary responses and calls for reforms after the damage of mismanagement and policy failure has been caused. Indigenous voices will be permanently documented within parliamentary records and governments forced to respond to the agendas that Indigenous peoples set. Collectively, this amounts to greater participation within the democratic process and facilitates a space where “salt water” and the “bubbling springs” of fresh water may meet, mitigating the risk of harm, and bringing forth new possibilities. Conclusion When salt and fresh water combine during Garma, it begins to take on new form, eventually materialising as foam. Appearing as a singular solid object from afar, foam is but a cluster of interlocking bubbles that gain increased stability and equilibrium through sticking together. When a bubble stands alone, or a person remains within a figurative bubble that is isolated from its surroundings and other ways of knowing, doing, and being, its vulnerabilities and insecurities are exposed. Similarly, when one bubble bursts the collective cluster becomes weaker and unstable. The Uluru Statement from the Heart is a vision conceived and presented by Indigenous peoples in good faith. It offers a path forward for not only Indigenous peoples and their future generations but the entire nation (Synott “Constitutional Reform”). It is a gift and an invitation “to walk with us in a movement of the Australian people for a better future”. Through calling for the establishment of an Indigenous Voice to Parliament, a Makarrata Commission, and seeking Truth, Indigenous advocates for constitutional reform are looking to secure their own foothold and self-determination. The Uluru Statement from the Heart is more than a “thought bubble”, for it is the culmination of Indigenous people’s diverse lived experiences, outlooks, perspectives, and priorities. When the delegates met at Uluru in 2017, the thoughts, experiences, memories, and hopes of Indigenous peoples converged in a manner that created a unified front and collectively called for Voice, Treaty, and Truth. Indigenous people will never cease to pursue self-determination and the best outcomes for their peoples and all Australians. As an offering and gift, the Uluru Statement from the Heart provides the structural foundations needed to achieve this. It just requires governments and the wider public to move beyond their own bubbles and avail themselves of different outlooks and new possibilities. References Anderson, Pat, Megan Davis, and Noel Pearson. “Don’t Silence Our Voice, Minister: Uluru Leaders Condemn Backward Step.” Sydney Morning Herald 20 Oct. 2017. 〈 https://www.smh.com.au/national/don-t-silence-our-voice-minister-uluru-leaders-condemn-backward-step-20191020-p532h0.html 〉 . Appleby, Gabrielle, and Megan Davis. “The Uluru Statement and the Promises of Truth.” Australian Historical Studies 49.4 (2018): 501–9. Appleby, Gabrielle, and Gemma Mckinnon. “Indigenous Recognition: The Uluru Statement.” LSJ: Law Society of NSW Journal 37.36 (2017): 36-39. Appleby, Gabrielle, and Eddie Synot. “A First Nations Voice: Institutionalising Political Listening. Federal Law Review 48.4 (2020): 529-542. Bailes, Morry. “Why the Law Council Backs an Indigenous Voice to Parliament.” InDaily 31 July 2018. 〈 https://indaily.com.au/opinion/2018/07/31/why-the-law-council-backs-an-indigenous-voice-to-parliament/ 〉 . Bartlett, John. "Chile’s Largest Indigenous Group Sees Opportunity in a New Constitution." New York Times, 16 Sep. 2020. 19 Nov. 2020 〈 https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/16/world/americas/chile-mapuche-constitution.html 〉 . Brennan, Bridget. “Indigenous Leaders Enraged as Advisory Board Referendum is Rejected by Malcolm Turnbull.” ABC News 27 Oct. 2017. 