Skip to main content
Log in

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of prolonged oral etoposide in women with metastatic breast cancer

  • Original Article
  • Etoposide, Pharmacology, Breast Cancer
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of prolonged oral etoposide chemotherapy were investigated in 15 women with metastatic breast cancer who received oral etoposide 100 mg as a single daily dose for up to 15 days. There was considerable interpatient variability in the day 1 pharmacokinetic parameters: area under the plasma concentration time curve (AUC) (0–24 h) 1.95±0.87 mg/ml per min (mean ± SD), apparent oral clearance 60.9±21.7 ml/min per 1.73 m2, peak plasma concentration 5.6±2.5 μg/ml, time to peak concentration 73±35 min and half-life 220±83 min. However, intrapatient variability in systemic exposure to etoposide was much less with repeated doses. The intrapatient coefficient of variation (CV) of AUC for day 8 relative to day 1 was 20% and for day 15 relative to day 1 was 15%, compared to the day 1 interpatient CV of 45%. Neutropenia was the principal toxicity. Day 1 pharmacokinetic parameters were related to the percentage decrease in absolute neutrophil count using the sigmoidal Emax equation. A good fit was found between day 1 AUC and neutrophil toxicity (R 2=0.77). All patients who had a day 1 AUC>2.0 mg/ml per min had WHO grade III or IV neutropenia. The predictive performance of the models for neutrophil toxicity was better for AUC (percentage mean predictive error 5%, percentage root mean square error 18.1%) than apparent oral clearance, peak plasma concentration, or daily dose (mg/m2). A limited sampling strategy was developed to predict AUC using a linear regression model incorporating a patient effect. Data sets were divided into training and test sets. The AUC could be estimated using a model utilizing plasma etoposide concentration at only two time points, 4 h and 6 h after oral dosing (R 2=98.9%). The equation AUCpr=−0.376+0.631×C4h+0.336×C6h was validated on the test set with a relative mean predictive error of −0.88% and relative root mean square error of 6.4%. These results suggest monitoring of AUC to predict subsequent myelosuppression as a strategy for future trials with oral etoposide.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Calvert AH, Lind MJ, Millward MJ, Cantwell BMJ, Gumbrell L, Proctor M, Simmons D, Chapman F, Robinson A, Charlton C, Balmanno K, Newell D (1993) Long-term oral etoposide in metastatic breast cancer: clinical and pharmacokinetic results. Cancer Treat Rev 19 [Suppl C]: 27

    Google Scholar 

  2. Clark PI, Cottier B (1992) The activity of 10-, 14-, and 21-day schedules of single-agent etoposide in previously untreated patients with extensive small cell lung cancer. Semin Oncol 19 [Suppl 14]: 36

    Google Scholar 

  3. D'Incalci M, Rossi C, Zucchetti M, Urso R, Cavalli F, Mangioni C, Willems Y, Sessa C (1986) Pharmacokinetics of etoposide in patients with abnormal renal and hepatic function. Cancer Res 46: 2566

    Google Scholar 

  4. Falkson G, Dyk J van, Eden EB van, Merwe AM van der, Burgh JA van den, Falkson HC (1975) A clinical trial of oral form of 4-demethyl-epipodophyllotoxin-B-dethylidine glucoside (NSC 141540) VP16-213 Cancer 35: 1141

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gaast A van der, Vlastuin M, Kok TC, Splinter TAW (1992) What is the optimal dose and duration of treatment with etoposide? II. Comparative pharmacokinetic study of three schedules: 1×100 mg, 2×50 mg, and 4×25 mg of oral etoposide daily for 21 days. Semin Oncol 19 [suppl 14]: 8

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gentili D, Zucchetti M, Torri V, Jong J de, Cavalli F, D'Incalci M (1993) A limited sampling model for the pharmacokinetics of etoposide given orally. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 32: 482

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hainsworth JD, Johnson DH, Frazier SR, Greco FA (1990) Chronic daily administration of oral etoposide in refractory lymphoma. Eur J Cancer 26: 818

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hande KR, Krozely MG, Greco FA, Hainsworth JD, Johnson DH (1993) Bioavailability of low-dose oral etoposide. J Clin Oncol 11: 374

    Google Scholar 

  9. Harvey VJ, Slevin ML, Joel SP, Smythe MM, Johnston A, Wrigley PFM (1985) Variable bioavailability following repeated oral doses of etoposide. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 21: 1315

