Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Health-related quality of life after laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy: Is uterine weight a major factor?

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To assess uterine size, symptom severity, and hemoglobin level as determinants of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in women subsequently undergoing laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH).

Methods

Sixty-one consecutive women with uterine leiomyoma or adenomyosis undergoing LAVH were studied using a prospective cohort design. The Chinese version of the Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Quality of Life (UFS-QOL) questionnaire was assessed preoperatively. The Taiwan brief version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF) questionnaire and a self-assessment of the perceived health status were assessed preoperatively and 1 day, 1 week, 12 weeks, and 18 months postoperatively.

Results

Women with a greater uterine weight did not report a greater severity of symptoms than those with lower uterine weight. Women with more severe symptoms had lower preoperative hemoglobin levels and were usually younger. Their perceived health status and their scores in physical domain of WHOQOL-BREF were also significantly lower, indicating a poorer HRQOL. The mixed-effects model found that a normal (higher) baseline hemoglobin level and a greater symptom severity were associated with a significant improvement of HRQOL in the physical domain of WHOQOL-BREF following LAVH.

Conclusions

Preoperative symptom severity, but not uterine weight, was associated with long-term improvement in HRQOL after LAVH. Women with severe symptoms could be considered for LAVH before development of anemia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nezhat F, Nezhat C, Gordans S, Wilkins F (1992) Laparoscopic versus abdominal hysterectomy. J Report Med 37: 247–250

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Olsson J, Ellstrom M, Hahlin M (1996) A randomized prospective trial comparing laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 103: 345–350

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Raju K, Auld B (1994) Randomized prospective study of laparoscopic vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 101: 1068–1071

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Marana R, Busacca M, Zupi E, Garcea N, Paparella P, Catalano G (1999) Laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: A prospective, randomized, multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180: 270–275

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Schütz K, Possover M, Merker A, Michels W, Schneider A (2002) Prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) with abdominal hysterectomy (AH) for the treatment of the uterus weighing >200 g. Surg Endosc 16: 121–125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schaffer JI, Word A (2002) Hysterectomy - still a useful operation. N Engl J Med 347: 1360–1362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Stewart EA (2001) Uterine fibroids. Lancet 357: 293–298

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Carlson KJ, Miller BA, Fowler FJ Jr (1994) The Maine Women’s Health Study. I. Outcomes of hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 83: 556–565

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kjerulff KH, Langenberg PW, Rhodes JC, Harvey LA, Guzinski GM, Stolley PD (2000) Effectiveness of hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 95: 319–326

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kjerulff KH, Rhodes JC, Langenberg PW, Harvey LA (2000) Patient satisfaction with results of hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183: 1440–1447

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hartmann KE, Ma C, Lamvu GM, Langenberg PW, Steege JF, Kjerulff KH (2004) Quality of life and sexual function after hysterectomy in women with preoperative pain and depression. Obstet Gynecol 104: 701–709

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Thakar R, Ayers S, Georgakapolou A, Clarkson P, Stanton S, Manyonda I (2004) Hysterectomy improves quality of life and decreases psychiatric symptoms: A prospective and randomised comparison of total versus subtotal hysterectomy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 111: 1115–1120

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kuppermann M, Summitt RL Jr, Varner RE et al (2005) Sexual functioning after total compared with supracervical hysterectomy: A randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol 105:1309–18

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rannestad T (2005) Hysterectomy: Effects on quality of life and psychological aspects. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 19: 419–430

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Korolija D, Sauerland S, Wood-Dauphinee S et al. (2004) Evaluation of quality of life after laparoscopic surgery: evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery. Surg Endosc 18: 879–897

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Garry R, Fountain J, Brown J et al. (2004) Evaluate hysterectomy trial: A multicentre randomised trial comparing abdominal, vaginal and laparoscopic methods of hysterectomy. Health Technol Assess 8: 1–154

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Friedman AT, Haas ST (1993) Should uterine size be an indication for surgical intervention in women with myomas? Am J Obstet Gynecol 168: 751–755

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2005) Appropriate use of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 105: 929–930

    Google Scholar 

  19. Chang WC, Torng PL, Huang SC et al. (2005) Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy with uterine artery ligation through retrograde umbilical ligament tracking. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 12: 336–342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Spies JB, Coyne K, Guaou N, Boyle D, Skyrnarz-Murphy K, Gonzalves SM (2002) The UFS-QOL, a new disease-specific symptom and health-related quality of life questionnaire for leiomyomata. Obstet Gynecol 99: 290–300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yao G, Chung CW, Yu CF, Wang JD (2002) Development and verification of validity and reliability of the WHOQOL-BREF Taiwan version. J Formos Med Assoc 101: 342–351

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Spies JB, Myers ER, Worthington-Kirsch R, Mulgund J, Goodwin S, Mauro M, FIBROID Registry Investigators. The FIBROID Registry: Symptom and quality-of-life status 1 year after therapy. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 106: 1309–1318

    Google Scholar 

  23. Stewart EA, Rabinovici J, Tempany CM et al. (2006) Clinical outcomes of focused ultrasound surgery for the treatment of uterine fibroids. Fertil Steril 85: 22–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bozdogan H (1987) Model selection and Akaike’s information criterion: The general theory and its analytical extension. Psychometrika 52: 345–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hsueh YS, Lee SY, Huang YT (2004) Effects of global budgeting on the distribution of dentists and use of dental care in Taiwan. Health Serv Res 39: 2135–2153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Fang CT, Hsiung PC, Yu CF, Chen MY, Wang JD (2002) Validation of the World Health Organization quality of life instrument in patients with HIV infection. Qual Life Res 11: 753–762

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Liou HH, Chen RC, Chen CC, Chiu MJ, Chang YY, Wang JD (2005) Health related quality of life in adult patients with epilepsy compared with a general reference population in Taiwan. Epilepsy Res 64: 151–159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Shih FJ, Lee PH, Wang JD et al. (1999) Changes in quality of life and working capacity before and after kidney transplantation. Transplant Proc 31: 1981–1984

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Horng YS, Hwang YH, Wu HC et al. (2005) Predicting health-related quality of life in patients with low back pain. Spine 30: 551–555

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Milad MP, Morrison K, Sokol A, Miller D, Kirkpatrick L (2001) A comparison of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy vs laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy. Surg Endosc 15: 286–288

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kohler C, Hasenbein K, Klemm P, Tozzi R, Schneider A (2003) Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with lateral transsection of the uterine vessels. Surg Endosc 17: 485–490

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Hwang JL, Seow KM, Tsai YL, Huang LW, Hsieh BC, Lee C (2002) Comparative study of vaginal, laparoscopically assisted vaginal and abdominal hysterectomies for uterine myoma larger than 6 cm in diameter or uterus weighing at least 450 g: A prospective randomized study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 81: 1132–1138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lind M, Vernon C, Cruickshank D et al (2002) The level of haemoglobin in anaemic cancer patients correlates positively with quality of life. Br J Cancer 86: 1243–1249

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Gerson A, Hwang W, Fiorenza J et al. (2004) Anemia and health-related quality of life in adolescents with chronic kidney disease. Am J Kidney Dis 44: 1017–1023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grant NHRI-EX94-9204PP from the National Health Research Institutes and grant NTUH095-000400 from National Taiwan University Hospital.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jung-Der Wang or Ta-Chen Su.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Torng, PL., Chang, WC., Hwang, JS. et al. Health-related quality of life after laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy: Is uterine weight a major factor?. Qual Life Res 16, 227–237 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-006-9123-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-006-9123-y

Keywords

Navigation