Danger of zooplankton feeding : the fluid signal generated by ambush-feeding copepods
Danger of zooplankton feeding : the fluid signal generated by ambush-feeding copepods
Date
2010-06
Authors
Kiørboe, Thomas
Jiang, Houshuo
Colin, Sean P.
Jiang, Houshuo
Colin, Sean P.
Linked Authors
Alternative Title
Citable URI
As Published
Date Created
Location
DOI
Related Materials
Replaces
Replaced By
Keywords
Viscous vortex ring
Copepod jump
Acartia tonsa
Optimal foraging
Copepod jump
Acartia tonsa
Optimal foraging
Abstract
Zooplankton feed in either of three ways: they generate a feeding current, cruise through
the water, or they are ambush feeders. Each mode generates different hydrodynamic disturbances
and hence exposes the grazers differently to mechanosensory predators. Ambush feeders sink
slowly and therefore perform occasional upward repositioning jumps. We quantified the fluid
disturbance generated by repositioning jumps in a mm-sized copepod (Re ~ 40). The kick of the
swimming legs generates a viscous vortex ring in the wake; another ring of similar intensity but
opposite rotation is formed around the decelerating copepod. A simple analytical model, that of an
impulsive point force, properly describes the observed flow field as a function of the momentum of
the copepod, including the translation of the vortex and its spatial extension and temporal decay.
We show that the time-averaged fluid signal and the consequent predation risk is much less for an
ambush feeding than a cruising or hovering copepod for small individuals, while the reverse is true
for individuals larger than about 1 mm. This makes inefficient ambush feeding feasible in small
copepods and is consistent with the observation that ambush feeding copepods in the ocean are all
small, while larger species invariably use hovering or cruising feeding strategies.
Description
Author Posting. © The Authors, 2010. This is the author's version of the work. It is posted here by permission of The Royal Society for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 277 (2010): 3229-3237, doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.0629.