Skip to main content
Log in

Early- Versus Late-Onset Prosthetic Mesh Infection: More than Time Alone

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prosthetic mesh used for ventral incisional hernia makes hernia repair surgery simple, effective, and safe. The mesh infection is a formidable complication and bimodal distribution. The differences between early- and late-onset are unknown. This is a cohort study of patients undergoing ventral incisional hernia (VIH) repair from January 2003 to September 2013. Data of specific risk variables were collected from electronic medical record systems in Jinling Hospital. And, the quality of lives was evaluated by WHO Quality of Life-BREF. A total of 102 VIH repair patients were analyzed and followed including the noninfection group and early- and late-onset group. There were significant differences between the early- and late-onset group in clinical manifestation, descriptive analysis of the study population, and postoperative quality of lives. These differences might imply the different pathophysiologic process of early- and late-onset mesh infection. Permanent prosthetic mesh should be used with caution, and the study of intraperitoneal onlay mesh is still needed in long-term follow-up.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Le Huu NR, Mege D, Ouaissi M et al (2012) Incidence and prevention of ventral incisional hernia. J Visc Surg 149:e3–e14

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lichtenstein IL, Shulman AG, Amid PK et al (1989) The tension-free hernioplasty. Am J Surg 157:188–193

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Burger JW, Luijendijk RW, Hop WC et al (2004) Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg 240:578–585

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Korenkov M, Sauerland S, Arndt M et al (2002) Randomized clinical trial of suture repair, polypropylene mesh or autodermal hernioplasty for incisional hernia. Br J Surg 89:50–56

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cobb WS, Carbonell AM, Kalbaugh CL et al (2009) Infection risk of open placement of intraperitoneal composite mesh. Am Surg 75:762–768

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sanchez VM, Abi-Haidar YE, Itani KM (2011) Mesh infection in ventral incisional hernia repair: incidence, contributing factors, and treatment. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 12:205–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hawn MT, Gray SH, Snyder CW et al (2011) Predictors of mesh explantation after incisional hernia repair. Am J Surg 202:28–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sahoo MR, Bisoi S, Mathapati S (2013) Polypropelene mesh eroding transverse colon following laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. J Minim Access Surg 9:40–41

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Moussi A, Daldoul S, Bourguiba B et al (2012) Gas gangrene of the abdominal wall due to late-onset enteric fistula after polyester mesh repair of an incisional hernia. Hernia 16:215–217

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sistla SC, Reddy R, Dharanipragada K et al (2008) Enterocutaneous fistula due to mesh fixation in the repair of lateral incisional hernia: a case report. Cases J 1:370

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Franz MG (2008) The biology of hernia formation. Surg Clin North Am 88:1–15

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Pomeroy IM, Tennant A, Young CA (2013) Rasch analysis of the WHOQOL-BREF in post polio syndrome. J Rehabil Med 45:873–880

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bothra R (1973) Late onset small bowel fistula due to tantalum mesh. Am J Surg 125:649–650

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shrivastava A, Gupta A, Gupta A et al (2013) Erosion of small intestine with necrotising fasciitis of over lying abdominal wall after expanded poly-tetrafluoroethylene mesh implantation: a rare complication after laparoscopic incisional hernia repair. J Minim Access Surg 9:138–140

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Voisard G, Feldman LS (2013) An unusual cause of chronic anemia and abdominal pain caused by transmural mesh migration in the small bowel after laparoscopic incisional hernia repair. Hernia 17:673–677

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Finan KR, Vick CC, Kiefe CI et al (2005) Predictors of wound infection in ventral hernia repair. Am J Surg 190:676–681

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Murray BW, Cipher DJ, Pham T et al (2011) The impact of surgical site infection on the development of incisional hernia and small bowel obstruction in colorectal surgery. Am J Surg 202:558–560

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Welty G, Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B et al (2001) Functional impairment and complaints following incisional hernia repair with different polypropylene meshes. Hernia 5:142–147

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, Conze J et al (1998) Modified mesh for hernia repair that is adapted to the physiology of the abdominal wall. Eur J Surg 164:951–960

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cuccurullo D, Piccoli M, Agresta F et al (2013) Laparoscopic ventral incisional hernia repair: evidence-based guidelines of the first Italian Consensus Conference. Hernia 17:557–566

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Skevington SM, Lotfy M, O’Connell KA (2004) The World Health Organization’s WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL group. Qual Life Res 13:299–310

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lauscher JC, Loh JC, Rieck S et al (2013) Long-term follow-up after incisional hernia repair: are there only benefits for symptomatic patients? Hernia 17:203–209

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by an unrestricted grant from the Jiangsu Province’s Outstanding Medical Academic Leader program (No. LJ200610) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81270945 and No.81200327). The authors are grateful to Prof. Yuxiu Liu and Prof. Jinyan Yan for their help in statistics and editing of this article.

Conflict of Interest

The authors of this research declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yousheng Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kong, W., Wang, J., Mao, Q. et al. Early- Versus Late-Onset Prosthetic Mesh Infection: More than Time Alone. Indian J Surg 77 (Suppl 3), 1154–1158 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-015-1225-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-015-1225-8

Keywords

Navigation