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hill BT, Whelan RDH, Rupniak HT, Dennis DY, Rosholt MA. (1981) A comparative assessment of the in vitro effect of drugs on cells by means of colony assays or flow microfluorimetry. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 7: 21

    Google Scholar 

  11. Joel SP, Dolega-Ossowski E, Jones K, Clark PI, Johnson P, Slevin ML (1991) The bioavailability of oral etoposide during prolonged administration and the development of a limited sampling strategy for the estimation of AUC after an oral dose. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 32: 178

    Google Scholar 

  12. Joel SP, Clark PI, Slevin ML (1992) Risk factors which predict for haematological toxicity with etoposide. Br J Cancer 65 [Suppl 1]: 11

    Google Scholar 

  13. Johnson DH, Greco FA, Strupp J, Hande KR, Hainsworth JD (1990) Prolonged administration of oral etoposide in patients with relapsed or refractory small-cell lung cancer. A phase II trial. J Clin Oncol 8: 1613

    Google Scholar 

  14. Miller AA, Tolley EA, Niell HB, Griffin JP, Mauer AM (1993) Pharmacodynamics of prolonged oral etoposide in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 11: 1179

    Google Scholar 

  15. Miller JC, Einhorn LH (1990) Phase II study of daily oral etoposide in refractory germ cell tumors. Semin Oncol 17 [Suppl 2]: 36

    Google Scholar 

  16. O'Dwyer PJ, Leyland-Jones B, Alonso MT, Marsoni S, Wittes RE (1985) Etoposide (VP-16-213): Current status of an active anticancer drug. N Engl J Med 312: 692

    Google Scholar 

  17. Palombo H, Estape J, Vinolas N, Grau JJ, Mane JM, Danielas M, Mellado B (1994) Chronic oral etoposide in advanced breast cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 33: 527

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pfluger K-H, Schmidt L, Mertal M, Jungclas H, Havemann K (1987) Drug monitoring of etoposide (VP16-213): correlation of pharmacokinetic parameters to clinical and biochemical data from patients receiving etoposide. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 29: 59

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rowinsky EK, Donehower RC (1992) Vinca alkaloids and podophyllotoxins. In: Perry MC (ed) The chemotherapy source book. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, p 359

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sessa C, Zuchetti M, Torri V, Pagani O, D'Incalci M, Gentili D, Martinelli G, deJong J, Alerci M, Cavalli F (1993) Chronic oral etoposide in small-cell lung cancer: clinical and pharmacokinetic results. Ann Oncol 4: 553

    Google Scholar 

  21. Seymour MT, Mansi JL, Gallagher CJ, Gore ME, Harper PG, Evans TRJ, Edmonds PM, Slevin ML (1994) Protracted oral etoposide in epithelial ovarian cancer: a phase II study in patients with relapsed or platinum-resistant disease. Br J Cancer 69: 191

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sheiner LB, Beal SL (1981) Some suggestions for measuring predictive performance. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 9: 503

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sinkule JA, Hutson P, Hayes FA, Etcubanas E, Evans W (1984) Pharmacokinetics of etoposide in children and adolescents with refractory solid tumours. Cancer Res 44: 3109

    Google Scholar 

  24. Slevin ML, Clark PI, Joel SP, Malik S, Osborne RJ, Gregory WM, Lowe DG, Reznek RH, Wrigley PFM (1989) A randomized trial to examine the effect of schedule on the activity of etoposide in small cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 7: 133

    Google Scholar 

  25. Slevin ML, Joel SP, Whomsley R, Devenport K, Harvey VJ, Osborne RJ, Wrigley PFM (1989) The effect of dose on the bioavailability of etoposide: confirmation of a clinically relevant observation. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 24: 329

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wander HE, Rauschning W, Meyer D, Achterrath W, Nagel G-A (1989) Phase II study with etoposide in previously untreated advanced breast cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 24: 261

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wittes RE (1985) Compilation of phase II results with single antineoplastic agents. Cancer Treat Symposia 4: 1

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Division of Haematology and Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, Locked Bag 1, A'Beckett St, Melbourne 3000, Australia

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Millward, M.J., Newell, D.R., Yuen, K. et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of prolonged oral etoposide in women with metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 37, 161–167 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00685644

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00685644

Key words

Navigation