Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton February 7, 2020

The memory of judgment: The Holocaust, witnesses and mediocrity in William Gass’s Middle C

  • Fan Fang

    Fan Fang is a Professor of English in School of International Studies, Zhejiang University. She got her PhD from Xiamen University (2005). Her research interests and publications are in the area of English and American Literature, and also Australian literature. She was a visiting scholar in English Department, Harvard University (2008–2009) and a senior visiting scholar in Faculty of English, Cambridge University, UK (July-August, 2015). She is entitled Qiushi Young Scholar at Zhejiang University, and accepted in 151 Talent Program of Zhejiang Province. Now she is general secretary of Association of Foreign Languages and Literature in Zhejiang Province. Address for correspondence: School of International Studies, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, 310058, China. Email: hzhzdonna@zju.edu.cn

    EMAIL logo
    and Zhixiang Gao

    Zhixiang Gao is a PhD candidate at Zhejiang University. Her research interest lies in studies of English and American Literature, and also Australian literature. Address for correspondence: School of International Studies, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, 310058, China. Email: 11705007@zju.edu.cn

Abstract

The memory of judgment and the Holocaust is of great interest in postmodernists’ writings. The relationship between postmodernism and the Holocaust is always paradoxically juxtaposed. William Gass, an American postmodern writer and critic, touches the topic of the Holocaust in his masterpiece Middle C (2013). Gass tends to trivialize fascism to every man and every ordinary life, to disrespect the “sacred”. The novel has the skill in faking the identity or the details of its putative history. Is the Holocaust a subcategory of war crimes or the inhumanity of genocide? Is there any reliable way of establishing the reality of the Holocaust either through the memory of groups or individuals? Are genocide and occasional or no systematic atrocities the inevitability of a state? In this paper, we tend to explore the collective memory and individual memory of witnesses of the Holocaust presented in Middle C and the puzzlement of judgment as a war crime or inhuman genocide, thus arguing the ethos of history and shock of mediocrity in our daily life.

About the authors

Fan Fang

Fan Fang is a Professor of English in School of International Studies, Zhejiang University. She got her PhD from Xiamen University (2005). Her research interests and publications are in the area of English and American Literature, and also Australian literature. She was a visiting scholar in English Department, Harvard University (2008–2009) and a senior visiting scholar in Faculty of English, Cambridge University, UK (July-August, 2015). She is entitled Qiushi Young Scholar at Zhejiang University, and accepted in 151 Talent Program of Zhejiang Province. Now she is general secretary of Association of Foreign Languages and Literature in Zhejiang Province. Address for correspondence: School of International Studies, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, 310058, China. Email: hzhzdonna@zju.edu.cn

Zhixiang Gao

Zhixiang Gao is a PhD candidate at Zhejiang University. Her research interest lies in studies of English and American Literature, and also Australian literature. Address for correspondence: School of International Studies, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, 310058, China. Email: 11705007@zju.edu.cn

Acknowledgements

This paper is for the program entitled “Cultural Memory in William Gass’s Postmodern Works”, which is funded by Zhejiang Federation of Humanities and Social Sciences (No. 18NDJC162YB).

References

Alter, R. 1995. The leveling wind. New Republic 212(13). 29–32.Search in Google Scholar

Ammon, T. G. (ed.). 2003. Conversation with William H. Gass. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.Search in Google Scholar

Assmann, J. 2015. Das kulturelle gedachtnis [Chinese version trans. by Shoufu Jin & Xiaochen Huang]. Beijing: Peking University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bartov, O. 2002. Lawrence Douglas. The memory of judgment: Making law and history in the trials of the Holocaust. New Haven: Yale University Press. The American Historical Review 107(3). 851–852.10.1086/532505Search in Google Scholar

Borries, B. V. 2003. The third Reich in German history textbooks since 1945. Journal of Contemporary History 38(1). 45–62.10.1177/0022009403038001963Search in Google Scholar

