医療薬学
Online ISSN : 1882-1499
Print ISSN : 1346-342X
ISSN-L : 1346-342X
一般論文
患者ベネフィットおよび安全性確保のためのジェネリック医薬品選択基準[Ⅲ]
「チモロールマレイン酸塩配合点眼液」の先発医薬品および後発医薬品における製剤学的特性および患者アンケートによる使用感比較研究
和田 侑子野澤 充後藤 美穂下川 健一石井 文由
著者情報
ジャーナル フリー

2015 年 41 巻 6 号 p. 394-403

詳細
抄録

The pH, osmolality, surface tension, and viscosity were measured in Timoptol® 0.25% and 0.5% w/v ophthalmic solutions containing timolol maleate, its 7 generic drugs, and Timoptol® XE and Rysmon® TG, which have the same composition and pharmacological effect but are administered by different methods, and their pharmaceutical properties were compared. The force required to deliver a single drop from various ophthalmic solution bottles (the squeeze force) was measured and usability was evaluated on a 6-point scale.
The results obtained showed that the pH values of the medicines tested in this study ranged from pH 6.7 to pH 7.5. The osmotic pressure ratios of the various ophthalmic solutions were between 1.0 and 1.5. The surface tensions of the various ophthalmic solutions were between 41 and 71 dynes/cm at 25℃. The viscosities of Timoptol® XE and Rysmon® TG were higher than those of the other preparations.
These results may have been due to different additives being contained at different proportions. The force required to deliver a single drop of Timoleate®PF was the highest. In addition, usability, which was evaluated using a 6-point scale in the present study, strongly correlated with the force required to deliver a single drop. Timoleate® PF may be less comfortable to use, but has the benefit of being “preservative-free.” These results suggest that generic drugs need to be selected that are not only cost-effective, but also match the individual requests of patients, for example, a good feeling without causing pain in the eyes when applied, the good usability of the bottle, or safety when applied for a long period.

著者関連情報
© 2015 日本医療薬学会
前の記事 次の記事
feedback
Top