〈 https://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-10-27/indigenous-leaders-enraged-by-pms-referendum-rejection/9090762 〉 . Centre for Governance and Public Policy. OmniPoll Australian Constitutional Values Survey 2017. Griffith University: Centre for Governance and Public Policy, 30 Oct. 2017. 〈 https://news.griffith.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Griffith-University-UNSW-Australian-Constitutional-Values-Survey-Sept-2017-Results-2.pdf 〉 . Davidson, Helen, and Katherine Murphy. “Referendum Council Endorses Uluru Call for Indigenous Voice to Parliament.” The Guardian 17 July 2017. 〈 https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2017/jul/17/referendum-council-endorses-uluru-call-indigenous-voice-parliament 〉 . Davis, Megan. “Some Say a Voice to Parliament Is Toothless. But Together Our Voices Are Powerful.” The Guardian 13 Aug. 2020. 〈 https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/aug/13/some-say-a-voice-to-parliament-is-toothless-but-together-our-voices-are-powerful 〉 . ———. “No Time for the Meek.” The Monthly Oct. 2019. 〈 https://www.themonthly.com.au/issue/2019/october/1569370776/megan-davis/no-time-meek 〉 . ———. “Moment of Truth.” Quarterly Essay 69 (2019). 〈 https://www.quarterlyessay.com.au/content/correspondence-megan-davis 〉 . ———. “The Long Road to Uluru – Truth before Justice.” Griffith Review 2018. 〈 https://www.griffithreview.com/articles/long-road-uluru-walking-together-truth-before-justice-megan-davis/ 〉 . ———. “The Status Quo Ain’t Working: The Uluru Statement from the Heart Is the Blueprint for an Australian Republic.” The Monthly 7 June 2018. 〈 https://www.themonthly.com.au/blog/megan-davis/2018/07/2018/1528335353/status-quo-ain-t-working 〉 . Davis, Megan, Rosalind Dixon, Gabrielle Appleby, and Noel Pearson. “The Uluru Statement.” Bar News: The Journal of the NSW Bar Association Autumn (2018): 41–48. 〈 https://search-informit-com.au.ezproxy.library.uq.edu.au/fullText;dn=20180726000224;res=AGISPT 〉 . Davis, Megan, Cheryl Saunders, Mark McKenna, Shireen Morris, Christopher Mayes, and Maria Giannacopoulos. “The Uluru Statement from Heart, One Year On: Can a First Nations Voice Yet Be Heard?” ABC Religion and Ethics 26 May 2018. 〈 https://www.abc.net.au/religion/the-uluru-statement-from-heart-one-year-on-can-a-first-nations-v/10094678 〉 . De Sousa Santos, Boaventura. Epistemologies of the South: Justice against Epistemicide. Routledge, 2015. Dodson, P. 2012. Recognising Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples in the Constitution: Report of the Expert Panel. 〈 http://australianpolitics.com/downloads/issues/indigenous/12-01-16_indigenous-recognition-expert-panel-report.pdf 〉 . Dolar, Sol. “Law Council Explains Government’s Key Misunderstanding of the Uluru Statement.” Australasian Lawyer 5 Nov. 2019. 〈 https://www.thelawyermag.com/au/news/general/law-council-explains-governments-key-misunderstanding-of-the-uluru-statement/208247?m=1 〉 . Fanon, Frantz. The Wretched of the Earth. Macgibbon & Kee, 1965. Fredericks, Bronwyn, and Abraham Bradfield. “We Don’t Want to Go Back to ‘Normal’, When ‘Normal’ Wasn’t Good for Everyone.” Axon: Creative Explorations 10.2 (2020). 〈 https://www.axonjournal.com.au/issue-vol-10-no-2-dec-2020/we-don-t-want-go-back-normal-when-normal-wasn-t-good-everyone 〉 . Ford, Mazoe, and Clare Blumer. “Vote Compass: Most Australians Back Constitutional Recognition for Indigenous Australians.” ABC News 20 May 2016. 