Skip to main content
Log in

‘Contractual’ and ‘cooperative’ civic engagement: The emergence and roles of ‘flood action groups’ in England and Wales

  • Report
  • Published:
Ambio Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Devolution of responsibilities is transforming how flood risk is managed in many countries. Research assessing the emergence and role of a new element in the governance of flood risk management in England explored the numerous ‘flood action groups’ that have developed over the last decade. We identified two broad categories of relationship between the public and authorities. The first displays ‘contractual’ characteristics: a level of protection provided by the authority in exchange for taxes or similar support. The second embodies a ‘collaborative’ relationship: public knowledge, social and financial resources are equal and complementary to those of authority, and seeking ‘collective security’. In general, the former were more successful than the latter, but common lessons were that success in FRM should not be defined purely as the ability to prevent flooding, but as the ability to access a variety of resources across different levels of society at different stages of flood risk management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Adger, W.N., J. Barnett, K. Brown, N. Marshall, and K. O’Brien. 2013. Cultural dimensions of climate change impacts and adaptation. Nature Climate Change 3: 112–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchecker, M., G. Salvini, G. Di Baldassarre, E. Semenzin, E. Maidl, and A. Marcomini. 2013. The role of risk perception in making flood risk management more effective. Natural Hazards & Earth System Sciences 13: 3013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Defra (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs). 2004. Making space for water: Developing a new government strategy for flood and coastal erosion risk management. London: Defra.

  • Denzin, N.K., and Y.S. Lincoln. 2000. Handbook of qualitative research, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra). 2010. Future funding for flood and coastal erosion risk management: Consultation on the future Capital Grant-In-Aid allocation process in England. London: Defra.

  • Environment Agency. 2010. FDGiA allocations for 2010/11 to 2014/15. Open Board Meeting 9 February 2010. Bristol: EA.

  • Gauthier, D. 1977. The social contract as ideology. Philosophy & Public Affairs 6: 130–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geaves, L.H. 2012. Emergence, interpretations and impacts of civic engagement in flood risk management in England and Wales. Unpublished M.Phil. thesis, University of Oxford.

  • Giddens, A. 2013. The third way: The renewal of social democracy. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harker, R. 2011. Standard Note: Voluntary Sector Statistics. House of Commons Library. SN/SG/5428.

  • Harries, T., and E.C. Penning-Rowsell. 2010. Victim pressure, institutional inertia and climate change adaptation: The case of flood risk. Global Environmental Change 21(1): 188–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. 1945. The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review 35: 519–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T. 1969. Leviathan, 1651. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C.L., and S.J. Priest. 2008. Flood risk management in england: A changing landscape of risk responsibility? Water Resources Development 24: 513–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kates, R.W. 1962. Hazard and choice perception in flood plain management. Research paper 78. University of Chicago, IL: Department of Geography.

  • Kisby, B. 2010. The big society: Power to the people? The Political Quarterly 8: 484–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, S.N., N. Odoni, C. Landstroem, S.J. Whatmore, N. Ward, and S. Bradley. 2011. Doing flood risk science differently: An experiment in radical scientific method. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 36: 15–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichterman, P. 2009. Social capacity and the styles of group life some inconvenient wellsprings of democracy. American Behavioral Scientist 52: 846–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNally, C. 2014. Partnership funding—Early indications of the impacts of Defra’s change in approach to capital funding for flood and coastal erosion risk management projects. Paper, CIWEM Rivers and Coastal Group Annual Conference, 30 January 2014, London.

  • Organski, A.F.K. 1968. World politics, 2nd ed. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. 1999. Coping with tragedies of the commons. Annual Review of Political Science 2: 493–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl, C., and M. Hare. 2004. Processes of social learning in integrated resources management. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology 14: 193–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penning-Rowsell, E.C., D.J. Parker, and D.M. Harding. 1986. Floods and drainage: British policies for hazard reduction, agricultural improvement and wetland conservation. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitt, M. 2008. Learning lessons from the 2007 floods. London: The Pitt Review Cabinet Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, F., and M. Geoghegan. 2004. The politics of community development: Reclaiming civil society or reinventing governance. Dublin: A & A Farmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prugh, T., R. Constanza, and H. Daly. 2000. The local politics of global sustainability. Washington DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rykiel, E.J. 1985. Towards a definition of ecological disturbance. Australian Journal of Ecology 10: 361–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayers, P., G. Galloway, E.C. Penning-Rowsell, et al. 2014. Strategic flood management: Ten ‘Golden Rules’ to guide a sound approach. The International Journal of River Basin Management 1: 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tammen, R. 2000. Power Transitions: Strategies for the 21st century. New York: Chatham House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, M. (2012). Textual Analysis Information. www.textualanalysis.info.

  • Wilby, R.L., and R. Keenan. 2012. Adapting to flood risk under climate change. Progress in Physical Geography. doi:10.1177/0309133312438908.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, Iris. 2000. Inclusion and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edmund C. Penning-Rowsell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Geaves, L.H., Penning-Rowsell, E.C. ‘Contractual’ and ‘cooperative’ civic engagement: The emergence and roles of ‘flood action groups’ in England and Wales. Ambio 44, 440–451 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0576-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0576-x

Keywords

Navigation