References
Anderson, A. R. andNuel D. Belnap, Jr. “Tautological Entailments”,Philosophical Studies, XIII (1962), 9–24.
Belnap, Nuel D, Jr.,A Formal Analysis of Entailment, New Haven, 1960.
Geach, Peter T., et al. “Symposium: Entailment”,Proceedings of the Arstotelian Society, Supplementary Volume LVIII (1958), 123–172.
Lewis, C. I. A Survey of Symbolic Logic. Berkeley, 1918; New York, 1960.
Lewis, C. J. andC. H. Langford Symbolic Logic. New York, 1932.
Moore, G. E., “External and Internal Relation”, inPhilosophical Studies 276–309. London, 1922.
Nelson, E. J., “Internaional Relations”,Mind. N.S. LXV (1930), 440–453.
Nelson, E. J. “On Three Logical Principles in Intension”,Monist, XLIII (1933), 268–284.
Strawson, P. F., “Necessary Propositions and Entailment-Statements”,Mind., N. S., LVII (1948), 184–200.
Vonn Wright, G., “The Concept of Entailment”, inLogical Studies, 166–191, London, 1957.
Woods, John, “On Arguing About Entailment”,Dialogue, III (1965), 405–421.
Woods, John. “On How Not toInvalidate Disjunctive Syllogism”Logique et Analyse, 32 (1965), 312–319.
Woods, John, “Relevance-Revisited: A Reply to Hockney and Wilson”,Logique et Analyse, 35–36 (1966). 364–371.
Woods, John. “Non-Paradoxical Paradoxes?”,Notre Dame Journal of on Formal Logïc, Forthcoming.
Woods, John. “Is There a Relation of Intensional Conjuction?”,Mind, N. S., 76 (1967) 357–368.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Allatum est die 7 Junii 1968
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Woods, J. Intensional relations. Stud Logica 25, 61–73 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02297274
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02297274