〈 https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-05-20/vote-compass-indigenous-recognition/7428030?nw=0 〉 . Gaykamangu, James, and Danial Terence Kelly. “Ngarra Law: Aboriginal Customary Law from Arnhem Land.” Northern Territory Law Journal 2.4 (2012): 236-248. Grant, Stan. “Three Years on From Uluru, We Must Lift the Blindfolds of Liberalism to Make Progress.” The Conversation 25 May 2020. 〈 https://theconversation.com/three-years-on-from-uluru-we-must-lift-the-blindfolds-of-liberalism-to-make-progress-138930 〉 . Grosfoguel, Ramón. "Decolonizing Post-Colonial Studies and Paradigms of Political Economy: Transmodernity, Decolonial Thinking, and Global Coloniality." Transmodernity 1.1 (2011): 1-36. Hunter, Fergus. “'It's Not Going to Happen': Barnaby Joyce Rejects Push for Aboriginal Body in Constitution.” Sydney Morning Herald 29 May 2017. 〈 https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/its-not-going-to-happen-barnaby-joyce-rejects-push-for-aboriginal-body-in-constitution-20170529-gwf5ld.html 〉 . Karp, Paul. “Scott Morrison Claims Indigenous Voice to Parliament Would Be a Third Chamber.” The Guardian, 26 Sep. 2018. 〈 https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2018/sep/26/scott-morrison-claims-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-would-be-a-third-chamber 〉 . Koziol, Michael. “Joyce Admits He Was Wrong to Call Indigenous Voice a 'Third Chamber’.” Sydney Morning Herald 18 July 2019. 〈 https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/barnaby-joyce-admits-he-was-wrong-to-call-indigenous-voice-a-third-chamber-20190718-p528ki.html 〉 . Larkin, Dani, and Kate Galloway. “Uluru Statement from the Heart: Australian Public Law Pluralism.” Bond Law Review 30.2 (2018): 335–345. Law Council of Australia. “Nothing ‘Un-Australian’ about Human Rights, the Constitution and the Rule of Law.” 14 Aug. 2017. 〈 https://www.lawcouncil.asn.au/media/media-releases/nothing-unaustralian-about-human-rights-the-constitution-and-the-rule-of-law 〉 . Law Council of Australia. “Law Council Supports Calls for Voice to Parliament.” 15 June 2018. 〈 https://www.lawcouncil.asn.au/media/media-releases/law-council-supports-calls-for-voice-to-parliament 〉 . Marika-Munugurritj, Raymattja. Workshops as Teaching Learning Environments. Paper presented to Yirrkala Action Group, 1992. Martin, Wayne AC. Constitutional Law Dinner 2018 Address by Wayne Martin AC Chief Justice of Western Australia. Sydney: Parliament House, 23 Feb. 2018. Mignolo, Walter. Local Histories/Global Designs: Coloniality, Subaltern Knowledges, and Border Thinking. Princeton University Press, 2012. Moreton-Robinson, Aileen. The White Possessive: Property, Power, and Indigenous Sovereignty. U of Minnesota P, 2015. Norman, Heidi. “From Recognition to Reform: The Uluru Statement from the Heart.” Does the Media Fail Aboriginal Political Aspirations? Eds. Amy Thomas, Andrew Jakubowicz, and Heidi Norman. Canberra: Aboriginal Studies Press, 2019. 216–231. Pearson, Luke. “What Is a Makarrata? The Yolngu Word Is More than a Synonym for Treaty.” ABC Radio National 10 Aug. 2017. 〈 https://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-08-10/makarrata-explainer-yolngu-word-more-than-synonym-for-treaty/8790452 〉 . Praiser, Eli. The Filter Bubble: How the New Personalized Web Is Changing What We Read and How We Think. Penguin, 2012. Prime Minister, Attorney General, and Minister for Indigenous Affairs. Response to Referendum Council's Report on Constitutional Recognition. 26 Oct. 2017. 〈 https://www.malcolmturnbull.com.au/media/response-to-referendum-councils-report-on-constitutional-recognition 〉 . Prime Minister of Australia. Radio interview with Fran Kelly. ABC Radio National 26 Sep 2018. 