Braun, R. 1994. The Holocaust and the problem of historical representation. History and Theory 33(2). 172–197.10.2307/2505383Search in Google Scholar

Cheng, L. 2010. A semiotic interpretation of genre: Court judgments as an example. Semiotica 182. 89–113.10.1515/semi.2010.053Search in Google Scholar

Cheng, L. 2012. Attribution and judicial control in Chinese court judgments: A corpus-based study. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 19(1). 27–49.10.1558/ijsll.v19i1.27Search in Google Scholar

Cheng, L. & W. Cheng. 2012. Legal interpretation: Meaning as social construction. Semiotica 192. 427–448.10.1515/sem-2012-0086Search in Google Scholar

Cheng, L., J. M. Pei & M. Danesi. 2019. A sociosemiotic interpretation of cybersecurity in U.S. legislative discourse. Social Semiotics 29(3). 319–335.10.1080/10350330.2019.1587843Search in Google Scholar

Derrida, J. 1989. Of spirit: Heidegger and the question. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.10.1086/448493Search in Google Scholar

Foucault, M. 1980. The history of sexuality: An introduction, volume I. New York: Vintage Books.Search in Google Scholar

Gass, W. 1970. Fiction and figures of life. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Search in Google Scholar

Gass, W. 2013. Middle C. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Search in Google Scholar

Heidegger, M. 1998. Letter of ‘Humanism [trans. by F. A. Capuzzi, in W. McNeil (ed.), Pathmarks]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

“An Interview with Prof. Dominick Lacapra”. http://www.docin.com/p-1740742211.html (accessed 10 Oct 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Lyotard, J. F. 1988. The differend: Phrases in dispute. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Search in Google Scholar

Mey, J. 2017. Discourse, interests, and the law: Some pragma-legal reflections. International Journal of Legal Discourse 2(1). 13–27.10.1515/ijld-2017-0004Search in Google Scholar

Milchman, A. & A. Rosenberg. 1998. Postmodernism and the Holocaust. Amsterdam: Rodopi.10.1163/9789004493858Search in Google Scholar

Nietzsche, F. & R. Hollingdale. 1989. On the genealogy of morals, 73–76 (essay II, § 11). Amsterdam: Vintage.Search in Google Scholar

“Nuremberg trials”. http://www.history.com/topics, (accessed 10 October 2018).Search in Google Scholar

O’Hara, D. T. 2014. Inside out again: In William Gass’s. Middle C. Boundary 2 41(3). 203–218.10.1215/01903659-2812109Search in Google Scholar

Oliver, K. 2001. Witnessing otherness in history. In H. Marchitello (ed.), What happens to history: The renewal of ethics in contemporary thought, 41–60. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Petrilli, S. 2016. Justice, fairness and juridical perfectibility. International Journal of Legal Discourse 1(1). 1–22.10.1515/ijld-2016-0011Search in Google Scholar

Ponzio, A. 2016. Justice and the right to non-functionality. International Journal of Legal Discourse 1(1). 23–47.10.1515/ijld-2016-0010Search in Google Scholar

Posner, R. A. 2009. Law and literature, 3rd edn. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.2307/j.ctvjhzpk6Search in Google Scholar

Silverblatt, M. 1995. A small apartment in hell. Los Angeles Times Book Review 1. 12–13.Search in Google Scholar

Solan, L. & T. Gales. 2016. Finding ordinary meaning in law: The judge, the dictionary or the corpus? International Journal of Legal Discourse 1(2). 253–276.10.1515/ijld-2016-0016Search in Google Scholar

Ziarek, K. 2001. The ethos of history. In H. Marchitello (ed.), What happens to history: The renewal of ethics in contemporary thought, 67–94. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2019-01-11
Accepted: 2019-08-20
Published Online: 2020-02-07
Published in Print: 2020-02-25

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 4.6.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijld-2019-2021/html
Scroll to top button