〈 https://www.pm.gov.au/media/radio-interview-fran-kelly-abc-rn 〉 . Reconciliation Australia. 2020 Australian Reconciliation Barometer, 2020. 〈 https://www.reconciliation.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/australian_reconciliation_barometer_2020_-full-report_web.pdf 〉 . Referendum Council. Referendum Council Final Report, 2017. 〈 https://www.referendumcouncil.org.au/sites/default/files/report_attachments/Referendum_Council_Final_Report.pdf 〉 . Reuters. "Chile Reserves Seats for Indigenous as It Prepares to Rewrite Constitution." Reuters, 16 Dec. 2020. 19 Nov. 2020 〈 https://www.reuters.com/article/chile-constitution-indigenous-idUSKBN28Q05J 〉 . Rose Gould, Wendy. “Are You in a Social Media Bubble? Here's How to Tell.” NBC News 22 Oct. 2019. 〈 https://www.nbcnews.com/better/lifestyle/problem-social-media-reinforcement-bubbles-what-you-can-do-about-ncna1063896 〉 . Rubenstein, Kim. “Power, Control and Citizenship: The Uluru Statement from the Heart as Active Citizenship.” Bond Law Review 30.1 (2018): 19-29. Synott, Eddie. “The Uluru Statement Showed How to Give First Nations People a Real Voice – Now It’s the Time for Action.” The Conversation 5 Mar. 2019. 〈 https://theconversation.com/the-uluru statement-showed-how-to-give-first-nations-people-a-real-voice-now-its-time-for-action-110707 〉 . ———. “Constitutional Reform Made Easy: How to Achieve the Uluru Statement and a Voice.” The Conversation 7 May 2019. 〈 https://theconversation.com/constitutional-reform-made-easy-how-to-achieve-the-uluru-statement-and-a-first-nations-voice-116141 〉 . Turner, Pat. “The Long Cry of Indigenous Peoples to Be Heard – a Defining Moment in Australia.” The 'Australia and the World' 2020 Annual Lecture. National Press Club of Australia, 30 Sep. 2020. 〈 https://ausi.anu.edu.au/events/australia-and-world-2020-annual-lecture-pat-turner-am 〉 . Wahlquist, Calla. “A Year On, the Key Goal of Uluru Statement Remains Elusive.” The Guardian 26 May 2018. 〈 https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2018/may/26/a-year-on-the-key-goal-of-uluru-statement-remains-elusive 〉 . ———. “Barnaby Joyce Criticised for Misinterpreting Proposed Indigenous Voice to Parliament.” The Guardian 29 May 2017. 〈 https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2017/may/29/barnaby-joyce-criticised-for-misinterpreting-proposed-indigenous-voice-to-parliament 〉 . ———. “Indigenous Voice Proposal ‘Not Desirable’, Says Turnbull.” The Guardian 26 Oct. 2017. 〈 https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2017/oct/26/indigenous-voice-proposal-not-desirable-says-turnbull 〉 . ———. “Turnbull’s Uluru Statement Rejection Is ‘Mean-Spirited Bastardry’ – Legal Expert.” The Guardian 26 Oct. 2017. 〈 https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2017/oct/26/turnbulls-uluru-statement-rejection-mean-spirited-bastardry-legal-expert 〉 . Wyatt, Ken. “Indigenous Australia: A New Way of Working.” 15 Sep. 2020. 〈 https://ministers.pmc.gov.au/wyatt/2020/indigenous-australia-new-way-working 〉 . Yunupingu, Galarrwuy. “Rom Watangu: An Indigenous Leader Reflects on a Lifetime Following the Law of the Land.” The Monthly (2016). Zillman, Stephanie. “Indigenous Advisory Body Would Be Supported by Australians, Survey Finds.” ABC News 30 Oct. 2017. 〈 https://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-10-30/australians-would-support-referendum-indigenous-voice-parliament/9101106 〉 .
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1441-2616
    RVK:
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Queensland University of Technology
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2018737-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...